>> Dickerson: SAT DOWN WITH
MR. TRUMP AT HIS HOME IN BEVERLY
HILLS ON FRIDAY THAT'S WHERE OUR
IN II VIEW BEGAN.
ON THURSDAY HILLARY CLINTON GAVE
SPEECH VERY TOUGH ON YOU SAID
THAT YOU WANTED TO BRING BACK
WATERBOARDING, GO AFTER THE
FAMILIES OF TERRORIST, SHE SAYS
YOU'VE SAID THAT YOU NO MORE
ABOUT ISIS THAN THE GENERALS
WHAT POLICY OF YOURS DID SHE
MISCHARACTERIZE.
>> IT WAS REALLY TRUMP POLICY.
SHE HAD IT ALL WRONG.
FIRST OF ALL SHE TALKED THAT I
WANTED TO NUKE ALL OF THESE
COUNTRIES IS RIDICULOUS.
I WANT THESE COUNTRIES TO PAY
FOR PROTECTING THEM.
WE HAVE 19 TRILLION IN DEBT VERY
SOON GOING TO 21 TRILLION IN
DEBT I WANT THESE COUNTRIES TO
REIMBURSE US AT LEAST FOR OUR
COST. SHE MADE MANY STATEMENTS THAT
SHE KNOWS WERE WRONG.
>> Dickerson: DO YOU FEEL LIKE
YOU KNOW MORE ABOUT ISIS THAN
THE GENERALS. >> THEY DON'T KNOW MUCH BECAUSE
THEY'RE NOT WINNING, I YOU THIS
THEY'RE NOT WINNING FOR A
DIFFERENT REASON.
I THINK OBAMA IS HURTING THEM.
>> Dickerson: HOW SO?
>> FROM WHAT I HEAR IT'S BEING
RUN FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.
IT'S ALL BEING RUN FROM THE
WHITE HOUSE.
I'VE SPOKEN TO CERTAIN GENERALS
I'LL KEEP IT QUIET HIGHLY
RESPECTED PEOPLE.
WE COULD KNOCK THEM OUT FAST.
>> Dickerson: IN OFFICE NOW GENERALS?
IN. >> ONE CASE IN OFFICE.
ONE CASE OUT OF OFFICE.
THEY SAID, BOTH SAID THE SAME
THINGF WE HAD THE LEADERSHIP
MEAN CAN THE GO AHEAD COULD
KNOCK THEM OUT FAST.
FOR SOME REASON OBAMA IS NOT
DOING THAT.
>> Dickerson: LET ME ASK YOU
ABOUT LIBYA YOU'VE BEEN HIGHLY
CRITICAL OF LIBYA.
YOU WERE ALSO FOR MILITARY
ACTION TO OUST GADHAFI AND TAKE
ACTION IN LIBYA, YOU SUPPORTED
THIS.
>> YOU SAY SUPPORTIVE, I
SUPPORTED LIBYA?
>> YOU SUPPORTED --
DID I?
WHERE DO YOU SEE THAT.
>> Dickerson: IN VIDEO BLOG FROM
2011 YOU SAID --
>> WE SHOULD GO IN WE STOP THIS
GUY WHICH WOULD BE VERY EASY AND
VERY QUICK WE COULD DO IT
SURGICALLY. STOP HIM FROM DOING IT AND SAVE
THESE LIVES.
>> BIG DIFFERENCE FROM WHAT
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.
I'M ONLY ONE, I MADE LOT OF
MONEY WITH GADHAFI.
HE CAME TO THE COUNTRY AND HE
HAD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH ME
BECAUSE HE NEEDED A PLACE TO
STAY, THEY PAID ME A FORTUNE
NEVER GOT TO STAY THERE IT
BECAME A BIG JOKE.
BUT THE FACT IS, THAT LIBYA WAS
A DISASTER FROM THE STANDPOINT
OF WAY IT WAS HANDLED.
>> Dickerson: FOR INTERVENTION?
JUST TO CLEAR THAT UP? >> FOR SOMETHING, BUT FOR WHAT
YOU HAVE RIGHT NOW.
RIGHT NOW ISIS HAS THEIR OIL
JOHN.
ICE IS SELLING -- AMONG FINEST
OIL IN THE WORLD.
ISIS HAS TAKEN OVER THE LIBYAN
OIL AND WE DON'T DO BLOCKADES OR
ANYTHING, MAKING A FORTUNE WITH
IT.
WE GO OUT WE DO LIBYA, WE DO IT
POORLY AS POORLY AS YOU CAN DO
IT.
YOU CAN'T DO WORSE.
AND THEN NOW IF YOU LOOK AT
WHAT'S HAPPENED, THE END RESULTS
ISIS IS SELLING THE OIL AND IT'S
A TOTAL MESS.
>> Dickerson: THIS IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT CONFUSE SOME PEOPLE
ABOUT YOUR POSITION YOU SAID YOU
WEREN'T FOR INTERVENTION BUT YOU
WERE FOR INTERVENTION.
>> I DIDN'T MIND SURGICAL.
I SAID SURGICAL.
DO YOU A SURGICAL SHOT YOU TAKE
THEM OUT. BUT I WASN'T FOR WHAT HAPPENED.
LOOK AT THE WAY -- LOOK WITH
BENGHAZI ALL OF THE PROBLEMS IT
WAS HANDLED HORRIBLY.
>> Dickerson: YOU SAID YOU WERE
NEVER FOR INTERVENTION. >> I WAS NEVER FOR STRONG
INTERVENTION, I COULD HAVE SEEN
SURGICAL WHERE YOU TAKE OUT
GADHAFI AND HIS GROUP.
>> Dickerson: YOU SAID HILLARY
CLINTON SHOULD GO TO JAIL. IF FBI WHICH IS INVESTIGATING IF
THERE'S NO INDICTMENT, WILL YOUR
ATTORNEY GENERAL GO --
>> SO, I HAVE SPOKEN TO, I'VE
WATCHED AND I'VE READ MANY MANY
LAWYERS ON THE SUBJECT.
SO-CALLED NEUTRAL LAWYERS.
NOT EVEN ON ONE SIDE OR THE
OTHER.
EVERYONE OF THEM WITHOUT A DOUBT
SAID THAT WHAT SHE DID IS FAR
WORSE THAN WHAT OTHER PEOPLE DID
LIKE GENERAL PETRAEUS WHO GOT
TWO-YEAR JAIL TERM.
GENERAL PETRAEUS AND OTHERS HAVE
BEEN TREATED -- LIVES HAVE BEEN
IN A SENSE DESTROYED, SHE KEEPS
CAMPAIGNING.
WHAT SHE DID IS A CRIMINAL
SITUATION. SHE WASN'T SUPPOSED TO DO THAT
WITH A SERVER AND E-MAILS ALL OF
THE OTHER.
NOW, I RELY ON THE LAWYERS.
THESE ARE GOOD LAWYERS. THESE ARE PROFESSIONAL LAWYERS.
THESE ARE LAWYERS THAT KNOW WHAT
THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT AND ARE
VERY WELL VERSED THEY SAY SHE'S
GUILTY AS HELL.
>> Dickerson: SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE
MAKING PROMISE FOR ATTORNEY
GENERAL THAT IF YOU WERE ELECTED --
THIS IS A COMMITMENT
YOU WERE MAKING.
TO HAVE --
>> VERY FAIR.
BUT I WOULD HAVE MY ATTORNEY
GENERAL LOOK AT IT.
>> Dickerson: EVEN IF IT
INVESTIGATION -- >> YOU HAVE A FIVE MAYBE
SIX-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATION.
>> Dickerson: CURRENT INVESTIGATIONS DON'T FIND
ANYTHING YOU'D HAVE YOUR ATTORNEY GENERAL GO BACK?
>> YES, I WOULD.
EVERYONE KNOWS THAT SHE'S
GUILTY. NOW, I WOULD SAY THIS, SHE'S
GUILTY. BUT I WOULD LET MY ATTORNEY
GENERAL MAKE THAT DETERMINATION.
MAYBE THEY WOULD DISAGREE I
WOULD LET THAT PERSON MAKE THE
DETERMINATION.
>> Dickerson: WHAT FOR YOU IS SHE EXACTLY GUILTY OF?
>> SHE'S GUILTY OF THE SERVERS,
GUILTY OF YOU LOOK AT
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, I MEAN
ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT
PROBABLY HAS GOTTEN OUT ALL OVER
THE WORLD.
AND THEN YOU KNOW WHAT SHE'S
ALSO GUILTY OF STUPIDITY AND BAD
JUDGMENT.
>> Dickerson: IF THAT WERE CRIMINAL --
>> I'M NOT SAYING THAT PART IS
CRIMINAL.
BUT CERTAINLY GUILTY OF THAT.
IN TERMS OF THIS COUNTRY, SHE IS
GUILTY OF HAVING JUST BAD,
BAD -- HOW COULD SHE DO IT --
>> Dickerson: WHAT GETS TO JAIL,
THOUGH?
WHAT WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RHETORIC AND LAW?
>> WHAT THE LAWYERS ARE SAY CAN
WHAT SHE DID IN TERMS OF
NATIONAL SECURITY, VERY STRICT
RULES AND REGULATIONS, SHE'S
BROKEN ALL OF THEM.
>> Dickerson: CLASSIFICATION
ISSUE? >> COURSE IT IS.
BUT SHE'S BROKEN SO MUCH.
BUT SHE'S SO -- IF YOU LOOK
AT -- FROM THE STANDPOINT I
DON'T HAVE DID SHE DO IT?
JUDGMENT, THE WORD JUDGMENT
THIS IS NOT CRIMINAL JUDGMENT
YOU MAKE BAD JUDGE THE.
ACTUALLY UNDER THOSE RULES AND
REGULATIONS JUDGMENT EVEN CRIMINAL.
WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO DO IT.
IF YOU MAKE A MISTAKE THEY DON'T
TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT WHY
WOULD A PERSON AND HOW CAN A
PERSON WITH THIS KIND OF
JUDGMENT BECOME THE PRESIDENT OF
THE UNITED STATES?
NOW, THINK OF THIS.
IN A CYBERWORLDN IS A VERY
COMPLEX, WE'RE IN WORLD LIKE
WE'VE NEVER BEEN IN BEFORE.
IF WE WERE IN CYBER-WORLD SHE
CAN'T EVEN HANDLE HER E-MAILS
HOW CAN SHE BE PRESIDENT?
WE'RE BEING HACKED ALL OVER THE
PLACE BY RUSSIA CHINA PROBABLY.
I MEAN TO THE BEST OF
EVERYONE'S KNOWLEDGE IT SEEMS TO
BE. LISTEN TO THIS, WE'RE IN A
CYBERWORLD AND SHE'S PLAYING
AROUND WITH SERVERS AND E-MAILS.
HOW CAN SHE BE RUNNING THIS
COUNTRY. SHE DOESN'T KNOW WHAT SHE'S
DOING IDEA MOVE ON TO ANOTHER
DEVELOPMENT. PAUL RYAN NOW COME OUT AND
ENDORSED YOU. YOU'VE TALKED TO HIM SEVERAL
TIMES. WHICH OF HIS IDEAS OF THE FAMOUS
RYAN IDEAS ARE MOST APPEALING TO
YOU?
>> HE'S MOST APPEALING.
HE'S A GOOD MAN. HE WANTS GOOD THINGS FOR THE
COUNTRY.
WE WILL AGREE ON MANY THINGS,
WE'RE NOT GOING TO AGREE ON ALL
IS THINGS.
WE'LL AGREE ON MANY THINGS.
I THINK WE'LL AGREE ON, AS AN
EXAMPLE HE REALLY FOCUSES ON
POVERTY.
HE WANTS TO TAKE PEOPLE OUT OF
POVERTY. SO DO I.
WE'RE GOING TO COME UP WITH A
PLAN. >> Dickerson: WHY DO YOU THINK
PEOPLE ARE POOR?
>> BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE JOBS.
POOR IN MANY CASES BECAUSE THEY
DON'T HAVE JOBS. I WILL TELL YOU WILL BRING JOBS
BACK TO THIS COUNTRY LIKE NOBODY
HAS EVER SEEN BEFORE.
AND PEOPLE LIKE CARRIER AND FORD
AND NABISCO LEAVING CHICAGO AND
MOVING TO MEXICO.
THEY'RE ALL MOVING TO MEXICO.
I WILL STOP THAT VERY QUICKLY.
>> Dickerson: DO YOU SEE
YOURSELF AS IMPLEMENTING PAUL
RYAN'S AGENDA AS PRESIDENT OR IS
PAUL RYAN IMPLEMENTING THE
DONALD TRUMP? >> I THINK COMPROMISE HONESTLY.
I CAN SEE A PROCEED MICE.
>> Dickerson: ON ISSUES OF
TRADE, ENTITLEMENTS, YOU AND --
IMMIGRATION, TRADE
ENTITLEMENTS, IMMIGRATION ARE NO
SMALL ISSUES YOU ARE ON EXACTLY
THE OPPOSITE END -- THOSE AREN'T
DIFFERENCES. >> I DON'T KNOW. TO BE HONEST.
WE'VE SPOKEN ABOUT IT VERY
BRIEFLY. THEY ARE BIG SUBJECTS.
WHAT MY DEAL IS ON TRADE I WANT
GOOD DEALS.
SOMEBODY SAID, WHAT IS YOUR
POSITION ON TRADE N I SAID I
WANT GOOD DEALS.
WHETHER IT'S FREE TRADE, NOT
FREE TRADE I WANT GOOD DEALS
FOR OUR COUNTRY.
WE DON'T MAKE GOOD DEALS WE HAVE
A TRADE DEFICIT WITH CHINA WITH
MEXICO WE'RE HAVE TRADE DEFICIT
WITH JAPAN.
WE MAKE BAD DEALS WHETHER IT'S
THE MILITARY, WHETHER IT'S
TRADE, WE ONLY MAKE BAD DEALS.
>> Dickerson: HE WAS ASKED BY
CNN, TWO THINGS.
ONE ABOUT DEPORTING OF THE 11
MILLION UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS
WHICH THE PRESIDENT BY THE WAY
CALLED A FANTASY.
HE SAID IF YOU ASKED HIM TO DO
THAT HE'D SAY NO, DON'T DO IT.
ALSO SAID ABOUT TEMPORARY BAN ON
MUSLIM INTEGRATION NO DON'T DO
IT.
BASED ON THESE PROMISES.
HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET PAST
THE ESTABLISHMENT TO KEEP THOSE
PROMISES? >> YOU HAVE TO WATCH AND SEE.
I'VE DONE A LOT OF THINGS NOBODY
THOUGHT I COULD DO.
>> Dickerson: YOU'RE NOT BACKING
DOWN ON THE PROMISES BASED ON --
>> WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING. WE HAVE A PROBLEM IN THIS
COUNTRY. WE HAVE A RADICAL ISLAMIC
TERRORISM PROBLEM IN THIS COUNTRY.
BY THE WAY, THROUGHOUT THE
WORLD. THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
IT'S A PROBLEM.
IT'S A TEMPORARY THING I'M NOT
TALKING PERMANENT.
WE HAVE TO FIND OUT WHAT IS
GOING ON.
>> Dickerson: WHAT DOES THE
MEMBERS CAB HERITAGE OF THE
TRUMP -- HERITAGE.
JUMP UNIVERSITY CASE?
>> I'VE HAD TERRIBLE RULINGS
FOREVER. I HAD A JUDGE PREVIOUS WOULD
HAVE BEEN A VERY QUICK CASE.
THIS IS A CASE I SHOULD HAVE WON
OWN SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
THIS IS STREET CASE, NOBODY
WRITES THIS, THEY DON'T LIKE TO
WRITE IT THE PLAINTIFF IN THE
CASE IS A WOMAN.
SHE WAS SO BAD THAT UNDER
DEPOSITION IT WAS OVER.
SHE COULDN'T HAVE BEEN -- IT WAS
A DISASTER.
THEY WENT BEFORE THE JUDGE THEY
SAID, WE DON'T WANT HER TO BE
THE PLAINTIFF.
WE WANT TO PUT SOMEBODY ELSE IN.
WE SAID, WELL, THAT'S FINE.
DISMISS THE CASE.
YOU HAVE TO DISMISS THE CASE.
WAIT A MINUTE.
SHE GAVE LETTERS, THE MOST
INCREDIBLE REVIEWS THAT YOU'VE
EVER SEEN, OF THE UNIVERSITY.
SHE HAD MOST INCREDIBLE.
ON TOP WE HAVE A TAPE WHERE
SHE'S TALKING ABOUT IT IN THE
MOST GLOWING TERMS.
YOU WOULDN'T SPEAK ABOUT YOUR
COLLEGE --
>> Dickerson: BUT THE JUDGE FROM MEXICO -- >> WE'RE GETTING TERRIBLE
RULINGS.
WE GO TO THE JUDGE SAY TO THE
JUDGE, YOU CAN'T LET HER OUT OF
THE CASE. HE LET HER OUT OF THE CASE.
SHE'S THE PLAINTIFF.
THE CASE IS OVER.
THE CASE ISN'T OVER.
NOW, GIVE ME --
>> Dickerson: BUT -- FOR HIM
HOW IS HIS MEXICAN HERITAGE HAVE
TO DO WITH HIM NOT RULING --
>> HE'S A MEMBER OF A A CLUB OR
SOCIETY VERY STRONGLY PRO
MEXICAN.
WHICH IS FINE. BUT I SAY HE'S GOT BIAS.
I WANT TO BUILD A WALL.
I'M DOING VERY WELL WITH THE
LATINOS, MEXICANS, VERY WELL
WITH THEM IN MY OPINION.
AND WE'RE GOING TO SEE -- YOU'RE
GOING TO SEE, BECAUSE YOU KNOW
WHAT I'M PROVIDING JOBS. NOBODY ELSE IS GIVING JOBS.
BUT JUST SO YOU UNDERSTAND.
THIS JUDGE HAS TREATED ME VERY
UNFAIRLY. HE'S TREATED ME IN A HOSTILE
MANNER.
AND THERE'S SOMETHING GOING ON.
WHEN A WOMAN CAN BE A PLAINTIFF
IN A CASE THEN SAY, I DON'T WANT
TO BE -- YOU KNOW WHY THEY DON'T
WANT TO BE A PLAINTIFF THEY
DIDN'T WANT HER LAWYERS ASKED
THAT SHE NOT BE A PLAINTIFF
BECAUSE THEY BOO HAVE LOST THE
--
>> $.
Dickerson: IF HIS MEMBERS AN
HERITAGE IS BEAR -- DASH MEMBERS
AN HERITAGE WHY WOULD ANY
MEXICAN VOTER VOTE FOR YOU WHEN
THEY BE -- >> THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE BECAUSE
I'M GOING TO BRING --
>> Dickerson: THE SAME PROBLEM
BECAUSE YOU WANT TO BUILD A WALL?
>> BY MADE SPEECH LAST NIGHT
HUNDREDS OF SIGNS, LATINOS FOR
TRUMP.
ALL OVER THE PLACE.
YOU KNOW WHAT, THEY ARE HERE
LEGALLY.
THEY DON'T WANT THEIR HOMES
TAKEN AWAY, THEY DON'T WANT
THEIR JOB TAKEN AWAY.
THEY LIKE WHAT I'M DOING.
PEOPLE CAN COME IN BUT THEY HAVE
TO COME IN LEGALLY.
>> Dickerson: WHAT IF HE WAS A
MUSLIM.
YOU'VE BEEN TOUGH ON TEMPORARY
MUSLIM IMMIGRATION BAN.
WOULD A MS. LIMB JUDGE BE
ALLOWED?
>> TREMENDOUS NUMBERS OF PEOPLE
COMING INTO THIS COUNTRY THAT WE
KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.
WE HAVE A PROBLEM IN THIS
COUNTRY, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE BIG
PROBLEMS.
I'VE BEEN GOOD AT PREDICTING
THING, JOHN.
WE'LL HAVE PEOPLE COMING INTO
THIS COUNTRY TOTALLY
UNDOCUMENTED THEY DON'T KNOW
ANYTHING ABOUT THEM.
THEY DON'T HAVE PAPERWORK.
I INTERVIEWED TALKED TO THE BEST
LAW ENFORCEMENT PEOPLE IN THE
BUSINESS, NO WAY OF KNOWING
WHERE THEY COME FROM.
AND WE'RE TAKING THEM IN FROM
THE SO-CALLED MIGRATION.
THEY ARE BEING SENT ALL OVER THE
COUNTRY. WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT DON'T
KNOW --
>> Dickerson: MY QUESTION IS
DIFFERENT. WOULD A MUSLIM JUDGE NOT BE ABLE
TO TREAT YOU FAIRLY BECAUSE OF
THAT POLICY OF YOURS?
>> IT'S POSSIBLE, YES.
THAT WOULD BE POSSIBLE
ABSOLUTELY.
>> Dickerson: ISN'T THERE SORT
TRADITION IN HECK THAT WE DON'T
JUDGE PEOPLE BY WHO THEIR
PARENTS ARE? >> I'M TALKING ABOUT COMMON
SENSE.
HE'S SOMEBODY IS PROUD OF HIS
HERITAGE, THAT'S GREAT THAT HE'S
PROUD --
>> Dickerson: YOU'RE SAYING
BARRIER TO HIM DOING HIS JOB.
>> HE'S IN THE TREATING ME
NARROWLY.
>> Dickerson: NOT BECAUSE WHO
HIS PARENTS ARE?
>> I HAVE A CASE WHERE THOUSANDS
OF PEOPLE HAVE SAID IT WAS A
GREAT SCHOOL.
THEY HAVE WRITTEN REVIEWS WHERE
THEY SAY IT'S A GREAT SCHOOL.
NOT A GOOD SCHOOL, LIKE GREAT.
GAVE HIGHEST MARKS.
I HAVE THOUSANDS OF THESE
PAPERS.
SHOULD HAVE BEEN SUMMARY
JUDGMENT CASE MEANING THE CASE
SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISMISSED.
I HAD A JUDGE WHO WAS VERY FAIR.
A LAWYER THAT CAME IN WHEN HE
CAME IN.
THE LAWYER ON OTHER SIDE SORT OF
ENTERED THE CASE WHEN DID HE
TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THAT
IS --
>> Dickerson: THROW THIS OUT
BECAUSE --
>> NOW THAT WE DIDN'T KNOW
BEFORE.
>> Dickerson: BECAUSE OF HIS
MEXICAN HERITAGE?
>> BECAUSE OF OTHER THINGS.
Dickerson: YOU SAID YOU WANT
TO --
>> HOW DO YOU ALLOW A CASE TO
PROCEED WHEN THE PLAINTIFF ASKS
TO BE DISMISSED FROM THE CASE.
THE PLAINTIFF, THE ONE THAT
BROUGHT THE SUIT, SAID, I DON'T
WANT TO SUE ANY MORE.
THEN YOU KNOW WHY THEY DIDN'T
WANT TO?
SHE CAN'T WIN THE CASE BECAUSE
SHE WAS A DISASTER.
THE THE LAWYERS WANT HER
DISMISSED. THEY GO BEFORE THE JUDGE HE
LET'S HER OUT?
WELL, HE CAN LET HER OUT BUT YOU
HAVE TO DISMISS THE CASE.
>> Dickerson: I GUESS I'M
CONFUSED WHAT HIS MEXICAN
PARENTS HAVE TO DO WITH THAT.
>> EXCUSE ME, I WANT TO BUILD A
WALL. I DON'T THINK IT'S VERY
CONFUSING. HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING
EXCEPT COMMON SENSE.
WE HAVE TO STOP BEING SO
POLITICALLY CORRECT IN THIS
COUNTRY. WE NEED A LITTLE MORE COMMON
SENSE, JOHN.
I'M NOT BLAMING, I'M PROUD OF MY
HERITAGE, WE'RE ALL PROUD OF OUR
HERITAGE. BUT I WANT TO BUILD A WALL.
HISPANICS, MANY OF THEM LIKE
WHAT I'M SAYING THEY'RE HERE
LEGALLY THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE
COMING TAKING THEIR JOBS AND
THEIR HOUSE AND EVERYTHING ELSE.
THEY DON'T WANT THAT.
>> Dickerson: LET ME ASK YOU
ABOUT TRUMP UNIVERSITY YOU'RE
GOING TO REOPEN IT ANYTHING DO
YOU DIFFERENTLY WHEN YOU REOPEN
IT? >> LOOK, I GUESS IN LIFE YOU
ALWAYS DO THINGS DIFFERENTLY.
THE THING THAT WE DID VERY WELL
WE HAD EVALUATION REPORTS DONE
BY ALL OF THE STUDENTS.
WITHOUT THAT IT WOULD BE MY
WORD AGAINST THEIR WORD I GUESS.
OR SOMEBODY'S WORD AGAINST THEIR
WORD. WE HAVE EVALUATION REPORTS WHERE
WE HAVE THOUSANDS OF THEM.
THOUSANDS OF THEM.
AND THESE REPORTS VERY DETAILED
REPORTS. WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE
INSTRUCTORS, WHAT DO YOU THINK
OF THIS. ONE TO FILE.
MOSTLY FIVE.
FIVE BEING EXCELLENT.
IT'S FROM ONE TO FIVE.
FIVE BEING THE BEST.
PEOPLE CIRCLED, I'M BEING SUED
BY PEOPLE THAT HAVE GIVEN THIS
TREMENDOUS -- THEY'RE GOING TO
SAY, THEY WERE FORCED.
WHO FORCED THEM?
NOBODY FORCED THEM.
THEY FORCED THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE
TO SIGN REPORTS?
NOBODY FORCED THEM TO SIGN
REPORTS.
MANY SAYS REMARKS MANY HAVE
BEEN HANDWRITING, BEAUTIFUL
STATEMENTS ABOUT THE SCHOOL.
LOOK, IT'S VERY SIMPLE.
IT'S CALLED IF I HAVE CHANCE TO
GET MY MONEY BACK LET ME GET MY
MONEY BACK.
>> Dickerson: LAST QUESTION,
SHOULD THE U.S. GO TO THE
OLYMPICS WITH THE THREAT OF ZIKA
IN BRAZIL?
>> THE ANSWER TO, YES.
BUT CERTAINLY AS AN ATHLETE
WOULDN'T WANT TO DO IT.
>> Dickerson: THANK YOU VERY
MUCH. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
Dickerson: WE'LL BE BACK IN
ONE MINUTE WITH A LOOK BACK AT
THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD A