mark zuckerberg _ things controlling? mark zuckerberg said - things controlling? i things controlling? mark i zuckerberg said in the past that they care about the kind of content that users see and they have quality control and fact checkers to make sure this information and disinformation are not elevated in people speeds. what mark zuckerberg trying to convey in the letter he wrote to house republicans is he does not want to be pressured by the government and in fact he will push back against a lot of that pressure. i think this is very much for him trying to legitimise what he has often defended in the past which is facebook�*s ability to moderate their own content he may be trying to push back against accusations that facebook leads one way or the other and trying to ensure people that they have it under control heading into november. does this further shop in the case for the need for statutory regulation of social media? it's long been a contentious issue. ~ , ,., , it's long been a contentious issue. , , , , issue. absolutely. republicans would argue — issu

look at now maybe turning a corner here maybe mark zuckerberg after what he saw in france last weekeone gets detained you know he travels all over the world, if he is he having epiphany as one guest said in the previous segment. >> i don't know, don't bet on it lawfare to deal with special counsel jack smith indicting former president trump again this week, in january 6 case this was revised after supreme court immunity ruling trump facing same four federal offenses charged with smith reframed argumentsg movieing allegations against justice department officials trump writes on truth social yesterday that the indictment, has all the problems of the old indictment should be dismissed immediately. congressman what about this what can you do in your role in judiciary to stop all of this lawfare going on? everyone snows what this is about and know this case is not going to be tried soon, so why come out with it 19 days before early voting begins? >> yeah, that is correct so they continue to hurl everything they can at wall tomorrow tomorrow fullerton county case new york city, jack smith

~ , , ., zuckerberg? i think this is a difference _ zuckerberg? i think this is a difference of _ zuckerberg? i think this is a difference of degree - zuckerberg? i think this is a difference of degree in - zuckerberg? i think this is a l difference of degree in scale. zuckerberg? i think this is a i difference of degree in scale. . mark zuckerberg is, the a—list celebrity. taking action against him would be seen as really significant. telegram does say that it is encrypted, and it is if you opt into it. large amounts of communications through it are not as safe and secure as people believe. there is, also durov�*s past because he was born in russia. also durov's past because he was born in russia.— born in russia. could this be perceived — born in russia. could this be perceived as _ born in russia. could this be perceived as a _ born in russia. could this be perceived as a warning - born in russia. could this be perceived as a warning shot | born in russia. could this be i perceived as a warning shot to born in russia. could this be - perceived

did they arresting pavel durov and not mark zuckerberg?_ mark zuckerberg?e in seriousness _ mark zuckerberg? did degree in seriousness and _ mark zuckerberg? did degree in seriousness and scale. - mark zuckerberg? did degree in seriousness and scale. pavel- mark zuckerberg? did degree in i seriousness and scale. pavel durov is seen as a middle —sized fish in a large pond, rather than mark zuckerberg who is the a—list celebrity of the stuff. taking such action against him would be seen as significant. there are a couple more elements that need to be pointed out. telegram is encrypted if you choose to opt into it, but it isn't default. that is a common misconception. a lot of communication through it or not as secure as people believe. the difference also is pavel durov�*s past, in terms of his being born in russia means that there is this kind of quasi grey area in which he operates, which i think is why allegedly cyber criminals and others have been using this tool as they state as being so powerful. is have been using this tool as they state as being so po

zuckerberg. he had two years to talk about this supreme court has since ruled on this at the government should be wary about talking. he's companies but should be allowed to. and i don't think he was under any kind of pressure. he just decided not to do it and now he's worried about house investigations. he's worried about doing another hearing in the fall. and so he's decided to give them what they wanted, which was this letter so it's politically time not oh, it's totally politically, especially the part where he said he had given money to help voter registration. >> and of course, he was attacked for it and then he said, even though it wasn't partisan, i'm going to not do it just in case people think it's partisan. the whole thing is political rich, is zuckerberg trying to cozy up to republicans in congress? >> and they possibly re-elected donald trump to go easy on him for the next four years. >> he was under pressure by jim jordan's committee, this kind of i'll just add australia's anywhere.

zuckerberg, i want to come to you. we just had senator blumenthal and i have of course had some internal documents and e-mails that have come our way. one of the things that really concerned me is that you referred to your young users in terms of their lifetime value. of it being roughly $270. her teenager. each of you should be looking at these kids. the t-shirts they are wearing today say i am worth more than $270. we have some standing up. in those t-shirts. [applause] and, some of the children from our state, some of the children, the parents that we have worked with just to think whether it is becca schmidt, david malik, sarah flat, emily, would you say that life is only worth $270? what could possibly lead you -- i mean -- i listen to that and i know you are a dad, i am a mom, i am a grandmom. how could you possibly even have that thought. it is astounding to me. i think this is one of the reasons that states, 42 states are now suing you because of features that they consider to be addictive. that you are pushing

mark zuckerberg is not dumb.he absolutely hedging his bets here because what he has done is he has assessed regulatory landscape and he is determined, hey, i'm not going to really face any real consequences, for my platform, eagerly ache qui saying to government demands to censor free speech of americans, look at the municipal court? june they had a decision and they rejected the state's attempt to permanently stop the collusion between the biden administration and big tech companies that kicked it back to the states and mark knows democrats are liking this right now, they are not going to do anything about it. and then republicans, establishment republicans, all they are going to do is offer another strongly worded letter. they are not going to do anything. and meanwhile, facebook is going to call a defiant trump holding up his fist in the air, just after he has been shot, misinformation. so it's the same old and hedging his bets, they're rinsing and repeating and just covering it with a veneer of compunction th

so after screwing up the 2020 election, zuckerberg suddenly offers up a... they give him a hall pass in that they are supposed to do what? just because he says he's going to be neutral, doesn't mean kamala harris is going to be any less radical. her campaign manager was part of the pressure campaign to censor facebook and now that same manager is building a campaign based on you guested, freedom. let's face it, nothing screams freedom like shutting down... and running for the country's top job without getting a single vote. at some point in the next four years commonsense is convinced that freedom will indeed ring but kamala harris is not about to take that call. let's bring in... thank you both for coming on, we appreciate it. i want to play some sound, this is talking about the whole censorship thing. he is denying that the biden harris administration ever was involved in any kind of censorship. >> you are not pressuring the big tech companies to take down accounts, you are not meeting with them to ask them to censor on your behalf. >> that is correct we a

republicans regards zuckerberg's letter as a big win ahead of the presidential election in november. join us now for the program is anthony hall professor of globalization at leathbrid. university from uh lethbridge canada and also clive menz's political uh economy analyst and researcher joining us from london gentlemen like to welcome you both to the uh program here i guess we'll start with you professor anthony hall there in canada thanks for joining us on the program sir um now aren't these uh professor hall constitutional guarantees against i mean aren't there constitutional guarantees i should say against this very... exact kind of overreach by the government? well, the constitutional protections are pretty much null and void these days, the powers that be seem to disconduct themselves as they will. uh, zuckerberg is of course, kind of a strange figure, we know that facebook emerged from the deep state, the intelligence agencies, he's kind of a front person, has been from the beginning, there's a lot. more to facebook than meets the eye in terms of the deep state, but his admiss

why's mark zuckerberg speaking out about this? there speaking out about this?s a growing debate abou�* far there is a growing debate about how far a social media companies should go in being able to police comments, images and content by their users. some platforms believe they should be more hats are —— hands off, were some governments say having an overly laissez faire attitude could lead to crime. mark zuckerberg has come out and said he felt pressurised by the us government to centre content related to covid and he regrets the company decision to do so. during the pandemic facebook officials drew a lot of fire from critics about vaccine mandates and masks because it said it removed certain posts due to misinformation about the virus. what is significant is this is coming during an election year. zuckerberg said in his letter he would not be making any contributions to support electoral infrastructure and the presidential election this year, so as not to sway one way or the other. separately, we got a read of consumer confidence in the us suggesting american

mark zuckerberg finally coming out with the truth.eta ceo admitting his copy was pressured by the biden harris administration to censor americans on the coronavirus pandemic in particular. in the letter to house judiciary jim jordan, zuckerberg says he believes the pressure was wrong and regrets not being more outspoken about it saying i feel strongly that we should not compromise or content standard due to pressure from any administration in either direction we are ready to push back of something like this happens again. zuckerberg mentioned suppressing information about the hunter biden laptop story. this is the intersection of social media and politics and mark zuckerberg finally admitting what truly happened which we reported on in 2020. >> everyone united no censorship nothing happening, you know what scary if you look at what's happening in europe with these laws about free speech against free speech if you create a social media post i saw a story on bloomberg if you create social media post offensive to someone a british citize

okay, zuckerberg.u want to put your money where your mouth is, people are behind these algorithms that centered reagan, they trump assassination photo leave apologize for. the white house statement that we encouraged social media companies, give me a break. jen psaki said clearly not sufficient what they are doing. that might be encouragement. president biden said they are killing people in the white house had to clarify, we need the -- we mean the people spreading this information. jen psaki. they need to face legal consequent to spirit kate bedingfield. we not do make sure that they are held accountable. that's mafia like word coming from the federal government to private companies. the fbi command center before 2022. there's a lot there. we need to dig into it because the more we learn the worse it gets. >> emily: when does accountability fit in and what does that look like? we've been speaking earlier, there is a responsibility when you flip-flop, responsibility when your policies, actions, decisio

>> the zuckerberg letter is the missing piece with regard to the supreme court case. this isn't a fringe movement, the white house is unabashed saying we are doing it the we've been doing it, it's not a fringe theory. you have tim walz who said there is no right to free speech when it comes to what he views as misinformation but that's exactly what our first amendment is about. we have a choice about continuing down this path of censorship, re-embracing in a bipartisan basis free-speech. at the end of the day free-speech is the bedrock of democracy, we need to return to it. neil: great having a back with us. brendan car. anything more on this we will let you know. it's not disproportionately hitting technology stocks, social media concerns i have nvidia's release of earnings after the bell and they are caught up in that fray whether they are connected to that or not. updating you right now on the battle to save red lobster. and iconic brand that could go the way of the dodo bird but not if the new ceo has his way or what stores he keeps open and what he keeps on his m

t zuckerberg and the team at meta said? 2, , zuckerberg and the team at meta said? said? , , , ., said? i was surprised and investors _ said? i was surprised and investors were. _ said? i was surprised and investors were. i- said? i was surprised and investors were. i think i said? i was surprised and i investors were. i think meta was able to restore investor confidence it can deliver on its core moneymaking and business while continuing to spend ready heavily on its money—losing initiatives, which are the metaverse and ai which were the focal point again this quarter and this was something it needed to do after the market reaction in quarter one. i think it also helped meta could pinpoint specific ways in which ai is translating to revenue today rather than focusing only on how it will bring in more revenue in the future and i think that really helped to allay a lot of the investor concerns and gave them a little bit of a pause on some of the spending on the metaverse, which is still a pretty murky concept and something they haven't really been able to show much f

republicans regard zuckerberg's letter as a big win ahead of the presidential election in november. earlier in our news review program we discussed how the us administration has tried to manipulate and censor free speech and the flow of online information. let's listen to what our guests had to say about that. joing us now for the program is anthony hall, professor of globalization at leth bridge university from uh lethbridge canada and also clive menz's political uh economy analyst and researcher joining us from london, gentlemen, like to welcome you both to the uh program here, i guess we'll start with you, professor anthony hall. there in canada, thanks for joining us for the program sir, um, now aren't these uh, professor hall, constitutional guarantees against, i mean aren't there constitutional guarantees, i should say, against this very exact kind of overreach by the government, well the constitutional protections are pretty much null and void these days, the powers that be seem to disconduct themselves as they will, uh, zuckerberg. is of course uh kind of a strange figure, w

zuckerberg also said meta briefly demoted content related to joe biden's son hunter ahead of the 2020t it. letter comes as a us judiciary committee has been investigating content moderation on online platforms. republicans regard zuckerberg's letter as a big win ahead of the presidential election this november. and earlier in our news review program we discuss how the us administration has tried to manipulate and censor free speech and the flow. online information. let's listen to what our guests had to say. joing us now for the program is anthony hall, professor of globalization at aleth bridge university from uh lethbridge canada and also uh clive menz's political economy analyst and researcher joining us from london gentlemen like to welcome you both to the uh program here i guess we'll start with you professor anthony hall there in uh canada thanks for joining us on the program sir um now aren't these uh professor? constitutional guarantees against, mean aren't there constitutional guarantees, i should say, against this very exact kind of overreach by the government, well the cons

zuckerberg. you said to me that you had not. >> i must've misspoke. >> i asked you this very question. i asked all of you this question and you told me a very different answer when we spoke, but i won't belaborf. it. a number of you have talked about, i'm sorry, ms. yaccarino, have you talked to parents directly about designing a product? >> as the new leader, yes the answer is i've spoken to them about the behavioral patterns because less than 1% of the users are in that age group but, yes, i have spoken to them. >> thank you, ma'am. there arer a number of parents whose children have been able to access illegal drugs on your platform. what do youu say to those parents? >> senator, we are devastated. >> to the parents what do you say to those parents? >> i am so sorry we have not been able to prevent these tragedies. we work very hard to block all search terms and proactively look for and detect drug related content and remove it from the platform and preserve it as evidence and then refer it to

zuckerberg revealed the requests came from senior officials including the white house. and he says he regrets caving to their demands. zuckerberg wrote a letter to the house judiciary chairman jim jordan saying i believe the government pressure was wrong and i regret that we were not more outspoken about it. i also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn't make today. zuckerberg claims the administration repeatedly asked meta to take down content related to the covid-19 pandemic. he also added the platform was wrong to suppress the "new york post" report on hunter biden's infamous laptop saying quote, it has since been made clear the reporting was not russian disinformation and in retrospect we shouldn't have demoted the story. we no longer temporarily demote things in the u.s. the white house said this about the laptop in 2021. >> is the white house still going with russian disinformation? >> i think it's broadly known and widely known, peter, there was a broad range of russian disinformation back in 2020. >> the st

and now zuckerberg admits that he had to work together with the country's authorities.now the head of the banned meta confidently declares that he will no longer follow the lead of the administration. zuckerberg noted in the letter. believes that the organization should not compromise regarding its standards regarding content, and now after some time has stated its readiness to fight back if the company faces such pressure again. i think the government pressure was wrong, and i regret that we were not more open about it. i firmly believe that we should not compromise our standards regarding content because of pressure from the administration in one direction or another. we have changed our policy so that... this does not happen again, for example, we no longer limit the time dissemination of the news in the us, while we wait for fact-checking. well, experts are now actively comparing the fates of pavel durov and mark zuckerberg, but, for example, even elon musk said that the latter cannot suffer the fate of the creators of telegram, since he cooperates with the authorit

zuckerberg. instagram announced it's going restrict all teenagers from access from eating disorder material, suicidal theme material, self-harm content and it's fantastic. that's great. what's -- what's odd -- what i'm trying to understand is why it is that instagram is only restricting, it's restricting access to -- to sexual explicit content but only for ages 13 to 15, why not restricted for 16 and 17-year-olds as well? >> senator, is that we m don't allow sexually explicit content on the service of people of many age. the -- >> how is that going? >> our prevalence metrics suggests, i think it's 99% or so of the content we remove are able to identify automatically using ai. i think that our efforts while they are not perfect are industry leading. the other thing that you asked about was self-harm content which is what we recently restricted and we made the shift, i think the state of the -- and now more of the field better to not show the content at all. >> is there a way for fuentes make a req

one person not on that list is mark zuckerberg.s wrong, and i regret that i believe that pressure from outside that we did not speak out more openly about this. during the pandemic, facebook deleted more than 20 million posts, and zuckerberg succumbed to pressure from the fbi, in terms of the story. hunter biden's laptop. an article about biden's corrupt ties, including with ukrainian burisma, the new york-rost newspaper printed. but in the end, it was not an october surprise that could have changed the outcome of the elections. the article was declared russian disinformation. the first amendment says that the government will not restrict freedom of speech. that is exactly what they did by forcing zuckerberg to introduce censorship. they violated the first amendment to the constitution. and this is not only fake. zuckerberg should be held accountable for interfering in our elections, they knew what they were doing. however, with zuckerberg now everything is not so simply, formally, he does not support anyone in the elections, but t

and zuckerberg says he regrets it. he made the admission in a letter sent to the house judiciary committee yesterday. zuckerberg says the senior biden administration officials pressured facebook for months, including content labeled humor and satire, while the ceo admits the final decision was facebook's, he says he'd do it differently now. zuckerberg writes, quote, i believe the government pressure was wrong, and i regret that we were not more outspoken about it. let's bring in our business and tech reporter scott budman, who's been following this story, as is everything in the silicon valley, to start with the letter here. why now? and how does this letter come about? yeah, it's a good question. raj mark zuckerberg and facebook have been doing a political dance for years. remember, this company is still under an antitrust lawsuit filed back in 2021. he's trying to please both republicans and democrats, perhaps right now, taking advantage of a lot of political action, but somewhere else. so he thinks he can slip this

. >> tambiÉn es del director ejecutivo mark zuckerberg, por una carta que enviÓ al comitÉ judicial de de joe biden en 2021. miriam, cuÉntanos quÉ dice esta carta. >> nicole octavio este tema ha sido tendencia en redes sociales desde muy temprano. esta maÑana. bÁsicamente lo que dice mark zuckerberg alega que equipos de facebook se sintieron presionados para censurar ciertos contenidos relacionados con el covid 19 en 2021. sus palabras llegan luego de mÚltiples cuestionamientos en los Últimos aÑos sobre la desinformaciÓn en redes sociales. aquÍ tenemos los detalles y tambiÉn lo que ha dicho la casa blanca. una carta de mark zuckerberg causa discusiones y debates sobre las redes sociales y la moderaciÓn de los contenidos. en el texto publicado por el comitÉ judicial de la cÁmara de representantes, el director ejecutivo de meta, la empresa matriz de facebook, instagram y whatsapp, alega que en 2021. altos funcionarios del gobierno de biden presionaron a facebook para que censurara ciertos contenidos relacionados con el covid 19, incluyendo el humor y la sÁtira. zuckerberg ademÁs, dijo cr

, zuckerberg is admitting what a lot of americans have been thinking all along. that they were wrong, for bening to pressure, from the biden-harris administration to police covid content and that they were wrong to censor the hunter biden laptop story. zuckerberg confessing that they should have pushed back against the biden-harris administration saying, "i believe the government pressure was wrong and i regret that we were not more outspoken about it. i also think we made some choices that with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn't make today" but even though he is sorry the white house is not. they don't think they did anything wrong. they don't have any regrets. a white house spokesperson saying er action to zuckerberg's letter, our position has been clear and consistent. we believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the effects their actions have on the american people while making independent choices about the information they present. but, republicans think that the biden-harris engagement with social media

mark zuckerberg is not a leader. he's a follower.on we know this stuff and where -- is because elon musk bought twitter as well as the twitter files. we called out all this information, we found out about these weekly meetings. now he's coming -- jason is right this is a risk mitigation. this is look out donald trump is coming and a group for people like rfk junior, like dorsey gelbart catholic elon musk were skeptical of government power and government overreach are endorsing donald trump because this kind of stuff is scary to every american who watches. >> martha: i think the free speech whether people agree or disagree with the individuals that you just mentioned, they will -- they don't want to be protected from voices. they want to be able to hear what is out there and they don't want to get canceled your marketing people have had it with their environments. i think it's interesting -- i don't know if mark zuckerberg thinks that the former president trump is going to win. know that this is a very tight race when you look at the

on the east coast, hope you are having a good morning meta ceo zuckerberg admitting his company was pressured by the biden-harris administration to censor americans take down portfolios only, being when hunter biden laptop story dropped before 2020 election more pressure to take down the post zuckerberg writing the chairman jim jordan believed pressure quote was wrong regrets not being more outspoken about it saying i feel strongly we should not compromise our content standard due to pressure in any administration, in either direction, ready to push back if something like that happens again, the white house meanwhile claims it was only concerned about misinformation, and public health. joining me on the phone is ohio congressman chairman house judiciary committee jim jordan mr. chairman thank you so much for being here what can you tell us about this? >> well, i i mean we were right about everything, the biden-harris administration pointed out facebook did censorship he also said, back the hunter biden laptop we know had impact on the election that was 2 1/2 weeks before we vote on most impor

this is coming after years of silence after years of silence by zuckerberg. know elon musk has been the subject of unrelenting attacks since he released the twitter files and facebook fought every effort to release the facebook files. these files, most of us presumed had similar coercion pressure from the government and, zuckerberg never fessed up to any of it and, you know, i talk about this in my book, the indispensable right. i talk about facebook's role in all of this. why this is such a unprecedented anti-free speech movement and it is because of this alliance of the government, corporations, the media and academia. so what zuckerberg said today, we all knew but what he was forced to do that by the house judiciary committee. so this is an admission at the point end of a bayonet. david: yeah. >> he came to this epiphany only because he was forced to make these disclosures. david: i hope he means it when he says we wouldn't make the same mistakes now that we made then. i pry that he means it but you bring up a very interesting point because a lot of people

metta boss, mark zuckerberg who owns facebook and instagram is admitted that he was pressured by theuding covid-related humor and satire was taken down under pressure from the... biden administration, zuckerberg also said meta briefly demoted content related to joe biden's son hunter ahead of the 2020 election. according to him, move came after the fbi's warning about a potential russian disinformation campaign. zuckerberg described the government's pressure as wrong, regretting that he didn't speak out earlier. the letter comes as the us judiciary committee has been probing content moderation on online platforms. republicans regard zuckerberg's letter as a big win ahead of the presidential election slated for november and earlier in our news review program we discuss how the us administration has tried to manipulate and incensor free speech and the flow of online information. joing us now for the program is anthony hall, professor of global. economy analyst and researcher joining us from london gentlemen. like to welcome you both to the uh program here, guess we'll start with you pr

luis mÉjid nos dice de quÉ se arrepiente en zuckerberg. mostrÓ su desagrado diciendo "creo que el gobierno no debiÓ presionarnos y lamento que no levantamos mÁs la voz. siento decididamente que no debemos comprometer el estÁndar de nuestro contenido por la presiÓn de ninguna administraciÓn". la carta se refiere a los esfuerzos del gobierno para que facebook dejara de publicar informaciÓn falsa sobre el virus. en el 2021 el presidente biden dijo que las plataformas sociales estaban matando gente con falsedades sobre las vacunas. >> [habla en inglÉs] luis: en ese momento, durante la pandemia, facebook dijo haber tomado fuertes medidas para combatir la desinformaciÓn o informaciÓn falsa, aves mentiras sobre veljkovic seguÍan circulando en su plataforma. afortunadamente hace tiempo que la pandemia ya es historia, algunos analistas creen saber por quÉ es zuckerberg esperÓ tanto tiempo para elevar su queja. >> no hay ninguna duda que el motivo es la polÍtica, no hay ninguna coincidencia que salga con esa crÍtica hoy en dÍa, cuando tenÍa muchas o

after years of silent by zuckerberg.k has been subject of unrelenting attacks since he released twitter files and facebook fought every effort to release facebook files, most of us presumed had similar coercion pressure from government. zuckerberg never fessed up. in my book, i talk about facebook role in this. you know, why this is such a unprecedented and anti-free speech movement because of the alliance of governments, corporations, media and a academia, he was forced to do that by house judiciary committee, he came to that epiphany because he was forced to make the disclosures. david: i hope he means it when he says we would not make the same mistakes now. you bring up an interesting point. people use socialism over communism in describe this administration, it is corporativism, mussolini's italy, a few corporation in government that controlled the whole spear, i think of dangers there, i think of a corporativist environment, you know what i'm saying. >> you are right. that is why you know in book, it is dangerous co

zuckerberg ended his letter with this.y goal is to be neutral and not play a role one way or another, or to even appear to be playing a role. so i don't plan on making a similar contribution. this cycle joining me now is greg lukianoff a free speech advocate who is president and ceo of the foundation for individual rights and expression. he is the co author of a great book called the canceling of the american mind. greg great to see you again. in striking a balance between content moderation or maintaining neutrality. he is saying, i'm coming down on the side of neutrality. i imagine you think that's the right way to go oh, absolutely. >> because basically, if people see social media companies as censoring speech on a political basis, they're never going to trust them ever. and here's the, here's the one frustrating thing about this. and i want to say this directly to mark zuckerberg that essentially next time the government tries to coerce you into censorship, please sue. there was an important case in front of the govern

and, you know, zuckerberg is a is a, you know, well-endowed client.ly a decent amount of money. >> yeah, certainly an expression of love for his wife, priscilla. what alternative approaches do some critics suggest zuckerberg could have taken in commissioning art? >> yeah, well, you know, i talked to some sculptors, some critics, and, you know, the san francisco examiner's art critic, max blue, was saying, you know, if he's trying to be this sort of nobility class tech person in san francisco, like, for instance, the medicis were in florence during the renaissance. you know, the medicis were buying art from people from florence, not from people from paris, you know, like zuckerberg maybe is doing from new york, so they were saying, you know, for a long time, the tech class has been like the nobility class of san francisco, and yet we've never really seen them invest in the art world, so i think a lot of the critics i spoke to saw it as a real kind of missed opportunity. >> very interesting. well, sam, thanks so much for your time with us today. >> than

zuckerberg regret suppressing information about the hunter biden laptop.s white house present under press secretary jen psaki and biden back in 2020 and 2021 on hunter's laptop. >> i think is probably known and widely known that there is a broad range of russian disinformation. >> the stories from the fall about hunter -- [inaudible] >> yes, yes, yes. maria: here is mark zuckerberg testifying on capitol hill back in 2020. >> when it comes time to flag content as being reliable or not reliable, do either one of you believe that the government should do that. >> for certain types of illegal content i think it may be appropriate for there to be clear rules around that but outside of clear harms including things like child exploitation and areas like that, terrorism i would agree with your sentiment that that is not something that government should be deciding on a piece of content by a piece of content basis. maria: summary showing concern about the timing of zuckerberg's admission this is nine days away from early voting and surrounded the summer supreme cou

mark zuckerberg admitting th

for a zuckerberg four years later in 2024, hindsight is really 2020.use it is not. they would not do anything different sagan's statement, reacting to zuckerberg, our position has been clear and consistent, we believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the actions of their actions have on the american people. we don't know what vice president harris will continue the same social media censorship campaign if she is president but the trump team it says it not happen under the administration. >> the leader one of the most important social networks in the world just came out and said i censored donald trump in the one of to the election because there were certain elements within the biden administration and biden campaign that encouraged me to do that. that is crazy. >> everybody wants to know why zuckerberg had a come to jesus moment of months before the presidential election, one source tells me zuckerberg ultimately knew this is what houser what wickens wanted out of the investigation, so he gave it to them kind of like a p

, zuckerberg is insuring himself, looking at... telegram in america is experiencing a real boom after the arrest of its owner, it rose from eighteenth to eighth place in the list of the best applications, in the ranking of the best social networks it even became second, you can't resist lead the classic operations, which for the time being must be carried out under a foreign flag. valentin bogdanov, ivan udkina and vlada tsurkan, host usa. trump included kennedy jr., who withdrew from the election, in his transition team. he, like former congresswoman tulsi gabart, who has switched to the republicans, will join trump's sons eric and donald. the us president reacts to the rating jump of the harris 45 team not only by the number of people, but also by the quality of entertainment content. trump has launched a new batch of digital collectible cards for sale at $99 each. those who... buy a pack, get a piece of the jacket trump wore during the debate with biden, and some even get a personal invitation to dinner. report by dmitry melniko

that's exactly what they did by forcing zuckerberg to introduce censorship.y violated the first amendment to the constitution. and it's not just facebook, it's all digital media and probably all media in general. to prevent americans from doubting biden, materials began to be digitally stifled, artificially reducing the potential... represented time changed his image became interested in mixed martial arts, increasingly spends time in the company of a prominent trump ally of the ufc president, dana white. it is white who supports, but the billionaire and tech mogul who was the last trump at the republican national convention this year, it was he who came up with the idea of ​​holding a charity fight between zuckerberg and his rival, billionaire elon musk, who supports trump. details about why he was arrested. but internet entrepreneur kim.com, who is facing extradition to the united states, has already openly stated that the situation with the arrest durov is coordinated in washington. the scale, number and style of the accusations, as well as the malicious s

that's exactly what they did by forcing zuckerberg to impose censorship.y violated the first amendment. and it's not just facebook, it's all digital media and probably all media in general. to prevent americans from doubting biden, they digitally stifled content, artificially reducing the potential audience that could change their minds and vote for trump. dana white, it was white who represented trump on republican convention this year, it was he who came up with the idea of ​​holding a charity fight between zuckerberg and his rival billionaire elon musk, who openly supports trump. the owner of x has become one of the most influential americans who has responded to the founder's arrest. it would be useful for the world community to know more details about why he was arrested, here is internet entrepreneur kim.com, who is facing extradition to the united states, who has already openly stated that the situation with durov's arrest coordinated in washington. the scale, quantity and style of the accusations, as well as the malicious slander, leave me with no

facebook has removed more than 20 million posts during the pandemic, and zuckerberg has caved in to fbissure over the hunter biden laptop story. article about biden's corrupt ties, including with ukraine's burisma, were published by the new york post. but it was an october surprise that could have changed the outcome of the election. in the end, it was not. the article was declared russian disinformation. the first amendment says that the government will not restrict freedom of speech, and that's exactly what they did by forcing zuckerberg to introduce censorship. they violated the first amendment to the constitution, and it's not just facebook, it's all digital media and probably all media in general. so that americans do not doubt biden, the materials began to be digitally stifled, artificially reducing the potential audience that could change their mind and vote for trump. for me, this is interference in the elections and the state. dana white, it was white who represented trump at the republican party convention this year, it was he who came up with the idea of ​​holding a charity f

ed: mark zuckerberg alleging that facebook was pressured by the u.s.ensor content related to covid-19 during pandemic. that story is next. this is "bloomberg technology." ♪ gotcha. take that. whoa! bruh! i'm fine. that smack looked bad. not compared to the smack down i'm giving you. you sure you're, ok? you know you're down 200 points, right? lucky, she convinced me to get help. i had a concussion that could've been game over. in actual reality, you've only got one life. don't mess with your melon. if you hit it, get it checked. ed: welcome back to -- caroline: welcome back to "bloomberg technology." ed: the story in the markets is clear, technology is a big factor behind pushing stocks near to their all-time highs, the nasdaq 100 is up modestly, nvidia being a big part of that. up more than 150% year-to-date. unbelievably, up almost 1000%, almost 1000% from their october 2022 bear market low. it's astonishing and it is the story this week with earnings after market on wednesday where we will have special coverage. meda is interesting as well. give us

zuckerberg .... .... we found common ground that is astonishing hearing after hearing the bottom line is come tohat you are not going to support any of this. how do you say your last? >> yeah carino. >> support that act? >> is currently support the collaboration -- no, no, no. you support this act? yes or no? >> we look forward to the conversation. >> but -- can lose your liability when children are exploited. the earn it act means you have to, you're given that matter what the members of the communicable time make sure people holding up the signs and sue on behalf of their loved ones. nothing will change until the courtroom door is open to victims of social media. two billing dollars, what percentage of that is what you made last year? >> a significant increasing investment. >> to present his 4% of your revenue. >> we are not ready to share financials in public much do you make? eyeballs on you and it's not just about children. you realize tech representative resigned yesterday? >> yes, i am aware. >> is

did that today think what i did maybe was to me a normal response, but i was called by -- mark zuckerberg yesterday day before apologized said they made a mistake et cetera, et cetera, correcting the mistake google nobody called from google one of the things do i in a show like yours you show you say it on fox but when you really see it all over the place take clips of your show doing right now with me if i do a good job they are going to vote for me they are going to vote for me because not just on fox it is on fox a smaller part of it own all over the beautiful cell phones all over the place. you have a product you have a great product you have a great brand you have to get out you have to get out to do things like your show and other shows, and google has been very bad of this been very irresponsible i have a feeling google going to be close to shut down because i don't think congress is going to take it i really don't think so google has to be careful i will say this i believe mark zuckerberg called me a lot i think they fixed it not doing what he did four years ago with 500 million d

a bombshell admission from mark zuckerberg.

zuckerberg now deserves zero credit and only our contempt.years denying his senses sipped refusing to cough up incriminating documents he knew the truth. he concealed her. and he came clean only because he was forced to do so by congressional threats. now he sent a late contrite. that's like a bank robber whose only sorry because he got caught. and a zuckerberg does not even have the guts to accept responsibility and instead he blames pressure from the biden allies. think about what facebook and other social media sites did they help to throw a presidential election by suppressing laptop story peddling as it russian this information, they knew it was not. they blacklisted people and then on coalbed, and other important issues they muzzled important information whenever the biden demanded. you not allowed to disagree with joe biden. in concert they tore up the forced -- first amendment and it's interesting democrats claim that trump is a threat to democracy, they are the real threats and zuckerberg's confession belatedly proves it. >> sean: i

zuckerberg also said met a briefly demoted content. relating to joe biden's son hunter, ahead of the 2020 election, according to him, the move came after the fbi's warning about a potential russian disinformation campaign. zuckerberg described the government's pressure is wrong, regretting that he has not been outspoken about it. the letter comes as the us judiciary committee has been investigating content moderation on online platforms. republicans, regard zuckerberg's letter is a big win ahead of the presidential election in november. earlier in our news review program we discussed how the us administration has tried to manipulate and censor free speech and the flow of online information. let's listen to what our guests had to say. joing us now for the program is anthony hall, professor of globalization at aleth bridge. university from uh lethbridge canada and also uh clive menz's political uh economy analyst and researcher joining us from london gentlemen like to welcome you both to the uh program here i guess we'll start with you professor anthony hall there in uh canada thanks f

mark zuckerberg now says his company screwed up on the hunter biden laptop story and says he regrets speaking out more about the pressure to censor americans. >> this is a big story. >> brian: and he is growing his hair out. more on that later. plus, hiding harris after 37 days without an interview, even her own supporters calling her out for not stepping up. >> votes are earned, not given. and they're earned through you going out there and explaining yourself. >> brian: he believes she has got a good story to tell. she just won't tell it. kellyanne will join us live this hour. >> ainsley: cell phones in the classroom. should children have them or not? >> brian: are you asking me? >> ainsley: we will debate, brian. anxious to hear your opinion. >> brian: so am i. >> ainsley: you get to decide. >> brian: i can't wait. >> lawrence: "fox & friends" starts right now. and remember, mornings are better with friends. >> ainsley: we begin this hour with headlines we are following while tens of thousands of illegal immigrants continue to poor across our southern u.s. border a federal judge in

zuckerberg writes this. in 2021 senior officials from the biden administration including the white house repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain covid-19 content including humor and satire and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn't agree. i believe the government pressure was wrong and i regret that we were not more outspoken about it. zuckerberg also admits in the letter his company was wrong when they demoted the hunter biden laptop story. republican representative laura lee, a member of the judiciary committee had this to say this morning. >> to see mr. zuckerberg acknowledging this is really important. it shows the lengths that the biden administration went to try to shut this information down. and the other thing that he mentions in this letter that's really critical is an acknowledgement that the hunter biden laptop story was suppressed. >> the white house is responding issuing this statement saying when confronted with the deadly pandemic this information enco