and new york times list are. mass market series and that's they're they are designed to be instant you know dave pilkey dominate is has the first five i think in in epw week after week after week because people love his captain underpants and dog man and you know it an indication of success and it is an indication of sales. but since that's a kind of book that i do i not it's not that's not the way i'm going to get those big sales i am not generally going to get a bestseller you know, on a front list book unless it wins a big award. and so children's publishing, it's you does this book have a war potential and that to that that have been bestseller lists for me and i've been publishing since 2020 are you know everything sad is untrue by daniel nayeri. um, which one the prince medal and uh, the, the last 20 star by done about but he garo won the newbery so these are these are things that propel quality literary children's at least it. i think you know i think if this panel were to if this was ten years ago 20 year

i never followed up haley the story to new york times. why? and so mike schmidt, the new york times called me, i happened to be in my attorney's office when he called. and my attorney said, look, you haven't done anything wrong, just be honest with the new york times and tell them what happened. so i told them what happened. and apparently they had gotten the same story from another 4 or 5 people. and they published it, and then that was the end of it. i can't help but wonder though uh, what happened after this. i mean, did you sense that this was gonna come back at some point or did it just kinda die out? rick? i thought that it was done, in fact, i, i so put it out of my head that i haven't even told anybody about it since then. and then this last, it was filed at the beginning of the week and the whole story. i don't want men who by the way, is his secretary, who was also saying that he was doing very offensive things that he was drunk half the time. again, these are allegations that he sexually acted inappropriately with her. that's right

what the "new york times" wrote about. said justice thomas's use of the courtroom for the association while hardly unprecedented is quite rare. i mean, that has all the hallmarks of lazy journalism. you try to have it both ways, secondly, who else did it, what did they do and how many times, they don't mention any of that, just put out it's hardly unprecedented, it's very rare. >> well, the piece is really indicative of with the coverage he has faced since he first put -- first put on the court. the media has followed him bumper to bumper since he got on the court. they read every move he makes, sinister or wrong, and then give wide berth to any liberal justices and it's real extraordinary when you read these two columns. you get the impression justice jackson could have read from the boston telephone book and they would have called it a bold new voice. it gets to the point come on, you have to have some semblance of neutrality in this, and it's missing in the coverage. >> john: what the "new york times" did say, they did

was the new york times right? how frequently do we check in with these kids who enter without their parents? director marcos: thank you for that question. i would like to set the record straight. we did not lose anybody. we provide safety and well-being calls between 30 and 37 days after release. orr app up custodial authority ends when they are discharged. we have a number of things in place where we try to maintain contact. chairman grothman: if we had 1000 people six months after they were released, how many of those 1000 people do we know where they are? director marcos: orr does not monitor or track the whereabouts of children after they are released from our care, however, we are very committed to continuing to provide support. post-release services is our best option to provide continual care for them. chairman grothman: is the $85,000 number right? director marcos: we do not track or monitor. chairman grothman: the answer is no. is that right? apparently it is. director marcos: orr works within the statute

"new york times," i think what's interesting about the language in "the new york times," that's what surprised me the most. they said basically they talk about, you know, corrosive politics. money. that's the root of all of this. let's talk about the corrosive politics side of this, ok. they know that hunter is a liability. and you talk about addiction. he's admitted that he wrote a book about it. we know that. we also know that when he says that this little girl was conceived and the paternity shows that, he didn't remember anything because he was on drugs. fair enough. but on the political side, what they realize now is between the sweetheart deal that he got from the d.o.j. on tax fraud which nobody else, by the way, if it was any regular america facing those federal tax charges would have gotten off the way that he did with a slap on the wrist and he avoided gun charges. really? are you kidding? so that's one political issue and the other is the little girl's mother. she's the daughter of a gun owner, excuse me, a gun maker. that's politically very bad if you're on the democrats

beneficial for the russians, yes, it is beneficial for russia, finally, why does it work in the new york timesand from the usa and here the press headquarters to dry the press is located in new york and that is this this is generally agencies yes i it started from afar. and who are constantly trying to play the balance of the parties, that is, to make reports even from occupied cities, for example, ukrainian ones. how do the residents of kherson oblast feel about the voting there ? which are just hmm spread through the press and through routers - these are the materials of the chinese state a-a agency and in which if you read them well, they are very not pro-ukrainian, to put it mildly, they spread, and well, ukrainians, of course, do not use them or can use videos there. of course, do not use the text, but they spread to neutral countries, this is latin america - this is the whole of southeast asia - this is, well, in general, a country for which it is unnatural to constantly be interested in what is happening in ukraine, and this is a country that... e form their point of view from these age

did you look into the new york times, the whistleblower's listed in the new york times? did you look into any of those cases they were terminated after raising issues? >> congressman, that article just came out. we have a team looking into it. >> brian miller was the recent case. the first new york times article, which is more than one month old now, that's the one i mention. >> i would not necessarily know about these cases. >> did you bother to look into what i'm -- it's not like you didn't. let me ask you this question. matt haygood, director of services for refugees and migrants. one of the largest organizations in the mail for the trafficking concerns. having talked about trafficking, he said there is no follow-up there. are you working to make corrections when you get tipped off that there are people trafficking these children? >> absolutely. when a concern is raised to our office we are following up on it. i can't speak to what happened before i came, and i can't speak to join the border back up. but i can tell you is that today's o.r.r., we are hearing and we are

new york times prosecutor sought records on drug business deals. people familiar with the matter. new york times investigation of trump document case continues after his indictment? who says, according to people familiar with the matter. washington post dust hundred justice department, who says? people familiar with the matter. who do these leaks help? do they help donald trump? do they help a single witness? it is the federal government. the biden department of justice. the democratic party's department of justice. interfering in the election and trying to do many other things. i asked my brothers and sisters, i said go back about six months and pull out all the leaks from the new york times and washington post and cnn involving donald trump. here it is. look at this. you see this, these are the leaks from grand juries to witnesses to monologue go to the nature of the classified documents leak after leak after leak and i limited it to cnn, the new york times and the washington post. look at this. don't jerk around the former department of justice.

it's very expensive to do that, isn't the new york times, and we put it in or why the new york times actually? i mean it's a, i'll give a change. it's policy or the tory leo since you know, because it suddenly started to at least it was one all fed. uh that seemed to show some descent from the ruling class line. why did you choose the new york times? well, one reason i chose it, i recommended it, not that my view was paramount. it is because it was the war monger with regard to the rapport which was a disaster is still a disaster. and we saw the new york times, again being a war longer advocating in all manner of uh, what you might call american war, hungering period, london, berlin, everyone's war mongering all the time. and so that's the best place to put it in the mouthpiece of the war. and so that's why we put it there, at least that's why i wanted this one key feature then that it being the threat of a new to us strikes. i mean, i'm not going to accuse you here, but you know, that kind of, um, so might say faith join list, have bbc, cnn, the usual suspect that the 10 that, that

i think the resident in the new york times? i think the president role. _ in the new york times?k times? i think the president role, especially this - in the new york times? i think the | president role, especially this week was to— president role, especially this week was to reaffirm our alliance and progress — was to reaffirm our alliance and progress in friendship with israel. yotr've _ progress in friendship with israel. you've seen the president back off a little bit _ you've seen the president back off a little bit of— you've seen the president back off a little bit of what he said about netanyahu and some of the democratic house _ netanyahu and some of the democratic house members who made pretty strong statements— house members who made pretty strong statements this week and try to walk back a _ statements this week and try to walk back a hit— statements this week and try to walk back a bit of their comments. i think— back a bit of their comments. i think with _ back a bit of their comments. i think with the president of israel said in— think with the president of israel

why did you choose the new york times? the one reason i chose it, i recommended it, not that my view was paramount. it is because it was the war monger with regard to the rapport which was a disaster is still a disaster. and we saw the new york times, again being a war longer advocating in all manner of uh, what you might call american war, hungering period, london, berlin, everyone's war mongering all the time. and so that's the best place to put it in the mouthpiece of the war. and so that's why we put it there, at least that's why i wanted this one key feature that being the threat of a new to us strikes. i mean, i'm not going to accuse you here, but you know, that kind of, um, so might say faith join list, have bbc, cnn, the usual suspects that 10, that, that war and iraq, that low enough kind of sounds, serial libya they, they probably say, you know, what you're doing in that letter, it's caving in to put in new feedback. now, not at all. as a matter of fact, i have been assured in the last month by some of the highes

it's very expensive to do that, isn't the new york times. and we put it in or why the new york times actually, i mean it's a, i'll give a change. it's policy at the tory leo since, you know, because it suddenly started to, at least that was one all bad. that seemed to show some descent from the ruling class line. why did you choose the new york times? well, one reason i chose it, i recommended it. not that my view was paramount. it is because it was the war monger with regard to the rapport which was a disaster is still a disaster. and we saw the new york times, again being a war longer advocating and all manner of what you might call american war, hungering, period, london, berlin, everyone's war mongering all the time. and so that's the best place to put it in the mouthpiece of the war. and so that's why we put it there, at least that's why i wanted this one key feature then that it being the threat of a new to us strikes. i mean, i'm not going to accuse you here, but you know, the kind of, um, so might say faith, dreamless of bbc, cnn. th

host: our guest is luke broadwater who covers congress for the new york times.welcome your calls and comments. (202)-748-8000 for democrats. (202)-748-8001 for republicans. for independents and others, (202)-748-8002. you can send us a text if you like, that's at (202)-748-8003. a comment from -- he says that hunter's former business partner will testify under oath. hunter got his vice president dad on the phone 24 times to talk business. guest: my understanding is that the oversight committee has been working for weeks to try and schedule this business partner to come in. i'm not sure if that is happening today or not. some who talked over the weekend said he is trying to postpone again. i'm not sure where that stands. i did hear some rumblings that might be postponed. he has delayed that interview several times. the oversight committee is >> we are breaking away to keep our commitment to live coverage. the house is about to gavel in for a brief session this morning. no votes are scheduled today. to act as speaker pro tempore on this day. signed, kevin mccarthy

the new york times tries to veto your afternoon ma heat 0.rinking in the summertime as well as the wintertime springtime and fall time. but according to the new york times there's never been a robust clinical trial evaluating its health effects, of day drinking. so they got right to work doing what they do best, bumming the [bleep] out of all of us. but they didn't even think to go to trouble of offering any new insights instead they just slapped together some obvious observations like did you know drinking while the sun is out make you more likely to be dehydrated. and here's the kicker it's worse in the summer. >> what? >> greg: i know. seriously drinking alcohol under the hot sun can make you light-headed and woozy, but, i mean, my dad told me that when i was seven. yeah we liked to party. they also warn the earlier someone starts the sooner the hangover begins. so that's how time works. of course the best way to prevent hangovers is never to drink. or, and here's my secret, never stop. but, look, if i wanted to be alert and clear headed i

i'm able to afford the subscription to the new york times. my university provides the wall street journal for free. you know, it's it's different, you know, and i also kind of have a sense because of that, my cultural capital of places, i can get fairly even and high quality information about what's going on my country. yeah. and so that's what's so i think with limited i want to challenge you a little bit on that. so if i if if, if i decided i was going to have all money in the world and i could buy anything and i bought all these folks subscriptions to the new york times, the wall street journal, financial times. let's you know, let's go with the you know, the economists, you know, all of the the kind of outlets that we read kind of on a regular basis for additional analysis, what they read, you know, heidi, it's a great question, but as i say to my own children, why don't we try you know, i mean and i don't mean that to patronize any way at all. that's that probably landed incorrectly. what i mean is we don't know. and that's the problem.

"new york times" reads no spark lers for folks, whether crowds, politics or loss of patriotism, conflictedelebrating 4th of july. new york women's political qualm told outlet last summer roe v. wade was overturned and that made me less inclined to celebrate and says that even if she wanted to celebrate, she would worry about the message it sent. times cites arkansas woman who took issue with fireworks, it is hard to tell the difference in guns and fire 2k4r9works. it makes me nervous. they are bad for the environment, they release toxic chemicals. that woman posted this on tiktok. take a look. >> 4th of july is coming up, i would like to remind everyone, it is okay to not celebrate or take advantage of the festivities and celebrate something else. i will probably go to a barbecue, those tend to be host by a black family. celebrate the fact we are still here despite america trying to get rid of it when they were trying to gain their independence. >> "new york times" elevated that woman, it is not a controversial holiday, that is untrue. there are two points here, joe, one is the nature of t

>> from "the new york times." >> i reade. the article. don't know for was an investigative report but it was an article that have a lot of information and that you helped understand the way orr operates and there's information there. >> my time has expired but i just want to say when it comes to trafficking and abuse of immigrant children it has more than doubled from 21 to 22 and really at the end of the day as hhs secretary the buck stops with you. i can hope and i can and i can press other members from both sides of the aisle. this is something that needs to be totally removed from taking place in ourpl country. really i think is going to hold all of those responsible. if this is not addressed. >> the gentlelady gets back today recognize the settlement from george mr. carter for five minutes of questions. >> thank you for allowing me on to the subcommittee. mr. secretary been waiting for your turn to congress. we have some unfinished business and i want to shift gears if that's okay but i appreciate my colleagues concerned about unacco

we mentioned the new york times is reporting | the new york times is reporting tonight president bidenraine, these are bombs that rake apart into smaller explosive devices. they are very controversial as you know, many us allies have signed a treaty to ban them, should the usb giving these to ukraine? , ., , ukraine? the question is, can we provide — ukraine? the question is, can we provide the _ ukraine? the question is, can we provide the ukrainians - ukraine? the question is, can| we provide the ukrainians with what they need to win this war? ukrainians need to be able to push the russians out of the country. they are using artillery at a rapid rate, they are running out of shells, ammunition for their artillery, there are more artillery shells that are both cluster munitions and others. in order to support the ukrainians as they pushed the ukrainians as they pushed the russians out, we need to provide this ammunition. but what about — provide this ammunition. but what about the _ provide this ammunition. but what about the fact as i said that other countries including allies of the

i'd heard about new york times series back in 2013. i didn't engage then. i heard about the book when it was released. and i also resisted reading it. then and then it was recommended to me probably three or four times. and so finally last summer, i relented and i decided read the book. now, the reason i rejected the book is because maybe some like you kind of tired the same approach to these stories of poverty. they tend to to be the same. they tend to have some of the same endings, same heroines or heroes, same approaches. and no one comes away with anything different. that was that was an issue for me. and one of the reasons i avoided it, but also because i myself live the childhood of of intense poverty and people tell the story. right. from my perspective i'm overly critical of of storytelling. once i read this book i have to tell. not only did you resist the trap that that trap all writers who really are trying to do a good thing, they fall into this trap of the same old thing. you found a way. give this family and their plight the and honor it deserv

it's your "new york times" reporting that i referenced a moment ago.counts somehow be squared? >> who knows? but i think one of the things that is becoming increasingly clear is merrick garland did not do a very good job of explaining the process to us when he addressed us on friday. this is a much more nuanced process than weiss having completely unlimited authority to move unilaterally. the process would entail, say he goes to d.c. and california and says to them, let's partner on prosecutions involving violations of the tax code and what we're really talking about here, according to the material that's out there, is the 2014 and 2015 tax years are the ones they are targeting. they say, nah, we don't like it, or for whatever reasons that they choose to decline to partner. he can then go appeal, essentially, to merrick garland and say i want to invoke a section of the law called the special -- not special counsel, special attorney whereby you overrule these guys and give full authority. weiss says he never ask that. garland says he never did this. par

but "the new york times," to its credit, broke with the pack by saying it confirmed independently baseda source that a second unnamed irs official claims david weiss, the u.s. attorney in delaware, asked, the oj for special powers to -- the doj for special powers to pursue the case outside the state and was turned down. whistleblower gary shapley has said he was not the sole decision maker in the case and that he was constrained in the probe. >> you convinced looking back at this now that this was an effort to protect president biden and his family? >> there were definitely hindrances that aye never seen before in my 14 years concerning this investigation that didn't allow us to follow through an investigation of any other individual to include president biden. howard: so will the rest of the media now follow up on these accusation, or will we have to wait another year before they're deemed newsworthy? i'm howard kurtz rt and this is "mediabuzz." ♪ ♪ howard: one challenge from the media is that attorney general merrick garland gnatly denies the act -- flatly denies the accusation by the

the new york times published today. ukrainian command began to strengthen the military and on the front lines, in particular , with reserves that trained in the west. well, that is, in western europe, this was not used before . new wrote about it. the york times , citing two officials from the pentagon, reinforced ukrainian groups will try to advance to the city of tokmak and, in case of success, to melitopol in the zaporizhia region, the ukrainian officials of ukrainian colleagues. in this way, the armed forces of ukraine want to break the land bridge between the territories of ukraine occupied by russia and crimea in order to at least advance to a distance or make the peninsula accessible to ukrainian artillery , according to the article of the new yorkers, the operation, in case of success, can take from one to three weeks, that is, the americans, the american press claims that the armed forces of ukraine are successfully attacking in the direction of zaporozhye , moving towards the sea of ​​azov in order to destroy

same with the new york times. and i wrote for them. did you know i dug up a piece written in the 1980's extolling what a wonderful talk show host i was in the l.a. times? it is such a dramatic takeover of liberalism by the left and the liberal just lay down and allow the left to do this. it is a tragedy. host: dan just mentioned that one of the author discussions we just heard was about book bands. and i wanted to ask you about this, this was a recent headline in the hill newspaper. nearly 1500 book bans implemented in the first half of the school year. should books be allowed to be banned from school libraries? >> books have always been banned in school libraries. it is such an odd question. of course they have. who wants unfettered access to books for eight-year-olds? it's such an odd accusation. it depends on what you're banning. if you are banning things that are appropriate for that age group, that is a problem. you know, they did not have the playboy reader available in elementary school arguments. it's a dishonest tact. thank god

according do a february, 2023, "new york times" article, rather than listening to these concerns, you were pressuring h.h.s. employees and contractors to rush more children through the system faster. according to the times you were captured on video saying to staff last summer, quote, if henry ford had seen this in his plans, he would have never become famous and rich. this is not the way you do an assembly line, end quote. is that how your administration's treating the release of unaccompanied minors, sir? like an assembly line that can't stop to make sure that these minors are being released to a safe sponsor? that's a yes or no. sec. becerra: you may not have been here earlier, i responded to that question. the information relates to the process we were talking about, not people when it comes to how we gauge in an efficient process to get children where they need. mrs. harshbarger: i ask unanimous consent to submit into the committee record this february 25, 2023, -- mr. griffith: that's already been requested. mrs. harshbarger: thank you. mr. secretary, did you tell former o.r.r.