they've now given their reports to the "new york times," mr. corallo is not disputing the reports. and now we have, after he said it alarmed him, we know he quit. we didn't have an explanation at the time why he was quitting, this now gives us the explanation. so we have the reporting, the witnesses coming forward and going on the record and he's attesting to the truth of what they're saying, that's a lot of weight. that's not he said, she said, that's he said and these folks can back it up. >> it's a gigantic development in the obstruction of justice investigation. i try to find an adjective that will get this to land because we get so many bombshells and explosive developments this one is more of an important development of what we already knew about the president being on the phone trying to come up with lies to tell the "new york times" because as everyone pointed out, that was just lying to the "new york times." that wasn't lying in any legal procedure. and it's left a sort of mystery of why is the special prosecutor so interested in hope hicks and these air force one phone cal

and then you went to the new york times in 2015, and now to the newshour. and you knew you wanted to be a journalist the whole time? - i knew i wanted to be a writer since i was probably three. - [evan] why? - it just naturally came to me. - not the family business. - it's not the family business. my mom has a phd in french literature and social work and is a social worker in miami, school social worker. my dad runs a large non-profit in haiti for disabled people, he's blind. so that's his life's work is helping blind people in haiti. and i just popped out in the world and was a writer. and my first memorable thing that i wrote was an angry essay about george washington carver, because i'm allergic to peanuts. and i remember laying out how he was not actually great for society, and that he had made my life so much harder. and that was in third grade, and i remember thinking, i really like doing this. - and from there to here. it's great to meet you. any time i think about the future of journalism and i meet somebody like you who is younger but also seems old

we'll be joined by one of the reporters who broke the story for the "new york times" tonight. the times is reporting what mark corallo is planning to tell the special prosecutor when he's interviewed. he was special counsel for the trump team before he resigned in july, shortly before the incident that's described in the "new york times" tonight. mr. corallo intends to tell the special prosecutor about a conference call that has not previously been reported. we've known about a conference call from air force one involving the president and hope hicks in which the president was directing the false answers that should be given to the "new york times" for what became the first report of the meeting at trump tower in the middle of the presidential campaign with a group of russians, that meeting was attended by donald trump jr., paul manafort, and jared kushner. tonight "new york times" is reporting on another conference call about the evidence that could reveal that the trump tower meeting was really about getting dirt on hillary clinton. the "new york times" obtained the e-mails t

i think he knows i worked for the new york times. host: the failing new york times.g: the failing new york times, exactly. hurts, "the new york times" is the greatest news organization in the world. we do not put out fake news. that gets under my skin when i hear it. i think a lot of journalists feel that way. host: have you ever had a conversation with him? doug: for the white house news photographers contest, we were invited to the oval office to have our picture taken with him. there was a brief handshake. that was the first time i had ever shaken his hand. i think it was the first time i realized he knew who i was. he said something to the other photographers like, oh, he is really good. watch out for him. i realized he knew who i was and who i worked for. it is definitely different, he is not a politician. every time you are in the oval office, when he is around members of congress, to have a cabinet room photo op about immigration and be in their for about 55 minutes. we were flies on the wall negotiating the immigration bill. it was fascinating. it was unprece

the failing new york times is doing great! (audience laughs) i'll tell you that. our readership is up 400,000 paid subscribers this year alone. - right. - stock prices up, i think 50%, something like that. the washington bureau where i work, the staff has gone up from around 70 people last year to 107, something like that, right now alone - [both men] just in the washington bureau alone. - it's a good time for us. - right, well then, that is real news, not fake news. i love that, okay. peter baker, thank you for being here, good to see you, great, thank you. (audience applauds) - [man] we'd love to have you join us in the studio. visit our website at klru.org/overheard to find invitations to interviews, q and as with our audience and guests, and an archive of past episodes. - we've hired two fact checkers in the washington bureau of the new york times this year. one, he does nothing basically but fact check the president of the united states. and the other one, by the way, is now fact checking us, because we are now absolutely determined to make sure we make as fe

regnery publishes the, 27 weeks on "the news york times" bestsellers list. it was not flags of our mothers. publishers turned it down and published at 44 weeks on the "new york times" bestsellers list. the way things are going in the trumpcare there's a hysteria and i'm not sure if you were still reading but it's everyday a facebook page that they think russia was behind. if you've visited america in 2016 you would notice the major cities. you couldn't drive a mile without seeing it six-foot tall trump signed but i'm sure it's on the facebook page. in any event they have a couple more hysterical than i've ever seen. i think the errors that i've written about and i think this is worse than even that. we could be right back to regnery being the only source. the only way for conservatives to communicate with one another. [laughter] so remember there is a reason it's called -- he was called henry regnery the most dangerous man in america. here's to regnery. [applause] regnery publishing recently celebrated her 78th anniversary. booktv be visited their offices in

since then this residence has been home to a succession of new york times bureau chiefs this is from a video tour of the home shop by former bureau chief jody roux doron and this piece of furniture was here when we when we go i think it's been here since tom friedman pretty much journalist and author i'll expose the story of how the new york times took over a house from which palestinians were forcibly expelled and the fact that the new york times is occupying the property through which that can be firmly was forcibly extract old during the night by like so many other palestinians is some symbolic because the new york times is reporting. this. any. kind of justified cover up israel's expulsion of dispossession of palestinians and here the new york times goes beyond simply. the complicity of its reporting to becoming really actual participant in this now. so unfortunately no one was home to answer my question but i was hoping to get to talk to the current residents here about the former residents of this home the palestinians who can no longer return for the subject of countless new y

with brian williams starts now. >>> the breaks news we're covering tonight comes from "the new york times legal team thinks about their client sitting down for an interview with mueller. the times reporter on the story joins us live. >>> also as trump spoke about the economy today and declared america open for business, the cable networks cut away to cover the largest single point drop in the history of the market. and the president says the democrats who sat silently and didn't applaud his speech are un-american and suggest they might be guilty of treason. all of it as "the 11th hour" gets under way on a monday night. >>> good evening once again. as we start a new week from nbc news headquarters in new york, day 382 of the trump administration, a day when the stock market took a massive and

they've now given their reports to the "new york times," mr. corallo is not disputing the reports. and now we have, after he said it alarmed him, we know he quit. we didn't have an explanation at the time why he was quitting, this now gives us the explanation. so we have the reporting, the witnesses coming forward and going on the record and he's attesting to the truth of what they're saying, that's a lot of weight. that's not he said, she said, that's he said and these folks can back it up. >> it's a gigantic development in the obstruction of justice investigation. i try to find an adjective that will get this to land because we get so many bombshells and

. >> tonight the "new york times" is reporting that donald trump's lawyers also believe that he will definitely commit a crime if he speaks to the special prosecutor's investigators. his lawyers are concerned that the president who has a history of making false statements and contradicting himself could be charged with lying to investigators. that is why the lead of the "new york times" breaking story tonight is lawyers for president trump have advised him against sitting down for a wide-ranging interview with the special counsel, robert mueller iii, according to four people briefed on the matter, raising the specter of a month's long court battle over whether the president must answer questions under oath. the times reports indicate that some of the trump lawyers believe that, quote, mr. mueller lacks the legal standing to question mr. trump about some of the matters he is investigating, like the president's role in providing a misleading response last summer to a "new york times" story about a meeting mr. trump's son, donald trump jr., had with russians offering dirt on hillary cli

it's on the record, in new york publisher would publish it, gregory publishes, 27 weeks on the new york times best seller list. 27 new york publishers turned it down, published it 44 weeks on new york times best seller's list. the way things are going now in the trump era, the hysteria, i don't know if any of you are reading the treason times but it's every day about somehow facebook page that they think russia went behind who they have thrown the whole election. [laughter] >> if you visited america in 2016 you would notice outside of major cities you couldn't drive a mile without seeing a trump sign, but i'm sure that that was facebook page. at any event, they have become more hysterical than i've ever seen and lived through mccarthy era and nixon but i have written about them but it's even worse than that. if they do get control of the internet, we can get back to gregory being the only source, the only way for conservatives to communicate with one another. [laughter] >> so today on their mailing list and remember there's a reason, the most dangerous man in america. here is to regnery. [che

drugs and some of the most vocal critics of the memo have been the washington post and the new york times that currently the subject of a new film busses american explains journalistic values can change over time. the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster as risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war that ran counter to much of the optimistic talk that it permeated official statements for years now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trying to talk on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one thing that both of these

"new york times" bestseller? >> s., frankly was. most people, the average reader who is not sort of following the controversy day-to-day didn't know that "the new york times" bestseller list was no longer quite in sync with the actual best-selling book in the country. people inside the industry brinkley complained about it for a long time and have known this is an issue. certainly conservatives have talked about this for years, feeling that they have been treated unfairly. but the average reader would see "new york times" best seller and to them that meant national bestseller. that is really the reason we use that for so many years. certainly, plenty of our books have gotten onto "the new york times" best seller. money of our books have been number one on "the new york times" bestseller list. it was a certain degree of trepidation that we made that decision to say no, despite the fact that it's frankly a powerful marketing tool in some cases, we just didn't feel that we could in good conscience use that anymore if we didn't believe

there and some of the most vocal critics of the memo have been the washington post and the new york times that journalism has become the subject of a new film but it's on to use american explains journalistic values can change over time. the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster less risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war that ran counter to much of the optimistic talk that it permeated official statements preview now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trump attacks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one t

you and i also want to recognize john garten, a longtime reporter for "the new york times", a two-time polk winner and we are very proud that he serves as our curator for the polk award. now over the decades, the polk awards have represented an unbroken chain of the best journalists, including bob woodward carl bernstein, walter cronkite, edward murrow, peter jennings kaunda norman mailer, seymour hersh, glenn greenwald in today's honorees. most importantly, the polk awards symbolize their commitment to the american promise of a free press and awareness a moment to celebrate the incredible in per journalist that pursuit truth at all costs. it's an interesting dichotomy between information truth was mark funds in social media, we have never had more access to information in your truth is more elusive than ever. the polk awards honor truth. our judges painstakingly review 485 submissions this year. many stories have shown their potential to be life-changing and even world changing and each was told because a journalist unraveled a web of thought to tell the truth to read it, absorb it. w

you, it -- and john was a long-term reporter for the new york times. winner, two-time polk and we are proudly serves as our curator for the polk awards. the polk awards have written -- have represented an unbroken chain of the best journalists including bob woodward, walter cronkite, edward r. murrow, christiana amanpour, norman mailer, diane sawyer, seymour hersh, don george and, glenn greenwald, and today's honorees. most importantly the pull awards symbolize our commitment to the american promise of a free press and award us a moment to celebrate the incredible and brave journalists that pursue truth at all costs. there is an interesting dichotomy between information and truth with social media. we have never had more access to more information and yet the truth is more elusive than ever. the polk awards honor truth. our judges painstakingly reviewed 485 submissions this year. many of those stories have shown their potential to be life-changing and even world changing, and each was told because a journalist unraveled a web, sought to tell the truth a

there and some of the most vocal critics of the member have been the washington post and the new york times they're currently the subject of a new film but as a nice american explains journalistic values can change over time the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster as risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war that recount due to much of the optimistic talk that permeated official statements for years now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trump attacks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one thing that both of

when publish 44 weeks on the "new york times" bestseller list to the way things are going now in the trunk area the hysteria, i don't know if any of you are still reading the times, but it's every day about somehow some sad little facebook page that they think russia swung the whole election and if you visited america in 2016 you would notice outside of the major cities you could not drive a mile without seeing a 6-foot tall trump sign, but i'm sure that little facebook page-- in any event they have become more hysterical than i have seen and i've lived through the mccarthy era, nixon era and i've written about them and i think it's worse than even that and if they get control of the internet, we could be right now back to regnery publishing being the only way for conservative to communicate with one another, so stay on their mailing lists and remember there is a reason he is the most dangerous man in america. >> regnery publishing recently celebrated their 17th-- the 70th anniversary and we visited their office to talk to many people responsible for bringing their books to publicati

there and some of the most vocal critics of the memo have been the washington post and the new york times they're currently the subject of a new film but a similar call it explains journalistic values can change over time the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster less risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war that recount due to much of the optimistic talk that permeated officials to. now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect were bottle to trump attacks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one thing that both of these areas

the new york times who exposed the pentagon papers back in the seventy's were also against it so the cia and f.b.i. went from bad guys hiding their secrets from the public to a pillar of society standing strong against the evil trump the irony today among many ironies is how the mainstream media forgotten their own history the new york times the washington post today when it comes to us songe and others call him the worst threat to our republic is that we've ever seen but just years ago decades ago the same behavior. now lauded in the movies seem to herald this particular type of behavior though i show you again the unmitigated unbelievable hypocrisy that astounds me daily so there you have it the same outlet that has democracy dies in the dark as its slogan would prefer its secret intelligence actions never see the light of day samir khan r.t. washington d.c. . now the news a human rights watch report has exposed how drugs are being misused in us nursing homes victims' relatives say strong psychotic medicines are used to control residents with dementia the rights group has released

and poster as risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war had recounted to much of the optimistic talk that permeated official statements for years now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trump attacks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one thing that both of these areas have in common that really attracted me also to tell this story is two presidents. declaring war on the news media i really feel that we shall overcome what all of us have been so subjected to over the past sixty much while spielberg's political message is pretty difficult to miss even in the trailer you publish will be the supreme court next. we don't. we. why don't you going to do this is ok and what are those two newspapers up to these days well they're not exactly true to the idea of exposi

and i have one the reporters from "the new york times" just a reminer to the viewers, "the new york times" reporting tonight and in the discussions about this famous trump tower meeting in 2016 during the campaign that hope hiks, communications adviser to the president at the time made a comment that don trump junior's emails wouldn't come out. mark, you reported this story and tell us the significance of this. >> i think it's significant when corallo testifies to mueller this is a conversation he had with hope hicks. how he interpreted her statement. he believes she was perhaps trying to bury some of the e-mails or ensure they didn't come out. this would be maybe his word against hers. this is a senior member of the legal team who is going to testify to the mueller investigation that he was concerned about how in whole 24 hours went down. this is the day after the statement had been put out, the misleading statement aboard air force 1 describing the trump tower meeting in a certain way. he know that the meeting happened in a very different manner. >> no question. as you refer to, there,

there well some of the most vocal critics of the might have been the washington post and the new york times the journalism is currently the subject of a new film called explains the journalistic values and change over time. the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster as risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war recount due to much of the optimistic talk that permeated officials to. now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trump attacks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the contention one thing that both of these areas have in common th

"new york times" up 48%. amazon better by 65%. howie, good luck. >> thank you very much. an argument they're make money at a time when the president is constantly attacking fake news. liz: exactly. that's our point. he's the unlikely white knight for the newspaper industry. see you next time. good luck with the book. >> thank you. liz: apple, you should look at this. up 1% when. apple is up 1%, it has outsized effect on the major indices, shareholders gave tim cook and company a big thumbs-up. a big approval rating during today's shareholder meeting at apple's brand new headquarters after voting to approve all the board members. is trouble still on the horizon? there are discount deals for the iphone x. this just came out, the first buy one get one free deal of the iphone x arrived. at&t is offering it, and does this mean for the future of iphone sales? bring in longtime apple analyst dan ives, covering apple before the first iphone was invented. two for one, that looks like a bargain bin situation on the iphone x. am i miss interpreting that? >> if you look at iphone x,

for people who don't understand what it means to be blocked by the new york times.we are talking about 1971. to had gotten these papers "the new york times" and wanted the stories published, but explain what happened next. gar: the nixon administration went to court and stopped the new york times from publishing. that was a major infringement of the constitutional right of the free press, but nonetheless there was a stop. then the question was, it was stopped, how could you bring the story to the american public? decisions clandestine in which decision-makers in the government knew that they were doing something that was a most impossible in many peoples lives would be lost and there was great deception to the public. that is what the pentagon papers show. if it went on to put other papers, which had not yet been stopped, because they had done nothing yet, could they publish the papers? the next one was "the washington post." we got the papers to "the washington post" and they published and then they were stopped and we tried to keep that process going as long as we

the new yorks: times is a major global news brand. making the transition away from a printed newspaper to a digital is this. looking at the breadth of those you represent, will we see a consolidation continue at pace? where they have limited local news? i think there are several challenges david chavern: -- david chavern: i think there are several challenges. where people attach their attention is limited. that being said, the real fear, we talk about fake news as a aboutal story, we talk various issues on a national scale. the future of fake news will be a local phenomenon. withill have people curiosity and interest in their community and there will be insufficient reliable sources locally. crazyill fill that is bloggers and conspiracy theorists who have ideas of what is happening in the local counsel or's school board. -- or school board. when looking to the future, one of the challenges is as we move into digital consumption of news to a greater degree, do the local news organizations have the resources to build and optimize and co

york media. so it's a ticking time bomb.from the trump white house perspective, we're talking about stormy again, why? because of your ace lawyer. >> if the president wasn't defending men who are accused of beating up their wives, right now we're being investigated for the russia probe, this story would be all over the news, it wouldn't be brought back and you wouldn't be one of the very few people actually covering it. this is a huge story, and it gives us an opportunity to repeat the timeline here and express the timeline of stormy daniels. she came forward to the press exactly one week after the "access hollywood" piece came out. and when she was paid one month before the election, she stopped talking about media outlets. at best this is an affair, but at the least, we don't know what she knows. >> jim has covered this story and we're about to look at some of your interview footage. we continue to cover stormy daniels story on the beat because this is a huge story. it's a big story, it has a lot of big implications. jim,

i am not here to be challenged by a known, proven by "the new york times" and "the new yorker" by theirive journalists on the planet and you can say it before or after this thing, but i don't need to hear it. thank you, because i know what he did and we all do, okay? all of us women and victims, specifically and there are a lot of us, a lot more than people would think. >> all right. so he is obviously denying it. so i want to hear from you, your voice in response to this latest denial by him and his team. >> they can fall off the planet. i don't care what they say. they don't exist in my reality. they are complete, corrupt losers. this is a warning. do not do it. do not come at me. do not come at us because yes, you are powerful innen and using traditional methods of shame and you have hacked me, you have talked on me, you've spied on me, you've stolen 125 pages of my book after sexually assaulting me? no. absolutely not. i won't have it and they should know that they are going to be nt your book and your message to warn other people, not just in hollywood, but in all these different p

and some of the most vocal critics of the memo have been the washington post and the new york times that journalism is currently the subject of a new film but as the mirror con explains journalistic values can change over time the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster as risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war that recount due to much of the optimistic talk to me that official state. now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trump attacks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one thing that both of these areas h