what's untenable but youstill want to before the vote on bipartisan bills , will democratic leadership encourage progressives to vote for a bipartisan bill anyway even if the reconciliation bill is a threat. >> six days is an eternity in this place and we're going to get this done. we always do. because at the end of the day , what motivates us democrats across the ideological spectrum is delivering for the people and this is the president's agenda to build back better. he promised he would undertake this transformational effort to the american people . and we are going to make sure that promise is kept. in terms of the discussion that will take place over the next few days you all know house democrats are an enthusiastic group. we're not bashful. but we're a coalition, not a cult. so we embrace the fact that people have different ideas and perspectives but at the end of the day we always land at the highest common denominator and we will do that in this case. we're going to pass the infrastructure bill and passed the build back better act . >>. >> booktv.org. >> the senate in recess u

the reconciliation bill isn't ready by monday or if it's under numbered and what's untenable but youstill want to before the vote on bipartisan bills , will democratic leadership encourage progressives to vote for a bipartisan bill anyway even if the reconciliation bill is a threat. >> six days is an eternity in this place and we're going to get this done. we always do. because at the end of the day , what motivates us democrats across the ideological spectrum is delivering for the people and this is the president's agenda to build back better. he promised he would undertake this transformational effort to the american people . and we are going to make sure that promise is kept. in terms of the discussion that will take place over the next few days you all know house democrats are an enthusiastic group. we're not bashful. but we're a coalition

collapse and your response was, but lots of the drafters reflected much of the department, unquote and youstill maintain that to be the case . >> the cable did not predict that the governments or security forces wouldcollapse before we departed .>> but the cable did say the afghan government was at risk of collapse and you said that the box of the drafters reflected much of the thinking of the department. either way at the exact same time the bureau of intelligence research in that apartment was breathing this committee that the taliban was moving quickly toward to take over and you presumably have access to that same intelligence which corroborated the dissent table and was alarming to many members ofthis committee . do you dispute that?e. >> as we had an opportunity to discuss throughout these many months , or were ongoing intelligence assessment about the durability, resilience of the afghan government. >> let's be honest mister secretary, these werealarming cables , there were warnings that were to you and you said they reflected a majority of physicians of the department. did you share thi