for example, the judge of the kyiv court of appeal, yuriy tryasun, repeatedly found himself in the fieldtivists, in particular, due to improper declaration of property, so in declaration for the year 2020, the shaker indicated that in the 14th year he became the owner of a plot of land in the kyiv region with an area of 1,200 m², however, according to information from the state register of property rights to immovable property, the judge bought the plot back in 2007 and probably just forgot about it until 2020 to indicate it in the declarations, also a member of the ethics council, yuriy tryasun, has considerable wealth of unknown origin. in the first electronic declaration for 2015, the judge declared $60,000 in cash, which at the nbu exchange rate at that time was almost one and a half million hryvnias, and this more than one and a half times higher than the declared income of the whole family of the ryasun for 2015. among the questionable decisions made by yuriy ryasun during his judicial career, for example , changing the preventive measure of oleksandr belov from berkut, a suspect