>>host: let us talk about the benefits, it has a sleek yesteryear look it is a retro feel.it looks likene from 160 years ago but now the new modern capabilities. it is so easy, look how gorgeous bodice >>guest: and has the filigree pattern from the original from center.you have the wings in talk that is from the original, it is exciting to yesterday'sd a new configuration that still has a nostalgic feel. there are 24 built- in patterned you will notice lcd screen because it is all electronic now. is easy access simple to maneuver and operate.i want to show a extension table is different from others and are lined up it is its own flat bed and then watch this is the largest accessories george tray that we offer and any of center machines you have all of this space to keep your presser feasted. -- feet in. the entire table, it comes off with a free arm and an extension table, and then you have of course the accessory storage eye chair showed you. on >>host: it is a nice blige table you have that gentle and a friend, your fabric will movethe sewing machines of yesteryear did not have the ab

. >>> if you're watching us on news 4 woai in san antonio, texas, delve in the toy box of yesteryear at timeless texas toys at institute of texan cultures, that is the "early today" event of the day. >>> bill, thanks so much. >>> an early look at headlines in entertainment. jessica simpson baby watch is over. whoo. the 31-year-old singer gave birth to 9 pound, 13 ounce baby daughter named maxwell drew johnson tuesday according to pure publicist. big baby. maxwell is the first child for simpson and her 32 fiance, eric johnson. >> maybe last after one that big. >> ashton kutcher signed a deal to remain on two and a half men. >>> ri-that is set to play a villain in the fast and the furious. >> louis ck has snagged person of the year which honors the best of the web for comedy special he distributed on his own website for $5. >>> finally, 19-year-old miley cyrus is being considered for a judging spot on the x factor, the former hannah montana joins avril lavigne and britney speakers. >>> this comes to us from kxas in dallas, a nearby south grand prairie, one teen's hobby put him on fast

that sounds very yesteryear, i must say. we'll have other panelists in this room about russia, but i don't think anybody is going to buy on to that proposition. as for china, we all know that china is an easy target in some ways. but we've already mentioned the people who are, you know -- the wise heads of the republican party. and i can assure you, all you have to do is read henry kissing kissinger's latest book on china. and candidate romney is going to get a lot of advice between now and when he gets anywhere near the convention, not to mention the white house, to go easy on china bashing. and that's not what's going to win the election. it's the economy. >> do you want to pick up on this? >> well, i think just -- there are a lot of things that homi said i agree with about the nature of the challenge that we face. and i started off at the point that our economy is much more dependent on the global economy than would be true in the past and the kind of collective action challenge that homi talked about is real. where i dif

that sound very yesteryear, i will say. we will have other panelists in the room about russia. i don't think anybody is going to lie under that proposition. and as for choiina. we all know china is an easy target in some ways. but we have mentioned the people who are -- you know, the wise heads of the republican party. and i can assure you -- all you have to do is read henry kissing kissinger's latist boest book. candidate romney is going to get a lot of advice to go easy on china bashing. the one reason i am puzzled by it, that's not what is going to win an election. it is the economy. >> bruce, did you want to pick up on this? >> i think just -- there are a lot of things that he said that i agree with about nate chthe nf the challenge. our economy is much more depend en ent on the global economy. i look back at successive administrations. a clear pattern, republicans run as if american power, unfettered, is going to be wait you run the world. they enter office. try it out. it fails. they work in the mainstream. democrats run against that experience, say they're going to work

congresswoman, we're not just talking about romney of yesteryear but what he is promoting for president snp. >> yes, like ryan, they all favor helping the 1%, and i any what about the other 99%. what about the middle class. if you look at hedge fund managers and executives, they pay 15%. it would be great if all of the executives including governor romney would pay the same thing as my neighbors pay. that isn't happening. so they sheltered income in a thousand ways, and they made huge amounts of fortune off of raiding companying, and they're not playing by the same rules. so they're protecting the super class that has done so much to damage this economy. >> let me get this right, in your district, the ticket is willard romney and joe the plumber. >> that is correct. >> and mr. plumber, or joe the plumber, how i should refer to him, is supported willard and the ryan plan i assume. >> he sure is. i can't understand, joe, that's not his name and he's not a plumber. i don't know why he would be supporting those policies. he should be fighting for the middle class, not the super rich. >> gov

up being, they are dilutional if france thinks they can continue to be great and live afternoon yesteryear. it is pain will. we will see how much pain americans can take. >>neil: charles is charged. you see how angry he gets when they forget to put ketchup in the bags. germany is not here to finance french election promises great the german parliament leader. >> a rocky day with markets iraqis to the election of a socialist, the new president in france, the defeat of the market friendly center right sarkozy on the antiausterity and pro growth has economists worried and the pledge to renegotiate the e.u. debt pact but marks ended and germ any came back and the euro regained ground, as well, and i'm told folks factored in the hollande win and while they have not factored in all the possibility policy changes that he could put if place, they are thinking, or they are hoping he will be hermanned -- hemmed in y the union and in the socialist party he has been a pragmatic, so, maybe, what he said on the campaign trail is not necessarily what he will do in office. but what has more people spooked

yesteryear's goddess would be going to wait watchers today. when she got dressed she was supposed to have an 18 inch waist. -- fashion was insane. besides sex new york city offered gambling. yorker's played illegal bets at places called pool halls which were billiards. and hitting over a bar or a hotel. there were hundreds of these and resources came in by telegraph ticker. london, hotel on the outside, to the clubhouse turn, they are breathing it of of the ticker. gambling was much more posh. chandeliers, ivory chips. the key point of all that i have shown you up to this point is illegal gambling and illegal prostitution did not exist in new york city without the book the other way of the new york city police department. is simply not possible. i am not saying every police officer was corrupt but there was an attitude that it was ok to take some bribes and overlook vice. most new yorkers wanted vice. a veteran detective summed it up. there are cops who have never taken a dollar. at least i heard about them. but i never saw one. however they e

that sounds very yesteryear i must say. we will have other panels talk about russia but i don't think anyone will buy on to that proposition and as for china, we all know that china is an easy target in some ways, but we have already mentioned people -- the wise heads of the republican party. i can assure you just read henry kissinger's latest book on china and candidate mitt romney will get a lot of advice between now and when it gets anywhere near the convention not to mention the white house to go easy on china. one reason i am puzzled by it is that will not win an election. it is the economy. >> you want to pick up on this? >> there are a lot of things about the nature of the challenge that we face. i start with the point that the economy is more dependent on the global economy than in the past and the collective action challenge homi talked about is real. i differ when i look at successful administrations. the republicans run as if american power unfettered from multilateral institutions is the way to run the world. th

away from site but i worry about the high expectations set up, because i also as we all remember, yesteryear's stars, the pets.com, and all these high flying companies in the moment and the moment was gone. how do you tell people, look at this, what is meat and what's sizzle. >>guest: well, a tough question. remember what happened in 1999 and 2000, we had the dot.com burst. we lost $7 trillion of wealth back in 1999 and 2000 when people were buying amazon for, at one point the capitalization was greater than the value of every book ever printed since the printing press was invented so you get this euphoria but people are saying, what do i want to invest in? general motors? or a company like google and apple and face book that look like the future. >>neil: but general motors they make stuff. >>guest: they making something. >> and we talk about the great tech bubble crash, facebook will become the face of the stock market tomorrow. for a lot of people who have not played the market in a long time. i am worried about that. i want all americans to be in the market, and if this is what they hang th

>> listening to those two clips, you remind me of yesteryear when i found someone i disdained more thanmney and miss name is mccain. >> how do you -- go ahead. >> i love this argument. i have fundamental disagreements with a decent person. the other side of the argument, we're all called racists, mysogynists, traitors, we get called every name in the book. but he says he's a decent guy i have some fundamental disagreements with. that whole -- the clims you just played are a great example of why republicans lose all the time. all the time. >> you have to help me out. i can't see in your head righ now and i don't know what you're talking about. you're telling me that it was not a stand-up way to handle this when senator mccain, this woman said that then candidate obama was arab. he is not. and calling her out on that left you with a bad taste in your mouth for john mccain? >> it is not that part. it is what he said next. i have to apologize for disagreeing with the american left. i'm sorry. and if i say really nice things about them, maybe like the other guy here, michael from the new yor

yesteryear's does is going to let watchers today. the crazy thing is, which she got dressed she was supposed to have an 18 is waste. newt 32h. neither city offered gambling. new yorkers played at places cold pool halls. easily under a bar or motel. on the outside. the gating test. they're just reading it. gambling, much more posh. chandeliers. the key point of all that i've shown you up to this point is that illegal gambling and illegal prostitution could not exist in new york city with up to look the other way of the new york city police department. it is simply not possible. now, i'm not saying that every police officer was corrupt, but there was an attitude back then that it was to take some bribes and to overlook vice since most new yorkers wanted it. a veteran detective some debt. of course there are cops have never taken a dollar. at least heard about them, but i never saw one. i give him credit for being so good. so cops took bribes. bribe to let the overnight bargain parking. you cannot leave your wagon on the street at night

that sounds very yesteryear. we will bother to check panels about russia but i don't anybody will latch on to that proposition. as for china, we all know that china is an easy target in some ways but we have already mentioned the people, the wise heads of the republican party, and i can assure you that you could read and a kissinger's latest book on china and candidate romney will get a lot of advice between now and the vietnam were merely conventional the white house to go easy on china. that is not was going to win an election, it is the economy. >> do you want to pick up on this? >> they're a lot things i agree with this for the nature of the challenge. our economy is more dependent in the global economy and the collective action challenge that himey talked about was real. where i differ, democrats or run against republicans and said they will work with in the mainstream and i try that and it fails and they proceed with unilateral. the biggest success present obama has the unilateral killing of a terrorist. th

sub-prime is a division of yesteryear. wall street is not dancing to the song anymore.t is something that ended for aig back in 2006, 2007. caller: yes. i was curious why aig can carry losses forward and it was illegal for agriculture and businesses for a long time now. guest: the treasury says it is in the benefit of the taxpayer. the treasury is not there to try to game this thing. if allowing them to carry over losses which they accumulated over years, we will let them do that. that will be at cross purposes with the taxpayer. they are doing this with the other bailout recipients/wards of the state. that is a huge controversy. elizabeth warren is running in massachusetts and that amounts to a bailout. the stock price goes up and the insiders benefit from that. you are depriving the public coffers of billions in tax revenue in a time when we are running huge deficits. treasury pushes back. their interest is not to interpret legal provisions but to return this company back to private hands. host: how do the stock owners view the health of aig? guest: it is kind of bifu

today's competitive digital marketplace, as the white repelled long sideburns and disco music are of yesteryear not only must we stay energized and unified from swallowing the highly successful, nongovernmental, private sector multistakeholder model for internet governance, but we must find allies through out the world, especially in the developing world throughout this letter. thank you for having us here today and i look forward to your questions. >> thank you very much, commissioner. i will start with questions followed by senator hutchinson, senator kerry and senator demand. i appreciate the fcc's commitment to expanding the recent broadband across the country. i have said that. i also share your passion for making sure that broadband is a widely deployed and adopted in rural communities. we want to make sure that they study the efforts considering broadband through the beat-up program. we want to better focus resources on those endeavors that have proved to be effective. so i appreciate the fcc's recent efforts on promoting digital literacy, such efforts should not under any circumstances

but let me speak for a moment about those thrilling days of yesteryear as they used to say on the old radio serial, going back to 2001 if you can stick with me for a minute, that was the last time the united states of america had a balanced budget. who was president at the time? it was president clinton, left that budget for president bush. and that represented i think two or three successive years of balanced budgets. so i said to my staff take a look at the last time our budget was in balance and take a look at today and compare spending and revenue between those two periods of time. i think the senator from north dakota told me once something like 19.6% of g.d.p. in that year of balance was being spent, 19.6% was being raised in revenue, and there was the balance. now we have drifted to the point where i think that spending is around 24%, is that close? and that the actual revenue is down to 14%, the 10% delta equals the deficit. but in specifics what's happened in that period of time -- and this thanks to senator inouye, chairman of the appropriations committee, is a chart which k

that sounds very yesteryear. we will bother to check panels about russia but i don't anybody will latch on to that proposition. as for china, we all know that china is an easy target in some ways but we have already mentioned the people, the wise heads of the republican party, and i can assure you that you could read and a kissinger's latest book on china and candidate romney will get a lot of advice between now and the vietnam were merely conventional the white house to go easy on china. that is not was going to win an election, it is the economy. >> do you want to pick up on this? they're a lot things i agree with this for the nature of the challenge. our economy is more dependent in the global economy and the collective action challenge that himey talked about was real. democrats or run against republicans and said they will work with in the mainstream and i try that and it fails and they proceed with unilateral. the biggest success present obama has the unilateral killing of a terrorist. the bush at maturity