, not exactly another zovchenko, but still a person who made very significant discoveries for himselfurse remember our respected interlocutors, in the middle of the program we have an author's rubric, that is, mine, and i do one of three things: i either show an old book taken from my shelves, in no case from the museum where i work and maryana works, or i quote a poem and analyze it, or a fragment of prose, today it is an old book, a poem by apollon grigoriev, which in the sixteenth year was collected published by alexander blok, it is written here directly, collected and annotated, supplied by alexander blok and alexander blok in large font, because well, for readers it is still unknown what is more important, palon grigoriev palon grigoriev or blog. this book is also the flowering of the time we are talking about. the sixteenth year, a year before the revolution, the block almost silent, although it will be 12 at the beginning of the eighteenth year, suddenly opens apollon grigoriev, who is now for... alexander blog, to catch the eternal, to catch the music of the revolution, to ca

was all life was a ban on leaving the country, and he never went anywhere, and the revolution for zovchenko seems to me, was a determining factor in his literary development, and he counted his literary path from 1921. although he wrote before that, and he wrote stories, some beautiful sketches in the spirit of artsebashev, nitchi, nitchi was his favorite philosopher, in general, in such a decadent vein, and the revolution completely changed the vector of his development, that is, we can say that there was zoshchenko before zoshchenko, he never published things before, he published them and did not talk about them at all, that is, yes, he started as a writer, as if they didn't exist, he started to engage in literature in 1921, he wrote in his autobiographies, we and... we will return to 1921 more than once, because this was a turning point, of course, yes, indeed, some of the russian writers managed to fight on both sides, to participate in the civil war, but zoshchenko, straight from the wall of the law faculty of st. petersburg university, he found himself in the thick of things, and for

twenty -first year, something changed, because when the nep appeared, new types of people appeared, zovchenkonew types of people, not to people in general, by the twenty-first year he found, felt some kind of, i would say, this stream, in which there is some kind of carrier line, i think, yes, it started from there, but in general, it seems to me, there in each story, when you read, you don't need to talk, squat, science fiction finale tomorrow on the first, you need to study a wide range of people, it takes time. and it is necessary to neutralize the agent as soon as possible, but there is no other way out, the best chance is to meet him somewhere in a restaurant or in a bar where there is linen, this is already interesting, you yourself are from the nkvd. no, from the kgb. by the way, it would be nice if you managed to put him to bed. i am the only one here about this i know, and no one else, come on, writes you. the legendary multi-part film based on the novel by yulian semyonov. on the weekend at the first. in the twenty-first year, what happened? well , there are many dissatisfied, yes,

bulgakov, was restricted to travel all his life, and he never went anywhere, the revolution for zovchenkoit seems to me, was. the determining factor in his literary development and he counted his literary path from 1921, although he wrote before that, and he wrote stories, you mentioned, of course, about - the story before sunrise, and we will talk about it a lot, but now we will talk about early zoshchenko. let me ask you about this: in your family, what did they say about mikhail mikhailovich, what traditions were there, what could there may be stories that are unknown from his texts, but still it is not every day that you find yourself opposite the great-granddaughter of mikhail mikhailovich zoshchenko, well, here may be a short answer, none, none, none, here. the first year, from the same twenty-first year, it included very different writers , all, here ivanov, konstantin fedin, mikhail slanimsky, lev luns, lev luns, veniamin kaverin, some had a very, well, such a happy fate, yes, they, koverin, for example, everyone knows him as the author of two captains, although he is much broader

with the country, with the world and inside, with a person, yes, someone creates some other works, zovchenkoson, the pressure of criticism is growing, to this slander and mad and violent, well, that is, absolutely criticism, which increases the pressure, does not understand what is happening to the writer, what kind of work he is doing, therefore gradually, the difference of worlds, different tasks, different processes, it is surprising for me in this... or not surprising, on the contrary, that zoshchenko continues to do this anyway, he believes that it is necessary, it is necessary for readers, therefore i will publish this now in 1943, despite the fact that... practically no one understands this, no one, well, this is understandable, a mature person cannot help but follow his own path, it is impossible, naturally, well, you can't write what you don't feel, you can't say what you don't think, and so we've come full circle to this important event, to august of 1946, to the famous complex of different party decisions, which this complex led to the infamous decree. depicts the soviet man as a

actually, in the thirties he moved to leningrad, yes, and there he met all the wonderful writers like zovchenkohwarze, mikhail kazakov, boris mikhailovich, ekhenbaum, literatrov, tynyanov and so on and so forth, this is such a leningrad bohemian, soviet bohemia, all the thirties he wrote plays, yes, plays here just the same, rather socialist realist, yes, but what was the fate of these plays, they were successful, some were successful, but most were filmed after the two-hundredth, hundredth performance before the dress rehearsal, all the same 100 performances no, solid, but not enough by soviet standards, if you look at it that way, the writer is always unhappy. with how everything is working out for them, although from my point of view maringov is lucky, because he was not repressed, he earned literary income, which is already quite a lot. when he moved from kirochnaya on borodinskaya, it's in st. petersburg, yes, the next tenants who moved in, into the apartment on kirochnaya, yes, they left a memory later that they moved in there, and the front door had some crazy number of locks, about 10,