yeltsin did not change his points of view in any state, even in the signature state.t that there are 130 nationalities in russia, nevertheless, during all these troubled times, we have never had blood of an interethnic hue on the territory of russia. and, of course, we recognize the sovereignty of our republics that are part of the russian federation. and the corresponding agreements will be signed are currently being discussed and will be signed with each republic and government of the russian federation. will happen peacefully, firstly, and secondly, by respecting the sovereignty of each republic, of course, and i think that we have a contradiction. there won’t be any, a strange and terrible revenge of history, outbreaks of medieval fanaticism in a country that for seven decades in a row proclaimed itself the most advanced. nationalism, blinding millions, demanding blood sacrifices. in the month of october there were riots in grozny, yes, when dudayev arrived as president, and his policy went against the center, against moscow, there is a system here, the ninety-sec

was the russian leadership, it was the american leadership, and this is how america behaved, and yeltsinis way, be that as it may, he looked brave because he was drunk, he was unfit for the position he held, his merit was that... he climbed onto the tank, you know that, but he also climbed up there drunk, that at that time we did not have a single political will, there were completely different voices, quite contradictory, there was no consensus on any regarding the collapse of yugoslavia, nor regarding the bombings, news agency of ukraine, mr. grachev, regarding military doctrine, it is known that there is a point there that says that russia does not rule out the use of nuclear... but committing aggression in compartment or together with the state in control nuclear weapons, at the same time we emphasize that nuclear weapons are a political means of deterring the outbreak of any large-scale war, it can’t get any worse, back in peacetime in the seventies, eighties and early nineties, i can give you my fingers on my hands it’s not enough to count how many stupid things we ’ve done. the re

the second yeltsin, august 1996 , the former palace of congresses is now called the state kremlin palacee whole ceremony lasted about half an hour, the president's speech is only 45 seconds; shortly before this, yeltsin suffered a heart attack. by the way, it was with the inauguration of 1996 that the script for the ceremony was developed, which they still adhere to a certain extent with minor deviations, for example, vladimir. putin, unlike his predecessor, did not wear the presidential badge; it is an order with a gold chain. and in 2008 , the inauguration of dmitry medvedev included the process of handing over a nuclear briefcase, although this moment was not shown on television. the script included the script for the ceremony and the passage of the presidential motorcade through the streets of moscow. on other topics, the israel defense forces last night. military operation in the eastern part of the city of rafah, the last major hamas outpost in the gaza strip. according to israeli intelligence, the area is home to four of the remaining battalions of the hamas leadership group and a

yeltsin set poptsov the task of making radio and television.ffice, no telephone, no car, nothing. when i told yeltsin, i said: nikolayevich, during the revolution they appointed commissars like that too, but at least they were given a leather jacket and a browning. browning, no promises, but leather chicken. dollars for equipment collected people similar himself, daring, bright, romantic, he loved to work, as he said, with difficult people, as one big manager once told him about one of the employees of our company, that this is not an ordinary person, he says, but i don’t work with ordinary people, well, because it’s not interesting with ordinary people, the news was told as never before and never again, sorokina could cry over the message, the people’s commissar’s 100 grams for the victory of may 9 would be enough, the news lived. if we keep quiet, russia will curse us. yes, he showed how they shoot from tanks a revolting parliament, but never showed a drunken president or a head prosecutor. journalist povtsov was not interested in such scanda

meaning, going back to what i was saying, we have a potential yeltsin/putin scenario. you reach into the crowd for faces that are not public, not known outside of inner circles, much like vladimir putin was seen at the timing someone seen as a steady set of hands but someone who can drive the ship. keep it moving without emerging himself as that type of personality. it didn't work in russia, that's what yeltsin had in mind, the system would keep moving on. what, instead, we saw was a state takeover of security services, and i think that's possible what we're going to see in iran as well, a takeover of the security services, vis-a-vis, the clerical rules, vis-a-vis, the actually theocracy that's been in power since 1979. it could be a historic turning point, a shift. but we're talking about eternal shifts in iran, that i don't think those interacting with iran outside the united states and others you're going to necessarily see great changes in policy, but a profound stone in the road that could -- stone in the river that could change the course of the water for iranian

having taken the highest post, yeltsin immediately headed for russian independence.ignty was adopted, and in july , at the cpsu congress, he announced his resignation from the communist party. the laws of the rsfsr were placed above those of the union, the split worsened, and events developed progressively. finally, yeltsin gained control after the unsuccessful coup attempt in august. soviet union. this is what this day in history was like. you will die, damn it, like us, he says, who will protect you, if not me, many donetsk residents went to... in the southern donetsk direction, russian the military razed the ukrainian armed forces' fortifications to the ground. the strong point was hit by the newest heavy flamethrower system tosochka, after completing the task the crew took the vehicle into cover. the ministry of finance has submitted to the government an initiative to improve the tax system, the personal income tax rate is supposed to be made different depending on income, the increase will affect only about 3% of working russians, those who receive more than 200

, it was ninety-one, i was the first to hear it , to make peace with yeltsen, and yeltsin at this meetinge and others who were there, as part of our delegation, said that russia wants normal relations, russia wants peace, trade, normal economy, normal politics and respect, that’s all, nothing more. but the usa refused it again, because the united states was already planning a unipolar world at that time, this is a kind of addiction, like a drug, and we learned this from britain in the 19th century , britain was the hegemon in the world and... we learned this from the british. in 1815, russia was precisely an ally, an ally of england, and together with england fought against napoleon. but then, 30 years later, russia and england were already sworn enemies. very interesting, how did this happen? there is a very wonderful book. it was written, in my opinion, in 1960, by a scientist named gleason, he studied this issue: how did it happen that russia and england were allies, and then became enemies, and he writes in his book that there were no reasons for this, there was only one reason: engla

after the anti-soviet coup, the treacherous yeltsin's entourage imposed western approaches in russia,munists and patriots tried to ... maximum consolidation of the nation with the help of a movement based on the desire for complete subordination of society to a dictatorial state. anyone can fit into this formulation. the authors of such assessments emphasize the political, cultural and other external signs of fascism, but do not lose sight of the main thing, the social and economic factor of its emergence. such manipulations are intended to put makeup on the nazi monster, on this atrocity. we communists will never agree with anyone who ignores the key fact: fascism is a creation of big capital and a spokesman for its interests. we are obliged to resolutely hide any attempts to disguise the causes that give rise to nazi evil. according to the crc. in reality, fascism is a natural result of the development of western capitalist society. this was most succinctly expressed by the report of georgiy dimitrov at the seventh congress of the comintern. it emphasized that in conditions of a sha

jeffrey sachs sits, under yeltsin he sat as the chief economic adviser, it came through him, he gaveunched mechanism brought with it a lot of new and not always good, for example, you can it would be imaginable that a veteran of the great patriotic war could collect a billion rubles in bribes, and while still in the position of deputy minister of defense, especially in wartime, while the war is going on, and this happens when the whole country is collecting rubles a penny for a drone... so that, for example, a person who came back from the great patriotic war would be tasked with building a dam to protect the inhabitants of cities, villages, towns of some region, which was spent almost a billion rubles on that it is not a dam, but that it is an earthen rampart, as happened in the orenburg province, this is what the minister of construction irek faizolin says about this. that dam that the vors say is not really a dam. a dam of a billion rubles is not worth 10 km, with enormous speed, a huge mass of water pressed not on the dam, but on an earthen rampart. but the construction took 4 ye

- three, discord in yeltsen’s team led to a new coup attempt. soul, he has books dedicated to the yeltsind more accurate characteristics of the main figures of that time, the main political figures, he understood people very well, he had a brilliant command of the language, knowing that elson would not like this, he published and left from the post of chairman of the all-russian state television and radio broadcasting company, the very empire that he created out of nowhere, and we all live according to his law on the media, the very one that he wrote while a state duma deputy. for a journalist, the censor must be inside: don’t lie, don’t take advantage of your position. of all delivery, the development of delivery of electronic services, marketplaces and other internet services that we have seen over the past 2-3 years, taking into account the pandemic and everything else, we can say that the internet in the broad sense of the word has come to every person, which is what it says we have an internet audience of 105-107 million people. in addition to the business program, forum participants

boris nikolaevich yeltsin took office as president of the rsfsr.o the sound of lanterns and, putting his hand to his heart , took the oath. the then-current russian anthem, composed by mikhail glinka, was played. the flag of the rsfsr was raised above the kremlin next to the flag of the ussr. then boris yeltsin himself and ussr president mikhail gorbachev made speeches. after that, they shook hands and left. after taking the oath, the russian anthem is played. the presidential standard rises above the senate dome. i swear, when exercising the powers of the president of the russian federation, to respect and protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, to comply with the defense of the constitution of the russian federation, to protect sovereignty and independence, the security and integrity of the state, to faithfully serve the people. vladimir vladimirovich putin took office as president of russia, from the first building of the kremlin, where the president’s office is located, to the large kremlin palace, where the state rooms are located,

previous leaders of our country had a lack of political will, yes, there are the gorbachevs, the yeltsins don’t, now what’s wrong with political will. well, nikolai nikolaevich, radolfovich, when they showed footage of eurovision, the sabbath that was going on there, well, in principle, all this already happened in europe, and the sabbath, and witches, and satanism and the catholic church forbade washing, in shivporiks, and so on and like that, there was no united germany, italy, france, all these were hundreds of principalities that fought among themselves, it was a plague, yes, it was around the 10th-11th century, for the entire economy of the collective west, it could fit into 2%. of global gdp, china accounted for 50%, someone says 70%, that is, it seems to me that this is what we are now seeing this carnivalism in western culture, or in ideology, it’s just that it’s just a superstructure , which reflects the collapsing basis of the economy, that is, everything is leaving the west again to the east, in those glorious times when china and india accounted for 70% of the world economy, a

and putin moment, where yeltsin, he was sort of at the end of his career, he was very sick, he was anuld not hold the country together, and went to an apparatchik, went to someone from the security services, he went to someone who was an unknown factor, and we saw a transition away from soviet leadership, away from the politburo, away from big established names, moving towards those lesser known figures, apparatchiks from within the security service to take over and start to impose more of the military dictatorships, perhaps with the same trappings, the same covering of a supreme leader, but who would ultimately have the power, would be the supreme leader as it is currently, and his religious circle around him? looking to religious text for inspiration? or, will it be the military in iran, the revolutionary guard, who carry out the day-to-day powers, will we now assume a greater leadership role, with perhaps a fig leaf religious leader? i think that is the potential flexion point that iran is at right now. doesn't continue, as it were, being guided by clerics who commune with god, who

yeltsin set poptsov the task of making radio and television., no table, no office, no telephone, no car, nothing. when i told yeltsin, nikolayevich, during the revolution they appointed commissars like that too, but at least they were given a leather jacket and a browning. i don’t promise browning, but i’ll think about a leather jacket. so i went out into the field and this is how vgtrk was created. oleg maksimovich and anatol gich losenko created russian television from scratch in the literal sense of the word. i remember this building, it was empty, they came there and created television there, which is now a huge empire. the vgtrk empire began with oleg maksimovich borrowing 120 thousand dollars from his friend, ophthalmologist fedorov. on the... he was brave enough to work with difficult but interesting people. the news told the news as never before and never again. “sorokina could burst into tears over the message, the people’s commissar’s 100 grams would be enough for the victory on may 9, the news lived on, the news was frantic. the news

the floor is given to comrade yeltsin, first secretary of the sverdlovsk regional party committee.her fraternal countries, were able not only to begin the process of detente in the world, to fill it with concrete content, but also to prevent it from being disrupted in the face of frenzied attacks from imperialism. and the communists, all the working people of the sverdlovsk region, assure the delegates of the lenin congress. the central committee, personally leonid ilvich brezhnev, that for this grandiose and wonderful future, they will fight with all revolutionary passion and unwavering devotion to the cause of the communist party. he was elected as a people's deputy of russia, he was nominated by the chairmen of the supreme council, remember, it was 1990, may, suddenly a man appeared who began to tell the truth, a man from... partyocrats, a man who knows all this inside out, firsthand, like this , as they say, i myself was from this skin, people just began to take a closer look at them, and the first time they voted against, the second time against, and i flew to prague, from pra

unsuccessfully, you know how un -russian these are, that’s where jeffrey sachs sits in charge under yeltsinve it, and it was translated into russian, and they gave it, that’s what they did, and what did they, for the russians, for the citizens, or something, work for the benefit of the citizens, no, they worked for the benefit of the west, in favor of oneself, and it is also naive to think that new people will come, with one click, everything will change, no, it seems to me that this is a very subtle remark, a change in the elite, and if we are talking about the fact that we need economic growth, then this is inevitably the disappearance not even of specific figures, but of a certain type of figure, you know, okay, well, remove the nabiyuli now, put ulyukaeva, something will change, or is it senelnikova murileva, well, or make another rotation, that is, assign accordingly the movement between the central bank, the ministry of finance, set yourself so that a veteran of the great patriotic war could collect a billion rubles in bribes, and while still in the position of deputy minister of defe

on may 29, 1990, boris yeltsin became chairman of the supreme council of russia, then still the rsf ofsocialist republic. this event became one of the turning points in the bitter struggle for power between him and the head of the ussr, mikhail gorbachev. in at the end of eighty-seven, yeltsin found himself in decline, but under the conditions of perestroika he managed to advance again, leading the russian democratic movement in defiance of the allied center. and he was elected chairman at the first congress of russian people's deputies, but only in the third round and with a minimal margin. perhaps many voted not so much for him as against him. state sovereignty, at the july congress in june of the ninetieth, a declaration on the cpsu was adopted, he announced his withdrawal from the communist party. laws of the rsfsr were placed above the allies, the split worsened, events developed progressively, and yelson finally gained the upper hand after an unsuccessful coup attempt in august. if you are planning to buy or build your own house, you can do this with government support, thanks to

there these... you know, how not in russian, everything sits from there - jeffrey sachs, sat under yeltsinm, he gave and translated into russian and gave, that’s what they did, and what they this is not for the russians, for the citizens, or something, they worked for the benefit of the citizens, no, they worked for the benefit of the west, for the benefit of themselves. and it’s also naive to think that new people will come and with one click everything will change, no, it seems to me that the economist mikhail khazin made a very subtle remark, i respect him very much person and i want you to listen to his point of view, i can only say one thing, if we are talking about a change in the elite, and if we are talking about the fact that we need economic growth, then this is inevitable. nothing will change, but can i say why? because, within the framework of informal agreements of the nineties, the financial sector is under the control of the imf, and of course, of course, this launched mechanism brought with it a lot of new and not always good things, for example, one could imagine that a ve

in at the end of eighty-seven, yeltsin found himself in decline, but under the conditions of perestroikaing the russian democratic movement in defiance of the allied center. and he was elected chairman at the first congress of russian na... developed progressively, yeltsin finally took over after an unsuccessful coup attempt in august 1991, and in december 1991 he signed the belovesh agreements on the liquidation of the soviet union. this is what this day in history was like. and you're not at all are you changing? did you miss me, baby? the fate of the milky way planet and thirteen, thirteen, thirteen galaxies is in our hands, 100 years ago, it turns out that time heals, 512 people, including 91 children. introduced a resolution on the inadmissibility of the deralization of nazism. mostly europeans abstained. the united states voted against it. in a very well-thought-out attack in the information field on our historical self-awareness, because this is the basis of any national statehood. it is important that everyone involved inhumane treatment.

richard, as you were bringing up the example of history, in boris yeltsin, there was certainly, if youn operator at the time that was taking advantage of that particular context, who is now the leader of russia, vladimir putin. as you mentioned, the possibility of the hard right military, are there certain actors that could take advantage, if you will, of the current instability, and who do have the ears of certain people, who could actually make this happen? who might we watch, if that should be the case? >> quite a few. that reaction from narendra modi, much more effusive and emotional than i expected. i think we will hear president biden going that far, or most european leaders going that far. that is quite interesting. it is a symbol from india that they want to reach out, they want to get engaged in the same way -- i think probably the most effusive praise will come from vladimir putin, because iran, under raisi has been shoring up the russian military campaign against ukraine. iran has been providing a great number of drones, that russia has been using very effectively in its att

country and its resources are destroyed by all and sundry, and the clearest example of this is this yeltsin'sc russia after soviet authoritarianism. azerbaijan faced the same threat, and aliyev jr. was perceived as a temporary worker who would not interfere with the democratic stripping of assets. country, but the younger aliyev, which is important, a graduate of mgemo, did not allow this, and under him his country not only was not stolen, but turned from poor to rich, to the joy of the azerbaijanis themselves. i sing these odes to aliyev because i spent 4 days reading his biography, here’s an interesting fact: the next year after my first election victory, ilham heydarovich issued a decree on the adoption of a long-term strategy for managing oil and gas revenues for 2005-2025, that is , only... the president was so confident in his abilities when he came to power that he was ready to guarantee the implementation of the hydrocarbon program, and this is the basis of the entire well-being of azerbaijan for as long as 20 years. these 20 years have almost passed, and in these two decades the coun

a major invasion, but i was and remain convinced that did not prepare for the war only putin, and yeltsin was also preparing, and this was all during the last 33... years of our independence, obviously, in this case we can also talk about whether we were preparing for this war during these 33 years, obviously not . mr. serhiy, in what way did they prepare for this war, i am not talking about recent years, not about some military accumulation of equipment and personnel, but about how deeply they took our country under their control, how deeply... this their network of agents was formed by these cans, which now also very often give up their positions, and the pso conducts and so on, the fact is that this creeping annexation of ukraine began from the moment ukraine gained independence, and maybe even before ukraine, because in the 90th year absolutely everyone understood that... that it was about the possible collapse of the soviet union and that ukraine was and remains an important element of the entire russian empire or part of the soviet union or the post-soviet union, that is why they tr

nineties, this elite, which came to power, in my opinion, as a result of a coup d’etat, actually, yeltsinn fact, they surrendered all the interests of russia, first of all they convinced themselves. is that we lost, therefore, and how would this be the reason, well, that’s why we have to do this and that, give up all positions, this is it, it seems to me, this is the moment, we still need to constantly take it into account, have in mind, because this is an important moment, the internal state of the winner and the loser, we haven’t lost anything, the last thing i want to say is, of course, when i look at these belgorod, the loss of people, here... dynamics from presidential decrees, including on historical memory, on historical education, enlightenment, and the may decrees, socio-economic, and to the structure of the government, but something like this, this is my inner feeling, without armored cars, without slogans, very calm tone, formed absolutely on... a little different, you know what you have done, and now the question is much worse, much deeper, much more dangerous, you understand

i actually heard this formulation for the first time today, because again russia of the nineties, yeltsinent, we were told there is an international division of labor, you do it, all technological things will be in the west, they will sell you, but they will sell the oldest ones on a residual basis, when we started a special military operation... i’m just talking about time, that is, yes, yes, yes, it’s about time, but we understand what the policy was, this is it, let israel suffer now, a scottish economist is now living there, yes, but... actually in fact, this struggle for the country, it continued between patriotic forces and liberal forces, they talked with nato, you can be friends, you can conduct exercises in arzamas and set up a nato jump-up base in ulyanovsk, when serious things began, let’s still introduce the exact term, and a liberal can be a patriot, here they are rather westernized patriots, which means absolutely i’m obviously saying that i didn’t remember at least one liberal, but i decided to defend myself just in case. for a long time, now we need to understand very clea

... for this to be a non-pesodic contact, it is necessary to take into account the personnel when yeltsinok with the default, he was immediately found, persuaded both me and. .. concerns the whole staff, because we have a lot of interesting people, i turned to the president, discussed it with the prime minister, i worked for 10 years in novosibirsk, whoever has such experience, knows all the regional politics, and we can’t, take anyone as advisers , because after all, in many countries of the world, coalition governments are working, talented personnel, we need to get used to work today, well, in general, in general... we will all have to roll up our sleeves and, first of all, win, the president began all recent speeches with gratitude to those who are fighting, we are fighting together, we sent a convoy of 125 for the holiday, 17,000 children were accepted, i am sure that we will win, but we must put together efforts, and we wish mishustveno success, today we are holding back on voting, thank you, gennady andreevich, the floor is given to the ldpr faction by leonid udardovich sluvatsky.

under the light, it was this letter, along with other documents , that boris yeltsin handed over to theo refused to accept them as genuine documents. listen to what deputy viktor elyukhin says about this. on may 25, 2010 , an unknown man called me on the phone and stated that he knew that a group of scientists, together with... “we were supposed to break the totalitarian communist party, but it was precisely our behavior that led to complete impunity in the world towards to us, by in relation to our rights, to our claims, to our interests, we confirmed with our own hands this most talented operation of goebbels, which we are still discussing, which..." which biden used in his speech, we talked about this, remember why he was chosen for all this provocation and fake, the city of bucha, why not gastomel or irpen, why butcher? but because the president of the united states, in another wave of dementia, publicly called our president a butcher. in english, butcher. the meaning is how this can be played out. , rhyme, butcher, butchers, murderers, and so on. and then what happened that day? on

were written in the same color pencil, it was this letter, along with other documents, that boris yeltsinanded over to the constitutional court, which also refused to accept them as genuine documents. listen to what deputy viktor elyukhin says about this. on may 25 , 2010 , an unknown man called me on the phone and stated that he knew... that a group of scientists, together with me, was conducting a study of the circumstances surrounding the execution of polish officers, stated that he participated in a large group of specialists , specializing in the forgery of historical documents, including his statement that he and his team directly falsified, if you believe his statements, the so-called note of beria from 1900... after all, there was no other way, we had to break the totalitarian communist party, but it was precisely our behavior that led to the complete impunity of the world in relation to us, in relation to our rights, to our claims, to our interests, we with our own hands confirmed this most talented operation of goebbels, which... the word katyn was drawn to this story, because i

made with a pencil of the same color, it was this letter, along with other documents, that boris yeltsin handed over to the constitutional court, which also refused to accept them as genuine documents, listen to what deputy viktor elyukhin says about this: may 25 , 2010 to me an unknown man got through on the phone and said: that he knows that a group of scientists together with me is conducting a study of the circumstances, related to the execution of polish officers, stated that he participated in a large group of specialists specializing in falsifying historical documents, including he stated that he and his team directly falsified, if his statements are to be believed, the so-called note beria dated march 1940, he put bery’s signature on this note, at the same time on this note, on behalf of stalin, on behalf of molotov, malenkov , their other names were entered, in particular , he stated that he made this note according to the proposal that followed from the kremlin, here is the making of stalin. belsa, which we are still discussing, which created such discord between the poles and

it was this letter, along with other documents, that boris yeltsin handed over to the constitutional court, which also refused to accept them as genuine documents. listen to what deputy viktor elyukhin says about this. on may 25, 2010 , an unknown man called me on the phone. stated that he was aware that a group of scientists, together with me, was conducting a study of the circumstances surrounding the execution of polish officers. stated that he participated in a large group specialists specializing in the forgery of historical documents, including he stated that he, together with his team, falsified, if you believe his statements, the so-called: beria’s note dated march 1940, he put beria’s signature on this note , at the same time, on this note, on behalf of stalin, on behalf of molotov, malenkov , their other names were entered. in particular, he stated that he prepared this note based on a proposal that came from the kremlin. there is production here. goebbels’s last operation, which we are still discussing, which created such discord between the poles and russians, moreover, l

written documents, and we fell for this, fell for this deception, all the laws, all the decrees that yeltsin was a member of the government, i remember, they bring it all in english, and then they sit there and urgently translate it , they are translating, they are translating at 12 o’clock at 1:00 am they gather us, we still have not time to read anything, all these pages are even hotter, and even the translation is so rudely done, it’s unsuccessful there, these ones you know are not in russian, it’s all from there sits uh jeffrey sachs, sat under yeltsen. main economic adviser, it came through him, he gave and translated into russian and gave, that’s what they did, and what did they do for the russians, for the citizens or something, they worked for the benefit of the citizens, no, they worked for the benefit of the west, in benefit oneself, and it is also naive to think that new people will come and with one click everything will change, no, it seems to me, very much... economist mikhail khazin made a subtle remark. i have a lot of respect for this man and i want you to listen to his poin

made. with a pencil of the same color, it was this letter, along with other documents, that boris yeltsinanded over to the constitutional court, which also refused to accept them as genuine documents. listen to what deputy viktor elyukhin says about this. on may 25 , 2010, an unknown man called me on the phone and stated that he it is known that a group of scientists, together with me , is conducting a study of the circumstances surrounding the execution of polish officers, stated that he participated in a large group of specialists specializing in the forgery of historical documents, including he stated that he directly together with his team, if you believe his statement, he falsified the so-called beria note from 1940... it is enough to smear it with a certain, specific liquid coating, put it on the necessary documents and a signature, which is unlikely who among the criminologists will tell the difference, this is very interesting, this is what politburo member sachs, alexander yakovlev, who organized this falsification campaign in the nineties, says, we had to partially lie, be hypoc

gradually worsened its economic situation than in fact, again , traitors in power took advantage of yeltsinday. but if not a shoe, then at least a finger, we ’ll send a few people there, they’ll be there somewhere, what they’ll do, who these people will be, their uniform will be estonian, and what kind of passports they’ll have - in it’s not clear in your pocket, so all this shouldn’t happen in principle, so the economy, more state, more economy, more planning in preparing the country for possible external aggression, that’s what andreyevich’s appointment is belousov for the post of minister of defense, more to the economy, more control, more audit, we must not forget that we are now talking about 6.7% of gdp, which is allocated for defense needs, this is colossal, absolutely incredible money, plus this is a huge number of people, i let me remind you that the russian army... right now it is 1,100,000 people, when shaigu took up his post, it was 3,000 people, that is, this is a truly grandiose economy, which also needs economic support, keeping in mind that we are talking , god forbid, of co

documents, and we fell for this, fell for this deception, everything from there sits jeffrey sachs under yeltsinthrough him it came he gave and translated into russian and gave this is what they did and what did they do for this for the russians for the citizens or something in favor of the citizens they worked no they worked in favor of the west in benefit yourself and too. it’s naive to think that new people will come and everything will change with one click, no, it seems to me that the economist mikhail khazin made a very subtle remark, i respect this man very much and i want you to listen to his point of view, i i can only say one thing: if we are talking about a change in the elite, and if we are talking about the fact that we need economic growth, then this will inevitably disappear. not even specific figures, but some type of figures, you know, okay, well, remove nabiyulina now, install ulyukaev, something will change, or is it senelnikova muryleva, well, or make another rotation, that is, assign nabiulina, accordingly, to move between the central bank, the ministry of finance , appoint

real documents, and we fell for this, fell for this deception, all the laws, all the decrees that yeltsinwas a member of the government, i remember, they brought all this in english, and then they sat there with... it came through him, he gave it and, uh, they translated it into russian, and they gave it, that’s what they did, and what are they doing for the russians, for the citizens, or something, in favor did citizens work? no, they worked for the benefit of the west, for the benefit of themselves, and it is also naive to think that new people will come, with one click, everything will change, no, it seems to me that the economist mikhail khazin made a very subtle remark, i respect this man very much and want, so that you listen to his point of view, i can only say one thing: if we are talking about a change in the elite, and if we are talking about the fact that we need economic growth, then this is the inevitable disappearance of not even specific figures, but a certain type of figure, you know, well fine, well, remove the nabiulya now, but install ulyukaev, will something change, or

yeltsin's russia no longer needed its own heroes of the soviet union, let alone afghan ones.igrated to germany, where he often recalled how space did not want to send him back to earth, due to problems with the engines, the crew risked remaining in orbit forever. lyakhov, he was turned on manually , switched off again, and once again he i tried it, it turned off again, it worked for a short time. the crew spent more than a day in limbo, without food or toilet, but vladimir lyakhov still managed to start the engines and return the descent module from the afghan. the astronauts to the ground, and it’s true we waited there for days, but it’s getting confusing. 35 years after ahat mohmand’s flight into orbit, sharia law was introduced in his native afghanistan and women’s beauty salons were closed. for many years, ahad is destined to remain the first and only afghan astronaut. the idea of ​​exploring space together with countries refused for various reasons. first there was a joint satellite program. the orbital vehicles, called interkosmos, were made in dnepropetrovsk. in the en

it was this letter, along with other documents, that boris yeltsin handed over to the constitutionalourt, which also refused to accept them as genuine documents. listen to what deputy viktor elyukhin says about this. on may 25, 2010, he called me by phone. an unknown man and stated that he was aware that a group of scientists, together with me, was conducting a study of the circumstances surrounding execution of polish officers. stated that he participated in a large group of specialists specializing in falsifying historical documents, including he stated that he and his team directly falsified, if his statements are to be believed, the so-called note of beria dated march 1940, he put the signature of beria on this note, at the same time on this note on behalf of stalin, on behalf of molotov, malenkov their other names were entered, in particular , he stated that he prepared this note according to the proposal that followed from the kremlin is here. making stalin’s signature, making beria’s signature, as he said, it’s enough to smear it with a certain, a certain liquid coating and pu

unsuccessfully , you know, these are not in russian everything from there sits jeffrey sachs, under yeltsinhe chief economic adviser sat through him, this came through him, he gave and translated into russian and gave this is what they did and what are they for the citizens or what? and if we are talking about the fact that we need economic growth, then this is inevitable disappearance, not even of specific figures, but some type of figure, you know, okay , well, remove nabiulya now, install ulyukaev, something will change, or is it senelnikova murileva, well, or make another rotation, that is, appoint, respectively, between the central bank, the ministry of finance, appoint a minister of finance, what- will it ever change? nothing, but can i tell you why? because , within the framework of informal agreements of the nineties, the financial sector is under the control of the imf, and of course, of course, this launched mechanism brought with it a lot of new and not always good things, for example, you can it would be imaginable that a veteran... of the great patriotic war could collect a bil

a special inauguration ceremony was developed in 1996, when president boris yeltsin began working athe highest government post for the second time. since then , the ritual has undergone slight changes, but its main points are still preserved. as the press secretary promised. traditional script implies that the president goes to the ceremony from his office in the first building of the kremlin, to the large kremlin palace, where he must walk through the halls through st. george, alexander, and st. andrew's hall, where he will take the oath. our channel will show the ceremony. vladimir putin will officially take office as president of russia after the elections that took place in march this year. he received record support of more than 87%, and this was with a historic maximum of voter turnout. over 76 million people voted for him. as the head stated states in their address to citizens on the results. such a result will require even greater dedication. the head of state is expected to arrive at the large kremlin palace at 12:00 today in an updated auurus senate car. the main changes to

made with a pencil of the same color, it was this letter, along with other documents, that boris yeltsinover the constitutional court, which also refused to accept them as genuine documents. listen to what deputy viktor ilyukhin says about this. on may 25, 2010 , an unknown man called me on the phone and stated that he knew. that a group of scientists, together with me, is conducting a study of the circumstances surrounding the execution of polish officers, stated that he participated in a large group of specialists specializing in the forgery of historical documents, including he stated that he directly together with his team, if you believe his statements, he falsified the so-called note of beria dated 1900... the fortieth year of march, he put beri’s signature on this note, at the same time on this note, on behalf of stalin, on behalf of molotov, malenkov , others were added their names, in particular, he stated that he prepared this note according to a proposal that followed from the kremlin, here there is the production of stalin’s signature, the production of a signature. there was

only then, having arrived at vnukovo airport, did i find out, because yeltsin called me from belarus means we have gathered here, come on, come on, we will sign some kind, it was a car prepared, with the kazakh national a flag for his meeting, and the fact that the corridor and security was careless is a fact, here we will meet such a person coming, i say, what are we talking about? bush they said and this is generally a shame, you are talking to the president of the united states of america, you are not talking to the president of the country, this is shameful, shameful, shameful, so it’s unclean, in general, this is morality, shushkevich informs me, and boris nikolaevich is talking with bush. it’s unclear how you got there, you weren’t informed about the intentions with which you flew there bialowieza? no, well, they really had intentions, but how to develop them, after all, in general, the intentions were to discuss with koravchuk, well, they were bringing some documents there in their cases, one from kiev, the other from minsk, they say that they wrote there, and so. political, a

how did yeltsin’s russia differ from the soviet union even before gorbachev’s betrayal?tivities, thanks to people like kozyrev and company. this betrayal dates back to the gorbachev period, and then they lost economic sovereignty when western advisers. in the ministries, we lost educational sovereignty when we were given creditors and false values, which are now reflected, among other things, in the collapse of the system, then the bologna system, and so cultural policy, when the word russian, and especially soviet, was completely erased from all history, continue to flog sovereignties parcel is also the term red-brown, but i ’ll get to that, it means a parade of sovereignties, sending young people to study abroad , among other things. and turkey, the west, and so on, from where they brought us, we also reap many benefits, that is, this period was because we lost sovereignty, those who advocated state sovereignty, the zyuganovs, our party, patriotic forces, were called red -browns, for which, for coming out at rallies against the bombing of yugoslavia, i myself came out,

well, listen, well, that’s in principle , it is a tragedy of russia that once boris nikolayevich yeltsin book about their experience, yeah, it was such a thieves’ scheme, i remember. then they were kicked out there with a kick in the ass, i have a transfer there was, we talked about it, then i encountered kokh for the first time, which surprised me, this is a complex, that is, crazy conceit, there is zero reason for this, well, it’s empty as a drum, then i also tried to manage television, now there are wars against russia and iraq , of course, but why haven’t they been recognized yet? it’s been a long time since they were traitors, here’s the whole list of who was there? excite everything, treason and confiscation of the property that they have here, vladimir, thank you very much, for parzhiplata, court payment in general, listen, okay, but i understand everything. why, when he was liquidated, there were already banderas, shukhevych and all the little shuluponi like that, but this one really felt, understood and built a serious program for war, for terrorist attacks and other things prec

bessonov ilya konstantinovich, president of the russian federation, boris nikolaevich yeltsin, well ,stantinovich, of course, warmest wishes, health, longevity from the president, thank you, well , i didn’t expect it, to be honest, thank you, well well, hurray, congratulations, congratulations, thank you. oh, what a beauty, look, dad, well, it turns out, i caught up with you, by the next decree , the president awarded pyotr sergeevich the rank of lieutenant general, i hope this doesn’t upset you too much, so what will you do? do, congratulations, congratulations, well, is there a toast? yes understood. sorry. if you can’t drive me away, go ahead, where to put the flowers, a bucket, a bucket under the sink. are you getting a job? no, i just like to read newspapers for free advertisements. so, let's have some tea and you can tell me everything. where's your tea? there is no tea. okay, let's have some coffee. there is no coffee either. new addition, look, i should understand, i looked, that’s it, it’s free, but you can’t, why the fuck, oh well, no need to think, it’s necessary, great, we

and the testimony on is that even president yeltsin, boris yeltsin said, you know, or gorbachev's said this was gorbachev came to our 50th, 40th, 40th anniversary of radio liberty in moscow and said, you know, without without radio liberty, there would have never been any change in the soviet union. so we have testimonials. now, granted, that's post facto after the events, very hard to measure during the dissident movement, which was very important in the soviet, which helped bring about the end of communist rule. i'm thinking in particular, figures like alexander social neets and andrei sakharov and others who are jewish refuseniks who were not allowed to to emigrate from the soviet union, they would have been known. they would have been the best marginal, if simply unknown, without without what they call foreign voices. and by foreign voices, they mean people away. bbc, rfe, rl, radio france, i mean, is more than than just just voa, but they were an important part of the dramatic that took place politically and during the cold war in terms of today's broadcasts, yes, there's always p

and the testimony on is that even president yeltsin, boris yeltsin said, you know, or gorbachev's said this was gorbachev came to our 50th, 40th, 40th anniversary of radio liberty in moscow and said, you know, without without radio liberty, there would have never been any change in the soviet union. so we have testimonials. now, granted, that's post facto after the events, very hard to measure during the dissident movement, which was very important in the soviet, which helped bring about the end of communist rule. i'm thinking in particular, figures like alexander social neets and andrei sakharov and others who are jewish refuseniks who were not allowed to to emigrate from the soviet union, they would have been known. they would have been the best marginal, if simply unknown, without without what they call foreign voices. and by foreign voices, they mean people away. bbc, rfe, rl, radio france, i mean, is more than than just just voa, but they were an important part of the dramatic that took place politically and during the cold war in terms of today's broadcasts, yes, there's always p