. - okay if y-- it sms that- - yohave to ve a rin yoneed a rg wh you getarried. - he h a ring.he hasit is gnifican it the thoht behin- see, ring isust a-- piece ofaterialthat oneaid you ve to ha. - 's a syml. - d it's aymbol. why woulanybody nt toet marri in thei60s? - cause, nber one,e-- u asked that qution i am getng marri in my 6. - s, i--wh-- well, nuer onewe wanto make re th both ofs are--that wtever i ve-- beuse we'vbeen togher r so lon- whever i he will gto him d whatev he has es to me - thatas to ha a grear impacton theelationsp. - wellsure. - yoknow? - sure, solutely it's--it what haens ter that it's h much yore gonnaut in making work. - but--b your retionshipis no re of a cmitted rationshi thanines. - it'srue. you know - yes, aolutely.you kn, it's t same thg. anthat's wn goingback tyour orinal queson abouyou and anton stl, you ow beg as onepartners and ry and ieing spoes. [sighs]- i kn it goesack to mand garybut that-- - , i'm no- i'm no.. - i ow. - sighg becausit's u and ga t it's t same arment. need to ink abou wherdo i wanto go? and howill i g there? mm. [cting pap] - thi

when you stand in front of 100,000 yohav your head, you're like am i a sitting duck? have to really consider the fact there are crazy people and we live in a world where gun violence is an atrocious prevalence. yes. sometimes we have to think about those things, but i'm never going to let those people control me because if i am too afraid to come out and live my authentic live and do the service that i'm called to, then they've already won. >> reporter: sister roma saying it's a service. her art is a service. you will see sister roma featured heavily in pride festivities throughout the month. you were out there with your camera phones on social media. it's our joy to see you post what you think about this day and this month. #kpi x. we'll be back from harvey milk plaza live after this break. >>> welcome back, your community station live from the castro. down here on the ground it's a celebration, but also in the sky as we look at this huge pride flag. it will be replaced with a new one in the coming days and hours. this shot definitely reminds us of the fact there's s

yohave stopped a civil war. >> the reality was rather different.oldiers who had been jeered on the streets of rostov had only stopped their rebellion after the kremlin did a deal with them promising not to press charges against tm and their leader, yevgeny prigozhin. kremlin spin is presented as as a client for the president. >> to be neat by mercenaries was a major challenge, to vladimir putin's authority but the uprising is over and now the kremlin is trying to change the optics to reframe what happened as a victory for the president and for russia. >> where is yevgeny prigozhin? under his deal with the kremlin, he agreed to leave russia for belarus. today, the leader of belarus said he is here in exile. could he still be a threat to the kremlin? not if vladimir putin can help it. he is suggesting that russian investigators might probe the wagner's finances. a less than subtle hint to the chief not to make trouble. this has put him under huge pressure, now, president putin is determined to show he is in control. >> l us take a look at the view fr

i think if yowi call it aiding or abetting or soliciting yohave to write in specific inntdon't you? >> i would not dispute t premise. we are not asking you to rewri that. >> that is an intent quement, correct? >> correct. >> here, the defendant asked for an intent statute. >> not quite. thentt requirement required for aingnd abetting, the one we except here ishe one the court referred to in rosemont, the intent of facilitating making the offense succeed. >> with aiding and abetting you have to intend to make the offense succeed. i am wondering what you are making succeed. meaning, nothing -- you have not prov that these aliens were ing to leave anyway. >> ihink we have your testimony where two citizens said their visas were expiring and they would have left but mr. hansen said you can stay because i will make you a citizen. >> right. but you would have to write in an intent. we have to take the words and define the words encourage or inducing to mean aiding or abti or soliciting. what we do withur point where we said, if we are going to define a statute, we should not define it to p

yohave almost a textbook case here. thetatute is basically the same form for 70 years. >> how is that argumen how is it different? sometimes the government comes in and sayesntially, do not worry. we wil never apply the statute tse circumstances. we always say back, it is nice to stand there and s that but we are not taking your ward. how is this different from that? in a couple ways. one, to the extent we are seeing at here, mostly what we are saying, i guess, fightingou premises a little, we are asking you to writent the statute, into your decisi tt the statute has theims we say it has in weights we will not be able to get around in e future. you might think we are phing here and it it does not fully solve the problem. i guess i would say then we are in this special world of overbreadth, a deptu from usual standards. you are not just askingist constitutional as applied in a rtular case where you sometimes say we are not willing to take the governmt's word for it. you are saying, will we ts extraordinary thing and depa