wildcats from yesteryear, differing classes coming together to celebratç their team making it to thefour. they tell me friends and family have been calling asking if they can visit. not a bad reunion in the lone star state. >> when you go to a reunion at villanova, you get to focus on people your year but here you'll get to see everybody. >> you'll be going to reunions for the rest of your life and talking about this weekend. >> reporter: these alumni are pulling for villanova, of course. here in houston, you have a lot of oklahoma fans. the last time these two teams met a few months ago, it did not go well for the wildcats. they lost by 23 points. i spoke to a houston area alumnus who was there in 1985 for the national championship. he's hoping for a repeat show this time around. we'll hear from him coming up at 6:15. live in houston with the wildcats, matt delucia, nbc 10 news. >>> who can forget the upset of georgetown in 1985. >>> tonight, "villanova: march to victory," we've expanded it to an hour tonight. we'll highlight the players to watch, take a look at the host city of hou

. >>> and to a throwback now to yesteryear for britain's royal coup.am and kate wrapping up their tour of india with a trip to taj mahal. here in the some exact place. thanks so much for watching. "good morning america" and "this week" in the morning. i'll see you right back here tomorrow night. have a good evening. good night. >> i'm karen rogers. >> and i'm erin o'hearn. >> tonight on fyi philly. >> the nfl is gearing up for football, baseball season is under way. nice, all the way down. >> it's time for some spring conditioning. >> a smoothie for you. >> we meet a local family in the business of healthy living for three generations. >> that's so good! >> ride the wave of new vegan eating options. >> learn how to detox your life! >> look look! >> and visit a cafÉ for cats! >> hi everyone and welcome to fyi philly. >> when it comes to dining trends, eating vegan is definitely in vogue. >> that's right, there is a crop of meat free restaurants that have been popping up all over >> so melissa takes us on a tasting tour of some of the options. >> and she

it appears it's not just in the west, thinking about the seasons, talking about the seasons of yesteryear because now it is fire season all year long. with that, mr. president, i yield the floor. my colleague is here so i'll yield the floor. mr. merkley: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from oregon. mr. merkley: mr. president, i ask unanimous consent that my intern jonathan lynn have privileges to the floor for the balance of the day. the presiding officer: without objection, so ordered. mr. merkley: thank you, mr. president. the most important words in the crafting of our constitution are the first three words: we the people. with those three words the founders describe what the government of our new nation was all about. as president lincoln later summarized, a government of the people, by the people and for the people. in fact, even in just the crafting of the constitution, the founders put special emphasis upon those three words, putting them in supersized font before all the details that were to follow. so periodically i come to the floor to talk about issues that re

to truly understand it events of yesteryear, likewise one to look .hrough those blinders i'm an agreeable guy, but what gets against me is what people say, generally had not done that at gettysburg, things would have been different. if lee had had 150 years to think about it differently, he would have done something different. that is grossly unfair to lee and others to assume that you know better than they did. understand how the south could take on this. the power concentrated in washington was solution or a it came from time and circumstance in the civil war was the big hop for the federal government. had you lived in 1860, the federal government would have directed your life one way. it delivered your mail. that is the only contact you had with the federal government. you paid taxes. you settled your disputes in state and local courts. we had no familiar flag. the average american had never seen the american flag. we had no national motto. anthem heardional there was nothing nationalistic about this country at all, especially the 16,000 men in the united states army. nationalization s

mark: the exit polls from yesteryears --from yesterday's and here's a primary shows 68% of new yorkers said that if no republican candidate gets to 1237 before the convention, the nomination should go to those with the most primary votes. probably methodically certainly donald trump. even if the party thinks there is a better candidate out there. that is precious ammunition for the trump campaign, which is been trying to convince delegates that they deserve to win, even if falling short of that magic 1237 threshold. mark, there are obviously arguments, but are any of those arguments powerful enough to trump the trump argument? mark: very hard to trump the trump argument, especially if he wins the popular vote. the strongest is that this is a popular organization. as what kasich and cruz are are going, based on electability. that trump cannot win a general. that has to be there strongest argument. in july to election will be insight. that is the best i think they will have. and wehe reality is, have various people hurling trump -- people heralding trump's rise -- the bottom line is that

i think the president has decided to fight a whole lot of battles of yesteryear and opened wounds thatady healing and it backfired miserably. >> absolutely. there is no question without a doubt in the black community. i'm not speaking for all blacks. there is a lot of chatter within the black community that have been completely dismaid and let down by the first ever sitting black president, you would think he would have been a unifier. donald trump is coming at it from a different approach. as long as we are focused on the color of our skin and not the contents of our character, then we'll consistently have a divided nation. donald trump comes on the scene where he is saying, and this is write interpreted, there are no black people doesn't mean there are no black people obviously i'm black, there are no white people, there are no hispanic people. hard in, i'm not focus -- in other word i'm not focusing on the colors that divide us but focus on the colors that unite us. charles: why do you specifically think donald trump will be able to do that with the mainstream media and black leader

. >> jim is a baseball announcer, a golden-throated guy from yesteryear. i don't know why they all talk like this, but they do -- (laughter) and they always have to call you by your full name, stephen colbert... >> stephen: you did you did a skit about him calling a game after his wife was found having sex with another man on their kitchen floor. >> that was not funny, but this is a little funny, this is a man who would prepare for a broadcast by having two shots of rye whiskey, and that die after seeing that, he had about 19 saying whatever occurred to him. his home run call became, hit to right center field, i can't see the ball. it's either out of here or lost inside my wife's big fat cheatin' (bleep)! (laughter) >> stephen: yeah. o your mother didn't want you to do this for a living, i don't know why! >> mom had a problem with that one. >> stephen: hank, thank you so much for being here. >> my pleasure. >> stephen: do you have anything big coming up this spring? you're doing something at tufts university. >> i'm commentsment speaker. that was my alma m

she should remind the present day black leaders there, it was the black leaders of yesteryear that wantedlent crime prevention act. >> so bill clinton says, well, maybe i should have listened more instead of snapping at these young people with black lives matter. telling them he was stopping crime in the black community. it was necessary at the time. they're trying to change the narrative. when you hear these caustic comments, so broad and so grotesque. to make that kind of assumption and to say that so she knows and will sit there and castigate all white people and what they have in their hearts and what they're thinking and feeling. it is offensive. why would you want someone that would make that kind of statement. assuming bias and racism on your part. to represent you. >> i think i'm hearing something different. i didn't think she was speaking f all white people. >> the line that she said. we need to recognize our white privilege. >> exactly what she was saying. i agree. she doesn't speak for me. she shouldn't speak for all white people. that was pandering at its finest. right to the

i submit to the consideration of the vast bloomberg tv audience the paradigm of yesteryear in which thehe bank were -- equity holders of the bank were responsible for this. for at a capital call bank, your bank became impaired, resolve it. they came to you for additional .apital no more. taxpayers get the capital call in the extreme case. there is only one financial institution in new york city modeled on the old way, and it was conspicuously not insolvent in 2008, and that was brown brothers. worth -- ire net dan, if youpect of were here, he would say, that is a quickly what he would say. exactly what he would say. even if he does go along, equity holders would pay the bill rather than taxpayers. that is what he would say. >> that is the intent, but command and control hold true with banks with a mechanism of responsibility instead of individuals. over the course of decades we have moved away from individual responsibility finance and the partnership model to the model of state control. bigwe have six or eight banks that are increasingly features of the state. they are still too big a

caught up with a few of the folks who were here last night over at a local restaurant, wildcats from yesteryearlasses, all coming together to celebrate their team making it to the final four. they tell me friends and family have been calling, asking if they can visit. quite a few alums have made the trip out here. not a bad reunion. >> how exciting is this? >> it's pretty cool. it's pretty cool. when i thought about, this is my fourth villanova final four, it's mind boggling. >> it's the final four. can't miss this. >> can't miss this. this is the team hotel here in houston. they've got the banners. they're pretty much running this place for the next couple of days at least. they hit the hard wood at the stadium for the first time. that will be coming up with open practice at noon today. a lot of the fans will be able to get to see them play, especially the folks who live in houston and haven't been able to see this team play all year. they will get the chance. what an opportunity. live in houston, matt delucia, nbc 10 news. >> it is exciting, matt, thanks. keith jones and john clark are also i

yesteryear,eroes of 125,000 employees, $150 billion market cap. facebook, 12,000 employees.ciety? tom: that is the question i was going to. michael but lucien wrote an essay years ago, where it is winner take all. we do that and also to regulated business. we do that in industry. we did that with the chinese trying to buy a hotel company recently. are we at the point where we will begin to regulate your tech world? scott: i personally think it is going to go the other way. it is hard to regulate these things. by the way, the most rheumatic example, $60 million -- the most , $60 millionple for uber? 4000 people, investors? we are headed to a recognition that we cannot re-create jobs as fast as we are storing them, and we will end up with a negative income tax. francine: we do have regulators. we have antitrust regulators. they have been active and aggressive here in europe. even google today, once again being accused of wielding too much power over its smartphone. this goes to the core of their business model. it is that business model that is under threat. scott: aggressive?

today's rules come from yesteryear, from the last century, they're stuck in an era of fax machines and vcrs that predate the technology boom that has transformed the way in which america's live and work. my proposal says our business tax rules that should a 21st century economy and help part cutting edge entrepreneurs thrive, not hold them back. it makes no sense to cling to an outdated system that taxes some high-tech investments such as computer servers in mr i machines that are more than double the rate of other investments. a startup should not be told that they are not allowed to use a work laptop and a coffee shop or otherwise they're going to face a big financial hits on their taxes. in my view the tax code should not get in the way of public, private partnerships that want to build new roads, bridges and highways across the country. so my proposal would fix these issues with new rules grounded in common sense and a realistic appreciation of how our businesses, particularly the small businesses operate today. it is my hope that we will be able to look at these proposals and more

are they not the forgotten high-tech companies of yesteryear, so to speak?orgotten about them. >> yes, we have, they're depending on their legacy business, they're trying to move into data, cloud and security. they're not getting a lot of traction. stuart: they don't move. they don't move and they're reliant on using their balance sheets to buy back stocks. they need to transition into the spaces. stuart: i remember ibm in the '80s, '90s, not so much the early part of the century, way back when ibm was the king of the hill. >> it's a blue stock dynamic when we hahad the dot-com crash before it makes everything seem so weak. people can still look at the great entities if they canan adapt. like facebook is adapting. can they adapt to the ne world. >> they have a terrible revevene problem and keep declining and declining on revenues. forgotten tech? i like that heaeadline. shall we say-- making the running, amazon, apple, netflix. they're up today. amazon is close to 600 bucks again and apple 110 and ned fliks, 1104, 105. govevernor will soon owe more money tha

today's rules come from yesteryear, from the last century.re stuck in an era of fax machines and vcrs that predates the technology boom that has transformed the way in which americans live and work. my proposal sis our business tax rules should reflect a 21st century economy, and help our cutting-edge entrepreneurs thrive, not hold them back. it makes no sentence to cling to an outdated sism that taxes high-tech investments such as computer services and mri machines at more than did double the rate of our investments. a start-up shouldn't be told that they're not allowed to use a work laptop in a coffee shop or otherwise they're going to face a big financial hit on their taxes. in my view, the tax code shouldn't get in the way of public/private partnerships that want to build new roads, bridges and highways across the country. nigh proposals would fix these issues with new rules grounded in common sense and realistic appreciation of how or businesses, particularly the small businesses operate today. it's my hope we're going to be able to look