well, first of all, yulia navalna, she is nobody, let's say it directly, and you will be something. ites no sense for you to follow the american government's policy and push back from it, if it has some political mechanisms, levers of influence on the situation in russia, then, god willing, we will come to an agreement. at the moment, i do not see this, and therefore this is the question itself, it is purely like this, you know, in the american journalistic style, they believe something, that... zelenskyy should meet with tykhanovskaya, with yulia navalna, and they always draw these parallels, in my opinion, they are inappropriate and simply talk about the weakness of the western press, sorry for the such a comparison, but the very fact of participation in this event must be considered, well, first of all, i am not sure whether she refused or not, if she refused, i think that the reason is definitely not navalny, but the reason may be different: because now on the eve of the elections in the united states states, we understand that the benefit of the administration of the white house i

, well, event, yulia navalna suddenly became, in essence, well, an informal president another russia, with which western politicians communicate. and those who in the west are thinking of somehow investing in the development of civil society in russia, and talking to some part of the russian community that lives scattered around the world, well, they probably chose her as the main communicator from this part of her disunited russia, well, well and no more, you know, i personally feel about such a transfer of gender leadership. way with such a certain skepticism, because when you have to go from husband to wife and vice versa, then it means that what other leaders there are none that were popular, well, it’s sad, for example, the same mark fegin, who invented the election, well, to create some legitimate figure who would talk to western leaders on behalf of another russia, well, in fact, now this idea... runs out , maybe it will continue, but in fact, due to the circumstances, this tragic event made yulia navalna the only communicator who will say that she will be an effective communic

of this story from the point of view of the desire to show that there is an opposition member, yulia navalnaere is the first lady of ukraine, olena zelenska, and here is all of us together, together with the american people, we fight against putin, whether it works at all, or whether this scheme is correct, in your opinion. er, well, first of all, er, yulia navalna, she is nobody, let's say it directly, and, er, you, somehow, build your policy on by the american government and push back from it, no one, it makes no sense, if it has some political mechanisms, levers of influence on the situation in russia, then, god willing, we will come to an agreement. at the moment, i don’t see it, and that’s why... this is the very formulation of the question, it ’s purely in this, you know, american journalistic style, for some reason they believe that zelensky should meet with tykhanovskaya, with yulia navalny, and they always draw these parallels , in my opinion, they are inappropriate and simply talk about the weakness of the western press, so sorry for this comparison, but the very fact of participat

wife of the president , that is, she represents, including the ukrainian state, by status, while yulia navalna represents so far only herself, only the memory of her husband, and a small circle of russian oppositionists, with the logic of public relations and spindo. and everything else that goes with it, it was absolutely the right decision, the only thing , of course, we risk somewhat spoiling the relationship with the biden administration, maybe with him personally, since it is clear that it was a pr find of their own biden headquarters, it would have to look impressive, it should work on... his image as a person who is not only able to support ukraine, but also gives some prospect of reforming russia, it will take us a very long time to fight this, and eh, i don't know how successfully , this is the desire to see the russia of the future, democratic and so on, it is absolutely, well, so long-lasting. history, we will deal with it in the near future, maybe even decades, and here the logic of the americans can be understood in principle, they have always acted this way in the fight against s

of this story from the point of view of the desire to show that there is... the oppositionist yulia navalna and the first lady of ukraine olena zelenska, and here we all are together, together with the american people, fighting against putin, whether it works at all, or whether this scheme is correct in your opinion, well , first of all, yulia navalna is nobody, let's say it directly, and you somehow build your policy according to the american government and... no one is repulsed by this makes no sense, if it has any political mechanisms, levers of influence on the situation in russia, then god willing we will come to an agreement. at the moment, i don’t see it, and that’s why this is the question itself, it’s purely in this, you know, american journalistic style, they somehow think that zelensky must meet with tykhanovskaya, with yulia navalna, and these parallels are always drawn , in my opinion, they are inappropriate and simply speak of the weakness of the western press, but i am sorry for such a comparison, but the very fact of participation in this event must be considered, well, firs

svitlana tykhanovskaya, that is, we see, yulia navalna met with biden, yulia navalna spoke in the european parliament, that is, in fact, due to such a tragic, well, event, suddenly yulia navalna became, in fact, well the informal president of another russia, western politicians communicate with her, and those who in the west are thinking of investing somehow. the development of civil society in russia, er, and to talk to some part of the russian community that lives in the worlds, scattered, well, they probably chose her as the main communicator from this part of her united russia, well, well, and no more, well, you know, i personally treat such a transfer of leadership through sexual means with such a certain skepticism, because... when it comes down to it like this from a husband to a wife and vice versa, then well there, it means that there are no other leaders who were popular, well, this, well , for example, the same mark fegin, who invented the election, well, to create some legitimate figure who would talk to western leaders on behalf of another russia , well, in fact, now this idea

well, not the story with yulia navalna, because it is clear that she is not in russia on the territoryn federation, it is clear that it is very difficult to fight. against putin exclusively outside the borders of the russian federation, and this anti-putin story, which can unfold on the territory of the russian federation, can really only be in the form of some riots, if there are any. but there must be an anti-putin coalition in the world, in the end we see the election of this one of the anti-putin coalition, we see that this coalition is trying to cooperate in various formats. in the format of rammstein and in the format of the european union and in the format of the north atlantic alliance, but we have been witnessing for the last few days, gentlemen, how this anti-putin coalition is taking two steps back, because the russian federation should have made public the recordings of the german military, where they are discussing the issue of a possible strike by tauras long-range missiles on the kerch bridge, when suddenly everyone starts. to make excuses, to say that it is not so that

biden, yulia navalna spoke in the european parliament, that is, in fact, due to such a tragic, well,yulia navalna suddenly became, in fact, uh, informal president another russia, western politicians communicate with her, and those who in the west think of somehow investing in the development of civil society in russia, and talking to... some part of the russian community that lives scattered around the world, well, they probably chose her as the main communicator from this part of her disunited russia, well, well, and no more , well, you know, i personally treat such a transfer of leadership by sexual means with such a certain skepticism, because when it happens like this from a husband to a wife and vice versa, then... .. well, that means what, what else there are no leaders who were popular , well, that’s unfortunate, well, for example, the same mark fegin, who invented the election, well, to create some legitimate figure who would talk to western leaders on behalf of another russia, well, in essence, now this idea runs out , maybe it will continue, but in fact , due to the circums

before the congress, which is to be held on march 7, biden was supposed to be seated next to yulia navalna, and it was supposed to be a symbol struggle and the ukrainian people, as a representative of which are olena zelenska and yulia navalny, who is the widow of oleksii navalny, against the putin regime. so, we ask you this: do you approve of zelenskyi's decision not to go and not participate in biden's speech. to the congress 0800 211 381 yes no 0 800 211 382 if you watch us on tv in youtube everything is quite simple either with the yes button or the no button. if you have your own opinion, please write it in the comments below this video. let me remind you that all calls to these numbers are free at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. i want to introduce today's guest of our studio, this is maksym rozumny, a political expert, a political doctor. nauk, mr. maxim, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. good evening. oleksiy koshel, political scientist, head of the committee of voters of ukraine. mr. oleksiy, i congratulate you, thank you for j

, but well, this is literally a headline and a subtitle, but yulia navalna is treated with a certain skepticism in ukraine, which seems to have rejected oleg's invitation. zelensky, so as not to sit next to first lady jill biden and russian opposition figure yulia navalna? well, in my opinion, this is the right decision, from an informational point of view, both for internal and external audiences. well, come on, we would have to a greater extent, i think people don't, they don't quite understand it, we remember the reaction of ukrainians, the death of oleksiy navalny, great. we did not have any tragic and sympathetic, sympathetic moods on this matter, and we understand that this conditional russian opposition has no prospects for getting real power from the russian federation, everything they are doing now is all just trying to find further financing for a beautiful existence there and promises to build a beautiful one there. of the future and so on and the creation of this illusion, useful for putin, that this is not a war between ukraine and russia, that it is a war, well more pre

she was detained there one way or another, well, it was a huge danger, but tell me why suddenly yulia navalna is being talked about as the leader of the opposition, as if her husband really was the leader of some united opposition in russia, from where? this idea came about at all, because i hear it from many foreign journalists there, when i talk to some experts, they also ask the question all the time: will yulia navalny be able to replace oleksiy navalny, and she spoke before the european parliament, but i have question, but where, well, you know, they compare it with svitlana tykhanovskaya, but svitlana tykhanovskaya was a participant in real presidential race, and probably actually won these elections, well, look, there is a certain one. inheritance from alexey, and of course , it will belong to someone, and yulia was already of the opinion in the 18th year that she would go to the presidential race instead of alexey, and alexey then approved this idea, and was against it, well, i think precisely because not to create. competition itself, but now a lot of money has been invested in fbk b

decision not to attend biden's speech to congress, and in this way not to sit next to the russian yulia navalna , yes, no, please vote on youtube, or with the yes or no button, write your comment if you have your own position on this poll, on tv, if you think that zelenska's decision is not from... to witness biden's speech to congress true 0800 211 381 no 0800 211 382. all calls to these numbers are free, call, at the end of the program we will tally up the results of this vote. today, the army of the russian federation carried out a missile attack on odesa, when the president of ukraine was visiting the city volodymyr zelenskyi and prime minister of greece kyriakos mitsotakis. publication, the greek publication that first published this information, claims that the target of russian troops was the president's motorcade, zelensky himself confirmed the fact of the attack during his visit to odesa. let's listen. it seems to me that we only heard about moskar, we saw this relevant blow today, but you see who we are dealing with. so the point is no matter where to hit, i know that today there were

grave to... music from the song mayvey french sinatra and the melody from the movie terminator, yulia navalna, his widow, she is outside russia, well, it was not possible to drag her in, although the kremlin propagandists have already started spreading the story, as they, so to speak, promised under all guarantees and protection, well, that's all , so to speak, we understand why she did not arrive, about this and about other igor eidman, russian sociologist, political expert. journalist and publicist, congratulations, congratulations, igor, yes, our guest is not answering, well, we will try to restore contact with him , because we understand that the events today in moscow developed sufficiently, i would say, very quickly, because at first people came there, there were so many of them, some of them were even allowed to... where navalny was eulogized and only a few dozen of the closest people got there for a short time, but it was indicative that people came, and actually, well, there were quite a lot of people, and there were people who actually, well, chanted certain slogans, for what certai

no indigenous people here, there is almost no one left here, here are the unfortunate russians, yulia navalna navalnaya will come to their defense, i don’t know, khodarkovsky will say that the rights of military pensioners must be taken into account, so what, that’s why, what is the end, is it just... this , that is, they can’t live otherwise, yes, no, no , pressing, not oppressing, there, not repressing, is it really such a strategic , some, maybe not as i said, you can say something differently, meta, just sometimes we it seems to us that they just do something automatically, just because they are lazy, in fact, often in the end it turns out that there was such a strategic plan, the point is that what we... call russians, well, russians , it is not a nationality, it is not even a political identity, it is what erich fromm called a totalitarian collective personality, that is, it is such a transformation of a person under the conditions of a totalitarian regime, when a person becomes in fact the personification of this regime, a person has to give up everything personal and to merge into som

do with the fact that during the delivery of this speech, elena zelenska wanted to sit next to yulia navalna. and perhaps one of the reasons why zelenska did not want to visit washington was precisely her reluctance to sit next to a representative of the russian movement, which is behind border, not of the opposition, but of the movement abroad, i will call it that, if you think that this decision of zelensky not to go to washington is correct, 0800-211-381, no, 0800-211-382, all calls to... numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next, we have andriy klymenko, chief editor of the black sea news portal, head of the monitoring group of the institute of strategic black sea studies, mr. andriy, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. congratulations! mr. andrei, let's talk about what is happening now in the black sea, because it is very important from the point of view of fixation. in the course of the current war and during the deployment of defense forces in the black sea basin, according to the estimates of the naval forces of

casualties, and the polling station continued its work, but the widow oppositionist oleksii navalny, yulia navalnaed in berlin, she stood in line outside the embassy along with other russians, they applauded and chanted her name, and also held anti-putin banners, because such protests are possible only abroad. the motor vehicle accident occurred on the dnipro-zaporizhia highway, where a minibus with passengers flew into a ditch and overturned. it is previously known that three people died. more than a dozen passengers. were injured, children are among the injured, medics and law enforcement officers are working on the spot, the causes of the accident are currently unknown unknown protection against potential threats. safety audits help identify problem areas in communities and improve them. this project is implemented in 14 regions of the country by a consortium of six women's organizations, including the ukrainian public health foundation with the support of the government apparatus. on issues of gender policy of kateryna levchenko. so, our correspondents saw how security issues were resolved in

but i was reading now, that yulia navalna also voted in the elections, she came to the embassy if she wanted. in berlin and said that she wrote the surname navalny on the ballot, but in principle, should the widow of a murdered oppositionist legitimize the election process. well, look, even from a political point of view, navalnaya says that she wants to be the leader of the opposition there, but they don't write her name, that is, a person who can become the president, well, purely theoretically, huh. they also write about a person, that is, they do not even count on the fact that it can be any victory and they say it openly, that is, here actions are for action. then what are the prospects of all this process, i would say, political in the russian federation, even oppositional, when people who are opponents of the regime act in the logic of the regime, and most importantly, they perceive this regime as legitimate, you understand, even belarusian. the oppositionists do not perceive lukashenka as a legitimate president and saying that he is the self-proclaimed head of state, here in p

indigenous people here , there is almost no one left here, here are the unfortunate russians, yulia navalnaill come to their defense, there i will say khodarkovsky, it is necessary to take into account the rights of military pensioners, so what, to what end, is it just an instinct, that is, they cannot live otherwise, yes, no, no, pressing, not forcing. without repressing there, is it really such a strategic goal, maybe not as i said, you can say something differently, it’s just that sometimes we think that they just do something automatically, just because they are lazy, in fact, it often turns out in the end that there was such a strategic plan, the fact is that what we call the russians well, like a russian, it's not a nationality, it 's not even a political identity. this is what erich fromm called a totalitarian-collective personality, that is, it is such a transformation of a person under the conditions of a totalitarian regime, when a person. becomes in fact the personification of this regime, a person has to give up everything personal and merge into some kind of community, as you k

legality of these elections, it is necessary to show that people are going, people are leaving, and yulia navalna is here with your appeal, come at 12 o'clock, anyway for anyone but putin, but come, well, and many similar things in general. is putin really interested and is already thinking about options, how about these elections in general, so that someone will recognize him in the world, that he will be recognized as the president. i don't see any reason why it should not be recognized. even the fact that the number of territories he captured in ukraine has increased significantly. of course, no one will recognize the elections in these territories, as no one recognized in crimea. so. regarding non-recognition putin, there is a problem here. so you don't recognize him. as? then all this works, ugh, negotiations, direct communication between the ministries of defense and the general staffs, you see, from time to time the head of the central intelligence department and the director of the foreign intelligence service meet, from time to time the chief of the general staff and the head of the of t

people are leaving, and here is yulia navalna with her appeal, come at 12 o’clock, it doesn’t mattercome, well, and many similar things, in general, is putin really interested and already thinking about options, as it were so in general this election, for someone to be recognized in the world, for him to be recognized as a president, i don't see any lags for him not to be recognized, even that that the number of territories he captured increased significantly. in these territories , of course, no one will recognize the elections, i have not recognized them in crimea, so regarding the non-recognition of putin, there is a problem here, you do not recognize him, how does this all work, uh, negotiations, direct communication between the ministries defense and general staffs, you see, from time to time the head of the central intelligence department and the director of the foreign intelligence service meet, from time to time the chief of the general staff and the chief meet. united the joint chiefs of staff of the united states is happening, there is this hot line in the event of a nuclea

the award there, and with a shortened version. just the exit of the film crew and the speech of yulia navalna'sey didn't cut the russian politician, they left it, and that's why the management of social culture decided to send a letter to the actual organizer with a request to explain why this happened in general , well, in general, we don't remember if we cut this category of the best full-length documentary from the abridged version earlier , but in any case if not cut... then why did they cut 20 days then, if they cut constantly, then why did they then make an exception for the film navalny, i will try to explain, there are such options, but now i will tell you how things unfolded events after the public culture did not send the letter, we received a response from her, although their response was to the request of the voice of america of the ukrainian service, they actually explained that due to time constraints they are releasing such a short version, so what are we doing? .. they knew and explained that the categories that will be left and that will be cut were agreed upon, some two or thr

well, but on the other hand, i do not see, no matter how much they say, well, yulia navalna, she is aictim, and you understand, of course, the victim always has a certain, well, sympathy for the victim is always certain raises it to an extent. people, but i don’t see , i don’t see serious figures around, i just don’t see , well, you understand, well, no, there are no people in russia now who could lead and seriously lead, as it was, well, even like that, once there was a party bolsheviks, there are absolutely no, and not at all. in general, the party does not have a serious political force, there is no one that would lead the movement of the russians, but the one that, the one that is outside of russia, you see that they have quite different views on the war in ukraine, or maybe they have the same view , but they don't have it voiced, quite clearly, clearly, they do not articulate, well, you understand who those are, who are now, well... well, well, those guys we have, well, mr. mar, well, well, you understand, they are nice people, but , but almost, well, no more, ugh , that is, a le

no indigenous people here, there is almost no one left here, here are the unfortunate russians, yulia navalna end, or is it just the instinct is like this, that is, they cannot live otherwise, yes, no , no, pressing, not pushing, there , not repressing, is it really such a strategic, some kind, maybe not as i said, you can also say something differently purpose, it's just that sometimes it seems to us that they just do something on a machine, it's simple. because they are lazy in fact, it often turns out in the end that there was also such a strategic plan, the fact is that what we call russians, well, like russians, is not a nationality, it is not even a political identity, it is what erich fromm called totalitarian collective personality, that is, this is the transformation of a person under the conditions of a totalitarian regime, when a person... is actually the personification of this regime, a person must give up everything personal and merge into some kind of community, as you know, in germany this was hitler's truth theory, i.e. some, and the russians are now under putin, it’s just th

these elections, it is necessary to show that people are going, people are going, and here is yulia navalnaappeal, come at 12 o'clock, no matter for whom, in order not for putin, but come, and a lot such things in general, is putin really interested and is already thinking about options, how about these elections in general? for someone to be recognized in the world, for him to be recognized as the president, i don't see any reason for him not to be recognized, even the fact that the number of territories that he seized in ukraine has increased significantly, in these territories, of course, no one will recognize the elections, no one recognized them in crimea, yes, regarding the non-recognition of putin, there is a problem here, you do not recognize him, how does this all work, uh, negotiations, direct communication between the ministry of defense and the general staff, you see, from time to time the head of the central intelligence agency and the director of the foreign intelligence service meet, from time to time the chief of the general staff and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staf

oppositionist, well, of course, a figure, and there is such a certain legacy of him, and this is yulia, yulia navalna, but if a third of such supporters belong to her opposition views, then i will already be surprised. uh, no, the only real organization that exists now is the organization of the legion of freedom of russia, a partisan movement that exists independently of these units that are fighting in ukraine, but there is the vast majority of these partisans, they in one way or another connected with the legion, with the rdk and with other units, i also want to ask you about... about your impressions of putin's address to the federal assembly yesterday, did you hear something new for you, or for example, something that could threaten ukraine and the world, and what, in fact, was the course putin set for russia in the coming years with his address to the federal assembly? well, of course there was nothing new there, to put it briefly, he said that we will threaten the whole world with nuclear weapons. weapons, and finally we will build toilets in the village, well that's all he wanted to say, of c

there are no indigenous people here, there is no one left, here are the unfortunate russians, yulia navalnafense, i know there, khodarkovsky says, we must take into account the rights of military pensioners, etc. , that’s why, what is the end, is it just an instinct like this, that is, they can’t live otherwise, yes, no, no, pressing, not squirming there, not repressing, is it really such a strategic, some kind, maybe not like i said, maybe you can say something differently. and it's just that sometimes we think that they are just something they do it automatically, simply because they are lazy, in fact, often in the end it turns out that there was such a strategic plan, the point is that what we call russians, well, like russ, it is not a nationality, it is not even political identity, this is what erich fromm called a totalitarian collective personality, that is, this is such a transformation of people... in the conditions of a totalitarian regime, when a person becomes in fact the personification of this regime, a person has to give up everything personal and merge into some kind of comm

no indigenous people here. there is almost no one left here, here are the unfortunate russians, yulia navalnadefense, there, khodarkovskyi says, we must take into account the rights of military pensioners, etc., that ’s why, what is the end, is it just an instinct like this, that is, they cannot live otherwise, yes, no, no, pressing, not tying in there, not repressing, is it really there is such a strategic one, maybe not as i said, can you do something differently? the goal, it's just, sometimes we, it seems to us that they are just doing something on the machine, just because they are lazy, in fact, often in the end it turns out that there was such a strategic certain plan. the matter is because what we call russians, such as russians, is not a nationality, it is not even a political identity, it is what erich fromm called a totalitarian collective personality, that is, it is such a transformation of a person under the conditions of a totalitarian regime, when a person becomes in fact, the personification of this regime, a person has to give up everything personal and... into some kind of c