could you explain why the shadow on yuba buena gardens is insignificant? >> it is not a rec park facility. it is under the management of a redevelopment agency and their agents. prop. kate and section 295 does not apply to that park. supervisor mar: but it is a publicly accessible open space. >> my name is sarah jones. i am a city planner with major environmental analysis. supervisor mar: it is a publicly accessible open space. >> you are correct for that reason. we did include an analysis. we found the shadow would occur before a o'clock a.m. only at certain times of the year -- before 8:00 a.m. only at certain times of the year. in terms of use of the open space, that would not substantially impair the ability of the public to enjoy that space. supervisor mar: what about the trans bay terminal open space that is part of the proposal? >> in terms of the trans bay terminal open space, given where that effort is in the process, and also given the level of design for that park, which is not available at this time, we do not have sufficient information to det