zelinski: driver too. the in this case officer feeling -- felix shot u fast he did not have time to stop. let me sketch why it is so dangerous to shoot a driver. i'm not aware of any police department that recommends its officers shoot drivers. particular case, he did notis immediately die. he was able ak the car and put it int. if he had beenediately killed the car could have careened and crashed into highway. cer felix put other people on the highway in very serious danger that particular day. it's not just that he is jumping want to stop barns from ttg away. he is jumping on in a tt that will put oth pple at risk. e jackson: i want to go back twhher or not it was correct for the fifth circuit to apply the moment of threat doctrine. what is your understandi that doctrine? i was surprised that the responde ithis case at this time has now cre conception of it that did not seem tn with what the fiftuit said. what is your review of the momentthe threat doctrine? mr. zelinski: justice jackson, jugginbotham wa

zelinski: 100 pce.o far to say if an officerone -- jumps in front of a moving car and shoot the driver that is unreasonable. is our view of this case. part of the problem is we were not able to have a lower court look at the totality of the circumstances andece what is this like a case where you jump in front of her and immed shoot the driver? justice kavanaugh: dyou agree with the language that says the circumstances at the moment and force is used will generally have primary significance analysis? mr. zelinski: there is little daylight between us and that the letter -- solicitor general. that language is descriptive. juickavanaugh: do you agree general says the type ofolicitor rare?tion described would be mr. zelinski: there are a series of reoccurring fact patt there are two of them. i think that jumping in front of or onto a car doer with some frequency. we cedn our reply brief a study of 400 stops that showed a routine problem of officers jumping in front of cars. in the article it is described as

zelinski: driver too. in this case officer feeling -- x shot up so fast he did not have time to stop. let me sketch why it is so dangerous to shoot a drive i'm not aware of any police department that recommends its offirs shoot drivers. the gh likelihood, andhis particular case, he did not immediately die. he was able to break the car and t it into park. if he had been immediately killed the car could have careened anded into the highway. officer felix put o people on the highway in very serious danger that particular day. it's not just that he is jumping want to stopns from getting away. he is juinon in a matter that will put other people at risk. justice jackson: i want to go back to whether or not it was correct for the fifth circuit to apply the mom threat doctrine. what is yo uerstanding of that doctrine? was surprised that the respondent in this case at this ti now created a conception of it that did not fifth circuit said.what the what is your review of the moment of the threat doctrine? mr. zelinsk

but that being said, burton has made clear that zelinski has passed his presidential expiration date. he's only continuing under presidential powers due to repeated declarations of, of, uh, emergency connected with the conflict. and so therefore that he is not a leak. he can't legally sign anything. right. he, even if they agreed right, uh, uh, to sit down and talk and agreed to a deal that russia could never rely on. it can ever be settled because of future ukrainian ministration could always say he didn't have the power to sign that right . it, it has no legal validity, and it seems the americans are taking this seriously for the 1st time because they have never mentioned the elections in ukraine before. and now suddenly they are after putting and brought it up again in the last week. so, so they're not talking to each other on the phone, but they're talking mega phone diplomacy, social media, public statements, back and forth. and at least there's a sign that the trump administration is suddenly listening and taking seriously what the russian government is saying, even if there is

and of course you have zelinski at the top of it. now he knows there's a new sheriff in town. donald trump, and so donald trump's going to be asking some questions about where is that $100000000000.00? and that's going to be an interesting when we get those answers. so is it money laundered back to some americans? is it among some of the, with zelinski and some of his, you know, cronies, it's been a bottomless pit from the start and i think that, you know, the way it's been handled, the lack of transparency. and then of course you have on the us side, it's lack of transparency menu of the pentagon, wanting an audit for the 8th time before donald trump came in. so now you have a freeze on the for an aide. he's said no more money is going to ukraine, i think is a whiskey is accepted that faith for now. i think he's trying to back pedal are trying to shift the blame because, you know, he has been responsible. obviously there's been a lot of corruption there and he has a few villas to show for it doesn't a apparently. so i'm, you know, m

and of course you have zelinski at the top of it. now he knows there's a new sheriff in town. donald trump. and so donald trump's going to be asking some questions about where is that $100000000000.00? so yes, there is money there, so you're talking about defense contractors. you're talking about n g o is that were funded, you know, that were fueled by the democrats. you're talking about, um, you know, how much is that personally benefit lindsey graham. many of them sit on the boards of some of these weapons when you've manufacturer, so they personally benefits. they also make trades and the ones that are public. so you're talking a lot of money that's changing hands. and then also there's been money that's gone over to ukraine, that has disappeared and gone into of pockets and shown up in the form of like lamborghini is with some of these ukrainian oligarchy. you have an illegitimate president and ukraine. there's been no elections held. he's obviously, you know, as a tucker, carlson referred to him a little dictator. and so for him

i mean, that's one of the reasons many would say is that zelinski is going to fight to the last ukranian because it's a good business model for him and is his leads and policies being encouraged by so many people. it's still very bi partisan in the west side, you know, on this for the library and critics on all the time because they're willing to talk about it. but it still has not made an impact on many of the leads and the west. russia can't win. that's the mantra. go ahead vladimir. that's absolutely true. and i think there is a division. and the reason is really simple. common people are not very happy about it because you know, it's been inflation and other things. but ah, all this kind of leads in a chapter in glosses apology. sions, they are making money of that and you use a blaze. of course it can you great animal mo, most diet your under because got com and people that die in throes and rudy interactions as well. but basically what, what, what happens as far as the lead settings, an insane broken. let's not fix it because the money is coming as they are. i the course of like wa

because uh, currently zelinski, even according to the quote and elections as they have happened in ukraine since 2014, despite more than 20 p o o essentially all non my gone party is have been banned in the country, right? all parties representing east, you gray, know all the left as parties in the country. so i don't consider any elections in ukraine legitimate. but that being said, boston has made clear that zalinski has passed his presidential expiration date. he's only continuing under presidential power is due to repeated declarations of, of, uh, emergency connected with the conflict. and so therefore that he is not a leader. he can't legally sign anything. right. he, even if they agreed right at a to sit down and talk and agreed to a deal that russia could never rely on. it can ever be settled because of future ukrainian ministration could always say he didn't have the power to sign that right . it, it has no legal validity, and it seems the americans are taking this seriously for the 1st time because they have never mentioned the elections in ukraine before. and now suddenly they ar

there was also a whole series of legislative acts that were originally adopted by the zelinski regime for as they put it, a facilitated procedure that minimize the use of any monitoring and certification procedures for such operations. organs were sold via the internet, given the price is demanded for certain organs. it was not about ukrainian residents, but about customers in the west who could afford it. you might find less now across live to head of the silver, all these to do, didn't viet alexander model. they, i think that is good to have you join me now. so if, if taking organs of from dead soldiers is now prohibited the made me was perfectly legal before, as well. we know from reports by the russian ministry of defense that actually ukraine did exactly that. harvest the bodies of that soldiers during the last years of the war. and i guess it's very interesting to them finally i'm so let's do some for appealing. um, this seems practice practice, of course it's just the same that the, the war in total and still ukrainian states as the most such is only about the exploitation of y

there's no doubt a lot of the pockets have been lined hunter biden's zelinski his wife's and who knows who else is as the debate of nazi germany noon day 2 years ago, the need is of the allied states sat down to discuss a post will order. this was the old comb for insane to guarantee collective security for europe. and it led of course to the creation of the united nations. but now with will once again robert, during the continent many say it's time for new global architecture to set things straight. as off easy, i could have this kind of reports that it was an iconic meeting which symbolized the rare unity between the heavy weights of the 2nd world war. winston churchill of the united kingdom franklin roosevelt of the united states and joseph stalin of the soviet union. this picture is part of a unique exit addition taking visitors behind the scenes of this pivotal moments in human history, declassified documents and maps and diagrams show how the l a meters coordinated their military strategy towards the end of the war. how the invasions, the political future of a liberated to europe

there's no doubt a lot of the pockets have been lined hunter biden's. zelinski is wives and who knows who else has the right to stay with us here on our to international. i'm back with more and half an hour. in the meantime, visit our website, or to the com for the very latest breaking news and updates by the such element as was very, excuse this little boy. and that's really curious. what is it which commend immutable sort of senior for us to bring a bridge? if for example, as i said, i was just going to get upset, so thank you for asking before, but really color supplementing, group more interest, your old sample of me, the virginia probably do you too much too much. you to do it here. i see it the look at it on it the way it looked to sign it at all, but i mean it, obviously i'm reading something we need to go to pennsylvania where the photos get those renewals uh the critical security rather go to share contacts and uh, find your thoughts on you, his products. cool. cool. something is anybody. so looking at a mediator with the vehicle for through the screening system, the see the

resolutely against peace negotiations, i think the time is obviously running out for this dictator. zelinski. yeah, you should be noted because there's no freedom of speech in breaking the british. people are unaware of all these arguments because the, you can't really say things like is a dictator in britain, so they won't hear about it in britain that there are goals for the, for elections in ukraine. it's what amazing unit, remember that there is no freedom of speech as they go hungry in britain at night to the south, sanctioning of energy supplies and all manner of things from russia. i mean, they just thrown a diplomat out. i understand in the past few hours from the russian embassy in london. so britain, it just hasn't got the script from washington. i don't think all drunk is very much . but of course, little drum for his box. you're getting completely false information from his natural security adviser. mike waltz about whom we talk about him going on the ground on saturday because there is some room is that he may be going because he's reading all the information to donald trump, wh

there's no doubt a lot of the pockets have been lined hunter biden's zelinski his wife's and who knows who else has with french social security budgets facing a big crunch president, the manual micron alone seems to be dancing to the beat of his war drum promising to double military spending this year. archie contributor rachel marston has the story. the french president, a menu in that call is basically the hype man for the defense industry right now. picture him in a sparkly blazer with a megaphone step right up boats. blow your tax fair cash on premium grades, fire power because hey, war can always be in season if we act like it is good for them. and so many france will have doubled its defense budget and well also launching major projects in atlanta. and i invite all other partners to do the same appeal, but we also need more european funding and this for shadows, the next budgetary framework comfortably. we've all french people are wondering why their government is suddenly acting like a broad college students who somehow always has money for concert tickets, but can't afford rent

there was also a whole series of legislative acts that were originally adopted by the zelinski regime for as they put it, a facilitated procedure that minimize the use of any monitoring and certification procedures for such operations we organs were sold via the internet. given the price is demanded for certain organs, it was not about ukrainian residents, but about customers in the west who could afford it. the money that they had all the silver. busy of these to do it in the via the legs on the market. they said that the reports review lots about, keeps motivations. well, we know from reports by the russian ministry of defense that actually ukraine did exactly that the harvest, the bodies of that soldiers during the, the last years of the war. and i guess its swearing 1st thing but um, finally um, so that's just um for painting um this seems practice practice. of course it's just to assign them the war in total and the ukrainian states as the most oxygen is only about. so what would the expectation of your craniums until the last 2 craniums, even until they're that's bodies we know

and of course you have zelinski at the top of it. now he knows there's a new sheriff in town, donald trump, and so donald trump's going to be asking some questions about where is that $100000000000.00? and that's going to be an interesting, i'm when we get those answers. so is it money laundered back to some americans? is it among some of the, um, with zalinski and some of his, you know, cronies, nobody else? where is that body else? i wouldn't want to be in the hot seat screaming when those questions are off. as you said, that 100000000000 dollars that savanski calling account for a new one to i suppose that trump is sort of a stein, needs the us for need budget. at the moment opposite lensky is also saying, you credit on getting enough money. we don't know where a 100000000000 if it is, but we know getting enough is demanding more. i'm how much do you think would actually be enough? well, and that's the thing. it's been a bottomless pit from the start. and i think that, you know, the way it's been handled, the lack of transparency.

information and then for them to go after trump for asking questions about the money laundering through zelinski in ukraine after they started the coup in 2014 and then they impeached him for it and then joe biden parted everybody who set him up for the phone call that they impeached him for and then then when it cannot get him that route they took him to court in favorable jurisdictions with people that came out of the justice department? host: a lot of topics there. guest: i will avoid almost all of them because the point of this book is not to be they did this so we can do this or what aboutism. you will never win those debates and they should not be debates. the purpose of this book is to talk about what we think is wrong and what is actually wrong. any collar and i can agree there a lot of things we should do on policy fronts from education to health care to immigration to climate change. there are things we must do in 2025 but we cannot get there because we are distracted and having the wrong conversations over and over again. host: what about the pardon power? is that a conversation we sh

zelinski. mr. chief justice, an please. the court we a

information and then for them to go after trump for asking questions about the money laundering through zelinskie after they started the coup in 2014 and then they impeached him for it and then joe biden parted everybody who set him up for the phone call that they impeached him for and then then when it cannot get him that route they took him to court in favorable jurisdictions with people that came out of the justice department? host: a lot of topics there. guest: i will avoid almost all of them because the point of this book is not to be they did this so we can do this or what aboutism. you will never win those debates and they should not be debates. the purpose of this book is to talk about what we think is wrong and what is actually wrong. any collar and i can agree there a lot of things we should do on policy fronts from education to health care to immigration to climate change. there are things we must do in 2025 but we cannot get there because we are distracted and having the wrong conversations over and over again. host: what about the pardon power? is that a conversation we should be ha