in the case of private a, these are guys in the case of zhvalevsky and pasternak a, you do not know aboutty. everything, essentially. you can be the chronicler of the commission itself, or just a collegial decision. it is understandable not from the flour carrier ozaryomka, which you diligently, so to speak , make monsters in the palaces. that's individuality, therefore. cool solution here well, you know, when a decision is made or collegial it is always probably more correct than it is taken individually, because it takes into account all different points of view. i, probably, with a colleague somewhere, too, probably, do not quite coincide in terms of point of view, so this gives an opportunity. e, a verified position from behind and make a decision, because again i will return to what, that in each case the fate of a person will be considered , we should not forget about it for this and this the fate of a citizen of the republic of belarus and, in fact, if he, as i put it, is not lost to society. it might even become a very useful word. this is the final word. it's still because of the