be beneficial, so that it could possibly stimulate, on the contrary valery hnatenko and oleksandr yurchenkodraft law 9520, which number, and the text of the legislative initiative refers to changes to the law on the status of deputies of local councils regarding the early termination of the powers of a deputy of the local council. well, by the way, hnatenko is a figure in the register of traitors to the movement. he honestly organized an illegal referendum in druzhkivka. the person involved in the anti-valuable investigations , yurchenko, together with him, and all of them, or rather , the two of them, are now proposing such a change, or vice versa, its absence, so to speak, and what our american friends, mr. oleksiy, can say about this, our american friends will not react at all. because this is a very minor case, there are still bills that have prospects of being passed. there are bills that have no prospects. such deputy fantasies. electors and such draft laws even during the war there was a large enough number , that is, it is about documents in the parliament, many others. if we talk a

yaroslav dubnevich, vadim stoler , dmytro isayenko, oleksandr dubinskyi , mykola tyshchenko, oleksandr yurchenkos is so that the russian special services do not find out about his income, you understand, brave counter-intelligence just this week, an investigation was released bigus info and about what cars our people's deputies bought for themselves during the full-scale invasion, and there only a few in fact because of course journalists cannot collect all the information about all the people's deputies however, this is enough because there are 3 cars million dollars in total and there they talked about five or seven people 's deputies and the hearing of the people, in particular , the responsibility here lies with the citizens of ukraine and not with the people's deputies only because the citizens of ukraine elected this parliament. i am not talking about the presidential elections now, because in the presidential elections they voted for people whom they knew very well for many decades, they voted for volodymyr zelensky, he is not a politician, but he told him i am not a politician, and you k

reported by the public correspondent, was that he continued the meeting despite the request of oleg yurchenko's postpone the hearing and give time to get acquainted with the indictment, the defense was rejected. i repeat that, classically, in this criminal proceeding, such a procedural decision is not. prosecutor mykhailo domanivskyi's lawyers were summoned several times to hand over the indictment. and they refused to receive it directly in compliance with the very requirements and the criminal procedural code , including the fact that the suspect is in custody. communal action to each defender about what is a postal shipment and directly it and to the highest to the self-updated act in addition to the list with the postal rule the very shipment of the accident the commission of which the tandir judge is accused of, occurred on the night of may 26, 22-year-old fighter vadym bondarenko, who was shot down at the roadblock, was survived by his wife and three children , thanks to the investigation, it was possible to find out that the judge exceeded the speed limit. also in july, the state bureau

they are now from the faction of the restoration of ukraine , hnatenko and yurchenko, they propose toocal councils where military administrations work, this is such a draft law, they registered it and in view of how does the majority in the verkhovna rada feel about local self-government? what is the attitude of all the presidents, what is the idea that the budgets should be directed to the central budget and not to the local budget when it comes to taxes, we understand that such a team is dana was the next local self-government. please tell me what the chances of this bill are and how to explain the logic of its appearance. well, first of all, i thank you for raising this issue, and secondly, i would like to say that this is not just pressure on local bodies self-government is not pressure on local self-government, but pressure on citizens, because such local self-government is an opportunity for every resident of one or another community to easily influence the power that is in

[000:00:00;00] and yurchenko propose to dissolve local councils where military administrations work, this is such a draft law, they registered it in view of how the majority in the verkhovna rada treats local self-government , what is the attitude of the president's office . budget and not in local ones, we understand that such a team of dan was an attack on local self-government. please tell me about this bill, which has a chance and how to explain the logic of its appearance. well, first of all, i thank you for the fact that you raise this issue is the second thing. i would like to say that this is not pressure simply on local self-government bodies, it is not pressure on local self-government, but pressure on citizens , because such local self-government is an opportunity for every resident of one or another community. it is close to you to influence the power that you have, with which you work and have relations, that's why talking about the fact that this pressure on local self-government is not enough - it is pressure on every citizen, this is the first thing, i don't hear you,

is called one deputy valery hnatenko the former pzj and the other, former from the people's ears yurchenko oleksandr, both are very well-known scandalous, they proposed to make changes to the current legislation that where there is a military administration, to automatically terminate the powers of deputies of local councils, well, that is , to dissolve all of them, they are not needed. i am now about who will do the work for these families are there, budgets are approved and so on . it is legally necessary to do this because then if you liquidate, then you need to make changes to other laws. well, okay, i know there. that the comments are from the deputies. they said that we will listen to the people and protect this document in the committee . well, the bill. well, okay, but the initiative itself is questionable from the point of view of the alleged logic. although you can argue there, i literally two days ago threw the question to my subscribers, you know what the reaction was they said to disperse everyone and the verkhovna rada , and rightly so. they said to disperse all the deputies

war and some is trying to figure out certain schemes, and to work with them, so now we have alisa yurchenko on the phone, mrs. alisa, i congratulate you, good evening, and we will talk about, as far as i understand, we will talk about a strange scheme of payments for green energy, for the generation of green electricity, which was generated by the generator in the temporarily occupied territories of ukraine, but the payments for it went, please tell me what kind of scheme it was, and i understand that this case, this scheme was exposed by the national anti-corruption bureau of ukraine, please tell us more, look, the national anti-corruption bureau has not stolen anything yet, it just started the proceedings after our journalistic investigation, and the journalistic investigation related to the fact that from july 22nd in the occupied part of the region, and from november 22nd in the occupied part of khersonska oblasts, most likely, these parts of ukraine did not have an electrical connection with the unified energy system of the energy system of ukraine and were produced accordingly, if any