from video surveillance cameras, copies of timesheets , and even the vacation orders of judge yulia ivaninaand 2023. the decision of the investigative judge of the pechersk district court of kyiv dated february 8, 2014 satisfied the complaint of judge ivanina and obliged the authorized persons of the state bureau of investigation to return the judge ivanina's property was temporarily confiscated. in addition, from the content of this resolution on the return of property , it can be seen that the search conducted in the court premises by the investigating judge was illegal, the request for the search was refused. the supreme court immediately responded to the illegal actions of the sbi, declaring the inadmissibility of pressure from themis officials and the interference of law enforcement agencies in the court's activities. the supreme court appealed to the director of the sbi, who is directly responsible for the actions of his employees, with a request to provide. the explanation can be entered in the register and searched by the judge, without valid grounds, and the search can be conducted