well , it was registered by zhori vitaly yaroslavovych. who is the initiator?st a private person . yes, it's not me. public organization mrs. yevgenia how do you feel about this initiative, what do people propose to what extent is it appropriate, well , it is proposed to change official documents in particular, i know what it is, well, if all that in within the borders of our state, do we need it? i think we should talk about some things that we can change and we must change and uh, really, obviously we can use it in the media and in our social posts, but uh it won't change any kind of objective picture, but well, look, if it's going to be a very massive one from the ukrainian people, yes, it's possible when we sign the capitulation, when russia signs the capitulation, and in this agreement, we'll write that it's there our demand well, i can only react to it in this way, and well, of course, there are cases when countries there change their names and this is then reflected in international documents, but they do it well, let's say so voluntarily or in good fait

yaroslavovych, about this case. that the new majority should be an appropriate pact on the main conceptual conditions for achieving victory. by the way, how should one recognize and what is victory for ukraine? each speaker did not say what he thought was the doctrine, how do we achieve it and what we consider victory, we can talk about it separately and accordingly on this factor, if we form such a majority, accordingly, it is our task with you, yaroslav, to increase the weight of the verkhovna rada and to influence these processes on the condition that we lend a helping hand to the state and the president and so on . that is, it should be cooperation and it will work like this. this is an extremely important history of its time. yushchenko, i understand something like that, i am immersing myself in history, geography, he formed the national unity universal, they held the relevant meetings and so on, but i would like to return to this configuration of the opzj, it should not be at all in the session of the rear , i

yaroslavovych, what will be on the agenda of the tsk and, in general, what are the horizons and works, so to speak. well, if you're talking about this case, look at the law enforcement officers yesterday stated well, i don't comment on these notes and the lifestyles of these e-e notes, by the way, it's wrong. well, where do the materials come from, so to speak, a search? well, today , a note, tomorrow, there's some accessory, where are the accessories, the wardrobe, it's for the public, it's interesting , but there is there is another procedural structure, this is on the moral side of the law enforcement officers. once again, the life of this person is not responsible for the renewed position. but i am talking about something else, they declared against 30 billion, well, 30 billion. that is almost everything that kyiv reimbursed me , well, it is huge amount or well there is almost half of what we reimbursed in a year, and if the information of the law enforcement officers is believed, then it was a much bigger problem, if not, then they lied, so that i, or but, or someone else was not