>> yeap. especially because of the classes happening. >> right, and it's there, the existing entity. >> can we go back to the parking though? >> yes, please. >> i don't think we -- i am sympathetic to parking issues. but i think this is overreaching a bit. i wouldn't be in favor of adopting no. 7. >> no. 7 suffers the same problem as 6. they go hand in hand, 6 and 7 is not something we can condition on the permit. all equipment chosen for the job should be the quietest equipment available by independent sound consultant. >> that is very vague. >> yes. >> it is very vague. and it's also -- yeah, a little over reaching. the next one i found to be, while i understand the concern about barring entertainment uses and etc. i have a hard time that there is going to be another process in place. we heard from mr. teague that there will be another process and opportunity to that issue as to the use. that would take place in the commercial portion of the property. so i would be disinclined to put that on