. >> you're going to be saying yada, yada in his head. >> i think the more elegant way to say this --what my client meant to say. >> i think he needs to say he wants unity but not unity at all costs. there's something more important that be just people getting along in this town. they deserve a better economy. he's got to show the willingness to work with anybody but also the willingness to work against anybody who stops him from doing a good job. >> isn't that what republicans who say that compromise is a dirty word and it's important to standby your principles. >> i love paul. he's going to try to strike deals with republicans for big picture governance and get things done. run on politics, defeat republicans, don't worry about the nation and do what he wants to do mr. the final two years. that's what paul is getting at. >> i am for striking deals. >> you're for striking republicans. >> i'm for cuts deals but i'm not for saying everybody should come together because here i am. >> when you say ruthless, if a republican member said be ruthless, people would be screaming at you. >> i w

yada, yada. i've heard that.t remind me. >> pragmatic. >> in fact we could take the hope stickers from the last election and just add pragmatic on to that. >> pragmatic hope. >> i think that would be it. >> all right. stick around. i want to talk a little about what the democratic party is up to and what obama for america or whatever we are supposed to call it now organizing for action. trivia we asked how many times has the winning super bowl team hailed from the same state as the president during his inauguration year? all right. the answer is three. i only got two. here is missed, nixon was inaugurated in 1969. and the new york jets won the super bowl. yes, richard nixon was a new yorker when he won and california teams won both years that reagan was inaugurated. the oakland raiders in '81 and the 49ers in '85. if you've got a trivia question, e-mail us. we'll be right back. [ male announcer ] let's say you pay your guy around 2% to manage your money. that's not much, you think. except it's 2% every year. go t

the white house has been in contact as i was saying with advisers of bloomberg, yada yada yada.as we go through the next hostage crisis, we can move on to getting something done. >> stephanie: all right. i'll tell what you some ridiculous former nra president had to say. >> oh, yeah. >> stephanie: 17 minutes after the hour. we roll along our usual rude pundit coming up, eric boehlert and representative alan grayson. >> that woman's about as subtle as a rhinoceros horn at the backside. >> announcer: it's "the stephanie miller show." i want the people who watch our show, to be able to come away armed with the facts, and the arguments to feel confident in their positions. i want them to have the data and i want them to have the passion. >> announcer: stephanie miller. ♪ didn't start the fire, it was always burnin' since the world's been turnin' ♪ >> stephanie miller. ♪ didn't start the fire ♪ >> stephanie: it is the "the stephanie miller show." welcome to it. 23 minutes after the hour. his rudeness coming up at the bottom of the hour. rude pundit. mike in chicago you're on "the ste

other people see that, jump on, competition, yada, yada. and i think, one of the things i study for america's freshwater, and one of the big issues there of course is technological engineering, technological innovation whether in engineering or other rounds. this is a realm where, sure there's some research going on in government funded and publicly funded kind of ways, but there's a lot going on in private innovation as well. because everyone needs water. >> thanks. >> a twofold question. it will be more of applied and towards the premise tonight. questioning the gap between where we were decades ago and today's reality. rollback scores of years, you know, the predictions are wildly different from where we are today to a friend of mine argue specifically that the biggest gap was in the failure to anticipate the information technology, the drive towards ananda, the explosion of the cpu and all that. my question, how active is that, doesn't address life science or anything like that but widely divergent reality that we have today that we saw

yada. >> those measures make sense to you now.say i have a consultant so you're measuring against everybody else. >> in the context of what nobel laureates and physics make it makes no sense at all. in the context of people in finance i understand what one has to do to draw talent to our part of the industry. >> would you leave the firm if you were paid less? >> not today. no. >> okay. >> no, no, listen, obviously listen, i've been in this firm for 30 years. as a partner in the firm for longer than -- for longer than i've been an employee of the firm. i, most of my interest in going with goldman sachs comes from trading in my partnership interest for stock. so, i'm -- my -- i'm more of a shareholder than an employee. >> okay. richard bernstein back in the studio has got a question for you now that your ifb is working. >> lloyd, i'd like to ask you a question about the corporate sector, if we can get away from the public sector for a second. you mentioned before very briefly that corporate balance sheets are flush with cash, that s

forget the overarching vision, yada, yada, yada. when you hear that tomorrow, don't listen to it.on, and then grounded it in the american political tradition, and in the context of the declaration of independence. in other words, he put the democratic party, justified the democratic party coalition in the context of the american history and the declaration of independence. >> but this is a second term president. and he to in watching him, it was we need to act now. i've only got four more years, by the way. and i want to get all of this done. don't give me everything. i understand it. but you need to know where i am. i mean, my question is his democrats in congress are going to be perhaps not as quick to do a lot of the things he wants because they've got to run for reelection. he's the only guy who doesn't, right? >> the other question that was where is he going to make the mark? it's not clear here. is it immigration reform? >> there are opportunities, well, there are lots of opportunities. >> but that is the outstanding question at this point. initially it looked like he was go