lopez, did you understand that the email to include ivory madison advising you that your situation was serious? >> yes, she sent me this email on january 2, yes. so -- but that was not our conversation on january 1. >> i understand. >> ok. >> now, in this email, ivory madison advised you to call the police every time that -- that there was improper behavior by your husband toward you. >> if she advised me that? >> yes, how did you interpret this email? what advice did she give to you regarding calling the police in response to your husband's behavior? >> yes, i think on january 2, after she talk with so many people about this case, she change to now start to telling me, i think she start the plan to convince me to call the police in this email is the first step. >> so in this email, ivory madison is advising you to call the police in response to your husband's behavior? >> in this email, january 2, after she talk with so many people, yes. >> ok. >> that was not our conversation on january 1. >> there's no question pending. >> i was think finishing my ans. >> as of january 2, you realiz

do you understand that? >> i understand very well. i do not know if you want to allow me to respond or not. vice president marshall: no, sir. the discipline has been imposed. it will begin immediately. this matter is now concluded. >> thank you. vice president marshall: we still have to sign out. >> i know. >> just my opinion. if he is given 10 days and shows up in six days, where is the rule breaking? >> i believe that was public comment. vice president marshall: you can call the next item. >> line item 8, for adjournment. >> move to adjourn. >> second. vice president marshall: the meeting is adjourned.

do you understand that? >> i understand very well. i do not know if you want to allow me to respond or not. vice president marshall: no, sir. the discipline has been imposed. it will begin immediately. this matter is now concluded. >> thank you. vice president marshall:

meant about that when you said professional experience? did she understand, and did you make it very clear you were seeking official who legal counsel? did you say those words? >> i said its, and she responde, of course, i will help you. i have been in court so many times. i know how it works. >> i will stop you right there. it is one thing to say, i will help you. it is another thing to say, i will act as your attorney. did she ever say she would act as your lawyer? >> she said, i will take care of you. this is confidential. we need to make evidence. we have our office. i have been in court so many times. she has been telling me so many times she is a lawyer and using those words, i am all lawyer -- a lawyer. >> is it possible that at that point there could have been either language issues or some kind of cultural misunderstanding in terms of what she heard from you and what you heard from her? is that a possibility? >> it is. >> you have any understanding of why she might have been so upset or concerned about your situation after you described this inciden

chairperson hur: and same for the interpreter, you understand you are still under oath? >> yes, i understand. chairperson hur: mr. keith, you may proceed. >> good evening, ms. lopez. have you communicated with your husband's attorneys, mr. kopp or mr. wagner at any time before tonight? >> i just give him a little back and say hello and i bring a present for him from venezuela because i think they are doing a great job, both of you. i have one for you, too. >> have you had any conversations with them about the events of december 31 or anything that happened after that with regard to the police investigation of that incident? >> no. >> did you share a draft of your declaration with your husband's attorneys? >> no. >> and you recall being directed by the chair of the commission not to discuss your testimony with anyone after leaving the witness chair last night? >> yes. >> have you discussed your testimony with anyone since leaving the witness chair last night? >> no. >> ms. lopez, last night when we left off, i asked you about whether you made a statement to your husband on

did you not understand that? that there was the potential for this information to get out of your hands and you relayed to the police? >> i never thought. i was so naive. >> you did participate in that video. >> when she told me, you need evidence to protect yourself, because ross just got elected share of -- sheriff. if he does not want to give you any money, how are you going to call lawyers? this is an old boys' network. >> i understand your feedear. would you say that you exaggerated the extent of this incident when you were describing it to these individuals so they may have gotten the impression it was a far more serious incident then perhaps you have said since then? >> i remember i told not ivory and kelly in my heart i did not want to divorce. i said, i think he is a victim of circumstances. he was a little boy. >> we do not need to hear that. >> i understand that, and i understand his rational fear, and as his wife, i should support him, so my first step is to support him. good >> to protect your husband

we did not -- you understand what i'm saying. i can tell you what our understanding was and what we believe were gutted by. we did not understand it was the case that there is a separate pleading standard that we needed to meet. it was not clear at that time. that is understandable given the vagaries of the charter that we're struggling with and the novelty of this procedure. i want to put again my asterisk there that it is possible there are key issues you might want to address that you will not find already. >> which is why i am recommending we give you five additional facts. i am also not moved if you have not studied -- that the share of identified because you were included on this. your lack of preparation is not particularly moving. so, is that acceptable, five additional facts? >> i would add that each of the counts has one paragraph that basically summarizes, here's what you should draw from these other factors. i certainly would not want to lose the opportunity to have those paragraphs be part of our proposed findings. th

do you understand? so we consequently, there's no way that we could have that thing that we can stay with something. i'll stay with this woman or that woman. that's why we've been able to move out of situations and then feel nothing about it, because we've already been put in that position. we've been doing that since slavery. they've been taking our families, our daughters, our kids and putting them over here, and we had to move on and get a whole nother family. so consequently, that had to take effect on people down through history, so consequently men feel that way and consequently we have a tendency to say we can walk away from it. tavis: well, it's one thing, though, to be forced into that, as they were during slavery. it's another thing to make a choice, though, not to be there. >> but -- tavis: part of what these sisters are dealing with today are negroes making choices to not be men, to not be fathers. >> and i -- tavis: to not be responsible. i know you're not condoning that. that's why i'm jus

you know awesome garcia story and it seems so for lengthly you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else you hear or see some other part of it and realized everything you thought you knew you don't know i'm tom harpur welcome to the big picture. is this it. do they live here. you know i did see of my has been away from his home village of unfrosted in ukraine for nearly thirty years. in the spring of one thousand nine hundred three he was drafted into the soviet army and sent to afghanistan almost as soon as he arrived he was taken prisoner. for. my guys there to get an id. but. this is the first time he's been home after all those years. when he left his cousin the tasha was twenty nine years old now she's fifty eight. is this your son what's his name. polo eager. aloha low. value his father sister will soon be eighty. and. you know his mojahedin captors gave him the muslim name with no commitment he reluctantly takes his six year old son to this hill on the outskirts of condos where the remnants of soviet tanks can be found scattered all over the strike. i still have viv

you understand that, correct? >> yes. >> okay, so we're going to go ahead and release you to facility 3c sny. do you have any concerns with that? >> no, sir. >> do you agree or disagree? >> i agree. >> thank you. you have a nice day. >> i haven't been like this in a long time. you know, i've always been stressful, always thinking they're coming my way and what i have to do. but now i can just choose for myself. now that i've made this decision, it leaves all of that behind now, you know? all of that is gone. >> reuben's realization that the gang lifestyle is a dead end came only after a violent fight with his cellmate. for daniel bobian, another gang dropout, early retirement was also involuntary. >> i've been hanging with gang members since i was a kid, so it really wasn't news when i came to prison. i already knew what i was going to be, a northerner. now i've got to take -- an individual called me on some names, and i took off on him, and he called me a punk or a [ bleep ], i'm going to take off on you, especial

they don't want you to understand. did, then you might very well take control of your own finances. pick your own stocks and not pay someone else potentially sbosh tant fees to do things that you are perfectly capable of doing yourself. that's where i come in. tonight i'm explaining everything. while authentic wall street gibberish sounds complex it's not rocket science, not brain surgery. you don't need to go to business school or work in an investment bank to understand it. you can comprehend all the mystical sounding vocabulary we throw around as long as you have a translator, a coach like me who can explain what the darn words mean. think of me as a defector, someone who used to work for the other team who's now playing for you, teaching you to navigate your way through the mine field of the stock market every night on "mad money." forget "the da vinci code," the enigma. to be a great investor you have to break the wall street code. i'm here to help you crack it. that's why tonight i'm giving you my wall street gib

you do it when i tell you to, you understand? i worry about them 24 hours a day. e worst thing you can have happen as a warden is one of your staff members hurt or loss of one of your staff members. >> i am going to put it in these terms to just be honest and understanding that this is a war. so, you don't know what to expect from day to day and minute to minute. you can't beat the people that made the system and made the rules and have all the power. >> j.c., your locker is open! >> they got to handcuff the radio. you have nothing. you have yourself. you are your own weapon in this war. >> richard penn has spent the last ten days in disciplinary confinement due to an assault on two officers. he has been moved from general population to a single-man cell. he is on heightened security and must wear a spit mask any time he is out of his cell. sergeant carter was one of the two officers involved in the assault. >> when i ask an inmate a question, i expect an answer. if i tell them to do something, i expect them to do it. this is not a place where things are optional.

are going to have a very strict rule about any noises or outbursts from the crowd, so we hope you understandhat. if you hear somebody, please remove them. >> i think he would like to address the commission prior to her taking the stand. >> very well. >> my name is eric safire, and we received subpoenas from both parties, and it was our understanding that the purpose was to be cross-examined for issues that were raised, but it has become clear the issue has to do with the conviction and whether or not that rises to the level of contact doug requires determination, and in that regard she has no relevant testimony, so unless there is some specific she has no testimony to be cross-examined on. >> i am not sure you are familiar with the amended o but in ths in acts to intimidate witnesses. as a result, she was on the o there is going to be some examination, and i would not comment on the relevance. i think there was a enough to be a question. >> she will be examined about issues regarding conversations on january 4, and it is not just limited. >> i will not comment on what is in the paper, but sh

. >> you understand the question?i do not understand the question. >> try it again. iswg -- didgain. he ever approach you about trying to make clear either privately to the witnesses or publicly why you as his campaign manager were involved in the events of january 4? >> objection, relevance. >> are you aware of any time he has ever spoke out about your role for his understanding of why you were enmeshed in these events on january 4? >> no. >> that is all i have. >> any rebuttal? there i asked how long? >> 5 minutes. i am one of the lawyers representing chirac's -- sheriff mirkarimi. have you and i ever met? >> no. >> it is nice to meet you. >> nice to meet you. >> you were ask questions about not speaking to an investigator or other representatives of the city attorney's office. do you remember that? >> yes. >> the you remember someone trying to contact you? >> yes. >> why did you not speak to that person? >> from the beginning, because all this started when it was in the d.a.'s hahands, i told the investigators are

you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else and you hear or see some other part of it and realize everything you thought you knew. i'm tom harpur welcome to the big picture. download the official application to the sofa choose your language stream quality and enjoy your favorites from alzheimer's t.v. is not required to watch on t.v. all you need is your mobile device to watch on scene any time any of the. the. dow chemical company in midland michigan. seventy two million liters of defoliants sprayed by the us military over south vietnam beginning in one nine hundred sixty one one manufactured and sold by american chemical companies including dow monsanto and diamond shamrock. at that time vietnam was divided into north and south the us supported the government of south vietnam and military intervention intensified after nine hundred sixty five. but the us made strong resistance from guerrilla forces who used dense jungle as their base of operations. defoliant spraying was begun in an effort to deny cover to the guerrillas

that overbuilt and had excess capacity you would have mitigated the worst of that by understanding that you were in the winter cycle phase and that is not the cycle phase you want to expand too much and so by understanding where you are in the grand scheme of things you can help minimize some of the worst pain and also manage your financial affairs better ok great you set that up well so now you think where i can draw t.f. winter which is maybe not what our viewers want to hear but it probably sounds familiar because it's marked by high volatility slowed a negative growth deal levering by consumers corporations and governments hoarding of cash by banks at the deflation across the board depressions from bursting credit bubbles so this all sounds pretty familiar to most people listening but how can you be so sure we're in a can draw to if winter. well i think just the very fact that all of these things coexist at once is a great indicator that there's something very different going on here now also if you look at countries like spain at twenty five percent unemployment well that's that's