yezizadeh. yes, mr. daravi, see what they are discussing. firstly, regarding the balance of our trade balance . . if the exchange rate is to be determined in a market where the supply of foreign currency and the demand for imports are the source of this supply , it can be whatever it wants to be, the government is the government itself , it is also the largest importer, from its oil income , it imports 10 billion dollars, 12 billion basic goods , and 15 billion imports. you can't come tell me, sir, i consider imports, but they don't consider exports, so we have free trade, even if we didn't have it, even if we didn't have it. in the world, the countries whose trade balance becomes negative do not necessarily devalue the currency with the same policies as you said, it is not for countries like us, it is for all countries, the multi-rate system is implemented with different definitions, they manage the imports that demand they should reduce the import and in fact they can keep the price of land and yet you say that we have a deficit because of

yezizadeh i will use it for a minute. what result do i want? as a result, most of our currency changes go back to our trading account, not our capital account . you see, holding bills is the outflow of capital. it is possible to theoretically say that the same import and export time. most of the transactions are done in the current account, with a very high probability, and usually the exchange rate is from the fundamentals of the economy. mr. yazidzadeh, mr. daravi, there are several reasons for rejecting your order, one of which is the number of trade deficit we talked about the events related to import restrictions, such as household appliances, car imports, the queue that exists for the allocation of width, etc., and finally the rate increase that exists. i think it is in economic books, in the book of fortune, and something called the assumption of stability. we don't have other conditions, and this is a union. well, if it is a union, it is worse than the one that assumes the stability of other conditions, see if the same union that you ha

yezizadeh . no , you can't sell oil, oil is a source of supply it does not matter who owns the supply, if the supply rate is to be determined in a market where the supply of currency and the supply demand for imports is the origin of the supply, it can be whatever it wants to be, the government is the most important importer of its oil revenue, 10 billion dollars, 12 billion basic goods are imported. does in the world , the countries whose trade balance becomes negative do not necessarily devalue the currency with policies like you said , it is not for countries like us, it is for all countries, the multi-rate system is implemented with different definitions. they manage the import to reduce the import demand and so on the truth is that they can keep the price of land and pay attention to the other issue that you mentioned, which is to justify the excuse that we did not get past this trade balance deficit. how do you analyze this number of 27 billion and you say that this debate is about the hist