so the question of the nsr, um, i, i, i fully understand nsrs. i have promoted nsrs from this or seen nsrs promoted from this bully pulpit and they are they are purposeful and important. however they were tied to a specific, uh, ordinances, laws or real reasons at, you know, at the moment that we now have an nsr that is not applicable if it was today, uh, we the basis of that nsr law, which was view would not be valid. so how do we deal with the nsr appropriately in this case, given that it would not be an issue if today we were talking about the deck, who wants to take that jen or corey? i'm happy to do it and be corrected if needed. but like perfect. i mean that the you know, the nsr was really the relevant time. there is the are the restriction like, you know, the board placed conditions of approval on these prior permits. um, that went beyond what was required in the planning code. um, and, and you know, it's basically under your, your purview to maintain those or modify them or remove them, um, under whatever basis you find appropriate under

the volume of cargo traffic along the nsr increased from 1 million tons in 2012 to 34 million in the second. this year we expect a new record. in the new 36 million tons being created today along the nsr route. when reaching full power, enterprises will generate a cargo flow of more than 200 million per year and will provide significant additional revenues for the budget, according to the east state planning committee, tax revenues from new projects from the year thirty-five. on august 4 , the federal law on northern delivery, developed on your instructions, was adopted, which will allow delivery. these large-scale tasks are being implemented by the people who live, work and serve in the arctic. with a territory of 28% of russia, the population of the arctic zone is less than 2% of the total russian population, 2,370,000 people, 86% of them live in polar cities. it is fair to say that these are cities with some of the most... region, the government of the russian federation has determined the list and logistics of the northern sea route, approaches to the formation of the list have b

, for the extraction of metals necessary for the energy transition in chukotka, are provided by the nsr, of course, we need to create conditions for people’s lives; here, on the instructions of the president, a decision has already been made to form a list of 16 arctic agglomerations - this is our supporting framework. there from the largest scale arkhangelsk, murmansk agglomeration, where almost half a million people live, to dikson, where the population is 309, but it is still an irreplaceable, important stronghold on the northern sea route. the arctic really is now attracting attention, and the interest of our compatriots, the guys are happy to go to work on these megaprojects, but i have a counter question for you, andrey, related precisely to the attention that the arctic attracts to itself. this magnificent region is people who want quality of life, who are ready to move, for example, from west to east, to settle there, because the land is beautiful, so how will we develop the demographics of the far east, we complain all the time, there are not enough people, but we must raise th

, if the nsr issue were surfaced, we probably would override the nsr because we talked about that. but if the issue is of privacy was raised and we said, okay, we can fix this by putting up a requiring a condition to put up an opaque, uh, privacy fence. um, it doesn't aren't we there? and wouldn't it and where would the variance come in there if we required a privacy fence? because whenever we seem to require a privacy fence, anywhere else, it's a condition of. the our approval. again, it's really going to depend on which approval it was added to. so, you know, if you want to if the commission if the board wants to have you know, a structural, um, opaque screening there under the current code that's going to trigger a variance, um, you know, the alternative there is we can require, you know, landscaping of a certain height, whether it's bamboo. other thing that's kind of and those don't require variance because it's plants. so if it was a if, if instead of an opaque physical thing thing we, we, we required a, a trellis with thick shrubbery that would be the same as an opaque fixed