bring the situation to a rematch, ugh, and this rematch really took place in 2010, when viktor yanukovyche the president of ukraine, that is, he took the place that the kremlin, the kremlin itself, had prepared for him, starting in 200 there for 3 years, in 2014, there was such a paradigm of thinking, but i spoke about it sketchily. arseniy yatsenyuk is absolutely correct, they believed that there would be chaos, that the government was already illegitimate, that even under the conditions of this government, which will be, even if she succeeds, it will be possible to reach a scenario of revenge, and they saw in this scenario the year 2019, what the scenario of 2019 looked like is also completely understandable, just as in 2010 there was a party of enemies of russia, great enemies. led by viktor yushchenko, he was marginalized, including by russian efforts, especially after 2008, after the war in georgia, in fact, yushchenko was deprived of the possibility of, let's say, a foreign policy maneuver, because he took a very clear position, which was not appreciated by his compatriots then i i

ukraine should be in kyiv, well, it should be simple... that leonid kuchma differed from viktor yanukovychhis precise understanding of the nature of power, it was simple for him, you know, this is something that cannot be learned from leonid kuchba it was, it may be possible, it was possible not to notice that he had it, although it was impossible to notice somewhere, we all noticed it, but no matter how one treated him, someone treated him positively, someone treated him negatively, but what this politician is aware of what power is, it was clear from the first months of his tenure as ukrainian leader. of the state, and that is why this scenario did not go the way it did when yanukovych fled from kyiv, ugh, but we see that they were preparing for the same thing, for this same paradigm, and i think that if them it worked out, then it would have gone exactly as it did with yanukovych, there would have been no session of the verkhovna rada, it would have started in chaos, it is not clear where the legitimate government is, what part of the territory already is. split off, for this purpose th

these guys drew up an agreement, which was signed between yanukovych and the opposition, that yanukovychithdraw the security forces from the center of kiev, and the protesters would remove their militants from the government quarter. yanukovych fulfilled all his obligations, and the protesters responded by seizing it. the presidential administration and parliament, and the ukrainian president fled, unable to retain power and the country. in march 2014, it was decided to create a special osce monitoring mission, which was supposed to record data on violations of agreements on the territory of donbass along the line of military contact, but in 2022, when they decided to say goodbye to the osce in donbass, it became known that the cameras. installed to allegedly record violations, all information was directly transferred to kiev intelligence. osce initially did not take a neutral side, but supported the maidan coup, considering those who would carry out the coup on the right side of history. then there were geneva negotiations, the normandy format in minsk, minsk-2, where both political and

government, between yanukovych and the opposition, they signed their own, they put their signaturesp, all these countries pretended that they did not remember anything about the fact that they were the guarantors of a peaceful settlement, they immediately threw it into the oven, no one remembers, i don’t know. because after the collapse of the soviet union everything did not come, because we agreed that it should have been so, along the borders of the union republics, we agreed with this, but we never agreed with the expansion of nato. ago they directly told the whole world honestly that yes, they signed this minsk agreement, but they were never going to implement it, they just took us back, that’s it, don’t go on vacation, yes, i won in the ticker, it’s all for plus points. lisa, i bought a chicken example at a tasty point, scanned the code in the application and won a million yandexplus points, believe it or not, you want a million points and millions other prizes under. any business starts with a person, at first i cooked it myself, then the team began to expand, but when there a

these guys drew up an agreement, which was signed between yanukovych and the opposition, that yanukovychcurity forces. from the center of kiev, and the protesters remove their militants outside the government quarter. yanukovych fulfilled all his obligations, and the protesters in response seized the presidential administration and... parliament, and the ukrainian president fled, unable to retain power and the country. in march 2014, it was decided to create a special osce monitoring mission, which was supposed to record data on violations of agreements in the territory of donbass along the line of military contact, but in 2022, when with the osce in the donbass they decided to say goodbye, it became known that the cameras installed for alleged violations were directly transmitting all information to kiev intelligence. the osce initially did not take a neutral side, but supported the maidan coup, considering those who would carry out a coup on the right side of history. then there were geneva negotiations, the normandy format in minsk, minsk-2, where both political and military agreement

people in power tried to seize influence over our country after. after february 20, after yanukovych and his henchmen fled and it became clear that this would not be possible in russia, they came up with other methods, but the fact is that the war has been going on for a long time, it has been going on all it seems to me 300 years when we have such a neighbor, a neighbor, well, but their methods changed precisely after february, yes, when they realized that they could not just keep... their money like that in power ms. kateryna, recently, tucker carlson, the odious former american journalist, was interviewing the russian dictator vladimir putin, and putin said that the only thing he regrets is that he didn't invade on a large scale, a full scale army of the entire russian ukraine immediately after the 14th year. do we, or do we regret something that we did not do in the 14th year? well , in fact, maybe we can regret something that we did not do in the 14th year, because in fact we only have to regret that such a price was paid, hundreds of people were killed, and accordingly, it was

so, viktor yanukovych came to power, and how? kuchma, they organized a third round, which is not provided for in the constitution of ukraine. this is a coup d'état. imagine, someone didn’t like it in the usa, well, there was a dispute between. his opponents did not recognize this victory, the united states supported the opposition and scheduled a third round. what is it? this is a coup d'état. the us supported him. and he came to power as a result of the third round. imagine that in the usa, someone didn’t like something, they organized a third round, which is not provided for in the us constitution, but, nevertheless , they did it there. okay, victor came to power. he went to moscow on visits, we went to kiev, and i went, we met in an informal setting, well, westerners are westerners, let them, let people work, they believe that let the situation develop internally in ukraine itself, they are independent, which means that after he led the country, the situation. and ukraine, according to this association , had to open its border

to kill this electorate, which had a positive attitude towards russia, which means that viktor yanukovych the first time he won after president kuchma, they organized a third round, which is not provided for in the constitution of ukraine, this is a coup d’etat, imagine, someone didn’t like it in the usa, well, there was a dispute between, in the fourteenth year, no? that in the usa, someone didn’t like something, they organized a third round, which is not provided for in the us constitution, but nevertheless they did it there, okay, viktor yushchenko came to power, who was considered a pro-western politician, good, but we’re with him established relations, he went to moscow on visits, we went to kiev and i went, met in in an informal setting, well, western is western, let, let people work, think. let the situation develop internally in independent ukraine itself, which means that after he led the country, the situation worsened, viktor yanukovych still came to power, maybe he was not the best political president, i don’t know, i don’t want to give assessments, but the question of associa

houses of kharkiv or donetsk, to hold the inauguration of the new president of ukraine, viktor yanukovych a proposal that was made at a very high level, and leonid kuchma, according to my sources, categorically disagreed with this proposal and said that the president of ukraine should be in kyiv. well, you just have to understand that leonid kuchma differed from viktor yanukovych in his precise understanding of the nature of power. it was simple for him, you know, that's the kind of thing you can't learn. leonid kuchma had it, it is possible, it is possible, it was possible not to notice that he has it, although something is not to be noticed. we noticed it, no matter how he was treated, some treated him positively, some treated him negatively, but the fact that this politician is aware of what power is, was clear from the first months of his tenure as the head of the ukrainian state, and so this scenario didn't go as well he left at the moment when yanukovych fled from kyiv, ugh, but we can see that they were preparing for the same thing, for this... there would be no session of the verk

1414. no, before, no, no , this happened before, that means after president kuchuma, that means yanukovychhis victory, the united states supported the opposition and appointed a third round, what is this, this is a coup d’etat , the usa supported him, came to power as a result of the third. imagine that in the usa someone doesn’t like something i liked it, they organized a third round , which is not included in the us book, but nevertheless , they did it there, okay, viktor yushchenko came to power, who was considered a pro-western politician, good, but we established relations with him, he went to moscow on visits , we went to kiev and i went, we met in an informal setting, well, westerners are westerners, let them, let people work. they believe that the situation should develop internally in ukraine itself, which is independent, which means that after he led the country, the situation worsened, to power after all, viktor yanukovych came, maybe he was not the best political president, i don’t know, i don’t want to make judgments, but the question of association with the european union aro

yanukovych was preparing to sign a peace agreement agreements with the opposition guaranteed by western. most of the security forces were still sleeping peacefully in the october palace. the execution of the heavenly hundred happened later; some were not satisfied with the peaceful end of the maidan, the agreements with yanukovych and the early presidential elections at the end of 2014 . all at once, the government of petro poroshenko after the maidan also tried to convince everyone that it was the security forces who were killing people, but more and more information about snipers and ardent nationalists began to appear in sms, and andrei parubiy, the future speaker, supervised them verkhovna rada. by the way, the social-nationalist party, in which he was one of the leaders, later gave birth to the azov national battalion, and from stepan bandera’s trident, the right sector. in addition to videos and photos where parubi leads armed units on the maidan in december 2016 . so that they would kill both the police and the protesters in order to provoke a clash, as it were, which they basica

, a well-known fact, on the treasury account after yanukovych left...ah 114,000. international experts, your honor, and this is very important for our case, for this suspicion. this fact i will now tell. it was pointed out that yanukovych and his entourage stole 8 billion dollars. your honor, i both agree and disagree, because they meant theft from the state budget, but yanukovych and his entourage simply from... i had to, according to my official duties, organize the replacement of 25 heads of regional state administrations , to appoint 550 heads of district state administrations, we us called everyone, not only russians, participants in the coup d'état, and we immediately launched the procedure of the presidential election campaign, which was successfully conducted. may 25, these dates are very important for understanding the charges brought against me by the prosecutor's office, by the way, i was one of the people responsible for holding the elections, these are the first elections in the history of ukraine, where there was not a single complaint fro

the kremlin in ukraine, but also led to the rapid occupation of the peninsula, for the 14th year yanukovych planned the liquidation of defense plants, the liquidation of our very famous desna educational base, it was planned to liquidate the land for development, yes again, our defense factories, why did they work, and because each factory had whole fields covered with carcasses of non-working equipment. there was artillery, tanks, armored personnel carriers, they just started repairing them and put them, so to speak, we didn’t have, we didn’t have production of such, we had modernization and repair, but there were carcasses from which we could do something, we quickly began to do it, that is, if we had time to eliminate them at the beginning, by the way, at the beginning of ours, at the beginning of the anti-terrorist operation, so that we didn't even have armor to protect kyiv, at the end of february 2014. a group with a total number of 55 thousand people was deployed in dangerous areas of kharkiv, crimea, chernihiv, kyiv and donbas, but according to the ministry of defense of ukraine, th

without external help, politically, well, here are three foreign ministers sitting in front of yanukovychthe pole sekorsky, the german stanmay and the frenchman fabius, and they say that the political system needs to be changed, the presidential elections should be early, and the constitution is better than another, in parallel, the anizha shackled yanukovych, warning him not only from defending himself. in the view of the aquarium this night it looks like a mockery, right opposite the house of trade unions is burning, where the headquarters of the opposition was located until that time, the third floor is on fire, it was there that the headquarters was, yatsenyuk, klitschko, tyagnebok gathered there, they hosted there european commissioners and senators from the united states, sponsors of the country, like the ashtons, fulesis and barbaros there, you know, of the european union, who and if they walk here in a normal country can come. when the foreign ministers of germany, france and poland appeared in kiev on thursday afternoon, there was still an opportunity to overcome the crisis throu

yanukovych was preparing to sign a peace agreement with the opposition guaranteed by western leaders.ping peacefully in the october palace. the execution of the heavenly hundred happened later; some were not satisfied with the peaceful end of the maidan, agreements with yanukovych and early presidential elections at the end of 2014; others wanted everything at once. after the maidan, the government of petro poroshenko also tried to convince everyone that it was the security forces who killed people. but more and more information about snipers and ardent nationalists began to appear in the media, and they were supervised by andrei parubiy, the future speaker verkhovna rada. by the way, the social nationalist party. in addition to videos and photos where parubiy leads armed units on the maidan, in december 2016, the now closed news one channel published an interview with the leader of radicals from the nazhdak group. nikolai dulsky claimed that it was parubiy, people’s deputy pashinsky and the future head of the ministry of internal affairs arsen avakov, who hired snipers to support the

position with yanukovych in the presence of the leaders of poland, france and germany, they signed ane’s mood improved a little , because 3 days before there were murders, well , it’s scary, i mean on the maidan, there’s a political process here, that means there will be... the hr department called me and many people from the administration and said that they’ll quickly pour it out from work, because bandera’s guys will come and kill everyone, so in fact , february 21 ended, we understood that something terrible was being prepared, but here’s how, if the europeans said, they signed, of course, the next day, that is, on the 22nd, that’s all it was thrown into the trash, and we know what happened on the twenty-second, twenty-third, especially there already on the twenty-fourth, like... britain will sign this piece of paper, there are economic relations as they are now, that we will help, this is no guarantee, bih -bikh fell, they were just talking, beating themselves in the chest and zelensky yermak. that we alone received a guarantee, we received a guarantee, then the italian takes eve

, viktor yanukovych, but his opponents did not recognize this victory, the united states supported thee usa they supported him, he came to power as a result of the third round, imagine that in the usa , someone didn’t like something, they organized a third round, which is not provided for in the constitution, but nevertheless they did it there, okay, he came to power viktor yushchenko, who was considered a pro-western politician, good, but we established relations with him, he went to moscow on visits, we went to kiev and i went, met in an informal setting. a free trade zone, open customs borders, and ukraine, by this association, had to open its borders to europe with a flow of everything to our market, we said, if not then it won’t work out, then we will close our borders with ukraine, customs borders, yanukovych began to count, how much ukraine will gain, how much it will lose, i declared my counterparty in europe, i have to think again before signing, as soon as he said, there was one enterprise there that produced components for the final assembly in russia and ukraine , on the co

this is the case when indeed, you also mentioned tatarov, when people from the time of yanukovych, yes, that is, from the time of the fugitive president, return to their positions, and to such key positions, in particular the commander of the teroborona, you can talk as much as you like about this person after a large-scale invasion, but the very fact that he did during the revolution of dignity, from my point of view is a clear marker for the non-acceptability of such appointments, but probably in the office of the president they have already decided that they can get away with everything, and in this way, the reincarnation of everyone who was, who was during the time of yanukovych, is actually being revived, yes, is being restored in key positions in the state, this is an example of history and the situation, and during a large-scale war, realizing that society is not, has enough has... has enough wisdom to not to rebel, because the key thing now is the unity of society, they use their opportunities quite defiantly, or maybe for clarification you can just tell us, maybe the commander

, he was no yanukovych, he was a defender of the state of ukraine, he was in contact with the maidanomitested quite often, even he directly withdrew the internal troops of part of the internal troops and berkut, when this already happened. his fate was so surprising that in all the materials of the criminal cases that were against berkut, against the head of ukraine, he was not in any of the cases that were in the prosecutor general's office, then they were closed there, he didn’t appear anywhere, then the same person went to the front... he led the front in ukraine in there were, let’s say, a military structure, there is a quasi-military structure, there are positions that exist, but there are no functions, i don’t i’ll say for a long time, he was transferred to these functions, that is, he did not fight anywhere, he did not lead any unit, that is, he seemed to be at war and was not, this is the claim of these jingoistic patriots against him, not for the maidan, for the maidan, of course, for the fact that he, for the fact that he did not wash away with blood, did not answer. for their si

the sums involved are not as large as they were under yanukovych, but to be honest, if you look at theent case of embezzlement in the ministry of defense, to me it is an even worse crime because we are now at war. during the war, oleg simoroz lost his legs while protesting. here on the square 10 years ago, he joined the army when the full-scale invasion began, but he remains an anti-corruption activist and critic of the authorities, especially when it comes to restoring the influence of yanukovych-era officials. oleg tatarov, deputy minister of internal affairs during yanukovych's time, who even received an award for fighting protesters on the maidan. today he is the deputy head of the administration of the president of ukraine. such people are pro-corruption, not pro-ukrainian. it doesn't mean what he thinks. we did not let our country turn into another belarus or russia. we see how they shut down the entire opposition there. we can still speak up when something is wrong and try to change it. the maidan protests left ukraine with a strong civil society that continues to advance anti-c

yanukovych, he beat viktor yushchenko by 3%. according to official data, victor won .ition was invented in ukraine: vote until we choose the candidate the west needs. the opposition accused the party of regions, to which yanukovych belonged , of forging 750 thousand votes, and this happened on november 21, 2004, even before the results of the will were announced. and the very next day people poured onto the maidan demanding re-elections, orange ribbons, bracelets, songs, dances, according to various sources, up to half a million people gathered in the center of kiev, it seems they themselves did not understand what process they were starting. as a result, the supreme court gave in and a third round was announced. this was not provided for by the constitution or the electoral code of ukraine and, of course, another candidate, yushchenko, won there. the supreme court's decision was illegal. created a completely new legal reality, grossly contrary to the constitution. nevertheless, viktor yanukovych agreed to participate in the third round and even went to the pre-electio

came to power does not want to investigate what happened, so now we understand more and more that yanukovychhed on july 15, 2014 concluded that 103 protesters and 20 police were killed in these events. i believe that at least some of the protesters were armed, death of twenty policemen. suggests quite serious violence on the part of protesters. thus, anti-democratic violence was followed by lawlessness. thus, the crowd overthrew the legitimate head of state, and now a shocking test has come. western countries, including britain, were expected to condemn this action. they are usually the vigilant defenders of law and democracy around the world, aren't they? but in this case they...

of yanukovych’s party, one of the ministers, a man who loved yanukovych so much that he couldn’t walke in the current government? someone who passed by, oh well, tell tales, at all weak funerals and days. the representative of the united states of america, who said, he says, you know, we say , we don’t know the details and we don’t know at all, we don’t have information about what was there in lesichansky, but we know for sure that russia is to blame, so we had to tell something further, it was necessary to give some more arguments, to explain something, yes, because every next representative of france, a representative of great britain, they continued the same organ grinder, they too they continued to talk about how russia is to blame for everything and there is no point in understanding anything at all. the french were interested in two supposedly humanitarian figures who were trying to launch drones and then they flew at them, and britain believes sincerely that ukraine is exactly the party that complies with international humanitarian law, i would like to find out from the british

53 people were then killed, a provocation that disrupted negotiations between the opposition by yanukovych again france, germany and poland, how it all ended, we remember very well watching now, to unfortunately, it's not over, here we go in ukraine, all these years we were told that this was the work of the russian special services, and suddenly on the tenth anniversary of the tragedy in the office of the prosecutor general of ukraine. law enforcement officers, then there is no such thing, this is a beautiful version that is not based on the facts of crimes committed by the hands of ukrainian law enforcement officers. viktor aleksanovich, well, they are not shy, and they give guarantees, and the person says that this is the best, the most powerful thing that happened in the history of ukraine, what is happening to them? i want. to say why despondency is occurring at the moment, here, if you remember the president’s interview with a ukrainian journalist, he said that there was time to move on to negotiations before the russian economy was completely on a war footing, and we see that they a

money, well, how can it be illegal to take yanukovych's money ?was all this hysteria all the time, and we all the time understood who needed it, and i'll even tell you honestly, well, of course, for the russians , it would be necessary for us to have as few people as possible who could oppose them in this situation, for me it is an obvious thing, and an obvious thing for me, is the infiltration of ukrainian structures by any people who feel this way, because we have to remember that the russians have been actively working here for years, if not decades, next to us, a lot.. . who were here with us literally in the parliament, in various ministries, anywhere, took their suitcases one fine day, first in the 14th year, and then in the 24th, 22nd, i apologize, and everyone went somewhere, not somewhere, in a known direction, and the question arises, these went once, these went, who, all went, sure, no one is left, you know that this is also a huge question that i always ask myself, how many come. agents of the russian special services, specially create

these guys drew up an agreement that was signed between yanukovych and the opposition that yanukovychotesters remove their militants from the government quarter. fulfilled all his obligations, and the protesters in response seized the presidential administration and parliament, and the ukrainian president fled, unable to retain power and the country. in march 2014, it was decided to create a special osce monitoring mission, which was supposed to record data on violations of agreements in the territory of donbass along the line of military contact, but in 2022, when... in donbass they decided to say goodbye, it became known that the cameras installed to allegedly record violations were directly transmitted all information to kiev intelligence. the osce initially did not take a neutral side, but supported the maidan coup, considering those who would carry out a coup on the right side of history. then there were the geneva negotiations, the normandy format in minsk, minsk-2, where both political and military agreements were signed. in particular about the non-use of certain types of weap

it should be noted that one of yanukovych’s main proteges just spoke, one of the founders of yanukovycheign ministers. received from them all, well, everyone understands, last night there was a security council meeting , i had to look very carefully, especially at the reaction of those who took part in it, especially the permanent members, permanent members of the un security council, and you know, it literally resonated with me , when the representative of the united states of america began to speak, who said, says, you know, we say, we don’t know the details and don’t know at all. we know for sure that russia is to blame, we needed information about what happened there in lisichansk, but we had to tell something further, we had to give some more arguments, explain something, yes, because every next representative of france there, a representative great britain, they continued the same hurdy-gurdy, they also continued to talk about how russia is to blame for everything and there is no point in understanding anything at all, frantsuzov was interested in two supposedly humanitarian figur

these guys drew up an agreement, which was signed between yanukovych and the opposition, that yanukovychould withdraw the security forces from the center of kiev. protesters remove their militants from the government quarter. yanukovych fulfilled all his obligations, and the protesters in response seized the presidential administration and parliament, and the ukrainian the president fled, unable to retain power and the country. in march 2014, it was decided to create a special osce monitoring mission, which was supposed to record data on violations of agreements on the territory of donbass in... the line of military contact, but in 2022, when they decided to say goodbye to the osce in donbass, it became known that cameras installed to allegedly record violations directly transmitted all information to kiev intelligence. the osce initially did not take a neutral side, but supported the maidan coup, considering those who will make a revolution on the right side of history. then there were the geneva negotiations, the normandy format in minsk. minsk 2, where both political and military agre

and this was not just the sons of yanukovych, but others living in russia with yanukovych, they wereocess of getting-- literally we heard stories they would print it and cash it at the market and carry suitcases full of dollars down to the gulf to the bank. it was that obvious. and what happened was that not only did this erode any support that yanukovych had. i remember, i think 19% was the support he had in the last poll before i left 5-20-13. but it even started eroding the people in the party of the region, the people who were the supporters of yanukovych. the second big thing, of course, was the growth and empowering and influence of civil society and this was something that has grown over a long time, all of the ambassadors who were there on the stage and worked hard on this. this was a key part of american policy, to support the development of civil society, even if we couldn't influence some of the political developments at the top, we could support those people who sought democracy, who sought a european future, who wanted to build a country that was very western-like, a cou

, you can easily imagine, as yanukovych used to say, figure out the rest yourself, or guess where thentermountain region came from, yes, and then, that means, he continued his career. zelenskyi, during the war he was caught on some very expensive ocean resort, but the person went to rest a little, because you can’t keep the defense non-stop, so to speak, in kyiv, well, this one, well, he was rewarded for that, so to speak, and now he heads the entire odesa region, so to speak, although what does this mean is headed, again, when there are some seemingly legitimate authorities , and there is some such system of office supervisors. of the president and the one that we have now, well, i'm just talking about the fact that there are still such personnel changes, you just have to want to understand why they want to remove the hard worker, what he did it wrong, and why, for example, people like this kiper or the keeper, i can get confused in these surnames, for example, since he seems to be watching over the president in the region, well, it’s just the very logic of these improvements or some

, because he was very surprised that yanukovych became the president and sweated talking about the readiness to sign the agreement with the european association, that is, he somewhere... understood that ukraine cannot be, whoever you are in ukraine, er, whoever the ukrainians elect as president, that president will not want to be such a simple vassal of the kremlin, and that is fundamental has changed since those times, then he was a businessman, he told me why he was there on the phone when the privatization of kryvyi rih steel was going on, and why he stopped increasing rates there, because laxmital offered it... commercially unprofitable from the point of view of russia, that is, he was interested in this, he was interested in economic things there, some conversations there, until i started the topic of the maidan, it pissed him off, but in general he had, he had such a keen interest, he had to see what kind of orange the animals came, who is he, and to him there was information, he knew that i had a very close relationship with viktor yushchenko, they are very different, and that is why

, and... that is, he was a defender of the state, legislation, what they now say is that he was yanukovychf the state of ukraine, he was in contact with the maidanists, and he negotiated quite often, even he directly withdrew internal troops, parts of the internal troops and berkut, when there had already been a military coup and the maidanists, say, wanted to kill or maim all those who remained in the city of kiev. his fate was so amazing that in all the materials of the criminal cases that were against berkut, against the head of ukraine, he was not there, in none of the cases that were in the prosecutor general's office, then closed there, he was nowhere appeared, then the same person went to the front, he led in ukraine, there was, there is, let’s say, a military structure, there is... there is positions that exist, but there are no functions, i won’t talk for a long time, so he was moved around these functions, that is, he did not fight anywhere, he did not lead any unit, that is, he seemed to be at war and was not, that’s the claim these jingoistic patriots to him, not for the maidan

addict, but we are talking about how you act, the president is with someone you don't like, and yanukovychy said that the best way to neutralize tymoshenko is to simply, well , not touch her, because she it is like a plant without the sun withers in an information blockade, but then he became the president, planted it and that was the end of it. the situation with yushchenko and kuchma is very similar, when i had a conversation with pinchuk, when it was already clear that it was a matter of resignation, i told him: "well, listen, then you you are resigning the prime minister who liked being the prime minister, now a couple of months will pass, the parliamentary elections are starting, well , we will go to the parliamentary elections, we will definitely win these elections, and then yushchenko will be the president, why are you doing this, what it seemed clear to me, they didn't understand , but this story repeats itself, i'm not saying that zaluzhny will necessarily make a political career there, i don't know at all what kind of politician he is, he's not very public anymore... he enough,

and yanukovych then clearly said that... the best way to neutralize tymoshenko is simply not to touchshe is like a plant without the sun withering in the information, in the information blockade, but then he set a precedent, planted her and that's how it ended . the situation with yushchenko and kuchma is very similar, when i had a conversation with pinchuk, when it was already clear that it was about resignation, i told him, well, listen, well, you are resigning the prime minister who liked being prime minister. retired, now a couple of months will pass, the parliamentary elections will begin, well, we will go to the parliamentary elections, we will definitely win these elections, and then yushchenko will be the president , why are you doing this , what seemed clear to me, they do not understand, but this story repeats itself, i i'm not saying that zaluzhny will necessarily make a political career there, i don't know at all what kind of politician he is, he 's not very public anymore, that's enough, he 's like that, he's like that, well, he's the creator of our imagination and so on.

, for example, tymoshenko was conditionally imprisoned. obviously promised to be a downfall for yanukovychstood it, because i told you once, he told me for a long time, before he was prime minister, what mistake kuchma made when he put his opponent in prison, well, we don't say about prison with an addict, but we 're talking about how you act as president with someone you don't like, and yanukovych then clearly said that the best way to neutralize tymoshenko is simply not to touch her, because she... she is like a plant without the sun withering in the information blockade, but then he became the president and put and how it ended, the situation with yushchenko and kuchma is very similar, when i had a conversation with pinchuk, when it was already clear that it was a case of resignation, i told him: well, listen, well, then you resign the prime minister who liked to be the prime minister of resignation, now a couple of months will pass, the parliamentary elections are starting, well, we will go to the parliamentary elections, we... will definitely win these elections and then yushchenko wi

yanukovych was just a jerk, but... 7%, whom he allowed to the very trough at which he himself is.ed nationalist elements, on the basis of which, in principle, pyotr alekseevich poroshenko rests today. and now i want to rewind time a little to show you how the citizens of ukraine felt about... the separation of ukraine from the ussr and the acquisition, so to speak, of independence, this was in 1991, please pay attention, this episode was recorded in 2015, and since we were in a union, then we will be in a union, one way or another, regardless of whether we will be a separate state or joint, there will be no connections with russia interrupted, we will still be together with russia, but we will just somehow proceed from our own. republics, what do you expect from independence? well, of course, more freedom, yeah, economic freedom and improvement of life, of course, but what will the relationship with russia be like, just like that, the best. level, but there can be no other way, in general, we still need to stick together, you already voted today, so, for what? for independence, bu

, because he was very surprised that yanukovych became the president and began to talk about the readinessagreement with the european association, that is somewhere he realized that he cannot in ukraine to be, no matter who you are in ukraine, no matter who the ukrainians elect as president, that president will not want to be so simply complete. a vassal of the kremlin , and this has fundamentally changed since those days, he was a businessman then, he told me why he was there on the phone when the privatization of kryvyi rih steel was underway, and why he stopped increasing rates there, because laxmital offered a commercial disadvantageous from the point of view of russia, that is, he was interested in this, he was interested in economic things there, some conversations there, until i started the topic maidan, this is in his... strength, but in general , he had, he had such a keen interest, he had to see what kind of orange animals came, who they were, he had information, he knew that i had a very close relationship with viktor yushchenko, they are very different, and that's why it was a

and is known as the wallet of the yanukovych regime, knowing that ukrainian law enforcement agencies are under the significant influence of the president's office, namely the team that supervises law enforcement agencies, and it is no secret for anyone that this is oleg tatarov, then this is probably very revealing , what is the mental state of these... people, that now they are ready to spend time and energy on such procedural actions, although i have no doubts that there are much more priority directions, both for the sbu and the national anti-corruption bureau, ago here he gives away some political points, and i also think that it is no secret for anyone that serhii pashinsky, at the beginning of the large-scale invasion, was known as a person who was actively involved in the ukrainian missile program, anti-tank systems, if i am not mistaken, he heads association of manufacturers of the defense-industrial complex and closely cooperated with the teams of the ministry of defense and the general staff in the first two years. war, so it's all a bunch, actually a little alarming, i don

for example, the conditional imprisonment of tymoshenko obviously promised to be a downfall for yanukovychand he understood it, because i told you once, he told me for a long time while he was still prime minister, which kuchma made a mistake when he put his opponent in prison, well, we 're not talking about prison with an addict, but we 're talking about... how you act as a president with someone you don't like, and yanukovych then he clearly said that the best way to neutralize tymoshenko is to simply not to touch, because she, she how, like a plant without the sun withers in the information, in the information blockade, but then he became the president, planted and how did it end, the situation with yushchenko and kuchma is very similar, when i had a conversation with pinchuk, when it was already clear that... he was going to resign, i told him, well , listen, well, then you retire the prime minister, who liked being the prime minister, now a couple of months will pass, the parliamentary elections are starting, well, we will go to parliamentary elections, we will definitely win these th

i will honestly tell you that i was in yanukovych's time, especially, personally, i was not afraid ofi saw that many ukrainians did not see that we did not overestimate, we understood the threats, but for it was not a question of retreating for us, because authoritarianism threatens responsibility in every democracy, you have to go to the elections and you have to gain the trust of the voters, here i have serious problems, serious questions, i don't know how it will end from the point of view from the point of view of military tactics. hypothetically, maybe maybe something will be better, because you and i understand that there are enough problems in the ministry of defense, and the military will tell you how much is being done wrong there, but we are talking about the fact that responsibility will not succeed, it will not be possible to transfer it to any scumbags if the ermaks fail to shift the responsibility from the shoulders of politicians to the shoulders of the military, this will definitely not be accepted by society, because everyone is wrong. that the military must have thes

according to official data , viktor yanukovych won, he was 3% ahead of viktor yushchenko. with a new tradition: to vote until we choose the candidate the west needs. the opposition accused the party of regions, to which yanukovych belonged, of forging 750,000 votes, and this happened on november 21, 204 , even before the announcement of the results of the will of expression, and the very next day on the maidan. usa, right? we started with europe, we’ll finish with it, in austria in 2016 the elections literally didn’t go well. conducting a presidential campaign in two rounds, it seemed there. the bad envelopes were boring and disturbing the peace. the second round of the presidential elections took place on may 22. independent candidate alexander vander won. although another candidate, norbert hofer, was initially in the lead, thanks to votes sent by mail, this method has been allowed since 2007.

yanukovych began to count how much ukraine would win and how much it would lose.he said, the destructive actions of the opposition began, supported by the west, everything reached the maidan.

there, conditional partnov, tatarov and so on, that's a question, because under yanukovych, after alleverything was very vertical, very. for now, we cannot claim that this vertical has been built, but nevertheless, the security forces have become more active to be used, yes, unfortunately, apparently there are precedents when even a political position or the position of a business that owns the media becomes the reason why the security forces are so determined. and this, of course, is a problem, and it definitely does not help us in cooperation with our western partners, because they actually help us, because we are a democracy, and because we are not russia, if we repeat what russia is doing, then the desire for us will help less. well, there is actually such a dilemma here, on the one hand, we understand that the work of ukrainian business is of different scales has its own specificity, if we talk about the fact that we are all businessmen or businessmen. honest, not tainted, it will be too, well, i’m just lying, we, we know how to hide the real state of our affairs from the state,

go into details now, they also consider it incorrect, but still it was said, you will calm down yanukovychre, and we will calm the opposition, let everything go along the path of a political settlement, we said okay. but from a political point of view it is a colossal mistake, and here, of course , the political leadership did not complete the work; they should have seen the political leadership see what this would lead to. so, in 2008, ukraine’s doors to nato were opened. in 2014, they carried out a coup d'etat, and those who did not recognize the coup d'etat, and this is a coup d'etat, began to be persecuted and created a threat to crimea, which we were forced to do. despite this, the opposition carried out a coup d'etat, all these countries pretended that they did not remember anything about the fact that they were the guarantors of a peaceful settlement, they immediately threw them into the oven this one, no one remembers, i don’t know if the us knows anything about this agreement between the opposition government, and about the guarantors of the three guarantors, who, instead of retur

he sold his father, he sold yanukovych , whose ass was in his hands, and he will sell poroshenko, andt punched in the face there in crimea, he came once, you know, he ’s flimsy, goncharenko, he , he will buy twice what goncharenko sold three times and resell it to him, you don’t...