it thought that the value of the rewards that these courageous members of the armed forces we're zefing, was being demeaned and diminished. by charlotteians. that's what congress thought. is that uterly unreasonable that we can't accept it? >> justice, it's not entirely clear what congress thought here because congress held no hearings on this. it made a broad, general finding that false statements -- >> it's a matter of kbhoen sense that common sense that it seems to me to demean the medal. >> wearing the met dal is a slightly -- >> well, i'm not so sure. the tinker case with the arm band? it's purely expressive speech, it seems to me. i think if you prevail here, that the wearing prohibition must also be in serious doubt. >> it may be or it may be in doubt under certain situations in where one is wearing a medal v . but certainly, congress has an interest in protecting nonexpressive purposes. >> i think tsz. if the whole purpose of the person who puts the medal on his tuxedo that he doesn't earn, that's pure purpose. >> it may be, your honor. but, again, we view it under eight differe