, and before the yermakovsky era, it ended a long time ago, and that is why i agree with those who saythout reason, that in fact, with these decisions, yermak, like the cuckoo that laid, that is, yermak in the form of an egg, which in due time fell to the bank street, hatched and called everyone else, here it is also important to understand that... that the heads of the president, they are of two categories there, those who believe that they simply have to ensure his work, do not get in front of the public, in front of the cameras , and to do so that the president is as good as possible a well-thought-out policy to keep him abreast of what is happening, to provide him with multi-faceted, multi-vector access to information, and there are others who believe that they are not the first, but not the second, so those others, they always have... well, and it is very interesting , for example, i had three deputies, my successor viktor bologa already had 11 or more of them, but yermak also has a dozen of them, maybe more, and therefore, when these deputies are replaced, this means that this is

so the mother will be, thus characterizing ukrainian politics, you can say, as zelensky says, so yermakovskyill turn out, by the way, you mentioned the truth, you mentioned sociology, sir volodymyr, i opened the polls in february, 27% of ukrainians trust yermak , 61% do not trust, 61% in... there were 33 trusted, and 51% did not trust, and poroshenko, there is a decrease, yes, but poroshenko is bigger, the leaders mistrust, leaders of mistrust, these are the parliamentary leaders of the opposition, well, you see, you say that, in this case, i am not acting as poroshenko's lawyer, i will simply say that when you talk about poroshenko's micromanagement, yermak is also engaged in this micromanagement, not zelenskyi. because when he starts acting as foreign minister and going to those meetings is different here, look, i agree with you, he is busy. there was a separation of functions, so we had poroshenko as the minister of foreign affairs, unfortunately, klimkin revealed himself to me after he ceased to be a minister, yermak left behind, we have 20 seconds on the air, we have relations with the

well, we know that who is really, and in ukraine you can say, as zelensky says, so according to yermakovsky will work, although, although, this may be a false statement here, because the vote for the law on mobilization. showed that yermak is greatly overestimated, well, his capabilities as a gray cardinal, yes, because... the law was adopted for a long time, and some norms were thrown out of it, yes, about demobilization, about banning evaders from using bank cards, which means yermak compromised , which means what they say about yermak, that yermak controls zelensky, yermak controls the parliament and the government, yermak controls the judicial system there through tatarov, that all these... rumors are greatly exaggerated, and now he controls the army, if you can see from his photo that he did not control the poor, but now he controls the army, i would say which is not quite the case, because once the fronde appeared in the parliament, it means that it does not control everything, and now every vote is important, they will also vote because of the ultimatum, and the fact that they had to

characterizing ukrainian politics in this way, you can say that zelenskyy with... says it like yermakovskynd it will turn out, by the way, you mentioned requests in a different way, in fact , you mentioned sociology, mr. volodymyr, i opened the committee for february: yermak is trusted by 27% of ukrainians, 61% do not trust, 61%, in december there were 33 trusted, and 51% did not trust, and there is a decrease in poroshenko, yes, but it doesn't matter. don't trust the leaders, don't trust them, these are the parliamentary leaders of the opposition, you see, you say that i am not speaking in this case poroshenko's lawyer, i'll just say that when you talk about poroshenko's micromanagement, yermak is also involved in micromanagement, not zelensky, because when he starts acting as the minister of foreign affairs and goes to those meetings that are more frequent, look. i agree with you, he is busy, but there was a separation of functions, so we had poroshenko as the minister of foreign affairs, unfortunately, klimkin revealed himself to me after he ceased to be a minister, yermakt left specifi