we had professor zia said it but the bj p we had professor zia said it but the bjp spokesman is reallyonstitution. in fact, the first prime minister himself said in parliament it is a temporary provision. secondly, this move that has been done by the government is essentially not for the rest of india. it is about the people of kashmir, it is about there being able to finally have greater economic benefits, to basically ensure the kind of rule that they would have in terms of the group we are seeing another part the country. that was the perspective from the bjp. let's go back to professor zia, who were stocking about the sensitivity, whereas the bjp are playing this very much down. —— who was talking about. i agree with what the bjp spokesman as saying, when he says that article 370 was never meant to be permanent, it never was meant to be permanent, it never was meant to be permanent, it never was meant to be permanent, because the second part of the equation, the plebiscite, was never held. but that has been avoided, and that has been ignored by india. and that part is not being tal