zeller from the san francisco environment? >> my name is bill, zeller and i am with the department of environment and the clean transportation group and between tommy and todd i am going to try not to repeat anything that they said that they stole everything that i had. and todd, could you help me with this, i just need to get my slides up. we have had a long collaboration with the sfpud in a general sense they have been leaders as far as the different fleet operations in the city and helping us to push the projects forward that reduce, the petroleum use and reduce the greenhouse gases and been quite an example for other department to have to aspire to. our department is made up of two groups, and we are generally outward facing towards the public in the transportation, or the transit first side of things and we also serve the san francisco family principlely in the vehicle cleaning of the fleet in with the hack to implementation. and right now, roughly about 40 percent of the greenhouse gases that are generated by the city of

i have been working for more than a decade with the zeller box foundation and a coalition of agency and community partner and affected individuals that is so unique that the justice department has sent the urban institute to study san francisco response to these kids and it is tempting to tell you about all of the great things that are happening in san francisco and all of the wonderful things that the public agencies are doing and in fact that was my intention and but when i listed to her, i was reminded that there are many, many children who have never heard of the bill of rights, and are not touched by these programs and policies, and are still suffering tremendous unnecessary trauma. and so, i think that the challenge now, now that we have programs established, with the police, the jail, the probation, the public defender, and child welfare, and many more public agencies is to understand, that children of incarcerated parents are not a unique or separate group of kids. we have heard a lot of numbers, but the one that i find the most compelling and disturbing, is that one in ten amer

. >> matt zeller, a fellow of the truman national security project joining from washington dc. >>> the palestinian unit of deposit is off to a rocky start. mahmoud abbas swore in ministers as part of the deal with hamas. senior lawmakers are reluctant to send aid now that hamas is part of the government. and israel is reluctant to resume peace talks. >> reporter: it's the first palestinian government to be formed. a rift between hamas began when they took over the gaza strip and it took this throng form near unity government. >> translation: this government, as with previous governments - the agreement sign and approved. >> reporter: selecting ministers acceptable to both groups was complicated. concessions eventually ensured a government of tech no accurates were selected. >> i'm standing down from my role, but i'm not abandoning my responsibility towards our home lands. we'll serve our people wherever we are, within the government, outside the government. we'll serve the great people of palestine. >> national reconciliation is demanded by all palestinians, especially those in the gaz

zeller said he only went out that day to call a truce. >> the dream home. no, it's all good.f here. >> reporter: those were allegedly among upton's last words. for "good morning america," matt gutman, miami. >> let's talk about this with dan abrams. so, how does this case look? >> not a strong self-defense case. you have an eyewitness who contradicts the testimony of the defendant. no one backing up his account other than his own testimony. with that said, remember, the prosecution, even in a self-defense case in california, has the burden to prove, in effect, that it wasn't self-defense. key elements of self-defense, was it reasonable to believe that? and was it necessary to do what he did? and, you know, i think that that's a tough argument for him to make. the prosecutors have the burden. >> but it's why he had to take the stand with that real vivid testimony. >> without his testimony, there was nothing to support his claim of self-defense. and still evidence on the other side to indicate that it wasn't. so i think it was absolutely crucial that he took the stand in this c