and through yermak. i am sure that of these 10 no one can inform yermak's deputies there, report to zelenskyi without yarmak's permission and without yarmak's presence. you look. well, look at the timeline of the footage, yermak is just from behind , take any photo, the plot is television, whether it is to the front , or anywhere, this stooped big figure is definitely looming from behind, and this, well, this is strange, this is this a painful, painful construction of power, because there is a concentration at the level of rights there and it is possible. president and in parallel it is really a shadowy concentration of power with zermak, further you journalists are so persistent, they analyze personnel appointments, and no matter where you go, you will see that somewhere there the paths of life intersected with yermak, and bread positions are occupied by people who fall into this orbit, you know, journalists like to paint people like her horoscopes, but like cards. there once upon a time, during kuchma’

yulia navalna is on the cover, andriy yermak is inside this rating, the publication calls yermak a personyed a central role in ensuring the work of the ukrainian government after the start of a large-scale war, after a full-scale invasion, he conveyed zelenskyi's message to the world, creating a strong network of friends of ukraine from... west to of the global south, uniting them around issues ranging from sanctions to the environment, the publication notes. katerina, a lot is said about yermak, about how and in what status he generally manages the state and about his powers, about his omnipotence and about how he is one of the leaders of the state, despite the fact that he did not run an election campaign, for him no one voted, but well... it so happened that he manages the office of the president of ukraine and is one of the central figures, and now in general, i think that volodymyr zelenskyi should stress, because he is in the rating. according to the magazine, the most influential world leaders are not there, but yermak is, what does this mean? and yermak is there, and here you can

compromised , which means what they say about yermak, that yermak controls zelensky, yermak controlsliament and the government, yermak controls the judicial system there through tatarov, that all these... rumors are greatly exaggerated, and now he controls the army, if you can see from his photo that he did not control the poor, but now he controls the army, i would say which is not quite the case, because once the fronde appeared in the parliament, it means that it does not control everything, and now every vote is important, they will also vote because of the ultimatum, and the fact that they had to use the envelope method again, and as a motivator, now such method... will continue to be used, which means we have to say, yermak knows that in ukraine it has a very significant influence, but not final influence, so the only thing he added to ransmusyn is that yermak is demonized not only among the ambassadors there, yes, well, our allies, it is also demonized among civil society, it not demonized in the environment of the bodies. self-government, which means that yermak cannot create

i wouldn't ask yermak what will happen next, because yermak, he is completely attached to zelenskyi, i don't think that there can be any separate career line for yermak, separate from zelenskyi. well, by the way, you asked, you can, i ’ll say one more line, here in ukraine they say about a smart woman, a smart wife, like a father will say, this is how it will be by nature, characterizing ukrainian politics in this way, you can say that zelenskyy with... says it like yermakovsky and it will turn out, by the way, you mentioned requests in a different way, in fact , you mentioned sociology, mr. volodymyr, i opened the committee for february: yermak is trusted by 27% of ukrainians, 61% do not trust, 61%, in december there were 33 trusted, and 51% did not trust, and there is a decrease in poroshenko, yes, but it doesn't matter. don't trust the leaders, don't trust them, these are the parliamentary leaders of the opposition, you see, you say that i am not speaking in this case poroshenko's lawyer, i'll just say that when you talk about poroshenko's micromanagement, yermak is also involved

and yermak is there, and here you can joke that at least yermak is on this list, he really is an influentialerson, unlike ms. navalny, which is such a big question, by the way, about her, well, i talked to several of my journalists there, colleagues who are russian citizens, of course, work there not in russia and i respect their work, so i was wondering if they really see in yulia navalny there, well... some kind of leader and how do they see her in general, well, of course, this is not only for ukrainians, it is probably a shock, such a cover and such influence is revealed, but what about mr. yermak, well i also addressed podolyak live on the air with the fact that rfe/rl has a request at the interview with zelenskyi and yermak, and dasha zarivnaya, also during the interview, i remarked that i somehow wanted to talk with mr. yermak, in addition to... an interview with moseichuk or conversations , i don't know if it's an interview, to call it correctly, there is nothing, there are a lot of questions, and i want to return to the fact that these conversations are uncomfortable, there are also

, like the cuckoo that laid, that is, yermak in the form of an egg, which at one time got to bank streettched and threw away all the others , here it is also important to understand that the heads of the president, they are of two categories, those who believe that they simply have to ensure his work, do not get in there... in front of the public, in front of the cameras, but do so that the president has the maximum a well-thought-out policy so that he is aware of what is happening, to provide him with versatile, multi-vector access to information, and there are others who believe that they are not the first, but also not the second, so the others, they always have, and it is very interesting, for example, i had three deputies, my viktor bologa's successor, there were already 11 or more of them, but yermak also has a dozen of them there now, maybe more, and therefore, when these deputies are replaced, it means that it is definitely not zelensky's decision, because zelensky is quick, not most likely, but i know for sure that only yermamak communicates with the president, and apart from ye

that the era of zelensky is coming to an end. the era of yermak begins, although for me both yermak zelensky, well, they are political partners in this situation, they rule the state, a duo, this is a duo that rules the state, and i remember this anecdote that was constantly used during the presidency of kuchma, eh , who works for kuchma, er, under tabachnyk, he is the president of ukraine under the president or the president's administration. tabachnyk, then tabachnyk was at the top, in the first year of kuchma's presidency in 1994, demonstrated his omnipotence, as yarmak is now demonstrating. yarmak is the country's number one decision-maker in the judicial sector, in the law enforcement sector, and often in the diplomatic sector. we have more than once conducted an investigation, where we talked about disruptions of operations related to the intelligence option, with the option of work of our soldiers, back then in the ato zone, and then the oos, and i know for sure that certain decisions that would never have been made during the tenure of the previous government. but there were

volodymyr, yermak has made a torrid political career, actually. over the past 5 years, that is, fromthe president of ukraine to the chair of the head of the office of the president of ukraine, and well, actually, this is the peak now, the peak of his career, i don't know, maybe the fair will claim something more in some perspective, but what can it be a person who controls everything and possibly even president zelensky can apply, and even more so if he is among the most influential people in the world, well, look, this list is very conditional, very conditional, well there there is no sidzinpin, there is no biden, so shormak is more influential, no, well, look, come on, let’s not engage in manipulations, and primitive manipulations, the main person in ukraine, the most influential person in ukraine, is zelenskyi, he has the tools of power. and the influence on the parliament, the government, and the executive power, to a large extent, well, this is a consequence of the results of the 19th election and the one-party presidential ... majority, but now there are still war conditions, t

yermak, because in principle, the president did not transfer any powers to him, yermak will not inserttures on... in these negotiations, he does not sign as someone, there is no need to laugh, mr. danylo, he was not given authority, he was given power, and these are other things, these are other things, he does not sign anywhere, as i am yermak and the first one, that is, this is the moment that he is negotiating, he, who he is, it is not clear, he is actually on behalf of zelenskyi with giuliani. the cook could speak zelenskyi, could pokaivka zelenskyi, anyone could karlosonak come and convey some conversation, again, again, julianna is not queen’s english either, it’s just a conversation, but the fact that yermak himself has the authority, as i wrote the signature, i appointed the minister for my signature, he has no authority, and therefore we will not present anything to him later. that he signed, that your signature is under an illegal decision or some illegal device, he actually, he has enormous power, he is under his influence as a matter of fact the state is functioning, but he

yermak demonstrates.k is the number one person in the country for decision-making in the judicial sector, the sector, the law enforcement sector and often in the diplomatic sector. we have more than once conducted an investigation where we talked about disruptions in operations related to the intelligence option, with... the option of our soldiers working in the ato zone, and then the oos, and i know for sure that... decisions that would never were not made during the tenure of the previous government, but were pushed during the tenure of this government, in particular these peaceful, desires to move away from the demarcation line, when it was necessary to build factories and try to make a bridgehead, which is not what, given our efforts and help. even then, in order to build fortifications and protect not only avdiivka, but where the right sector and vovki davinchii stood strong, but also kyiv, near bucha, irpin, chornobyl station and everything else. all this was not done, and the reason why i mentioned

, uh, really, i partially agree with time, in terms of the fact that yermak really has extraordinaryowers in ukraine, extraordinary influence , he, uh, on my deep conviction governs not only the parliament, but also the government, and governs through tatarov, well, partially, let's say, not completely, some kind of power bloc, and law enforcement agencies, and has a certain influence, certain, let's not generalize there, that there is total influence, yes, the system, but, first of all, i would not exaggerate, yes, we see what the front was like in the parliament, yes, yarmak showed that he still controls the parliament by passing the law on mobilization, but... the law the emasculated was accepted, who knows whether he would have passed there in his, when there would have been and demobilization component, and there is something else, some other nuances, and more brutal options regarding the evaders, who means he would be accepted, that is, we cannot now confidently say that irmak controls everything, and i would not start saying, especially that yaermak created a network of friend

yermak, because in principle the president did not transfer any powers to him, yermak does not... signe negotiations, he does not sign like someone else, don't laugh, mr. danylo, he was not given powers, he was given power, and these are other things, these are other things, he does not sign anywhere, as i am yermak and the first one, that is, this is the moment that he is negotiating, it is not clear who he is, he is, in fact, on behalf of... pred "let's find out later that he signed, that your signature is under an illegal decision or with some kind of illegal device, he actually has enormous power, the state actually functions under his influence, but he doesn't put his signature anywhere, you don't see a problem in this, just listen to this one. mr. danyla, listen, i am saying that this is the problem, absolute irresponsibility under the crazy government, that the fair, that there is no problem here, it really is, because based on that, so, what are you arguing about, i i say that a person who has insane power, almost the power of the president, does not have the powers of the pres

yermak is the only ukrainian.as on this list, he got into the category of leaders, where he appears on the list together with the prime minister of poland donald tusk, the head of the government of italy, giorgia meloni and the president of argentina, javier millais. this category is headed by yulia navalna, the widow of the russian opposition leader oleksii navalny. yermak was nominated, or more precisely, yermak was nominated to this list by former nato secretary general anders fograsmussen. in his column, he calls the head of the president's office a person who plays a central role in security. works of the ukrainian government, although i will remind you that the ukrainian government is headed by denys shmyhal, well, at least officially. a man who played a central role in keeping the government running. after the full-scale invasion, he carried zelenskyi's message to the world, creating a strong network of friends of ukraine from the west to the global south, uniting them around issues from sanctions to the en

yermak, therefore that in principle, the president did not transfer any powers to him, yermak will notgotiations, he does not sign like someone else, don't laugh, mr. danyla, he was not given powers, he was given power, and these are other things, these are different. things, he doesn’t sign anywhere, as i yermak, vtorioi, that is, this is the moment that he is negotiating, he, who he is, it is not clear, he is, in fact, on behalf of zelenskyi, zelenskyi’s cook could talk to giuliani, zelenskyi’s maid could , anyone could, karl santakiv, come, convey some conversation, again, again, giuliani too, english, it’s just a conversation, but the fact that, and therefore the ermak himself has the authority, as i wrote the signature, i appointed the minister under my signature, he has no authority, and therefore we do not present him with anything "we will show later that he signed, that your signature is under an illegal decision or some illegal device, he actually has enormous power, he... under his influence , the state actually functions, but nowhere does he sign his hand, he does not put a

and therefore i agree with those who say, not without reason, that in fact, with these decisions, yermakke the cuckoo that laid, that is, yermak in the form of eggs, which at one time ended up on the street. hatched and all the others threw up here it is also important to understand that there are two categories of leaders of the president, those who believe that they simply have to ensure his work, not to interfere with the public and the cameras, but to ensure that the president has the most well-thought-out policy, for him to be aware of what is happening, to provide him with versatile, multi-vector access to information, and there are others who believe... that they are not the first, but not the second either, so others, they always have, and it is very interesting, for example, i had three deputies, my successor viktor bologa, there were already 11 or more of them there, but yermak also has a dozen of them there now, maybe more, and therefore, when these deputies are replaced, it means that it is definitely not zelenskyi’s decision, because zelenskyi is quick, not most likely, and

yermak, because in principle he has no powers, the president did not transmit yermak will not insertegotiations, does not sign as someone. don't laugh, mr. danyla, he was not given authority, he was given power, and these are other things, these are other things, he does not sign anywhere, how. that is not clear, he in fact, on behalf of zelenskyi , zelenskyi's cook could talk to giuliani, zelenskyi's maid could, anyone, karl santaker, could come and convey some conversation, again, again, giuliani is not the queen of england either, it's just a conversation. but the fact that yermak himself has the authority, as i wrote the signature: i appointed the minister under my signature, he does not have the authority, and therefore we will not present anything to him after he signed, that here is your signature under illegal decision or illegal device, he is actually he, he has enormous power, he is under his influence in fact. the state is functioning, but he does not put his hand painted anywhere, and this is the problem of the problem, you are only talking about this, listen, mr. danyla,

solsky on the list of servants of the people, someone appointed him in yermak's office as the futurer of agriculture, who supported him activity all these years, here are these people without even proven criminal profit. they should resign from such an appointment, then the institution of reputation will work in the country, then the government will be trusted that it can be wrong, but punishes its corrupt officials, and yes, this means that just one more got caught, the next one will take his place, and in this case, when you started your question, mr. sergey, about the fact that there may be changes in the government, in fact, this society practically does not care. you go outside and ask passers-by, well, for example, in the first 10 passers-by, what is the name of the minister of pc, well, i have almost no doubt that none of them will call you by his nickname, ask what the name of the minister of finance is, ask what is the name of, for example, the minister of energy, i think the result will be the same, why, because the state, unfortunately, in the current anti-constitutional m

has such a dream, that is, such a legalization would not be very beneficial for yermak, because thenhave to be really responsible for something, but he is not responsible for anything now, well, you haven't seen him take responsibility although he is not responsible for something, he is not responsible, there is no job description, we do not know what he can be asked for, journalists write about the fact that he is such a personnel officer who puts his friends on bread. trade winds, but it will end in nothing, so will it be good for country, whether it will change something, i don't know, because it will most likely lead to an inevitable conflict with zelensky, and again from the point of view of management, management will not improve, because i do not imagine yermak, but the head of the cabinet of ministers, collegial, who will be there to listen, where they will have some meetings there, talk about some things, listen... that is , to cooperate with the parliament, it is very difficult with the personal ones, look, but why exactly these changes took place right now in the spring ,

yermak, because in principle the president did not transfer any powers to him, yermak will not inserttures at these negotiations, no he signs like someone, don’t laugh, mr. danylo, dare, he was given power, and these are other things, these are other things, he does not sign anywhere, as i yermak, vtorioi, that is, this is the moment that he is negotiating, he , who he is, it is not clear, he is, in fact, from on behalf of zelenskyi , zelenskyi's butler , zelenskyi's maid, anyone, carlson could talk to giuliani. i appointed the minister under my signature, he has no authority, and therefore we will not show him anything after he signed, that your signature is under an illegal decision or some kind of illegal... borudka, he, in fact, he, he has enormous power, he, under his influence , the state actually functions, but nowhere does he paint his hands, he does not put, you do not see a problem in this, you are just a pro, listen, mr. danyla, look, i'm saying that's the problem, the total irresponsibility under the crazy power, that, that there's no problem here, it really is, because ba

if yermak has, i don't know, i think there are 10 or how many deputies.t means none of these deputies, i insist on this, it really does not affect anything there, he cannot go to a one -on-one meeting with the president and convey his point of view to the president, the fair stands firmly there, that is, the structure of the office, where there are a dozen or more deputies, she says that the head of this service does not delegate anything to anyone, it's just like that, it's such a labyrinth. you know, a variety of different positions, people are responsible for something, but they submit all documents and all proposals to the head of the office, and he , if he deems it necessary, can to give access to the body only in your presence, or to support this or that idea, because if you delegate, well, there must be one or two deputies, and these deputies must really work, you must meet daily, as we did with all the leaders subdivisions and discuss... the agenda, this is definitely not the case at the bank now, and that is why i share the point of view of those

my question is how effectively yermak performs all the functions that the president assigns to him in this case? well, let's start with the fact that yermak, as effectively as he governs, he did not agree that there was a real threat of a russian invasion, as far as we know, and it was ... public publications about, yes, that is, he is one of the reasons , why we were not ready for the invasion and did not listen to our international partners. next, ermamak is on his own for concentrated various appointments, and if you look at our officials, only a person with independent thinking, with respect in society, with authority, with direct access appears. zelenskyi, this person does not stay in office for long, and the most striking example is, of course, valery zaluzhnyi and his resignation. and there were media publications that when back in the 22nd year, when a full-scale invasion took place in the summer, it seems, or in the fall, zaluzhnyi received the love and support of the people, then who tipped zelensky that zaluzhnyi was a threat to political ambitions to president zelensky, it

solsky on the list of servants of the people, someone has already appointed him in yermak's cabinet ase minister and... who supported his activities all these years? these people, without even proven criminal profit from such an appointment, should resign. then the reputation institute will work in the country. then the authorities will be trusted that they may be wrong, but punish their corrupt officials. and yes, it means that just one more got caught, the next one will take its place. and in this case, when you started your question, mr. sergey, about the fact that there may be changes in the government, in fact, this society practically does not care. you go out into the street and ask passers-by, well, for example, the first ten passers-by, what is the name of the pc minister. well, i have almost no doubt that none of them will tell you his last name. ask what their name is minister of finance ask, for example, the name of the minister of energy. think that the result will be the same, why? because the state, unfortunately, in the current unconstitutional system of governance, has

hand, they see yermak's strengthening in everything, i understand, many people think that it is yermakuntry, in fact, people are knowledgeable, who know the real situation, well, read it, i i advise you to read there, not everyone likes it, simon shuster is treated differently there, yes, he mentions yermak much less than our commentators, yes. what must be understood is that the current personnel changes, in particular in the office of the president, are a reaction to the current period of war, most of the decisions, i would say, are just a statement of fact, that is, they had no influence and no, well, look, no, well, not at all, i can’t say that no one there had any influence, two deputies, well , there was purely hardware work at the prodnipro he is exactly here is what is important, he himself follows the reports of informed sources , regarding smirnov, i will tell you, i myself am surprised that he lasted so long, because he was bohdan's appointee, he was also a representative of andriy bohdan's team, he is the only one, apparently, exactly from bohdan's team, because, oh well jo

this is bad, bad news, really i partially agree with that. in terms of the fact that yermak really hasaine, extraordinary influence, he, in my deep conviction, rules not only the parliament, but also the government, and rules through tatarova, well, partially, let's say, not completely by some power bloc, and by law enforcement agencies, and it has a certain influence, certain, let's not generalize that there is total. influence and the system, but first of all, i would not exaggerate, yes, we can see what the front was like in the parliament, yes, the fair showed that it still controls the parliament by adopting the law on mobilization, but the law was adopted emasculated , who knows whether he would have passed in his, if there was also a demobilization component, and there was something else, something else, some nuances, and more... cruel options regarding the dodgers, who knows if he would have been accepted, that is, we cannot now confidently say that yermak controls everything, and i would not start saying, especially that yermak created a network of friends there, a network of

is actually the prime minister, the head of the executive power , stop, stop, stop, stop, yermak is in charge here international negotiations, in our country yermak is in charge of the humanitarian, in our country yermak is in charge of the head. military administrations, we yarmak tried to meddle in all military matters, well, i would n't even say that he encroaches on the place of the prime minister, he encroaches on the place of such a gray dictator in the ukrainian state, who controls absolutely all processes, i believe , that it is much more dangerous, because if we have people who have competencies according to their position, then he does not have any competencies, which he is engaged in, and accordingly, a person who does not for which he is not responsible, viri... you cannot summon him to the parliament according to some legal procedure and say: what is happening there, for example, i don’t know with the construction of defense lines, he will say: why am i here, and why am i, and if everything is destroyed, he will also say: what do i have to do with it, it is not my compe

, or even andriy yermak, i don’t know how it is there, but here hey, why not put dmytro kuleba among, for example, let it be dmytro kuleba, then, if there someone is influencing something, be it rustem umerov, president zelensky, or everyone in the world has understood who is the leader here, simple. in ukraine, well, objectively, whether we want it or not, objectively, just de facto the world, and the people who compiled this rating of the magazine understood that this is exactly the case, he said that he is the president's manager, but, look, mr. yevgeny, let's not have much time, but we still want to have time to discuss the so -called chinese peace plan, how he is going to help restore peace for ukraine, olaf scholz came with sijin ping... asked him to influence russia. we understand that china can influence russia, but the question is: does china want to influence russia in general, or is china not interested in this at all? first, china is one of germany's leading economic partners. and many different industries are located there to mercedes and bma, so olaf scholz flew there.

is based, what are we planning on, how many resources do we have, that is, maryana, if... you and yermak and zelensky , i didn't have any questions for you about maryana, i don't want to hear anything about her, i don't i know what she is, where she is, how she is, who she is and why she even exists in the verkhovna rada, okay, another question, well, i can come back to it later, because on the one hand, everyone loves the hard-working and everyone suspects syrsky, and with on the other hand, experts say that the tinkerer will not build. the defense system in no way, and it was necessary after, after it is worth building, we will not argue, you are right in everything, i am even, you are a guest, you are right in everything, i am wrong everywhere, there are no questions, look, it means that now there is an opportunity, you have appeared some chances, i don't know how illusory they are, not illusory, which really gave me the go-ahead. even trump, that maybe ukraine will get these 60 billion, plus maybe it will get planes in the summer. how can this change the situation on the front? ah, t

yermak and mr.ermak will determine what and how this structure will do, since today it has a huge number of informal powers that are not written down in any legal acts, but nevertheless in real politics, well, he plays an extremely important role, with to some extent, the dismissal of several advisers is probably connected with this, since the same mr. trafimov is already there, again he remained an adviser, although he was dismissed from the corresponding position there a long time ago, probably the president of the company. decided to clean a little and that's it the advisory institute as such, well, just so you know, it was not only about one or two names of the deputy heads of the president's office, but it could have been about some kind of reform, modernization, change of approaches and the like, but really, what can be done here to agree, this is not the end, i think that there are still people who, in principle, can be deprived of their positions, others will be appointed in their place, but

actually, in yermak, compared to december 23rd to february 23rd, the level of trust has decreased.be happy or sad here? so how should we perceive it? we can be sad in the sense that actually, you see, the fair has concentrated too much power in its hands. here's the problem. that is, maybe he is a good negotiator or manager, but we know that there are a lot of problems, and his deputy is tatarov, and uh, that is, a problem that has not been solved for several years, that is, this is the problem with yermak, and because the sad problem is that zelensky only trusts a small number of people around him, well he himself said that she... relies on five or six managers, well, obviously, one of them is yermak, and yermak has concentrated a lot of power, especially in the context of the recent reshuffles and reshuffles in the president's office, well he gains more and more power, and this becomes bad, yes, that's why that in fact zelenskyi has, well, i think that there is only one channel of information left, and this is always bad, and the real question here is, how was it? communicated ag

priorities, but for these people war, it or the issue of war is also a way, well, in this case, with yermak, he... tries all the time to the president the same topic , the form of the peace formula, there are these political advisers, where yermak presides over 60-70 councilors of all countries of the world, this is such an entourage, which seems to be quite solid, but we understand that this is, well, well, that it is more of a, well, if not a pr, then a symbolic way of demonstrating that great work is being done, and. .. that the result will already be determined by dozens of advisers who meet there once a year or twice a year to talk about the future of ukraine, it is decided in different offices and there is no access to certain offices of dermak, and they will not meet with him the leaders of european countries or those circles that they really solve the issue, because they know very well that the head of state in our country is still the president. recently , denys shmyhal has become quite noticeable, i somehow even forgot his name on some broadcast, because i haven't heard from him f

i.e. no no... activity, namely, that he lost his positions there, and here smirnovy dniprov are yermak's deputies, that is, as far as we understand, i don't know whether they were the shefir's people, or it was just, i don't know, rethinking the management concept itself office, so let this chief, shakespeare almost said, you know, did not have a direct influence there on the resolution of certain important issues that yermak wanted to deal with, yes, but he had access, he had. he had certain, so to speak, communication access, this is important, and he was not from yermak's team, he was from zelenskyi's team, the first team, that is, he was a person who was directly, directly close to the president, but regarding dniprov and smirnova, the situation here is more complicated, since i am not i think that they will disappear from work and vice versa, i think that they just might appear in a new one. and positions in several positions , because it is obvious that a number of heads of military civil administrations also need to be replaced, this is the first, and secondly, there is informatio

as for yermak's revenge, well, let's be honest: with yermak coming to power, actually after the oman don't know if the tail leads the dog or the dog leads the tail, remember that famous movie, but the fact that we turned into an office yermakov's republic, this is no longer a secret for anyone, and time magazine here showed us both the alpha and the omega in one person, well, yes... yermak's revenge is not only to pack up chervinsky, it also consists in discrediting him as an officer of the special services, labeling him as a traitor, and here i recall the theses of dmytro tymchuk, who, while still alive in the 19th year, said that the anti-maidan will come to power and will hang the name of kremlin agents on us maidanites and will try to discredit in just this way, well, we see a person in the analysis of absolutely difficult cases that are happening in the rear and have an absolutely demoralizing effect, including on the line defense ihor lapin, former people's deputy, former veteran, special officer, aidarevets. we're going to take a short break, then we'll have a special topic an

has such a dream, that is , such a legalization would not be very beneficial to yermak, because then he would really have something for to be responsible, he is not responsible for anything now, well, you have not seen him take responsibility for anything, he, he, he is not responsible, there is no job description for him, we do not know what he is responsible for you can ask, journalists write about the fact that he is such a personnel officer who puts... his friends on bread trade winds, but it will not end in anything, so whether it will be good for the country or whether it will change something, i do not know, well, because this will most likely lead to an inevitable conflict with zelensky, and again from the point of view of management, the management will not improve, because i do not imagine yermak, but the head of the cabinet of ministers, a collegial one, who will listen there, where they will have some meetings there, speak... some things, listen to opponents, that is, cooperate with the parliament , it's very difficult with those personalities, look, but why did these cha

formal mode for a long time. a similar situation, they talked about smirnovoy for a long time, and yermakoday is simply taxed by his people, now mudra appeared there, who is associated with the head of the nbu, and in fact he deploys his people, i would already start to worry about this in this regard if i were the president, because soon at this rate the leadership of the president's office will release the president in order to take... his positions, honestly, i'm not surprised, it's not because that today is april 1, and sometimes it turns out that in our country the position of the head of the office of the president has already become more important than that of the head of the state, and if you look at the second deputy who was appointed, she was the head of the office of the head of the office of the president of ukraine, well, that would be funny , if it wasn't so embarrassing. if we let's talk further, i don't know the situation around dniprov, but in fact this is the purge of all personnel who were not at 100. from yermak, we will see further, i think that the same, the same dir

yermak, now there are some rumors that yermak may be nominated in the parliament for the position of prime minister, that you do you think about it, is it really beneficial to yermak and zelensky? i think we are witnessing the existence of a model of government called the office-presidential republic, it did not appear today, it appeared back in 2020 during the coronavirus pandemic, and no one's parliament... no one in parliament is didn't particularly mind, and when the monomajority in the parliament began to fall apart, it immediately became noticeable, you see, denis shmegal also didn't mind that he has practically no powers, that he goes to work just to go to work, well, he really is the most the longest serving prime minister in the modern history of ukraine, it is true, but it seems to me that he is simply not taken seriously by our outsiders. partners are from abroad, so they are clearly aware of who to communicate with. sh- one more story, this is something that stefanchuk seems to mark in the chair chairman of the constitutional court, if this suddenly happened, would it sti

is in the hundreds, and what the publication writes, the publication calls yermak a person who played a central role. in ensuring the work of the ukrainian government after the start large-scale war, after a large-scale invasion, he carried zelensky's message to the world, creating a strong network of friends of ukraine from the west to the global south, dining them around issues from sanctions to the environment, the publication notes. what does it mean, mr. volodymyr, that the era of zelensky is leaving, and the era of e... which is coming? it seems to me that this trick was turned around, well, it is clearly a lobbying effort to promote yermak. and it is obvious that part of the ukrainian bureaucracy is beginning to, well, let's say this, loop. they understand hopelessness of the servant of the people party, they understand the hopelessness of zelensky himself. well, i would like to remind you that they suddenly started throwing things away here. in the media field of sociology that zelenskyi remains, well, the leader of the race for today, that he would get into the second round,

, of course , from a general political point of view, yermak is interesting, not yermak, yulia navalnaresting, and after that yulia navalna gave an interview. who reproached the ukrainian authorities for not establishing the correct contacts with the russian opposition in their opinion, that is, in principle, these narratives, which we have heard before, have not changed, even despite the fact that oleksiy navalny is no longer among us, but his death practically went unnoticed by the vast majority russians, look, yuliya navalny has already been invited to come to ukraine and express everything that she thinks right here, to answer frankly to all questions. it is not a question to once again support our armed russians, the guys who are actually fighting putinism at the front together with the ssu, because i think she is the only one now, she refused, no, she is simply ignored, she wants them to come to her there, to come to her there zelensky said, here is yulia navalnaya, there is someone over there, we respect you, please, there, well, it will not happen in any way. of course, but thi

well, this is it, if you believe the words that shmlhal says, that president zelensky says, that yermakeveryone else says, look, i want to tell you without any there complaints, but none the less, already today... battles are taking place near the eastern part of the town of chasivya, held the videivka, then if everything is so good with us, well, then i can't understand why everything is so bad with us. the second point is that there are brigades that are already rotating of course there are, well, 110 were there, for example, lying in avdiivka with no exit, no passage, no exit, for several years and... and it was torn to shreds there, then they are now on rotation, of course, and what was there to leave, you don’t remember you see, how many people were left in the units, you and i have said this many times, the staffing needs to be better, if shmyhal has people, but no weapons, then i will tell you a few units where there are no people, but there are weapons, well kalash everyone has them, the infantry lives in the trenches, we need shells, shells they are going, so there are shells,

of victoria sports, she showed it very well, that's right. that you personally don't like andrii yermakoleg tatarov, and at the same time there is such a congresswoman in american politics who criticizes yermak and tatarov. this does not make this lady your friend or ally, she does it for completely different reasons than those from which you criticize the ukrainian authorities. you, we criticize the ukrainian authorities, after all, with this in mind the interests of this state, the improvement of this state, the survival of this state. mrs. sparts is not talking about this at all, but mrs. sparts was at that time, in fact, a fairly pronounced representative of this fairly radical trumpist wing. republican party not as much as taylor green's mergery, but enough to be quite recognizable. i am surprised that those people who were actively fighting with this lady, when there was a year and a half ago, did not find the strength today, you know, not even to... admit your mistake, but just at least keep quiet, because i saw that some continued that no, spart is still good, you still need to

he writes politics referring to yermak, or rather quotes him.t putin is preparing a new wave of mobilization, we believe that the new counteroffensive operations of the russians may begin at the end of may or the beginning of june. of course, we should be ready for it. it is still critical for us additional air defense systems are needed because without them we cannot protect our own. city ​​- he said, at the same time denys shmygal in an interview with the estonian tv channel irr said that the army does not need to mobilize 500,000 people now, the mobilization in ukraine will be much milder. let's hear what shmigel said. the president and i are monitoring the situation. we changed the commander, he conducted an audit of the defense forces, rotations on the front line began. for the first time since a full-scale invasion began. we understand that not so much is needed now people, so the mobilization will be much softer. i think that during this year we will complete all the necessary tasks for the mobilization of ukrainians. we have new brigades

, but of course from a general political point of view it is interesting not yermak, yulia navalna isnteresting. and yulia navalna gave an interview after that, in which she reproached the ukrainian authorities for not establishing, in her opinion, the correct contacts with the russian opposition, that is, in principle, these narratives, which we have heard before, they are not have changed, despite the fact that oleksiy navalny is no longer among us, and his death practically went unnoticed by the vast majority of russians, you see, yulia navalny has already been invited to come to ukraine and openly express everything that she thinks right here. to answer all the difficult questions and once again support our armed russians, the guys who are actually fighting putinism at the front together with the armed forces, because the only thing is to go, i guess, she refused, no, she is simply ignored, she wants to come to her there came to visit her there, zelensky said, here is yulia navalna, there, someone we respect you, please, there, well, anyway, nothing will happen in any way, of cour

this is the congresswoman who criticizes yermak and tatarov.hat does not make this lady your friend or ally. she does it for completely different reasons than those from which you criticize the ukrainian authorities. we criticize the ukrainian authorities with the interests of this state in mind. the improvement of this state, the survival of this state, mrs. sparts is not about that at all, but mrs. sparts was still at that time actually a strong enough representative of this so-so, fairly radical trumpist wing of the republican party, not as much as margery taylor green, but enough so that it can be recognized quite well. i am surprised that those people who were actively messing with this lady, when there... a year and a half ago, did not find the strength today, you know, not even to admit their mistake, but just keep silent, because i saw that some continued that no, sparts is still well done, you still have to listen to it, it still carries weight, once again the simple takeaway from this whole story is that not everyone who criticizes th

zelensky is leaving, and the era of yermak is coming? it seems to me that this trick was turned, well, this is clearly a lobbying effort to promote the fair itself, it is obvious that part of the ukrainian bureaucracy begins to, well , let's put it this way, loop, they understand the futility of the servant of the people party, they understand the futility of themselves. i would like to remind you that here they suddenly started throwing sociology into the media field that zelensky remains, well, the leader of the race for today, that he would get into the second round, so this is not a problem, as a rule, a representative of the incumbent gets into the second round of the government, only he will lose in the second round, didn't the whole story with poroshenko teach someone, this is true in... the current nomination of the government there is always a nucleus, such a capital electoral nucleus, but when the society is charged for worse or another, i.e., irrational behavior, and zelenskyi proved it in essence, i.e. he led the country in t

the story of victoria sports, she is very good at it showed that you personally don't like andriy yermak or oleg tatarov, and at the same time there is such a congresswoman in american politics who criticizes yermak and tatarov. that doesn't make this lady your friend or ally, she does. for completely different reasons than those from which you criticize the ukrainian authorities. we criticize the ukrainian authorities, after all, having in mind the interests of this country, the improvement of this country, the survival of this country. mrs. sparts is not talking about this at all, but mrs. sparts was still on that time, in fact, is enough for you'. representative of this fairly radical trumpist wing of the republican party, not as much as margery taylor greene, but enough to be able to recognize it quite well, it amazes me that the people who have been active with this lady when there.. . a year and a half ago, did not find the strength today, you know, not even to admit your mistake, but just keep silent, because i saw that some continued that no, sparts is still good, you still need

, is terribly lobbying him, cyprus and yermak, they are some friends there, they have all known eacher for a long time, all this is one, so to speak, one society or community. and here is the goalkeeper, he just has a lot of skeletons in the closet, well, there could be more, but he has already had a classified declaration for three years, since they decided that his declaration should be classified, so we do not know , what and how is happening in kipera, so to speak in odessa, but instead we know that his family lives in austria, where, by the way, he already went during his tour, because he, like us... is the type to go to christmas or new year's eve, ugh, and he was gone for a long time, ugh , there was a christmas vacation, and he spent it in cyprus, then he told you when the vacation was, i have a vacation now, i have a vacation today, i really have a vacation, but this whole week is my vacation, well, i, for example , i don't think that i i i let's say so, they said, i don't see a vacation this year for myself, like last year, i i don't understand how he can leave. a journalis