this report expectedly provoked the wrath of the leadership, israel in particular prime minister yair lapid that the un report is biased falsely inflammatory and blatantly unbalanced not all criticism of israel is antisemitism but this report was written by anti-semites for the united states this un report is an inconvenient document, israel is the main ally in the middle east, but its help to ukraine, for example, is very. cautiously, defense secretary benny gans stressed that tel aviv does not supply him with any weapons, white house spokesman john kirby stressed that he respects this decision of israel to some extent, israel is a client of the united states, but in this case it would be appropriate to use the expression the tail wags dog. israel in the situation with ukraine wags the united states in many ways after all, israel does only what it wants, and the united states supports it in everything, and now the journalist actually catches the official representative of the state department, on double standards, in particular, on the fact that israel occupied the territory of east jerusa

prime minister yair lapid: this agreement strengthens israel's security and our freedom of action against and the threats to our north. there is rare consensus in the security establishment regarding the necessity of this agreement. john: as questions remain if is small degree of peace will extend beyond the sea. to unpack this historic deal, i spoke with two reporters about what it means for their home countries. neri zilber is a journalist based in tel aviv. i asked him how israel stands to benefit from this deal. >> there are a few benefits. first and foremost, it is a diplomatic agreement. when the israeli prime minister says it is an historic deal, it is true. primarily, it provides israel a certain percentage of the potential future lebanese natural gas fields, around 17%, and also provides israel security for its own gas fields nearby. that went online a few days ago. despite hezbollah threats it would torpedo that drilling, the drilling has gone on uninterrupted. john: this is an historic deal. it is two states technically at war. could this be the beginning of something new? >> i

even yair lapid. with a kuleba on the phone, but obviously this call may not take place, because israel has stated its position already firmly and repeatedly. yes on the one hand, they repeated again that the civilian population was specially always emphasized not to the military, not to the special services, but to the civilian population of humanitarian aid. one time. in the area of ​​​​lviv, a field was deployed. the hospital had supplies of medicines, there were supplies of several hundred protective equipment, helmets and body armor. that is, quite a bit and every time emphasizes that this is for civilian structures, not for military purposes, and obviously this policy has only strengthened over time. with the development of the military conflict and the obvious, israel will not change it following the results of the elections, which are already scheduled for the month of november, and even the opinion of the private opinions of ministers. it turned out that this is a private opinion, that it sho