should elect, but i have... a terrible thing, but i before that, i gave an interview in prague that yeltsenand-so, so-and-so, so-and-so, i flew to moscow, met, she says, why don’t you trust me, i say why, so i was given your interview, you say they won’t elect me, and even yeltsin was elected, but it turns out they talked to the director’s corps, they involved chubais and said that directors will receive half during privatization, half. ownership of enterprises, but then you will push all your workers to vote for yeltsin, and so it was. i was only an opposition politician at the time when the soviet union collapsed. and i remember a great feeling of freedom among the people, but many of things. honestly, i don’t know, i don’t understand this word, i honestly don’t understand, the further it goes, the more incomprehensible, the more incomprehensible, this word is this term, democracy, that this is a separate film that needs to be made, democracy, what is it? completely copy all western principles, russia has its own tradition, its own culture, its own civilization, it can accept some values

yeltsen. that is, what we have achieved today is, of course, the revival of the phoenix bird.perts and politicians say, no, we do not have such financial and political opportunities, but we launched this mechanism, we really showed the whole world that it is possible so, and you won’t get anything for it, the states are not able to stop anyone, the states. they are not able to control anything, these are not just words, analyze, today washington does not control a single process in which it is involved, they cannot cope with ukraine, they cannot help it, they cannot calm it down, they cannot do anything there, just shower them with money and weapons, and you are sure that they want to help ukraine, they really want to help themselves. but this also fails, because defeat in ukraine is the beginning of the end for hegemony the united states of america, this is the beginning of the end of the hegemony of the dollar, these are all very interconnected things, and i’ll tell you, isn’t there some kind of contradiction? russia , according to you, is not yet capable of leading, let’s s

line needs to be followed in order to please, especially at that moment when he was the ascending yeltsene left, he was his with the announcement of an early battle on the authority, he moved many of his opponents to pity. as for trump, there is only one question: everything that does not kill us makes us stronger. if these accusations do not actually block the subsequent investigation. specific question, i even think that it may very well be that trump’s arrival could have unpredictable consequences for us in terms of aggravating the situation in russian-american relations, i’ll ask a specific question, since trump is always very spoke out sharply against aid to ukraine, he openly, in addition, accused ukraine of interfering in the american elections against his most beloved, now as we get closer to the elections. the more he changes his position, of course, and now he’s already saying that you can help ukraine just not a direct grant, not a direct gift, but a loan, but who will believe that if ukraine receives this money, it will return it, and i can imagine , that trump believes in thi

yeltsen, that is...he new world, as some of our experts and politicians say, no, we do not have such financial and political capabilities, but , but we launched this mechanism. “we really showed the whole world that you can do this, and nothing will happen to you for it, the states are not able to stop anyone, the states are not able to control anything, these are not just words, analyze, today washington is not controls any process in which he is involved, they cannot cope with ukraine, they cannot. they can’t help her, they can’t calm her down, they can’t do anything there, just shower them with money and weapons, and you ’re sure that they want to help ukraine, really, they want to help themselves, but that doesn’t work either, because defeat in ukraine - this is the beginning of the end for the hegemony of the united states of america, this is the beginning of the end. world of equal players, look at our interaction with the global south, there are no main ones, despite the fact that china, of course

arrived - clinton in may, at the celebration of the fiftieth anniversary of the victory, she and yeltsension, the issue of elections next year arises. and boris nikolaevich says: i wish there were better yet, nato should not expand before the elections. and as you rightly say, clinton told him exactly the opposite, and i, too , will have elections soon; in order for the elections, i need to expand. well, what does this have to do with elections, right? these are your elections, your people, win this regardless of the foreign policy positions that professionals must defend, in these most difficult conditions the priority for russian diplomats and for specialists from the ministry of defense has become the following: yes, it is clear that the westerners will still somehow expand nato politically. as far as i understand, the priority for pryamakov was not to give. expand the infrastructure, like, you are expanding it with declarations, you are adopting, maybe distributing the fourth article, but not the fifth, such options also arose in the discussions of the nineties, but the main thing is