70, i do not know, but to return to the performance of my parliamentary duties, thank you, yulia volodymyrivnaher minute, please, i absolutely am, dear friends, i am sure that now there are no more than 71 people, because while we were talking, another dozen deputies came out, that is, in fact, the hall was empty. and what we are now filming, video, we will report to the constitutional court about the invalidity of voting for these amendments and about the invalidity. then as a consequence of the adoption of the law on the so-called medical cannabis in quotation marks, and i completely understood oleksandr serhiyevich that he did not put it now to confirm the registration of deputies for voting, i absolutely understand, because he has an empty hall in front of his eyes, and if he now puts it on voting, the presence of deputies in the hall, then he needs to take the next constitutional step, that is to stop... stop this one nonsense, because this is not a meeting of the verkhovna rada, and this is not a plenary session, and to announce that there are no deputies in the hall, and further amendme

the law on the legalization of marijuana in the constitutional court, that's how, that is, yulia volodymyrivna said the day before that there are only... two genders, the entire lgbt and genders they will abolish when they come to power, well and this law on the legalization of medical marijuana, they will appeal to the constitutional court, what will come of it, moreover, they will block this law with regulations, then it will go to the constitutional court, well, but actually i think that... uh, we complied as much as possible of all norms, at the voting of the draft law did not violate the legislation of the constitution of ukraine, therefore, of course, it is their right as people's deputies to go and appeal, but i still hope that healthy flus will also win in the constitutional court, and this issue will not be slowed down in this way. look, we will carefully monitor this dialogue, we will be interested in what the lgbt will answer to yulia volodymyrivna, but this is different and... i have a question for you, and why did we go specifically for the legalization of medical cannabis, and no

, that is, there were forces that worked separately under viktor andriyovych, according to yulia volodymyrivna, and this whole thing could not stick together, because this or that contractor constantly appeared, now we see in... openly paid manipulative articles that appear in some semi-respectable western media, yes and we also see a certain synchronization, certain things are thrown in there that we cannot verify, we understand that if they refer to anonymous sources that say some absolutely mind-blowing unworldly things, well, very often suspicion arises accordingly, but people are all politicians, they are emotional people , generals are emotional, everyone is on emotions, everyone is on nerves, and it is clear why, well, the price is very high. and here something appears, this is part of that campaign, you probably remember, our president also talked about some kind of maidan 3, anti-maidan 3, i.e., our intelligence warned that there is a 1.5 billion allocation of funds being prepared there, which will now be carried, well, it is carried, so it should not be an indicator of the authentici

and so on, that is, there were forces that worked separately under viktor andriyovych, under yulia volodymyrivnaing could not stick together, because this or that contractor constantly appeared . now we see from.

and i don't know. me, to be honest, if yulia volodymyrivna adopts our today's broadcast, where i told that it is necessary to mobilize the security forces, the state apparatus must be reduced, then i i think, then it will be fair, let's see if she will do it, because everything else is bullshit, well, listen, i remember very well the hysterics of ms. tymoshenko, when the last parliament wanted to introduce martial law in 10 regions, then she shouted that it was poroshenko who wanted to extend his term of office in order to disrupt the election process. i remember these populist statements very well, it is exactly the same now, if you say a, then you would say that i believe that in order for the mobilization to be fair, it is necessary to amend this law, 1, 2, 3 , 5, 10, and voice them, and not voice anything, then it looks like zelensky in the stadium, i am for everything good, against everything bad, that's all, populism, it is transmitted to people in this form, mr. major, yesterday i had a general. onos was on the air, he and i were talking about the draft law on mobilization, he

not heard from for a long time, there is boyko, we have not heard from him for a long time, yulia volodymyrivnahas not been heard from for a long time, and here they are, and here they are again, it is very good , that they finally stopped and started doing the things they were supposed to do to deal with, that is, political affairs, to discuss something, although it is difficult to agree with them with what they say. well, this is my separate personal opinion, and as for whether it is right or wrong, let's just divide it into two components, which are at least two components, firstly, is a law on mobilization necessary, yes, it is needed, if we do not mobilize a certain the number of people, then with or without help we will not be able to win, meaning financial and technical assistance is simply not available to us, because this is what our partners give us - these are means, and for to achieve victory. forces and means are needed, the forces are our military personnel who must be mobilized, people who must defend our country with weapons in their hands, then we need to think and make decisio

and so on, that is, there were forces that worked separately under viktor andriyovych, under yulia volodymyrivnahole thing could not stick together, that’s why that this or that contractor constantly appeared. now we can see clearly paid, manipulative articles that appear in some semi-respectable western media, and we also see a certain...

we can recall yulia volodymyrivna tymoshenko and president yushchenko. it's enough.an't help asking you, although you may have already been asked this when you were working. in great britain, great britain and the british press, and british, british diplomats, and british intelligence, most loudly informed ukraine and ukrainians that there would be a war, and do you remember the communication of those days there in february, january 22 , how did these warnings sound to you, perhaps in closed meetings? absolutely straightforward, there will be war, you have to prepare, you don't realize how much... it's going to be tragic for your people, the only specific thing was that people didn't believe that we would survive this war, that is, i was looked at, you know, i was sitting with your colleagues, at me i looked at such and such a sick person, they said that i'm sorry, you don't understand , you will die, you will all die, the russians are coming, and so on and so on and so on, i always told them that it would not be easy, it will not be a walk in the park, as they say,