and trump, and trump demanded that zelenskyi influence the case.eph biden, the main competitor of trump, who was involved in the case of burizma in ukraine and depended on the aid of the united states of america on whether zelensky would give in or not, then this phone conversation got into the american media, her bodyguards were angry, and this began the whole procedure, but it turns out that zelenskyy is with trump for the second time and this is the story for the second time... when it is clear that they are among themselves, well, if they do find a common language, then it is difficult enough, and especially on the part of trump, but less so, you mentioned the plan victory, about yermak's statement, about the fact that this, this victory plan will be presented to ukrainians without some closed details, let's listen to what the head of the office of the president of ukraine said, because it is very... this is the president's plan, and certainly, as he promised, after presentations by the presidents and the united states, partners, i think it wil

melinda: president zelenskyy said today before his parliament, no way.ing to give away any of our territory. we are going to have to wait and see on this one. but the overall mood is that you are right, the peace plan zelenskyy presented sounds like old wine in new bottles. the last two points are little bit new thouy -- though. he suggested ukraine's partners might be able to enter into an economic deal after the war is over. the fifth point is after the war is over, ukrainian troops might be able to serve in europe and ensure european security. those two last points sound like they were written for a republican presidential administration. they are points that would -- those were interesting to me. sumi: here in the u.s., kamala harris and donald trump are campaigning heavily in the home stretch of a very tight residential race.day trp spoke a prerecorded all-female town hall in georgia that aired on fox news. when speaking about women's reproductive rights, he called himself the father of ivf. the former president has pledged to make the fertility tre

, and he said it during the meeting with zelenskyi, and he said it after the meeting with zelenskyi,o what can zelenskyi do to change this, this election position of his, nothing , that is, the problem, that is, the problem in essence, well, again, in my opinion, not even in them, but the problem in him, that is, in trump , in fact, it is trump who made the whole mess, and by the way, trump spoke in essence such that, in principle, it does not go to the head, and that in general far from any diplomatic etiquette, even despite the fact that, relatively speaking, something could have offended him there, that's what the phrases are worth, there is no ukraine there, it is almost destroyed, millions of people died in ukraine, civilization was destroyed there, destroyed cities, in fact he said that there is no such country. well, i’m sorry, it was just a stream of lies, a stream of fakes, and these things, they are far from any protocol at all, even, well, i’m not talking about diplomatic protocol, of any adequacy conducting a political campaign, well, why, well, if trump knows that the pe

will have it advantage, but if the same general zaluzhnyi registers, as zelenskyi won, no, thank you, and the end, what is the situation in sumy now, if possible briefly, we literally have a minute left, it is difficult, complicated the situation is bad with light, bad with water, bad with mobile communication, bad with the internet, er, and the enemy, as a rule, beat sums either late at night or early in the morning, and this is today, well, they they fly all day, in anxiety, in fact, like it's a break at school. in class 10 minutes and a new anxiety, 10 minutes and a new one anxiety, and they fly all day, they are shot down all day, somewhere, well, they use a new attack tactic during the day. thank you, mr. viktor, take care, send greetings to my native sums, and all the best to you, take care. it was viktor boberenko, an expert of the bureau of policy analysis, and i would like to remind you, friends, that during our entire broadcast, we conduct polls, or rather already after. we are conducting this poll, which reads as follows: should zelenskyi make public his victory plan, mean

next, time meeting, zelenskyi had to extend his stay overseas for one day.t, the meeting place is new york. zelenskyi was already in new york at the un general assembly, went to washington. then, in order to meet with trump , he returned to new york again, and even in new york itself. the place of the trump tower meeting, that is, on the territory of donald trump, but still, having made these compromises, having gone, so to speak, to this meeting with trump, it was important, the meeting itself was important for conveying to trump the ukrainian position on war, isn't it, of course, and trump wanted to clearly demonstrate by this behavior that this meeting is more important for volodymyr zelenskyi himself than for him, he forced volodymyr. to go to a certain public humiliation, begging him for a meeting many times, publicly sending such letters, and he also emphasized that he is ready to be quite tough in relation to ukraine, even on the eve of this meeting, because we heard accusations from the republican side towards volodymyr zelenskyi, towards ukraine in

trump spoke with zelenskyi for over an hour. for such conversations - this is an extremely long time. this speaks of both trump's interest and possible development prospects ukrainian-american relations in case of his victory. of course, these relations will develop and america will still support ukraine. and we will see the result of this visit on october 12. reinstein will be there, biden will be there, it will probably be his last message, i predict, to the world, from a security perspective, he will be there for the last time as president of the united states of america, i think the outcome will be very good, given the what and in general the results of this visit can be called difficult or bad for ukraine cannot. now trump is ahead of harris, but trump is a charismatic politician and i...

i believe that volodymyr zelenskyi's meeting with trump, under the conditions in which it took place, actually went very well and successfully. you mentioned 2020, but you remember, then it all almost ended with the impeachment of trump, because the conversation was between zelenskyi and trump, and trump demanded that zelenskyi influence the case of the son of joseph biden, trump's main competitor, who was involved in the case of burism in ukraine and depended on the help of the united states of america on whether or not zelensky would give in, then this telephone conversation got into the american media. her bodyguards angered her and this whole procedure began, but it turns out that zelenskyy is already out for the second time trump, and for the second time here is the story, when it is clear that they are among themselves, well, if they find a common language, then it is quite so difficult, and especially from trump's side, but less so, you mentioned the victory plan and yermak's manifestation of the , that... this, this victory plan will be presented to ukrainians without some clo

still, it is important that the meeting between zelenskyi and trump was held in new york, but here, so to speak, there were certain compromises from the ukrainian side. first of all, zelensky had to write a personal letter to donald trump, signed by volodymyr, and trump, by the way, published it later on the social network, made it public, though. there was a private letter, then, at the time of the meeting, zelensky had to extend his stay overseas for one day. next, the meeting place is new york. zelensky was already in new york at the un general assembly, went to washington, then to meet with trump was returning again to new york. and even in new york itself, we can see the trump tower meeting place, that is, on the territory of donald trump. but still, having made these compromises, leaving, so to speak. for this meeting with trump, it was important, the meeting itself was important for conveying to trump the ukrainian position on the war, right? of course, and by this behavior, trump wanted to clearly demonstrate that this meeting is more important for volodymyr zelenskyi than for

olezh, that the victory plan that zelenskyi and yarmak brought to washington can also be perceived asart of... let's say yes, a part, a large part of the political activity of the current team, because in the united states of america, i think they have their own plan to fight russia, and it is, well, clear, at least to them, and they follow this logic, and our plan victory, it depends on their plan for victory, and it is absolutely obvious from their plans, because ukraine has been politicized enough. to this question, that there is a victory plan, and yarmak and zelensky flew to the united states of america, ukrainians did not hear or see this the plan of victory, although this plan of victory, of course, corresponds to the plan of victory or appeasement of putin in the united states of america. yermak, returning from the united states of america , said that this victory plan would be presented to the ukrainians, with the exception of some secret separate parts, which apparently concern weapons, the list of weapons that ukraine is counting on. mr. oleg, should we expect a victory fro

i never thought that we would not get a meeting with zelenskyy. - zelenskyy really stood up to lev andpe that you and president putin get together and can solve your problem. that would be a tremendous achievement. - i thought trump's a hero saving our democracy and zelenskyy is a corrupt leader. and it was all the opposite. at the end of the day, it turned out that trump was the actual criminal and zelenskyy was a stand-up guy. - we were all waiting for trump to get presidential. and instead, he just became a monster. he's a bully, and he really needs to focus on himself. like, please stop focusing on the united states. go sit down. it's time. [whimsical music] - the serial entrepreneur-type judgment debtors, they're going to find themselves into something. and lev found himself into the biggest something i've ever seen a debtor ever get into. we were able to find a account that lev controlled through an entity called aaron investments i, llc that the $325,000 actually came from. they gave 325,000 to america's first action. - the money got flagged by a bank. they saw the hallmarks of

volodymyr zelenskyy then came third.t the same time, budanov never voiced his political ambitions. does he have them ? budanov's popularity is not typical for scouts. usually scouts of this level are not public. instead, kyrylo budanov during his work... gave a huge number of interviews and comments, where he voiced dozens of forecasts, well, how exactly did he gain such popularity and recognition among the population, in the winter the war will reach a large extent, and after the winter the end of this conflict will begin with the exit of the first stage to the admindons, as of the 91st year, are you not afraid to give forecasts? no, i'm not afraid, this active phase has a lot. reduce by the end of the year, almost to zero, and then in what form the war will continue, the exit to our administrative cordon, this will end our war, i tell you once again, being a little... certain difficult times, but the loss of russia is already a settled issue, and they themselves know this very well, in october of last year you announce

the situation during zelenskyi's visit to the united states of america about the need for bipartisan support, can we say after this visit that ukrainians and the ukrainian authorities finally understand the need for this bipartisan support, and that we will not give preference to one of the candidates and the other the candidate will be offended, and like the current one, during the current election race in the united states of america. will and will the ukrainian card be played, the ukrainian question? the ukrainian question, it is in general one of the key issues in these pre-election races, and here we must not forget that on november 5 in the usa, not only presidential elections will be held, but also elections to the capitol, that is, to the american one, to the american parliament, and below. chamber and to the senate partially, so in this case we have to understand that there is a comprehensive approach to ukraine, and in general the support and somehow the influence, influence and participation of the usa on the situation in the war between ukraine and russia, it is key, and

in a conversation with president biden, president of ukraine zelenskyi presented his plan for victory. they discussed in great detail what he believed was necessary to implement this plan. we are looking into this very carefully, including what should we, or other partners in ukraine, do, if any, to help them achieve this success? mr. andrii, here we are talking about what really happened interest, yes, and i want to clarify here once again, regarding the victory plan, regarding the vision for the united states of america, actually what volodymyr zelenskyi presented, whether indeed... all the points are shared, actually by our american partners, whether there are any a caveat to the fact that our international partners are currently unable to fulfill certain points due to clearly objective circumstances. the biggest caveats are aimed at america, these are internal affairs, internal quarrels, misunderstandings between republicans and democrats, and so on. now we have passed the end of fin. fiscal year, fiscal year, and now we only now understand what the budget is left, because they ju

zelenskyi, who is announced as somewhat breakthrough, serious. it is obvious that zelenskyy stated before that that diplomacy and force should go hand in hand and that is the only way they work together. that is, it is obvious that there will be certain details, let's say, of those agreements that were reached in washington. based on biden's recent tweet, then it is possible to assume that something, something serious will be said there. perhaps for part of the billions, the invitation of ukraine to nato, and perhaps for the permission of our partners to strike deep into russia, not the united states, but european partners, and the united states will say that they are not against it, i think that biden until the end of the election campaign such a decisive step will not be taken, perhaps some other positions will appear now not in the budget terms, but in 8 plus in a specific amount. and the dates of the supply of the necessary armaments to ukraine, including airplanes, these are also air defense systems, these are a number of positions that toda

president zelenskyi, the first visit to the usa by president biden was back in the 20th year, if i am not mistaken, in february, when he stepped in, started with this, said, we need to accept, join nato, and when they told him that this work is with three 32 countries, he said, well, cholera with him, this is generally a routine, and soon germany, france will be out of it it will turn out, it was a shock for biden, all the newspapers there were buzzing after that, now after so many years, president zelensky is going to... the usa and says again: we need to join nato, knowing for sure that in america in less than a month presidential elections, that is, he communicates with the president, who in fact, there are 3 weeks left, he will still be the president until the inauguration in january, but for that, someone believes that in a month it is possible to mobilize 31 countries of the crimea of ​​the united states, which must be unanimously agreed upon. inviting ukraine to nato, so why do things that cause only misunderstanding, well, irritation, or to be more precise, irritation, well, a

another topic is postponed presentation of zelenskyi's victory plan.omised that he would show the ukrainians or tell the ukrainians about this victory plan that zelensky presented in the united states of america, as the president himself said while talking to the new nato secretary. mark rutte, one of the elements of the victory plan is geopolitical certainty. let's listen to what zelensky said. in particular, part of the plan is geopolitical determination, i.e. the decision regarding ukraine's place in the european and global security architecture. moscow must receive a clear signal that it is guaranteed security for ukraine. and the whole of europe is irreversible, as is the independent right of every democratic nation in europe to determine its own future. well, this is zelensky's position. larisa, there is a lot of talk about the fact that the plan needs to be shown to the ukrainians, there is no need to talk about the political part, not to talk about the specification of weapons, which is obvious in this plan, and maybe... should, well, no one ca

zelenskyi win over him?nk you, mr. viktor, and finally, what is the current situation in sumy, if possible briefly, we literally have a minute left, a difficult, difficult situation, bad with light, bad with water, bad with mobile communication, the internet is bad, and... and the enemy, as a rule, hit sums, either late at night or early in the morning, and this is today, well, they fly all day, anxiety actually, like a break at school during a lesson, 10 minutes and a new alarm, 10 minutes and a new alarm, and they fly all day, they are shot down all day, somewhere, well, they use new tactics, attacks in a day, thank you, mr. viktor, take care, send congratulations to my native sums and... and that's all all the best to you, take care. it was viktor boberenko, an expert of the bureau of policy analysis, and i will remind you, friends, that in the future throughout our broadcast, we are conducting a survey, or rather, we are already completing this survey, which sounds like whether zelensky should make his v

zelenskyy did not comment any further about the details. he says his government has intelligence that at least 10,000 troops are north korea are being prepared to join russian forces. meanwhile south korea national intelligence services said russian navy ships have already transferred 1500 north korean special operation forces to rush at this month. they also claim north korean soldiers have been given russian military uniforms, weapons forged identification documents. will likely be deployed after training about the crime went beyond yang did denied the allegation to secretary-general said this week they could not yet confirm the reports either. >> at this moment our official position is they cannot confirm north korea's active late now as soldiers engaged in the war effort. but in any way even if north korea is not physically there at the battlefield the and still they are helping to fuel the war against ukraine. >> in brussels zelenskyy discusses victory plan to end the war with russia the plan zelenskyy once ukraine to join nato is seek

well, by the way, about what volodymyr zelenskyy expects from our western partners, he spoke yesterday and in the evening address, he spoke about the need to close the sky over ukraine, let's listen to what the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine said. we see that one of the main reasons for the lack of security in the skies of ukraine, and in particular, near the nato borders, of our neighbors is the lack of decisions on joint work, about joint defense, what works in the skies of the middle east and helps the defense of israel, can also work in the skies of our part of europe, in ukraine, as well, helping to save lives, are special. night decisions are a very effective tactic, today we talked, in particular, about this with mark ryuta. we will continue to convince all partners of what needs to be implemented, what is needed for effective protection of the sky. and there is the reaction of the pentagon, they say that they will not get involved in the russian- ukrainian war, the deputy spokesperson pentagon sabrina singh at a briefing. said that the north atlantic alliance

at the stadium, another candidate, could be addressed today to president zelenskyi himself, and the and he would hardly dare to answer them, well, especially about what all the president's friends have two hands , yes, and about nepotism and about many other things, let's talk about one more topic, mr. dmitry, actually about russia and about theirs. already a plan, a nuclear plan, a new nuclear plan, because they have declared that they are changing the nuclear doctrine and, rather, the concept of nuclear deterrence, nato members should not refuse to provide more military aid to ukraine because of the irresponsible nuclear rhetoric of the russian dictator putin, has now declared already former nato general jens stoltenberg in an interview with reuters, let's listen to what he said every time we increased our support. ukraine with new types of weapons, battle tanks, long-range artillery or f-16, the russians tried to prevent this, they failed, and this latest incident should not prevent nato allies from supporting ukraine either. mr. dmytro, how and in what way should ukraine respond

star is rolling there and the like, but this is not a question of zelenskyi, i think that in this case we absolutely do not care about his stars , but the question regarding ukraine is fundamental today, and it would be necessary to work in a different format, in my opinion, because we also received internal scandals related to the meeting with trump, from visiting certain factories that started with wine. . seeing that ukraine takes this or that position, supports these or that candidates, we cannot afford it, we have always worked to ensure that we have the support of two parties, two candidates and the current president of the united states of america. unfortunately, today we saw what we saw, going back to the war in the middle east, if such a war were to develop there in the full sense. then this will negatively affect the level of support for ukraine, most of the weapons will go there, and they, it is not unlimited, and in the warehouses of our partners, it also ends, it's no secret, and if they choose the high probability that the lion's share will go specifically to help israel

ukrainians will be presented with a plan to win the initiative. by president zelenskyi, but partially the head of the president's office, andriy yermak, announced this in the one news telethon. this is the president's plan, and certainly, as he promised, after the presentation to the president of the united states, partners, i think it will be presented to the ukrainians, but i can tell you, certainly there are parts, they are so very sensitive, they are closed. and not because there are secrets, this is our country, we all, you know, today, in the good sense of the word, we are such, really the only family in which there can be no secrets, especially in wartime, but still, you you know, everything that happened becomes public, and it is heard not only in our country, the enemy also hears it, and therefore, of course... the details, some details of this plan, they are closed, but you know, the implementation of this plan is important , to see on enemy territory and see in the results, in the victories of our military, our armed forces. the past volodymyr zelenskyy came to the usa last

team, is it ready now zelenskyi's team to such drastic actions regarding the implementation of these points, which are necessary for joining nato, that is, conditionally. saying that ryute clearly understands that he is not only making statements that we will support ukraine, ryute's next statement may be that ukraine started this movement, it is doing something, and we will see what they are doing there and how it corresponds to our criteria let's, if you allow, come from the other side, i will also ask questions, and we will come out with you for an answer. first, when we talk about the fight against corruption. and that string corruption scandals that have been shaking society for several months, most of them are one way or another connected with representatives of the authorities, as i said today, everything is managed from the office of the president, that is, the answer to the question of fighting corruption, it is obvious how many were handed and they did everything to prevent the bab law from passing through the parliament, now they did the same to prevent the customs law fro

yevgeny, president zelenskyi successfully visited america and with retained, it seems bipartisan. theof ukraine, which is most important, that is why he also presented his ambitious plan for victory there, nevertheless, many wrote that this plan did not seem to impress the american side, and now, well, we also have an interesting publication, for example, in economies, where they said , that ukraine's plan, zelenskyi's plan should be more realistic. because they are unrealistic goals, they repel allies and divide ukrainian society, what do you think about it, about president zelenskyi's plan, and uh, and in general, when andriy started asking questions, i said, i had a successful visit to the united states of america, you somehow smiled like that, mr. yevgeny, i thought so, do you have any thoughts about the visit, in your opinion, was it successful or not, it didn’t seem , it didn't seem like it, panel. it didn't seem like, well, first of all, uh, about whether we will maintain bipartisan support, we will see objectively already in further actions, literally in the near future, i...

this is the visit of the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi to the united states of america. the visit lasted more than five days. the president met with the leaders of the united states of america, with the president of the united states, joe biden, with the vice president and democratic candidate kamala harris, and in the end , he still managed to meet with another candidate for the post of president. and the usa by donald trump, even after a certain scandal. in general, during this meeting, the president presented a victory plan, met, by the way, also with congressmen and senators, there were also meetings with the defense by the industry of the united states of america, well, in short, many, many things. mr. vitaly, if we summarize like this first, how do you... will you characterize this visit, relatively speaking, was the victory plan, as they say, presented positively, did this chip work with him, and did the victory plan succeed, sir andrii, did you notice that in the last days of the visit, almost nothing was mentioned about the victory plan, and no one spoke anymore

against this background, zelenskyi says that ukraine is starting to increase the production of weaponsand among other things, he says that it is starting to produce systems, unmanned systems. that is why , in your opinion, the president is emphasizing right now on the third year of the great war and whether there were any other options. with the beginning of the great war, and your calculations for your own weapons, well let's put it this way, it would be a long conversation if we remembered what happened in the 19th year, how the missile, artillery, drone, air defense and many other programs were frozen, let's put it down to the fact that the current president believed that all this was unnecessary, the main thing was to look into putin's eyes and meet in the middle. let's hurry to the fact that he was a naive manager who did not understand that he was dealing with an absolute maniac, to whom to go unarmed means simply to fall into the clutches, to become a victim. yes it happened in the 19th year, in the 22nd year, i'm sorry. but in the 22nd year there was a shock. we all fought back

let's take a look. >> i think zelenskyy is one of the greatest salesmen i've ever seen. every time he comes in, we give him $100 billion. who else got that kind of money in history? there's never been. that doesn't mean i don't want to help him, because i feel very badly for those people. but he should never have let that war start. that war is a loser. ukraine, remember, is not ukraine anymore. every city almost is knocked down to the ground. all those beautiful golden domes are laying on their sides, smashed to smithereens. >> joining us now matthew brzezinski. he previously covered russia and ukraine for the paper. good to see you. it is incoherent, donald trump blaming volodymyr zelenskyy for, quote, letting that war happen when, of course, it was vladimir putin who gave the order for russia to invade. it continues a pattern of trump blaming zelenskyy for many things, including, in part, his first impeachment. what does it also tell us about what would happen to that conflict if trump were to win in just 18 days' time? >> that's not even the most ridiculous thing tha

zelenskyy looks exactly like the president of war, not the president of peace, which means that wheneace, new people, new forces will appear, i think that in general there will be a serious reformatting of the entire political field, or it may not be so, or the war will continue for years, there will be no elections here, and there will be such a de facto authoritarian regime of volodymyr zelenskyi, i don’t know there for another 10 years, it may be like that, absolutely, absolutely, in many countries like you know what outposts look like. democracy, martial law was not lifted for decades in taiwan, let's say during chenka's time, the first real free elections were held there, 30 years later, it seems, after chiang kai-shek managed to withdraw his troops to taiwan, but taiwan was considered a fortress of the free world, no matter what , and ukraine can be considered a fortress of the free world, and the elections, what are the elections, here the inhabitants of this country will forget for a long time, they simply will not be, but they will be. after the war, i guarantee it. vance an

supreme council of justice is already preparing a submission to the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi on the appointment of judges of local courts. the vrp considers candidates who have already been selected and recommended by a higher qualification commission, recognizing them as virtuous and meeting professional criteria and ethical requirements. some applicants are simply amazing. this is valentina, judge of the cherkasy district administrative court. and she has not administered justice for more than seven years due to the expiration of her term of office. studied at the school of judges, sometimes helped colleagues prepare projects. i prepared some for meetings. valentina orlenko is a classic judge and uses standard schemes. issued a lexus for a 62-year-old mother. at the moment, if i am not dying, she was 62 years old, but she is a modern woman who was always busy with herself. the judge assures that the mother dreamed of a car and collected money for it all her life, but it did not increase with the receipt of a driver's license. mother had the skills to drive a car, because he

well, it is obvious that zelenskyi and yarmak showed more than one map of hostilities, where, how, whoand this will lead to a plan or to victory. it is clear that the main concept of the victory plan is the defeat of russia, i understand that this is a plan to defeat russia, they don't talk about it, but well, it's absolutely obvious. janino, what do you expect from this plan of victory. do you also think that this is a well-wrapped action that is currently taking place, the liberation of the territory of ukraine, an attempt to liberate the territory of ukraine, that this is an attempt to push the west to make a decision that ukraine will be, well, to the invitation of the western countries to nato , that this is an exit there to the borders of 1995, well, such general things, political coercion of russia, yes, advisers, who recently became almost the only speakers of zelensky's various plans, named this plan, we actually talked about it on our youtube, well, what is known, and mainly the western press somehow confirms all kinds of different plans, negotiations, starting with johnson,

london was the first stop of president zelenskyy's latest diplomatic tour as he tries to gather moreort for ukraine. he later traveled to paris for similar talks with the french president. a short while ago, president zelenskyy was greeted by the italian prime minister upon his arrival in italy. after that will be a meeting with pope francis at the vatican friday before a trip to germany to attend a security summit that was delayed after u.s. president biden said he was unable to attend due to hurricane milton. our defense correspondent jonathan beale has this update. >> this visit was part of a whistle stop tour of european capitals by president zelenskyy to try to rally support for what he calls his victory plan for ukraine. something he has already presented to president biden in the u.s.. details have not been revealed, but we know what some of it contains and it includes for example some clear steps for ukraine's membership of the nato alliance, more security guarantees, and also ukraine being allowed to use western supply long-range weapons to hit targets inside russia, somethi

volodymyr zelenskyi repeatedly, and in the end not only him, but the ukrainian authorities emphasizedstable peace, a just peace. all of us in ukraine, of course, understand what a permanent just peace is, but... he also spoke about this permanent just peace during of his visit to the united states of america, he spoke about it from the high rostrum of the general assembly, he spoke about it during a meeting with president joe biden from candidate for the presidency of the united states, kamela harry. he eventually talked about it with donald trump. we all understand very well what this lasting just peace is. in your opinion, do they now understand this just and permanent peace, the same way we understand it in ukraine. judging by the statements, judging by the fact that the allies, including washington and european countries support the union. zelenskyi's peace formula, which consists of ten points, and strictly speaking, all these markers of a just peace are listed there, including the return of territorial integrity and sovereignty of ukraine over all territories, but the question i

will have an advantage, but if the same general zaluzhnyi as zelenskyi registers, he will have no lucku. mr. viktor, and finally, what is the situation now in sumy, to be brief, we literally have a minute left, a difficult, difficult situation, bad with electricity, bad with water. bad with mobile communication, bad with the internet, and the enemy, as a rule, hit sums, either late at night or early in the morning, and this is today, well, they are flying all day, in anxiety, in fact, like a break, at school in class, 10 minutes and a new alarm, 10 minutes and a new alarm, and they fly all day, they are shot down all day, somewhere, well, they use a new attack tactic during the day, thank you, mr. viktor. take care of yourself, send congratulations to my native sums, and all the best to you, take care of yourself, this was viktor boberenko, an expert of the political analysis bureau, and i would like to remind my friends that throughout our broadcast we are conducting a survey, or rather we are already completing this survey, which sounds like this should zelensky make public his victo

, taking offense at his visit to a military plant in pennsylvania, but president zelenskyi said after end of his visit to the united states of america that during the next ramstein, based on the results of his negotiations in the united states of america, ukraine expects specific things from its partners to strengthen our strategy. let's hear what she said. it will be a special ramstein, and from our side the partners receive all the details, all the arguments, how to ensure results in the coming months both at the front and in the diplomatic work the power of arms and the power of diplomacy work effectively, always, only together, and this is how we calculate, this is how we should... implement the victory plan and we were joined by yelyzaveta yasko, people's deputy of ukraine from the servant of the people, a member of the parliamentary committee on foreign policy and inter-parliamentary cooperation mrs. elizaveta, i congratulate you and i am glad to see you on the air. let me remind you, let me remind you that yuliya klymenko and volodymyr arriev, people's deputies of ukraine, mrs.

and possible potential presidential candidate zelenskyi must confirm that it works for the benefit of ukraine and that it is effective, in this context there are two big risks for the current government and potential presidential candidate zelenskyi. this is the 2025 budget, in which, as we have already heard, all social benefits will be cut very significantly, which is actually a very, you know, tough budget that will leave few people satisfied in this country, let's say this is one risk factor, the other the risk factor is, if the war is ended, or because... it is put on hold, then under what conditions? potentially, it can also cause very big claims and questions to the current president. two eyes risk factors, i think, are calculated in the political headquarters of the current government, and depending on this, they will obviously decide to facilitate the holding of elections in the near future or postpone them. after all, this process, well, it is obvious, mr. maksym and mr. olezh, that the victory plan that zelenskyi and yarmak brought to washington is that. can be perceived as

rather irritation, well, again. joining nato, this is a very correct policy, i absolutely support zelenskyisolutely support it, if it was a job of 5 years, because it is work with 32 countries, very different, from the united states and britain to hungary, slovakia, if this system worked, and for not a year we were paired with peace forums, with cape verde and east timor, with san marino and other island countries, then maybe it would have given something, but on the last day to decide that we need nato by invitation, well, this kind of diplomacy does not work , once she can work surprisingly, the second time respect for the heroic ukrainian people, the third time it causes... irritation, that's the problem, although, i want you to understand me correctly, nato is the only formula for victory in this war, and the only formula for preventing the next war. without nato, we will not be able to end this war, prevent or prevent the next one, and we must work on this seriously, systematically and professionally. you already mentioned about... the victory plan that was supposed to be presented to

the problem is that volodymyr oleksandrovich zelenskyi has both a plus and a minus, which are called the same, he is an artist. in the 22nd and part of the 23rd year, it saved us, because he was a wonderful speaker of the heroic ukrainian people and the heroic armed forces of ukraine, giving the opportunity to army professionals to do their thing. then he once again wrote the script of the winning series, in the last series he is personally nobody the other must go with the state flag to the state border in 1991, all those who could have been close to him at the same time are removed from their positions, starting with zuluzh, ending with syrskyi and budanov as well, and vumerov , and in short, the head of the ministry of foreign affairs, well... people begin to recognize and appreciate them for something, they get rid of this scenario, because there must be one hero, the main character, and you will understand, everyone else is a fake, that's why there is no with us there's no point in talking, we're just being told where to go, it's your business to go to the trenches, and your bus

max also got this huge wishlist, hasn't he, from volodymyr zelenskyy. >> i don't think any diplomats realistically think he's going to get the full list. but what can president biden offer to the ukrainian president? >> well, certainly zelenskyy zick victory plan has now been shared privately with all allies and now publicly to his own parliament. all those zelenskyy says that there are three bullet points on that victory plan that will still remain secret that are just going to remain behind closed doors. all allies have continued to usher in drawdowns of aid to ukraine, germany, just with a new $1.5 billion traunch last week. and the u.s when zelenskyy visited washington back in september with a multi-billion-dollar drawdown of its own. but certainly allies are divided on what happens next. they agree that ukraine the faces real challenges on the battlefield as this war continues in a protracted manner, and faces yet another difficult winter where zelenskyy is warning of potential nuclear war. but they remain divided on how to move beyond that, how to tackle that. we know that the

if we still remember that the popularity of volodymyr zelenskyi is not based on the common sense of histhe sectarian attitude to politics, then i think that he can afford anything, and those who now began to accuse volodymyr zelenskyi, by the way, absolutely baselessly of all mortal sins, when he himself wants the continuation of the war, preservation of power, he will never convince them of anything, this is how from the situation with petro poroshenko, that is, if we... we look at it from the point of view of volodymyr zelenskyi holding power, well, these are not my problems, these are the problems of the president himself, his entourage, i do not believe at all that president zelenskyi can win any real honest competitive elections after the war, but if they believe in it, then let them work for his election results, not for reality, this is again, these are not my problems, i just repeatedly said that in history this does not happen, a war president never does not become the president of peace, but president zelensky became the president of war and he is not in this. guilty, by the w

for volodymyr zelenskyy, it was interesting, he referred to the fact a decision has not been made onong—range missiles and even expressed some frustration. he will be pleased that mark rutte has prioritised ukraine in terms of the first foreign visit. , ., ., , . visit. in terms of that basic question — visit. in terms of that basic question that _ visit. in terms of that basic question that volodymyr i question that volodymyr zelenskyy has been pushing, the use of weapons into russian targets are does he feel he is making headway? it is targets are does he feel he is making headway?— making headway? it is not clear. making headway? it is not clear- as _ making headway? it is not clear. as i _ making headway? it is not clear. as i say, _ making headway? it is not clear. as i say, he - making headway? it is not i clear. as i say, he expressed what seemed to me to be frustration, basically saying more decisiveness was needed. lots of people are looking to the us, the outgoing president joe biden was speaking to ukrainian officials and the message they have been trying to take to him an

he recently called president zelenskyy, a salesman and that zelenskyy should never have let the war start. of course we know that it was rushed so that invaded ukraine and so there's a lot of anxiety of course, here in kyiv about just what comes next, what is going to happen in the next year. but particularly heading into the brutal winter months when russia is bound to start attacking critical infrastructure in ukraine the efforts to shore up those power grids are happening right now. now in the us has already started shipping winter weather gear, for example, to ukrainian soldiers. >> and so this meeting is going to be a chance for secretary austin to kind of go over the arc of the relationship between ukraine and the u.s. >> over the last two plus years of war, and also kind of try to reassure them that us florida is going to continue however, it is anyone's guess just how robust that support is going to be over the next, over the next year. >> and natasha, that is the big issue, isn't it? there is panic in ukraine about the possibility of a trump win in this election just two weeks aw

general, how do you assess the pace announced by zelenskyi and shmyhal, it is obviously not enough, and it will obviously take several years for ukraine to increase the production of its own weapons, what do you say about it? unfortunately, we see how the shortcomings that previously existed in the construction of the cartridge factory, the construction there the plant that was supposed to produce projectiles and all this was postponed, well, we see the consequences of this, and now in such a fire scenario we are trying to resolve this situation and we see that there are difficulties due to the fact that with the help of our allies. what else, where some people are fueling these processes, in general, all this is not easy, and we definitely need to focus primarily on the production of our enterprises, the averno-industrial complex, there are, as we can see, shifts in these processes, but definitely it's really not enough fundamental question about ammunition, we try. to replace them as much as we can with shock unmanned aerial vehicles, but artillery will not be replaced, the current ti

on ukraine, president zelenskyy told the "financial times" that a formal invitation to join it or the only way ukraine can survive russia's invasion. do you agree with the assessment, and more broadly do you endorse his victory plan? sec. austin: which one of those questions do you want me to answer, phil? all right, let's start with the question as to whether or not there is an opportunity available with respect to gaza. of course there is. and we would hope that we can work together to take advantage of that opportunity. the first thing, phil, that we need to focus on is the return of the hostages. again, you heard prime minister publicly state yesterday that anyone who has control of hostages, he would encourage them to return them. and again, i would hope that they would do so. beyond that, i think there are other opportunities, and we will see how things evolve. clearly there are opportunities for a change of direction, and we would hope that parties would take advantage of that. both in lebanon -- in gaza and in lebanon. the second question was, as i recall, about the victory pl

might have to do is basically cut a deal in lieu of zelenskyy. that might be something that has to happen where the u.s. coast or russia, if russia was willing to negotiate, and says, here's the deal. we will have a mutual aid guaranteed with ukraine, guarantee their security, you will not invade their borders anymore, but those lines get frozen where they are essentially, and then you might have to console her. and if that sounds like a hawkish perspective, it is weird because that is the issue -- position donald trump has taken on the issue. >> thank you. [applause] >> thank you for being here. i would like to continue with the question about ukraine. we generally don't know the answer to the question i'm about to ask you, so i'm interested to hear what you think about it. several reasons were given by the pro-hamas activists on why they support hamas. hamas hates the west, but so does russia. israeli operations have killed many civilians, but russia use this conscript and abductees from poor countries that go and sign, with the russian militar