it’s just that we are used to a different kind of populism in ukraine, populism named after yulia volodymyrivnarint money here now and everyone will be happy, let's give everyone more money, first money is printed, people are happy, and then devaluation comes, five are always one and the same consequence, the crisis here is simply unusual for ukraine, populism, again, before only balashov ran something with this, but he is a city madman, well, he runs and runs, but here it is just a larger group of people. it took on itself, this pulled the blanket, balashov, but the session is the same populism. to be happy and then, since we have a huge hole in the budget that cannot be closed by anything, well, during the war, it’s completely crazy. yes, a crossbow, but let’s imagine even this reform was proposed after the war. borrow and then and again devaltsy f5 i.e. the consequences are the same as from populism named after yulia volodymyrivna but just a side view yes i.e. printing the hryvnia on a guaranteed economic growth is populism, we know that if too much is printed as it was in the 90s then e wil

canceling taxes, well, everyone always likes it, you know, you're just used to the populism of yulia volodymyrivnaukraine, so don't cancel 10%, they leave it at 10%. well, that is, let's just cut taxes in half, yes, what to do with pensions, well, what to do, well, somehow it will be, yes, let's print whether the measure will help us well, or something else. look, this is populism. yes, it doesn't work, it's impossible. links where the senior default just happened because the government did not think that it reduced everything, well, that is, a clear example have demonstrated what is happening, come on, business always advocates a lower tax, nobody likes to pay taxes, the witness likes to pay taxes is an abnormal story, but taxes are a forced story, or the state must fulfill its functions, and if we do not cancel the functions of the state in the social sphere, on pensions and so on, that is why we cannot radically cut taxes because a default will result and a deep economic crisis will result, because we also see a lot of skeptics from the ministry of finance and from the national bank who say tha

yulia volodymyrivna tymoshenko made such a impression on me with her inappropriate comments and the factin support. then viktor yushchenko showed himself very well, who he is normal, absolutely himself, he is the first, he is one of the first presidents who, and ukraine began to transfer weapons to georgia at that time, she transferred some weapons there , i don't remember the amount, but it was very important in those five days of ukraine, it was difficult to transfer some weapons even to georgia, as far as i remember it was an initiative under yushchenko, it wasn't the president who said what about him and the georgians or there like and tomorrow there will be kebabs or there and also who is interested in such a difference and so on. then we went, it is still unknown what happened, they went to the mountains in tbilisi, he valensi, who was the third, i don't remember anymore, well, that is, they immediately left for three presidents, because they reproduce, it is important, it seems that the valence flew with them, so i will already check well that is, did i remember or do i remember?