kyiv court of appeals, where the case on extending the terms of detention of former ex-intelligence roman chervynsky continues. i will say that at today's meeting, the panel of judges allowed chervinsky to be next to his defenders, and not in a glass box, as it was before, but at the same time, as it was before, but at the same time i will say that... requests for the recusal of judges and prosecutors were again ignored. also, at today's meeting, the lawyers attached documents to the case, in which it is said that the defense side received threats. however, what exactly those threats were, from whom and in what format were voiced. chervinskyi himself stated at the meeting that the case against him is illegal persecution. and as usual, chervynskyi came to the meeting to support him a lot of people shouted shame at the judges during the session. at the moment, the session is still ongoing, just a few minutes ago, the judges announced a break, but returned to the courtroom, and currently the session is still ongoing, and i want to remind you that roman chervynskyi was a former employee

i greet the audience of the espresso tv channel, and we are now in the walls of the kyiv court of appealsse on extending the terms of detention of the former ex-intelligence officer roman chervynsky continues. and i will say that at today's meeting, the panel of judges allowed chervinsky to be next to his defenders, and not in a glass box, as was the case before, but at the same time i will say that... nothing, but at the same time i will say that the motion to recuse judges and prosecutors again were ignored. also on today's the sitting lawyers attached documents to the case, which say that the defense received threats. however, what exactly those threats were, from whom and in what format were voiced. chervinskyi himself stated at the meeting that the case against him is illegal persecution, as usual, a lot of people came to the meeting to support chervinskyi, during the meeting, they shouted shame at the judges. currently, the meeting is still in progress, just a few minutes ago, the judges announced a break, but returned to the courtroom, and currently the session is still ongoing, an

in the backs of the kyiv appeal court, and where the consideration of the case on the extension of theerms of detention of former ex-intelligence officer roman chervynsky continues. and i will say that at today's meeting, the panel of judges allowed chervinsky to be next to his defenders, and not in a glass box, as it was. as it was before, but at the same time i will say that the requests for the recusal of judges and prosecutors were once again ignored. also , at today's meeting, the lawyers attached documents to the case, in which it is said that the defense side received threats. however, what exactly those threats were, from whom and in what format were voiced. chervinsky himself stated at the... meeting that the case against him is an illegal persecution, as usual, a lot of people came to the meeting to support chervinsky, they shouted shame at the judges at the... meeting. at the moment , the session is still going on, just a few minutes ago, the judges announced a break, but they returned to the courtroom, and currently the session is still going on, and i want to remind you th

keep in custody, this is the decision of the court of appeal of kyiv regarding ex-intelligence officerroman chervinskyi. the judges upheld the decision of the shevchenkiv district court, which was issued in absentia military lawyers. the defenders consider this a violation of their client's rights to a fair trial and plan to file a complaint with the supreme council of justice. the next meeting in this case will be held on january 25. let me remind you that chervinsky is accused of self-government and the failed operation to recruit a russian pilot, which allegedly led to the shelling of the kanatove airfield. however , the ex-intelligencer considers the case to be political persecution because of his involvement in wagnergate. more than 70 thousand debtors. the yasno company, which is one of the of light suppliers in ukraine. those who owe will be the first in'. queues for disconnection, the companies owe a total of uah 600 million to consumers, most of the debtors are from kyiv and the dnipropetrovsk region, they will not turn off the lights for all at once, they will take into accou

the court of appeal of kyiv made such a decision to keep the ex-intelligence officer roman chervinskyiin custody. the judges upheld the decision of the shevchenkiv district court, which was issued without the presence of the military's lawyers. defenders think so violation of their client's rights to a fair trial and plan to file a complaint with the supreme council of justice. the next meeting in this case will be held on january 25. let me remind you, chervinskyi is accused of self-government and the failed operation to recruit a russian pilot, which allegedly led to the shelling of the kanetove airfield. however, the ex-intelligencer considers the case to be political persecution because of his involvement in wagnergate. in kalusha in prykarpattia , firefighters saved an entire family together during a fire. pim is a favorite. apartment caught fire in the five-story house of two children. together with the dog, the rescuers evacuated through the balcony with the help of a car ladder. parents were helped down the stairs. fortunately, no one was hurt. the cause of ignition is initiall

such a decision was made by the court of appeal of kyiv regarding ex-intelligence officer roman chervinskyi. the judges upheld the decision of the shevchenkiv district court, which was issued without the presence of the military's lawyers. defenders are considered violation of their client's rights to a fair trial and plan to file a complaint with the supreme council of justice. the next meeting in this case will be held on january 25. let me remind you that chervinsky is accused of self-government and the failed operation to recruit a russian pilot, which allegedly led to the shelling of the kanetove airfield. however, the ex-intelligencer considers the case to be political persecution because of his involvement in wagnergate. the blockade continues, three checkpoints on the border of ukraine and poland remain closed, where 800 trucks are waiting in queues, he said spokesman of the state border service andriy demchenko. according to him, the shegyni point, which was previously unblocked by polish farmers, is working, but there are also about a thousand trucks waiting to pass there, because

judge of the court of kyiv, yulia ivanina, and the appeal of the meeting of this court about interferenceactivities related to the administration of justice. however, the hearing of the case took place behind closed doors, which was requested by the judge herself for reasons of security. the judge requests this notice of intervention. actions regarding the administration of justice, i ask to be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice of the council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined regarding the threat to the safety of my family members, in particular minor children. decision about the closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to contact the office of the prosecutor general and the director of the state criminal investigation department to verify the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court. kyiv two weeks ago. members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigation to the need to observe guarantees of

yulia ivanina of the district court of kyiv and the meeting's appeal of the court on interference inctivities related to the administration of justice. however, the hearing of the case took place behind closed doors, which was requested by the judge herself for reasons of security. the judge asks for this notification about interference in the judge's activities regarding the administration of justice, i ask that it be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice of the council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined. for the safety of my family members, including young children. the decision on the closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to apply to the office of the prosecutor general and the director of the dbi regarding the verification of the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court of kyiv two weeks ago. members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigations to the need to observe guarantees of ind

district of the court of kyiv, yulia ivanina, and the appeal of the meeting of this court about interferenceed to the administration of justice. however, the hearing of the case took place behind closed doors, which was requested by the judge herself for reasons of security. the judge asks for this notification about interference in the judge's activities regarding the administration of justice, please consider it at the meeting. of the supreme council of justice, the council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances described by me regarding the threat to the safety of my family members, in particular minor children. decision the closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to contact the office of the prosecutor general and the director of the state criminal investigation department to check the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court of kyiv two weeks ago. members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau. investigations on the need to comply with guarante

in the largest kyiv court of appeal, out of 145 judges by staff, there are not enough 70.gher qualification commission of judges plans to start interviews with candidates for vacant positions of judges in appeal courts in autumn next year. competition. has already started for the occupation of 550 vacant positions of judges, more than 200 candidates are applying. most willing to take the position in the general court of appeal - 912, the least in the commercial court of appeal - 183. the meeting of judges of the civil court of cassation of the supreme court elected judges olga stupak and serhiy pogribny to the grand chamber for a term of three years. according to the estimates of the foundation's experts, there are appointed judges. unscrupulous, according to the conclusion of the public integrity council, the property of olga stupak's family does not correspond to income, and the judge allegedly deliberately understated the value of the purchased real estate in the declaration. olga stupak assured that she bought 10 acres of land in kyiv, allegedly for uah 149,000, and a

only 13 judges work in the kharkiv court of appeals out of 60 positions by state, in the largest kyivcourt of appeals out of 145 judges by state, 70 are missing. above... the qualification commission of judges plans to start interviews with candidates for vacant positions of judges in appeals courts in the autumn of next year . the competition has already started, more than 200 candidates are applying for 550 vacant positions of judges. most willing to take the position in the general court of appeal - 912. the least in the commercial court of appeal - 183. the assembly of judges of the civil court of cassation of the supreme court elected up to. of the grand chamber of judges olga stupak and serhiy pogribny for a term of three years. according to the experts of the dere foundation, the appointed judges are dishonest. according to the conclusion of the civic council of virtue, the property of olga stupak's family does not correspond to income. also, the judge probably deliberately understated the value of the purchased real estate in the declaration. olga stupak assured that she had p

dnipro district court of kyiv, yulia ivanina, and the appeal of the assembly of this court about interferenceactivities of the administration of justice. however, consideration of the case took place behind closed doors, which was requested by the judge herself for reasons of security. judge. requests this notification about interference in the activity of a judge regarding the administration of justice, i ask that it be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice, council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined regarding the threat to the safety of my family members, in particular minor children. the decision on closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to contact the office of the general the prosecutor and director of the dbr. regarding the verification of the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court of kyiv two weeks ago. the members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigations to the need to observe the gua

in the largest kyiv court of appeals, out of 145 judges by staff, 70 are missing. the higher qualification commission of judges plans to start interviews with candidates for vacant positions of judges. in the appellate courts next fall. the competition has already started for 550 vacant positions judges, more than 200 candidates apply. the largest number of applicants for a position in the general court of appeals is 912. the least in the commercial court of appeals is 183. the meeting of judges of the civil court of cassation of the supreme court elected judges olga stupak and serhiy pogribny to the grand chamber for a term of three years. for the eyes. we experts of the foundation appointed judges are unscrupulous. according to the conclusion of the public integrity council , the property of olga stupak's family does not correspond to income. also, the judge allegedly deliberately understated the value of the purchased item in the declaration real estate olga stupak assured that she bought 10 acres of land in kyiv for 149,00 uah. and a new house with an area of ​

kyiv court of appeals there are not enough full-time judges out of 145 70.her qualification commission of judges plans to start interviews with candidates for vacant positions of judges in appeal courts in the autumn of next year. the competition has already started, more than 200 candidates, the most willing to take up the position , are applying for 550 vacant positions of judges in the general appeals court, 912. the least in the appellate commercial judge - 183. the assembly of judges of the cassation civil court of the supreme court elected judges olga stupak and serhiy pogribny to the grand chamber for a term of three years. according to the estimates of the foundation's experts, the appointed judges are dishonest. according to the conclusion of the civic council of virtue , the property of olga stupak's family does not correspond to income. also, the judge allegedly deliberately understated the value of the purchased real estate in the declaration. olga stupak assured that she bought 10 hectares of land in kyiv for allegedly 149 00 uah, and a new hous

the head of the dniprovsky district court of the city of kyiv appealed with a statement about the commissiont. transfer of power or official powers by employees of the law enforcement agency to the dnipro district prosecutor's office, however, according to the answer, the indicated appeal is by the prosecutor's office forwarded to the state bureau of investigation. during the search, the investigator took a photo on his personal mobile phone, the text of the still unannounced court decision and sent this photo to someone via messenger. interfering and filming, the future decision and transferring it somewhere else, this is such a ... blatant interference in the administration of justice, which does not withstand such criticism, and you must understand, and then how to evaluate all these actions, and this is, in principle, a crime, and the crime provided for by article 365 of the criminal code, i.e. it is abuse of power, that official who made the decision to conduct the search, she should be immediately released and criminal charges brought against her. affairs. the sbi also seized data from

the head of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv appealed to the dnipro district prosecutor'swith a statement about the commission of a crime, regarding the abuse of power or official powers by the employees of the law enforcement agency, but according to the response, the prosecutor's office forwarded the said appeal to the state bureau of investigation. during the search , the investigator took a photo of the text of the yet-to-be-announced court decision on his personal mobile phone and sent the photo to someone via messenger. intervene and shoot the future decision and transfer it somewhere else, this is such an impudent interference in the administration of justice, which cannot withstand any such criticism. and you must understand, and then how to evaluate all these actions? but this is basically a crime and a crime. which is provided for by article 365 of the criminal code, i.e. this is abuse of power, the official who made the decision to conduct the search should be immediately dismissed, and a criminal case should be initiated against her. the sbi also seized data fr

the head of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv appealed to the dniprovska district prosecutor'soffice. however, according to the answer, the said appeal was forwarded by the prosecutor's office to the state bureau of investigation. during the search, the investigator took a photo on his personal mobile phone. the phone text of the undeclared is still pending.

the head of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv appealed to the dnipro district prosecutor's office with a statement about the commission of a crime of abuse of power or official authority by employees of the law enforcement agency, but according to the response, the prosecutor's office forwarded the said appeal to the state investigation bureau. during the search , the investigator took a photo of the text of the still undeclared court order on his personal mobile phone. his decision and sent this photo to someone via messenger, to intervene and shoot the future the decision and transfer it somewhere else, this is already such a brazen interference in the administration of justice , which does not withstand any such criticism, and you must understand, and then how to evaluate all these actions, and this is, in principle, a crime and a crime provided for by article 365 of the criminal code, i.e. it is you. the authorities, that official who made the decision to conduct the search, she should be immediately dismissed, and a criminal case should be initiated against her. the sb

district court of kyiv, yulia ivanina, and the appeal of the meeting of this court about'. interferenceration of justice, however, the case was heard in closed session, which was requested by the judge herself for security reasons. the judge asks for this notification about interference in the judge's activities regarding the administration of justice, i ask that it be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice, council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined regarding the threat to the safety of my family members, in particular minor children. thirteen members supported the decision to hold a closed hearing grp according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to contact the office of the prosecutor general and the director of the state criminal investigation department to check the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court of kyiv two weeks ago. members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigation to the need to observe guarantees of independence of judges and maint

only 13 judges work in the court of appeals out of 60 positions in the state.appellate court of 145 judges by state lacks 70. the higher qualification commission of judges plans to start interviews with candidates for vacant positions of judges in appellate courts in the fall of next year. the competition has already started for the occupation of 550 vacant positions of judges, more than 200 candidates are applying. the most willing to take the position in the appellate general. judges - 912, the smallest in the appellate commercial court - 183. the assembly of judges of the civil court of cassation of the supreme court was elected to the great chamber judges olga stupak and serhiy pogribny for a period of 3 years. according to the estimates of the foundation's experts, the appointed judges are dishonest. according to the conclusion of the public integrity council , the property of olga stupak's family does not correspond to income. also, the judge allegedly deliberately understated in the declaration. the cost of the purchased property. olha stupak assured tha

dnipro district court of the city of kyiv about interference in the court's activities regarding thenistration of justice. representatives of the dbr are also invited to the meeting of the vrp. let me remind you, earlier on january 12. the supreme court appealed to the director of the sbi with a statement about the inadmissibility of court pressure. all because of the actions of the investigative bureau, which conducted searches in the premises of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv. in particular, documents were seized and judge yulia ivanina's computer. presumably , the searches were related to the consideration of a specific court case. the biggest violation is that they came without a court order. the law requires a court order to confirm that their actions, that is, the actions of law enforcement agencies , have a legal basis, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime, and if the vrp considers that there are indeed signs of a crime, they turn to the prosecutor general and prosecutor general andriy kostin must immediately enter the data in

dnipro district court of the city of kyiv, about interference in the court's activities regarding the administration of justice. representatives of the dbr are also invited to the meeting of the vrp. let me remind you that earlier on january 12 , the supreme court appealed to the director of the dbr for a manifestation of the inadmissibility of court pressure. all because of the actions of the investigative bureau, which conducted searches in the premises of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv. in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized. presumably , the searches were related to the consideration of a specific case court case the biggest violation is that they came without a court order. the law required. has a court order to confirm that their actions, that is, the actions of a law enforcement agency have legal grounds, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime, and if the vrp considers that there are indeed signs of a crime, they turn to the prosecutor general, and prosecutor general andriy kostin must immedi

dnipro district court of the city of kyiv, about interference in the court's activities regarding the administration of justice. representatives of the dbr are also invited to the meeting of the vrp. let me remind you that earlier on january 12, the supreme court appealed to the director of the dbr from on the evidence of the inadmissibility of pressure, the court. all because of the actions of the investigative bureau, which conducted searches in the premises of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv. in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized. presumably, the searches were related to the consideration of a specific court case. the biggest violation is that they came without a court order. the law would... require a court order to confirm that their actions, i.e., the actions of the law enforcement agency have legal grounds, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime, if the prosecutor general's office considers that there are indeed signs of a crime, they turn to the prosecutor general, and the prosecutor general

previously, the kyiv court of appeal partially satisfied the complaint of mazepa's defenders, he was kept in custody until february 27, while the bail was reduced from uah 350 to uah 21 million. let me remind you that on january 18, the law enforcement officers detained a businessman while trying to leave the country. he is accused of organizing a scheme of illegal acquisition of lands on which critical infrastructure facilities of the kyiv hydroelectric power plant are located. a citizen of ukraine for travel abroad. the most responsible people in the capital were awarded, public organizations were recognized for their work. responsible partnership. the award was founded by the family foundation of bohdan gavrylyshyn, which was the award ceremony. let's see further. the mariupol orchestra is on stage. to the sounds of cult classics in the capital , public organizations are awarded for their responsible partnership. those whose projects are embodied in cooperation are celebrated. became an example of ukrainian unity and strength . stronger, there is a lot of k... activity here, a lot

once again , the kyiv court of appeal rejected the appeal in the case of roman chervinskyi. the former intelligence officer complained. due to the inaction of the sbi and the investigator due to the fact that information about the criminal proceedings was not entered into the unified register of pretrial investigations , the convoy did not bring roman himself to the meeting, this caused outrage from the lawyer, who noted that this violates the right of his client to access justice. let me remind you that roman chervinskyi is accused of exceeding official authority, he faces eight to 12 years behind bars. satisfaction of this kind of complaints, in particular, regarding the failure to enter information in the register of pre-trial investigations and the beginning of a pre-trial investigation, since the 12th year a purely formal history, a purely formal position of judges, which consists in judicial control, first of all, and the obligation of any which law enforcement agency, be it the national police, be it the security service of ukraine, be it then dbr, if we talk about ou

by the supreme court of appeals.'t know if i'm present in this hall, generally sinless. someone from us. congratulations. i, tetyana shustrova, and the judicial control are on the air. reorganization and reformatting bodies of the judicial system. after receiving the status of a candidate for joining the european union, judicial reform is one of the main requirements for continuing our path to the eu. the higher qualification commission evaluates current judges for their suitability for positions. the servants of themis continue to amaze with wealth, which cannot be explained by income to professional incompetence. today we will tell you about those who have already been weeded out by vkks. but first before... news of a development in the criminal investigation of the attack on our colleague in ternopil. the court satisfied the complaint of the journalist maria ivanovska, who was attacked in may of this year by the tenant of the judge of the northern commercial court of appeal, lyudmila kropyvna. complaint of mariia

the kyiv court of appeal did not satisfy the complaint in the case of roman chervinskyi.he ex-intelligence officer complained about the inaction of the sbi and the investigator on the fact of non-reporting. on criminal proceedings to the unified register of pretrial investigations. the convoy did not bring roman himself to the meeting, which caused indignation in the lawyer, who noted that this was the case violates the right of his client to access justice. let me remind you that roman chervinskyi is accused of exceeding official authority, he faces 8 to 12 years behind bars. the satisfaction of this kind of complaints, in particular, regarding the failure to enter information in the register of pre-trial investigations and the initiation of a pre-trial investigation, since the 12th year is a purely formal history, a purely formal position of the courts. which consists in judicial control, first of all, and the obligations of any law enforcement agency, be it the national police, be it the security service of ukraine, let the sbi, if we are talking about our case, enter

the judge of the northern appeal court of economy, lyudmila kropyvna. of revolutions many unscrupulousone step away from dismissal. oksana myroshnychenko, judge of the holosiiv district court of kyiv, was recognized as unfit for office by the supreme court of ukraine. for six months, she revoked the driving rights of five automaidan participants who allegedly did not stop at the request of traffic police inspectors on the day of their trip to mezhyhirya in december 2013. that year, she issued a series of resolutions that brought the automaidan participants to justice in the 14th year. the only evidence in these cases were the protocols drawn up by the inspectors. the judge allowed the delay that provided for repeated violation of the terms of bringing to administrative responsibility. in her declaration of integrity, the judge hid this fact. and yet i indicated that i did not make a decision, but, well, it would be strange not to admit that these... this decision falls under. during the interview, the members of the highest quality commission of judges drew attention to many more viola

the tv channel, today kyiv. the court considered an appeal against the decision of the pocharskyi districtrt, which on january 19 decided to keep businessman ihor mezepo in custody with the possibility of making bail in the amount of almost uah 350 million. today, they still decided to keep the entrepreneur in custody, however, the amount of his bail was significantly reduced, now it is 21 million uah, he will be in custody at least until... february 27 of this year, appeals were filed by both the prosecutor and the lawyers, the prosecutor asked on the contrary, increase the pledge to almost 700 million hryvnias, and the defenders, on the contrary, tried to cancel the decision of the pocharsky district court, at the meeting igor mazep's lawyers again emphasized the unfoundedness of the suspicion, as well as the bias of the court of first instance, but still. their complaint was partially satisfied and the amount of bail was reduced, at the moment it is not known whether it will be made, however, let's hear the lawyer's comment, thank the journalists directly, and you, and the community, ap

the kyiv court of appeal rejected it again complaint of an ex-intelligence officer. correspondent kateryna galko knows the details. katya, congratulations. so what was the appeal about and what was the reaction of the defenders? i congratulate annuyeva, i congratulate the viewers of the espres tv channel. so, today the appeals court of the capital considered a complaint about the inactivity of the sbi and the investigator regarding the failure to submit this. cases to the unified register of pre-trial investigations. let me remind you that the shevchenkiv court of the capital previously dismissed this complaint. so actually, the prosecutor did not appear at the meeting, and the convoy did not bring him either roman chervinskyi, to which one of his defenders later appealed, saying that the client's right to access to justice was thus violated. he also commented on the actions of the presiding member of the court regarding this situation. let's hear how it happened right now. you informed us that it does not have a status, if it does not have a status, then how did you

the next hearing in the case of ex-spy shchervinskyi will be held on january 11 at the kyiv court of appeal. it is impossible to ensure that criminal proceedings are initiated, that an investigation is started, that the sbi is convinced that the information included in the suspicion is false, they do not correspond to the circumstances of the case and the facts. circumstances that occurred. in odesa, the police issued a warning for verbal murder. a resident of one of the villages decided to kill his neighbor, with whom he had a bad relationship. i was looking for executors for the crime, promising $10,000, and to secure his own alibi, the criminal left the house. law enforcement officers managed to conduct a successful operation. polish farmers are planning to resume the blockade of the sheghini medical checkpoint, local zmi reported. according to the protesters, they did not receive written confirmation of the fulfillment of their demands. it is about increasing subsidies for corn producers, additional money for liquidity loans and maintaining the amount of the agricultural tax next

previously, the kyiv court of appeal partially satisfied the complaint for mazepy, he was kept in custody until february 27, but the bail was reduced from uah 350 to uah 21 million. let me remind you that on january 18, the law enforcement officers detained a businessman while trying to leave the country. he is accused of organizing a scheme of illegal acquisition of lands on which critical infrastructure facilities of the kyiv hydroelectric power plant are located. in five districts, in five regions of ukraine. centers of sustainability will appear, all of them will meet the criteria of accessibility, inclusiveness and barrier-free, and they will also necessarily have shelters, said the head of the government, denys shmehal, and added that later such institutions will work in every community. social services, counseling and social-psychological services are provided there help, this is part of the all-ukrainian mental health program initiated by the first. christmas of ukraine by olena zelenska. in the future, every community should create such a space. funds for financing the service ar

to leave in custody, such a decision was again issued by the kyiv court of appeal regarding the formeron

today, last night, the pachersky court of kyiv chose a preventive measure for him, that is , detention until march 17. lawyers of roman hrynkevich announced that they will file a complaint appeal against this court decision. let me remind you that roman hrynkevich was detained a day earlier in odesa. according to law enforcement officers, this happened during an attempt to organize. crossing the border legally, hrynkevich himself denied it, he says that he was detained in his apartment, and he had no intention of leaving the country, he considers all the accusations unfounded and someone's order. i am interested in this meeting to prove to everyone that my family was simply covered with dirt, that we did not deserve it, because all the accusations that are directed at our parties, i think it's completely unfounded, i think it's completely unsupported by anything , especially i think it's for... and it's kind of a very powerful order, because it used to sound like we're considered one of the largest suppliers of the ministry of defense there, to which i want to emphasize, there was not