you don’t even need to remember yushchenko about whom you spoke about, or there.h, zelensky and poroshenko, we don’t need to take these people who led ukraine from the first day at the beginning, and just the party boss, kravchuk then we had the actual red director, as he was called kuchma for a second this man who headed the largest industrial enterprises . and like would was from representative. actually, this russian-speaking southeast is there, and ukraine just needed to lead its country normally to develop. there are some laws to pass and so on and ukraine would be just in chocolate, but no, from the first day these people took the course and began to promote it, the anti-russian anti-russian course is not poroshenko and not yushchenko with his foreigner. my wife wrote a book there. ukraine is not russia yes, they did exactly that. here are the people who led this still successful ukraine for decades, and moved in this direction for ten years , drummed into their people that everything that is bad in this world is connected with russia the next day. after ind

for the head of the national bank of ukraine, not only that yushchenko, as we remember, has a wife,in significant rank, that is, we understand that in this situation the interests of the ukrainian oligarchs coincided with the interests of the west, gradually the ukrainian oligarchies, they integrated into the west, not in russia, but what the oligarchs were afraid of, they were afraid of a repeat of fate, gusinsky, khadarkovsky, others, power began to dominate, and the ukrainian new oligarchs were afraid that they would cease to be the masters of their country, accordingly, very quickly those people began to appear, co-authors, with whom this policy began to be implemented, rejection from russia, than the further the more, europe is ready to brew the soil for a free and democratic ukraine. in recent years, it seemed like you know it all, such hopelessness, everything is gone, no one needs us, it’s getting worse, worse, worse, my mother, who has 40 years of experience there, has such a pension that she had enough to pay for services, there’s no talk about medicines no, there ’s no qu

who promised to investigate the case, but neither yushchenko nor poroshenko. well, of course, we don't talk about the presidential case either, they weren't going to finish it because it's her case, and in fact , they didn't raise theirs, although it would seem that there was something more important. when i found the judge in person during the presidency of kuchma, yuriy vasylenko, deceased, who initiated a criminal case, and then it was possible even if he was brought before the court and it was at least proven that he was good, let there be access to the executors, let him not want and so it happened but the very fact of taking a person to court would show that ukraine was on the way to building a state governed by the rule of law . this is what we are talking about. this is the one who understands, because by the way, to the history of dating, serhiy worked on the channel that was the forerunner of espresso, and i was then the editor of information programs, and mykola knyazhytskyi and i came up with a special evening edition for her, with the aim of the f

where it is indicated that you are personally an fsb agent involved to the poisoning of viktor yushchenkoh happened in 2003, god bless my memory if it's incomplete, i'm not mistaken. here, among the people involved in this poisoning, there was a scheme. well, you are named the institute of the future, which you head. and the espresso tv channel, which did not even exist then and the journalists of this channel, serhiy rudenko, vitaly potenkov, and also my colleague myroslava myroslava barchuk, who is we now, who is currently working in the public service, by the way, did you really take part in the poisoning of yushchenko, and are there legends of the fsb? there are increasing number of similar investigations which, well, are simply reduced to, well, some certain order. maybe i'm wrong, sometimes i'm really wrong, well, first of all, the future also didn't exist at that moment. and at that moment, in 2003, i was working in the crimea , that is, in general it wasn't even in kyiv at that time, i was in the crimea at that time without leaving the country, and i was working there for the news

, who promised to investigate the case, but neither yushchenko nor poroshenko.lensky, of course , we too we don't say, they weren't going to finish it because it's her business, and in fact it's not uplifting for them, although it would seem that there was something more important. vasylenko, deceased, who initiated a criminal case, and then it was possible even if he was brought before the court and it was at least proven that he was good, let there be an excess of executors, let him not want and so it happened, but the very fact of bringing a person to court would show that ukraine was on the way the structure of the rule of law, of course, this did not happen, but it must be said responsibly and honestly that there are very few voices in ukrainian society, and in general, minimal in journalism. well, i think that on the channel on which we talk about this exactly this one understands because, by the way, about the history of acquaintances, serhiy worked on the channel that was the forerunner of espresso, and i was then the editor of information programs, and

powers, and this is constantly happening, and now he wants to strengthen his power again, that is, yushchenko to give up his powers in order for democracy to win, so yanukovych was ready to do everything to strengthen the powers, now again this story, when he tries to strengthen despite everything, that is, to preserve what is there, i will ask very briefly, we literally have a moment, a moment of time, the same issue can be resolved in the parliament, for this no should a referendum be held? no, no, to be exact, such changes are made, of course, only exclusively by referendum, and it just seems to me that it was not exactly about consts. here it is about constitutional changes, and what is worse here is that it is about the actual , actual strengthening of the role of the president, where, well , it is believed that the ukrainian people will remain silent, because, well, we are now, we are very dependent on the government, of course, we , moreover, we behave very tolerantly and calmly, we do not go to rallies, we do not protest, although there were a lot of reasons, for example, when i would

recognized as heroes; they tried to call a spade a spade, that is, europe in 2010, which condemned yushchenko’sosthumously recognize bandera as the heroes of ukraine . now his direct and ideological heirs are being heroized, despite the mass of archi. documenting the brutal crimes of ukrainian nationalists and direct accomplices of hitler, part of the declassified materials was published by the russian foreign ministry on march 23, 1944 at approximately 7:00 a.m. in the village new bricolle. from the trusovsky district of the ternopil region. bandera's men arrived, dressed in red army uniforms, surrounded the village and began gathering people to work. these people were shot in the amount of one hundred to fifteen thousand people and hundreds of thousands of victims, tortured from the weight of those killed by criminals from the un organization of ukrainian nationalists, created in 1929 in vienna by the un in its military doctrine. almost immediately she proclaimed that the future ukrainian state should have a pure national composition, quote. no need to be shy about the methods listed national

and in 2010, president yushchenko solemnly posthumously awards stepan bandera, the main defender of thel idea, heroism and self-sacrifice in the struggle for an independent ukrainian state, ruled the powers of bandera stepan andreevich glory to ukraine already at the state level. we need help, we don't need words, we need actions. the city's streets are called bandera's associates and torchlight processions are held in ukraine by a battalion. azov is all in venders such an attempt. uh, black out for white is the whole story. she simply rewrites from the eighth to the fourteenth year of ideology, the change of state leaders, the change of national heroes from the fourteenth year. uh, stepan bandera, his ukrainian post-stay army , the organization of ukrainian nationalists became the standard for national ukraine. rejecting the soviet past, it was necessary to fill this gap with something, and here i found bandera did not find anything better in 2019 , a law came into force in ukraine. and most importantly, they are not just not heroes on their blood, including the ukrainian population, p

we want our ukrainian state to still be on our land. and in 2010, president yushchenko solemnly posthumouslydera with the main order of independent ukraine, i prescribed a decree, i signed a decree for the invincibility of the spirit in upholding the national idea of ​​heroism and self-sacrifice in the struggle for an independent ukrainian state, i decide to confer the title hero of ukraine and award the order of power to bandera stepan andreyevich glory to ukraine under his portraits in 2014, another coup d'etat takes place in ukraine , from that moment on, a new wave of glorification of nationalists begins at the state level. we need help, we don't need words, we need actions. city ​​streets they are called the ascetic of bendery, torchlight processions take place in ukraine, uh, battalion. azov is all in bold uh fascist uh tattoos, uh, is zelensky's personal guard and so on. well, this is all such an attempt to pass off black as white. she is simply rewritten from the eighth to the fourteenth year of the ukrainian states by the change of state leaders. and already from the 14th year of st

pashinyan is the same project as yushchenko is his goal.power, and therefore he is supported by his power, and he went to this, if not the war began. what kind of relations were there between armenia and russia on the eve of the new war? they have already arrived almost now, he continues to do this, if the armenian people are in armenia, then armenia is waiting very, very much. the difficult future is exactly why this is an anecdote, but there is the objectivity that was talked about here. there are three countries in the caucasus that are ruled by iran, dispersing, turkey, none of them want americans for their own reasons , the american family has no chance. although they will try to remove pashinyan just like on in ukraine, well, after a while they found poroshenko , after poroshenko they tried to play this niche for yulia. zelensky will try to do the same in armenia. but this also depends on those armenians who live in armenia and their future depends on them a hundred years ago. they put their country on the brink of the abyss then vlad

promised that he would not fight, including with corruption, remember the first speech of viktor yushchenkoand as a president, the fight against corruption, according to the democrats, was carried out at such a leading price, the same thing, on the wave of the same expectations, volodymyr zelenskyi was also elected, and this is the priority of the fight against corruption, he became even more important during the war, because it is the ukrainian national tradition to show the responsibility of the head of state, what and who will always be with you during the service, and in which and in which situation he carries out this policy, mr. peter from on the other hand, i cannot remember any of the ukrainian presidents who would go to the elections, you know, with the slogan, i will build you complete corruption in the state, you know, so that people would vote for him, well, the only thing for sure who did not talk about corruption very loudly was yanukovych, well, he put, so to speak, on some other guidelines, but if we talk about the mood of our fellow citizens, that is, there is no sense of y

pritzker, i’ll tell you, the lady is very famous, once, once i saw her in the company of ekaterina yushchenkonter... of kiev, this is the historical part of kiev , yes, st. sophia cathedral, st. michael's cathedral, standing, who? osinitsa khayad, it’s the same as building on the territory of the kremlin, guys, it knocks out everything, it’s absolutely prohibited by law, also, yes, it ’s a system, hayat is its, the whole system, can you imagine, it’s in 2007 there was also...

presidency of leonid danilovich kuchma end with the fact that he exchanged prime minister viktor yushchenko for of the prime minister as a result of viktor yanukovych well, not immediately because of kinakh, he changed because he became an isolated person to the international community because he signed an agreement on a single economic space with russia, belarus, kazakhstan at the end of his presidency, and only the orange revolution, in principle, did not allow this agreement to be implemented life, what a mechanism began to spin up in 2000, a mechanism that, in principle , was supposed to lead to the liquidation of ukrainian statehood already in 2005, it's very simple kuchma is isolated subscribe that we him we say we remove it, we don't create a parliamentary presidential republic here, we bring yanukovych to power and he dismantles everything, damn it, we have a union state of russia and belarus of ukraine no, well, that's already , well, there was already a document, there was already a document, it was already signed , now the question is whether it could all be without killing her.

since then amount of evidence with poisonings there and in england and there will be and you see yushchenkohere is this one, and you see that this is absolutely the same then you could not believe well , how did they get it? this is somewhere from moscow. there was no kremlin. there was nowhere to go and someone to hug. the kremlin was left as a result of all these events, and the whole world knew me . i was the former ambassador. ambassador i am your ambassador in to ukraine, he says: oh, i know this country, the president killed a journalist there, everything is obvious, if he says this, then he will never accept this president as a tyrant in his house until it was kuchma, then can we really hope, let’s say conditionally, they are quite cautious the answer and the question will be a careless answer. i understand you, if you imagine the best investigators in the world who will come from the fbi with a cauldron of yards. i don't know there from the french police. so they will come and show them the documentation, show the testimony , show that they can advance. i don't say to open the toile

was predicted for ukraine after the constitutional reform that yushchenko carried out, and he was such king, who formed himself to have the authority and so he thought that this would be medial, well, but you see how things are going in our country, it is difficult, but it is a huge problem and challenge for democracy with by what is happening in ukraine well, we will talk about it later, but now let's listen to prince harry he will speak in english who understands english it's great who doesn't understand please teach us when someone appears from the speakers who speaks in russian, you are indignant, you are indignant, well, please, this is a magical warning for you, but i think you will understand what prince harry is saying about our beautiful secret , he said that this is a special person , he said that we could lose her, but fortunately she joined the invincible games, he said that it actually symbolizes the very idea of ​​these invincibles and is a symbol of ukraine and its indomitability and courage. well, you actually heard the ovation that was given to the brave paramedic tyra

what did he change from prime minister viktor yushchenko to prime minister viktor yanukovych? an agreement on a single economic space with russia , belarus, kazakhstan at the end of its presidency, and only the orange revolution, in principle, did not allow this agreement to come to life , so what mechanism began in 2000 to spin up the mechanism that, in principle, should have led to the liquidation of ukrainian statehood already by 2005 is very simple. kuchma is isolated, sign what we say to him. we are removing him . we are not creating a parliamentary presidential republic here , we are bringing yanukovych to power and he will dismantle everything . there was already a document already there it was already signed now the question is whether all this could have happened without killing her i think not it was, as you know, the first shot of the signal gun and after that it started the real race that was supposed to end was the liquidation of ukraine as a state, it was supposed to happen in 2004. the maidan in 2004 interrupted it, then russia worked for a few years on revenge,

i’ll tell you, the lady is very famous, once upon a time i saw her in the company of ekaterina yushchenkoi’ll tell you how famous and authoritative that i’ll give you an example in the center of kiev - this is the historical part of kiev, and sofievsky cathedral, st. michael's cathedral, who is standing? asinica hayat, it’s the same as building on the territory the kremlin, guys, it is out of everything, it is absolutely prohibited by law, this is hayat’s system, this is her entire system, can you imagine, in 2007 she was still... not even the minister of trade, but she was always a sponsor, the democrats, they forced the ukrainian to allocate power for this monster, in another place it’s normal, but this is concrete and glass, so she comes not to improve the lives of ukrainians, but to improve the lives of american billionaires who today came, are coming into ukraine, to take everything, but she’s right , here comes zelsky, rejoice you, you will sit, but not rule, in what it is not...' we are talking from the point of view of how to call this territory occupied , they looked at what they

and so, after yushchenko, it went away that ukraine was deprived of ukraine.out nuclear potential. all this is completely complete, so to speak, not true, and moreover, and when kuchma signed the budapest monarda there in general, uh, it was specially stipulated that all this would be financial, so to say, ukraine is provided with and compensated for nothing. transferred to the russian federation for free for the entire russian federation, paid for the uranium and for the missile because of the aircraft for everything and this, so to speak , was also uh, one of the features of the transfer of nuclear weapons to ukraine . i generally have to say that recently this is the topic of uh nuclear weapons. it starts to come up more and more in speeches and performances. just recently, uh, the crown prince of saudi arabia said that if iran becomes the owner of nuclear weapons, then so will saudi arabia, so to speak, will become the owner of nuclear weapons. i think that there will be no problems here, because pakistan has obligations to saudi arabia. saudi arabia actua

pashinyan is the same project as yushchenko is his goal.or this purpose. they brought him to power, and therefore he is supported by you and he would have gone to this if the war had not started. what kind of relationship were between armenia and russia the day before, they had already come almost to this point, but the war misfired. and now he continues to do this, if the armenian people in armenia do not expel him. then armenia lives very, very well. the difficult future is exactly why this is an anecdote, but there is the objectivity that was discussed here. there are three countries in the caucasus that are ruled by iran, scattering, turkey, none of them wants americans for their own reasons, all together, i ask the americans there is no chance. although they will try to remove pashinyan just like in ukraine, well, after yoshchenko they found poroshenko after poroshenko tried to play a prank on yulia, but it didn’t work out. zelensky will try to do the same in armenia. but this also depends on those armenians who live in armenia and the

whose were they from the time of yushchenko or yanukovych? voiced. i really enjoyed spending. now they won a tender there. e over 300 million hryvnia. well, that is about 8.5 million dollars goes to the purchase, or rather not to the purchase for the repair of tennis courts. at the same time, in the ice stadium in kiev , you understand, that is, eight and a half million dollars. just, uh, money revival. yes, then a rocket will fly there or something there, i don’t know, it will unfreeze next to the ice rink and, accordingly, short on the ice quite right at the ice stadium in kiev , commissioned by mr. rebound from the ministry of youth and sports. naturally, there will be no youth for a long time, because a sport is only one deadly dangerous solution already, by the way, and here is an indicative moment, after all, we and they should show i, uh, i want to remind you. yes, that's not something to quote myself there, but the end of february of the twenty- second year, the first days when we went to my native zaporozhye region. i shot a video an

be difficult for anyone, and for some it would be impossible at all, this is viktor andriyovych yushchenkos really difficult to communicate in russian, i remember it, it's easier, but that's because i'm from western ukraine, maybe, probably because, well , she even switched to moldovan, moldovan several times during this interview language, and the presenter said how it would be in russian, and it even happened several times, well, but this statement, it's just great, what she said, and it's obvious that this statement was immediately reacted to by terrorists in the country, putin's spokesman, dmitry peskov, said, yes, i'll even quote it: moldova sees in european values ​​that it seeks to promote categorical denial of everything russian is a mistake, because russia is also a european value, and the price of this mistake will have to be paid by the moldovan people, and on which side russia is a european value, firstly, it is, secondly, it is a threat, it is a direct threat to moldova for the fact that and for the fact that she denied everything is russian, you remember how, just before the

pro-ukrainian views, and i talked with the cleric who even earlier , let’s say, the good times of yushchenko such a pro-ukrainian line and began to push it, it felt very good who supported him and it was felt , what views are there. i now communicate with many priests from the moscow patriarchate . who still remains there at all? i understand why they stay there. i think that they expect something. they don't want to move. there are, for example, priests who come. we recently wrote a news story about something. three priests moved three parishes. it's not that he took the keys and handed them over, as it used to be. when they were transferred to the mp, this is actually what he wants to convince people of, but i know of cases where in fact that structure already works powerfully as an agent , even during the unification cathedral. i have seen priests who are completely pro-ukrainian, who can to say there are such, well, they can be. here is such a good one with a sample of ukrainian orthodoxy, they didn’t switch immediately, then he says you left six months before it became clear that there

twenty is now for an exclusive interview you on one nation, former ukrainian is viktor yushchenko, ihe front lines, how backward he attacks the last couple of days? >> all night, dave was an object there, massive attack. they came on the first infrastructure. we see preparation for mobile attack but we are decisive to protect ukraine and free ukrainian soil and there was no electricity in kyiv and no electricity in my house. at the same time the ukrainian air defense so respect to armed forces. >> we are going to show a map, taken roughly 50% of what russia took after their invasion a year ago. taken 50% back, progress reportedly in this insurgency, what do you need to make more progress right away and how frustrating is it we seem to be slow walking equipment and aid? >> we have strong support and appreciate the leadership of the united states. we are proud the support in washington and that situation we keep fingers crossed. coalition and long-range and attack missile and air defense. this is together with the experience of armed forces and how stop the war viktor. our fight bigger

former president of ukraine viktor yushchenko said that ukraine has fought with russia 24 times in itsap there are 24 wars with russia , even the history of the twentieth century, if we take from 1917 to the ninety -first year, ukraine declared independence six times, five times we lost, the reason was one external aggression, five times we did not lose due to external aggression. wait, they fought because of external aggression, ukraine did not appear as a subject that could fight with someone, and in the spring of 1917, when the central rada was created, in kiev and when the ukrainians began to claim that they had their own army, we give six times, as they were announced there, first the central joy, the hetman of rapata, appears. then they united there. yes, and skoropadsky was sitting on german bayonets, he was knocked out by the red army, which means that the ukrainian red army was supported, of course, by the russian red army, that is, there was a civil war in ukraine. it had its own red army and its own bolsheviks. nationalist regimes appear there from time to time. that is, rou

practicing hand-to-hand combat techniques and learning to sing muscovites to knives, president yushchenkoibraries a book translated into russian by moscow’s famous russophobe, a ukrainian emigrant from canada, pavel shtepopa. this is a russian work that ukrainians and russians are two different peoples and ethnic types, the author says that russians have arms , legs, in short, height is shorter, the width of the chest is narrower, that is , at the level of genetics it is proven that the ukrainian is white kostya and the russian is inferior race fina tatar mix quote from the book. strength is the only argument that understands and moskvin respects law, justice, morality for him, chinese literacy, all this nonsense in subsequent years migrated to children's manuals and textbooks. hatred of the russian world devoured ukraine for many years. let's remember the year 2022, when from every iron they shouted that it was necessary to kill russians and their children. the tv channel ukraine 24 presenters on air calls for the unthinkable to kill not just russians, but to cut children so that they do

and you don’t even need to remember yushchenko about whom you were talking or there.nterprises. and there seemed to be a representative. actually, this russian-speaking southeast is there, and ukraine just needed to lead its country normally to develop. there are some laws to pass and so on and ukraine would be just in chocolate, but no, from the first day these people took it. or the course and they began to promote it, an anti-russian course anti-russian is not poroshenko or yushchenko with his foreigner. there my wife wrote a book, ukraine is not russia. yes, they did exactly that. these are the people who led this still successful ukraine

privatize, then quite accidentally introduced mercy to the head of the national bank of ukraine viktor yushchenkoced banderaism into the school curriculum. exhibitions are all two equivalent projects. here are two faces of the ukrainian project , there is no one, here there is another. then i discover an interesting factor, which was also a shock for me when i studied her biography. ah christie is on a very interesting site. it turns out that she is not just a member of the bilderberg club, but is also on the board of trustees of the economic forum, including, well , the difficult role of a lady, we are somehow on a tangent we touched upon a very important issue: the question of a person’s competence and independence in decision-making, when a person without a basic education becomes the minister of foreign trade and then the minister of foreign affairs, then the minister of finance. it is clear that you need to understand all matters. this man cannot, such ministers become hostages of those who give them information. she, perhaps, will consult with the same people on some issues in contentment o

tell you, the lady is very famous, once upon a time, i once saw her in the company of ekaterina yushchenkoitative, that i will give you an example, in the center of kiev - this is the historical part of kiev, yes, st. sophia cathedral, st. michael's cathedral, who is standing? aspen hayat? it’s like building on the territory of the kremlin, guys, it knocks out everything, it’s absolutely prohibited by law, it’s a system, hayat is hers, the whole system, can you imagine, in 2007 she wasn’t even the minister of trade yet, but she was always a sponsor, a democrat, they forced the ukrainian to allocate power for this monster, in another place it’s normal, but this... the tone is gone , so she comes not to improve the lives of ukrainians, but to improve the lives of american billionaires who came today, are coming into ukraine, to take everything, well, just right, here comes zelensky, rejoice now, you will sit on the wrong side, what is she wrong about, she is an american citizen, the money of american taxpayers, they realized that the agrigens are stealing, we are talking to you from the poin

either out of ignorance, or i don’t know, it’s yushchenko and now zelensky has again raised this issuee withdrawn from the western group from the southern group to ukraine , and huge warehouses were fully stocked. they had everything, everything was given away. everything was stolen. everything was sold so to speak. here, uh, the beginning of our special operation. there they have, uh, about 200,000 armed forces in total, and they are armed, and the westerners already have weapons. ham, the black sea fleet is the same. i imagine if we left ours black sea fleet. what did they insist on, by the way, in all seriousness. leave us the black sea fleet - this is our fleet. well, okay, so to speak, there was a commander. well, so to speak , correctly configured and the majority of the fleet personnel, who simply refused to accept the ukrainian squat when the question of dividing the black sea fleet arose. unfortunately. e. well, there was not much rush, so to speak, qualified specialists were not very good at that time. uh, an agreement on the division of the black sea fleet. they didn't give

and so, after yushchenko, it went away that ukraine was deprived of ukraine.paid for uranium and for missiles and for aircraft, for everything. and this, so to speak , was also, uh, one of the features of the transfer of nuclear weapons to ukraine. in general, i must say that recently this has been the topic of uh nuclear weapons. she uh is starting to come up more and more in speeches and speeches. just recently, uh, the crown prince of saudi arabia said that if iran becomes the owner of nuclear weapons, then saudi arabia too, so to speak, will become the owner of nuclear weapons weapons. i think that there will be no problems here, because pakistan has obligations to saudi arabia. saudi arabia itself financed nuclear capabilities and the acquisition of nuclear status. e pakistanis, so pakistan will share everything. what can anyone do in the middle east? if saudi arabia turns out to be there and the united arab emirates and egypt are accused. by the way, turkey , which is now creating a civilian sector of the nuclear industry, so to speak, would not mind, bu