. >> commissioner yee riley? >> here. >> commissioner tour-sarkissian? >> here. >> commissioner white? >> here. >> the commission has a quorum with four members present. public comment, is limited to 3 minutes per speaker unless otherwise established by proceeding officer of the meeting. completion of the speaker card while optional will ensure proper spelling of speakers' names. greg, do we have any members of the public who would like to make any comments that are on items that are not on today's agenda? seeing none, public comment is closed. next item, please. >> item 3 approval of the airport 14, 2014 regular meeting minutes, action item. >> do we have a motion to approve the minutes? >> move. >> so we have a second? >> >> all in favor? >> aye. >> next item >> motion passes four votes in favor, none opposed. item 4 discussion and possible action to make recommendations to the board of supervisors on bos file no. 140097 medical cannabis dispensary ocean avenue neighborhood commercial transit district and we have with us the legislative aide for superv

. >> commissioner yee riley. >> yes, this minimum wage is mandated for employers in san francisco? >> that is correct. >> now i know you all know there are a lot of people that commute from other cities in the bay area to work in san francisco? >> right. >> so one of the reasons why they wanted to raise the minimum wage because they can't afford to live in san francisco. would this really be benefit san franciscan residents or are we raising the minimum wage and they still live out of san francisco? >> ted egan has presented data on the percentage of minimum wage employees who are residents of the city as of today. and it ranges from 75% in certain sectors or in the 70% range in restaurants actually, down to lower numbers in various other sectors. i think that again the challenge of looking at the numbers as they exist today does not take into account the acceleration of people being pushed out of the city. and i don't mean by evictions, but just by people realizing that i can't afford to live here any longer. the real estate situation is accelerating at such a rapid pace, that ren

. >> commissioner yee riley? >> here. >> commissioner tour-sarkissian? >> here. >> commissioner white? >> here. >> the

. >> commissioner yee riley. >> the only difference is whether or not we count international locations? >> right. >> whether or not they go through the cu process? >> right. >> so there is still a chance they will go through? >> right. >> so i support that. >> all right, next item should locations of subsidiaries major-owned under the current definition be included in the calculation? >> it's similar to the first one. subsidiary of the gap. they didn't have to go through the cu because they were a subsidiary? >> correct. >> so to me that would go along with no. 1. >> it's related. >> may i respond to commissioner dooley's the financial ability of companies representing these properties this is something that we're seeing a shift in people's concerns. i think it used to be the aesthetic impact, which our current drafting, but shifting to where the finances are coming from and what the backing and power that these companies have? so we can't really make these businesses happen. what we can do is prohibit other businesses to try to encourage something else. what we are hearing from develo