. >> i -- commissioner yekutiel on that. >> i am happy to be the guinea pig there. >> since i am in a district with an active and ongoing small spaces program that i can add a lot of expertise because we have done everything. we are still doing everything. we are way ahead and we can give people advice on how to go forward. >> all right. here is the problem. we have the brown act. clearly we have more than three people who feel passionately about this. i think we are going to have to take a two meeting process to this. just to properly bring in everybody's input. go ahead commissioner. >> i wonder if to avoid a brown act violation if we can maybe take the input that was today. commissioner dooley since we have active street shut downs in our district and maybe just the two of us send bullets and we have a conversation on the resolution in the next commission meeting. is that acceptable to streamline this. >> yes. >> commissioner ortiz cartagena we are working on this together anyway. >> yes. >> then commissioners, when the resolution is drafted and then posted, the commission can amen

that concludes my presentation and i will answer any questions. >> commissioner yekutiel. >> if the goals are the same of making this process simpler, easier and less time consuming, why not just follow this planning department's guidance versus codtifying the existing process? >> i would respond to that in two ways. the planning commission did recommend support of this legislation. i would rather clarify that i don't think it was the planning commission not to codify. they did support the legislation with modifications. the recommendation as to a different approach which amounts to removing the c .u. requirement altogether instead of proceeding with legislation to streamline that process is going to be a different conversation really. the conversation that needs to be had and not exclusive and can happen separately and in tandem with this legislation. our approach is not to dictate what is afforded c .u. and what should not. it is counter to underline premise of the districts which evolved into unique zones throughout the city. to talk about things that activate the commercial corridor l

that concludes my presentation and i will answer any questions. >> commissioner yekutiel. >> if the goals are the same of making this process simpler, easier and less time consuming, why not just follow this planning department's guidance versus codtifying the existing process? >> i would respond to that in two ways. the planning commission did recommend support of this legislation. i would rather clarify that i don't think it was the planning commission not to codify. they did support the legislation with modifications. the recommendation as to a different approach which amounts to removing the c .u. requirement altogether instead of proceeding with legislation to streamline that process is going to be a different conversation really. the conversation that needs to be had and not exclusive and can happen separately and in tandem with this legislation. our approach is not to dictate what is afforded c .u. and what should not. it is counter to underline premise of the districts which evolved into unique zones throughout the city. to talk about things that activate the commercial corridor l