yatsenyuk, as the founder of the kyiv security forum. mr. yatsenyuk, do you think we should cook. er, a symmetrical, commemorative note for the president of ukraine, because of course we are, that would be plan a, that's a good idea, thank you, thank you, would you like to answer your question specifically, or all, or who, mr. ambassadors, or mr. herbs or mr. versbao, and that to the question of the military lobby, it is possible. general lutz will be able to answer this question. thank you very much, if ukraine does not get this extra that we are offering. i think it will be disappointing, but it will not be the end of the road, nato is doing a lot, in terms of military support, at least simplifying the process of joining nato, in any case, because, after all, the glass is not half empty, half full, and i think, but this can become a symbol for moscow that nato support, nato support for ukraine falters falters and it's russian propaganda that will take advantage of that and so we will have to work using the existing structure to prepare the

of all, and in the form of a question, i have no questions, i have words of gratitude to arseniy yatsenyuk, who has been dealing with security issues for not the first year, and what is happening today on the site of the security forum is extremely important , i took part in the meeting or in holding the forum many times, and we always talked about security, if we look at the dynamics, when we talked, and what we are doing now, the issue of security is not just a topic that is still there for years 10 ago was and predicted, yes, what can be, and this has already become our reality with you, and that is why we are holding this forum today in the bomb shelter, so first of all, arsenia, i thank you, and frankly, because this topic is not the only one the year is in your field of vision, i know how much effort you put into it. i want to thank the atlantic council for what you do for ukraine, and many things that we managed to do in ukraine are precisely with your help and support. i would like to say something about something else today, 2008, when the summit was taking place, at which the fat

yatsenyuk in her own words. guy. pyatt warned her. the europeans might not support yatsenyuk, to which she replied , f the eu, except she replied, f the eu, except she replied, f the eu, except she didn't limit herself to the letter . f yatsenyuk ended up as letter. f yatsenyuk ended up as prime minister right enough , and prime minister right enough, and the rest, including the latest war there, bar the shouting is history . any consequences for history. any consequences for nuland ? well, in 2021, she was nuland? well, in 2021, she was made undersecretary of state for political affairs. so that's nice for victoria. the desiccating ghouls are everywhere . former us speaker everywhere. former us speaker nancy pelosi's net worth has rocketed since the 2008 financial crisis , with the help financial crisis, with the help of her husband's lucrative stock trades. she's one of the richest people in congress pocketing $140 million since the crash . $140 million since the crash. and while she strenuously denies sharing

your document and this discussion start an important path to the washington summit, and now arseniy yatsenyuk, you were the person who signed in 2008, jointly, the letter to the secretary general nato with a request to provide ukraine with an action plan to prepare for nato membership, this was the beginning of a great process that led to the idea joining the alliance, what do you think about this formula, which is presented in the document presented by our friends, to start the admission process. thank you, danyla, 15 years ago we appealed to nato member countries to support ukraine. after that, russia annexed crimea, attacked georgia, started a war in syria, and we have to draw conclusions, i would like to start with a sincere thank you to our friends from the athletic council, you are doing a terrible job, i would like to interpret. messages that were provided by our colleagues, explain them for the ukrainian audience, we are talking about whether ukraine will be a member of nato or not, so the atlantic council provides a clear path, this , this is a road map, this is not just words, a roa

yatsenyuk's wall is more reliable than the csto.e csto so useless that we will now show you something that is much more useful? here, or here, or here, and what can i say, even a grater without a grater is more useful than the csto. the csto is an organization of a collective security agreement, or rather, the security of a certain collective that sits in the kremlin, and its hostages already understand this well and freeze in every possible way and try to escape from captivity. let's watch a video of how it was. and vladimir vladimirovich, and you without a suitcase have you arrived yes, what? ah, no, nothing, i’ll just get further, for god’s sake, find some suitcase, the smell reaches me, how are you standing there, jamat takavych, i apologize, and vladimir vladimirovich, according to the documents, he is already a terrorist, or still not a terrorist, i just want him not to be a terrorist for one and a half more years, i need to get the money in time, and maybe i will come closer to you. further from this dirty stand up, yes, let'

kuchma, yanukovych, yatsenyuk, prokhorov, and painstaking work, from elaborating the theses of ideasrds, yes, or there are some inaccuracies, about which of the clients we can say that he won or lost, maybe some client was especially remembered, and this can be discussed. say, you know, won, lost, have they achieved, well, how would they have achieved their goals, well, i think that to one degree or another , in the overwhelming majority of cases, they have achieved, well, if we start with the same kuchma, it was 1999, yes, well, that’s the situation there was something similar to the fact that well... it was as if this was an unsolvable problem, well, that is, he started the election campaign with some very minimal percentages, yes, but it was possible to solve it, was there always victory as the main result of which you wanted to achieve, or the task was, let’s say i want to dial so many percent, or to reach second place, third, it happens differently , again, yes, it happens differently, but as a rule, these are the specifics of my work in this area, and especially when we are act

you are credited with working in election campaigns in russia and ukraine, and kuchma, yanukovych, yatsenyuklaborating theses and ideas to conveying them to the electorate, that’s where the truth is in my words, and whether there are any inaccuracies about which of the clients we can say that he won or lost, maybe some client was especially memorable, and you can say about this, you know, win, lose. did they achieve their goals? well, well, i think that to one degree or another, in the overwhelming majority of cases, they have achieved it, well, if you start with the same kuchma there in 1999, yes, well, that’s the situation there similar to the fact that, well, it’s like an unsolvable problem, well, that is, he started the election campaign with some very minimal percentages, yes, but it was possible to solve it, was there always victory as the main result that you wanted to achieve, or the task melted away, let’s say i want to gain so much percentage, or there’s second place, third place, it varies, again, yes, it varies, but as a rule, these are the specifics of my work, in this area, yes

kuchma, yanukovych, yatsenyuk, prokhorov, and painstaking work, from elaborating the theses of ideasuth is, in my words, yes, or there are some inaccuracies, about which of the clients we can say that he won or lost, maybe some client was especially remembered. and we can talk about this to say, you know, won, lost, did they achieve their goals , well, i think that to one degree or another, in the overwhelming majority of cases they achieved, well, if you start with kuchma, there is ninety-nine year, yes, well, the situation there was similar to the fact that, well, it was like an unsolvable problem, well, that is, he started the election campaign in some very minimal percentages, yes, but they managed to solve it, was there always a victory, as the main the result you wanted to achieve, or the task, i want to score so much percent, or there to reach second place, to third, it happens in different ways, again, yes , it happens in different ways, but as a rule, these are the specifics of my work, especially when we were actively involved in this, so we usually took on unsolvable probl

yanukovych, yatsenyuk, prokhorov, and painstaking work, from developing theses and ideas to conveyinghe truth is, in my words, yes, or there are some inaccuracies, about which of the clients we can say that this is it won or lost, maybe some client especially remembered, and you can say about this, you know, won, lost, did they, well, how would they achieve their goals, well, well, i think that to one degree or another, in the overwhelming majority of cases they achieved, well, if you start with the same kuchma there in ninety -nine years, yes, well, the situation there was similar to the fact that, well, it’s like an unsolvable problem, that is. but it was possible to decide whether victory was always the main result that you wanted to achieve, or whether it was a task, let’s say, i want to gain so much percentage, or come in second place, third, it happens in different ways, again, yes, it happens in different ways, but as a rule, these are the specifics of my work in this area, yes , especially when we were actively involved in this, we usually took on unsolvable tasks, well this t

kuchma, yanukovych, yatsenyuk, from developing the theses of ideas to conveying them to the electoratethere is truth in my words, or are there any inaccuracies about which of the clients can be said to have won or lost, maybe some client was especially memorable, and this can be said, you know, won, lost, did you achieve? well, they kind of achieved their goals, well, i think that to one degree or another, in the overwhelming majority of cases , they achieved it, well, if you start with kuchma, there was the year ninety-nine, yes, well, the situation there was similar to that , that well , it’s like this is an unsolvable problem, well, that is , he started the election campaign with some very minimal ones. yes, but it was possible to decide whether victory was always the main result that you wanted to achieve, or the task melted away, let’s say i want to gain so much percentage, or go to second place, to third, it happens differently, again, yes, it happens differently, but as a rule, these are the specifics of my work in this area, yes, especially when we were actively involved in thi

states are building it, just poland. the wall was the most promoted, the ukrainian wall was also yatsenyuk americans and brussels, look how they fought, it’s true brussels targeted the visa scandal, said that you are doing noodles here, you hang this on your ears , this is the second point, the third point why it was suddenly put to a referendum, look at all the questions on the referendum, and there are such interesting questions. you are in favor of raising the age and the pension, well, it was just lowered in the fifteenth year in a populist way, then you want to accept these migrants, you are in favor of supporting brussels, of course , that no one, the third point, yes, for the construction of a wall that has already been built , why destroy it, they will pay money, these are all the questions, why did this referendum arise at all, why is it, the only goal is to turn the parliamentary elections into a referendum on support, pis, you vote for these questions, which means you vote for the pis program, which means you should vote for pis, but it’s not a fact that the people who vote for

there was also the ukrainian wall, yatsenyuk. to both americans and brussels. look how fought. true, brussels leaked the visa scandal and said: “what are you doing here, making a fool of yourself.” this is this. second point, third point, why was this suddenly put to a referendum, in general, look at all the questions on the referendum, yes, there are such interesting questions, you are in favor of raising the age, yes the pension, well, the pis just lowered it in the fifteenth year, populist, then, you want to accept these migrants, you are for supporting brussels, it is clear that no one, the third point, yes, for the construction of a wall, which is already they built it, why destroy it, pay money, that’s it... all the questions, why did this referendum even arise, why is it? there is only one goal, to turn the parliamentary elections into a referendum on supporting peace, you vote for these questions, that means you are voting for the peace program, which means you should vote for peace, but it is not a fact that people who v