cinema, how it has survived at all to this day, not rebuilt, completed in the sixties, architect zaborskyesting because it contains monumental art, stained glass, mosaic panels, in general, every element there has meaning. one of the interesting solutions was the sports palace of architects filimonov and malyshev, built in the sixties. the main thing in this sports palace was the creation of a huge, transforming internal space. this was done precisely thanks to new technology, these are cable-stayed structures that made it possible to block this huge span. the use of very powerful elements and a concrete structure, like a support, well, this is an excellent engineering calculation, that is, such a huge building with a huge span for that time in the seventies, this is a big breakthrough. decades later, the sports palace building remains original today. without it, it is difficult to imagine a modern prospect of winners. but the desire for novelty did not always have a positive effect on the historical appearance of cities and the capital. the fashion for large-scale multifunctional objects

in such a way that they are no longer good for their own man, the one they are used to, give them zaborskyords, so that with show-off, everything in life it’s not like on tv, in life you forget who’s showing off, that’s right, shelupony, here they are shelupony on top. what he saw, that is, what he was on duty, paints in colors over the general communication, today mikhailovich, hope, you, like two generations, can answer the question: skill and talent? are they moving in the same direction or in different directions? as an example, let me give you, let’s say, poor musicians on a cracked guitar and everyone is dancing, then he matures, he has a studio, and a guitar, the skill is there, everything is there, but there is no music anymore, when is a person more talented? talent is something that changes past dignity, this happens with us, i won’t. can't be named call it that, but there is talent, talent , no, but there is no talent, there is opportunism, wonderful knowledge of the subject, technology, all that, but there is no talent there, and talent is, well, relatively speaking , pakhmutov