examined, if it is established or refused due to the non-department of the driver, they deprive yury ivanovacorrection, nothing is indicated. and dmitry ovcharenko received exactly the same act of a narcologist. he did not write anything in the conclusion, there was no conclusion. that is, there was a huge other from the driver approved drug found. so what prevents to write simply the state of intoxication is not established. we are working on the year 933, which is obtained by all people who have decided the rights for a drug that is not on the banned list, you understand this correctly. well, it’s not we who deprive everyone on purpose, and dmitry was drawn up by inspector frolova. why, in principle, materials were not found in these cases ; people who do not consume anything appear in the judicial district. directly, along the way, the plays are commented on by lawyer sergei radkov, on the one hand on the other hand, it is clearly stated that deprivation of rights is possible only if one of the three substances of alcohol, drugs or psychotropic drugs is found; on the other hand, the same