implement their decision or their orders, just like any other court, international court of justicehe judges, including from various part of the world, they are judges from the europe, there are judges from the africa, from the middle east, from latin america, i mean it is very, very important and high level court, and it it is very important, the decision of this court has a international importance, it is the backing of the international community, of course the court itself has implementation force, but definitely the international community will exert lot of pressure and i believe that the israel has to bow down and israel has to respect the international court of justice, i mean israel cannot rebellion to united nation, cannot be rebellion to international court of justice and all the... international community, it cannot be rebellion to everybody, american might to try to protect them and but still i believe the international court of justice will do something and it will make some difference in the coming days. thanks lot sir, foreign pakistani diplomats, zamir ahmad joining

international court of justice. la by legal step by step south africa has made this very compelling argument is talking about mass killings, mass displacement, but also it is fairly systematic plan that israel has to destroy palestinian life palestinian history, palestinian future memories. so it's, it's a very strong case, according to international law experts. and what it's very important that's happening here now is that the, the state of south africa is asking for an urgent injunction. that means that while this genocide case, which could travel on for years is now on paul's basically. and the court has to decide 1st, what has to be done now? and that is what a south africa's asking to stop the military campaign and gaza immediately. so that's something that the court is discussing. we 1st of course have to listen to the israel arguments on friday tomorrow, but we will see hopefully according to south africa within a few weeks and then a decision by the self and team member court step best. of course, thank you

to the international court of justice. in the case that's been filed against me in march and they proposed a very expensive understanding of the problem of genocide. of this, of course is going to be very helpful in terms of finding against me and more than the case. but it's also going to be very helpful to south africa. i think the probably the lawyers in those countries of those european countries in canada who prepared that are now regretting that they took that ignition of what it, it brings up the double standard speak. this is the beauty of the court, is that that's a place where you can, to some extent, i don't want to say there are no double standards, there are there, but you can cut through them and you can expose them. and that's, and that's the interest in these remedies. absolutely. and this cassidy. how much and did you think, how many we have been talking about it already, but just how much has as well as one, gaza at the devised expose, the double standards of the west of europe when they open the time and

to the international court of justice. choosing it of commission genocide, israel now if he has more isolated than ever, it's president ties, it could. so even became the subject of a criminal complaint in switzerland while mexico and should i have referred as well to the international criminal court. but wouldn't any of this make a difference and what can be done and the palestinians suffering and gaza will get to our guest for the moment. but 1st, this report from poor gig, it is earl's will drag zoning, dasa with food and medical supplies, nearly exhausted to humanitarian condition has become dia, doctors, accounting out amputations without any anesthetic with growing outraged. and perhaps crucially legal proceedings, ramping up these really presidents isaac could, so it's facing criminal complaint in switzerland. it happened during his recent trip to the world economic form in davos statement, from swiss. prosecutors said the plaintive seeking a criminal prosecution in power though to case brought by south africa at th

talk about the hearing in international court of justice, the international court of justice is a worldourt which adjudicates issues and cases between states. it is different from the in that way where the icj -- the icc would prosecute individuals on international criminal concerns, the international court of justice only deals with issues between state parties. this is the reason why south africa has filed this case before the international court of justice. it was a pretty remarkable hearing. you have said already about the historical significance of this hearing. there have been previous cases at the international court of justice dealing with genocide, but those previous cases have not attracted as much attention and interest as this particular case. nermeen: could you explain how often it has been the case that a case has been brought to the icj by a country that is not one of the parties involved in the conflict? one thinks most recently of the case of russia and ukraine, which ukraine brought were in fact diverse genocide case that was heard at the international court of justice

on the decision of the international court of justice. meanwhile, netanyahu said: the court's willingness to discuss genocide claims against israel is a disgrace that will not be erased from generation to generation. and: he accused and claimed whose decision proves that it does not seek justice. the palestine information center reported the martyrdom of a starving infant in the gaza strip. this baby, who was less than 6 months old , was martyred in the north of the gaza strip. the area where the zionist regime continues to prevent humanitarian aid from entering on the 111th day of attacks. the palestinian ministry of health has announced that about 600,000 palestinian citizens are in northern gaza due to the severity of the outbreak. disease and bombing are at risk of death. today, the zionist regime targeted khan yunis in the south of the gaza strip. the military the zionists also surrounded the refugees in the west of this city and shot at them. al brij nasirat camps in the center. gaza was also targeted by artillery attacks, 13 people

hebrew media regarding the subject of the sessions of the international court of justice in the hagueר היה לתת לגיטימציה למסמח שיש שם, מהבחינה הזו ישראל הייתה צריכה להגביל את הנוכחות שלה שם רק לטענות חוסר סמכות, אני אגב מאלה שטוענים בניגוד למה שאמרת, שהזה שאנחנו חתומ. i believe that the most important point that the regime is facing today, since it's inception is not only the fact that it is before an international court, i mean the international court of justice, which is part of the united nations charter, but the tragedy is that the regime of israel believes that this massacre or genocide is justified and has legal right to it. this regime is the only one which was subjected to genocide and in fact, the international court of justice was established for this reason because it was subjected to genocide at the hands of the nazis. for it to be put on trial before this court, which had been established to defend it on the subject of genocide, indicates a quantitative change within the framework of the views towards the zionist regime, and in the eyes of those who used to show sympathy

regarding the subject of the sessions of the international court of justice in the hague to discuss south שלה שם רק לטענות חוסר סמכות, אני אגב מאלה שטוענים בניגוד למה שאמרת, שהזה שאנחנו חתומים על האמנה לא הופך אותנו לא הופך אותנו לכפופים לסמכות בית הדין בנושא הזה, אה... חושבים שהיום היה הוכחה למה לישראל לא הייתה שום ברירה לשתף פעולה, כי אם זה מה שקרה כשאנחנו נמצאים שם ויש לנו אפשרות להציג טיונים, אפשר רק לדמיין מה היה קורה אם ישראל לא הייתה מביעה את עמדתה. ועוד משהו שמתחזק אחרי הדיון היומטלי, זאת אותה הערכה שפרסמנו שיש בישראל, שצוו כלשהו בית הדין יוציא נגד ישראל. that the regime is facing today since its inception is not only the fact that it is before an international court, mean the international court of justice, which is part united nations charter, but the tragedy is that the regime of israel believes that this massacre or genocide is justified and has legal right to it. this regime is the only one which was subjected to genocide, and in fact, the international court of justice was established for this reason, because it was subjected to... genocide at the hands of the nazis, for it

regarding the subject of the sessions of the international court of justice in the hague to discussזו ישראל הייתה צריכה להגביל את הנוכחות שלה שם רק לטענות חוסר סמכות, אני אגב מאלה שטוענים בניגוד למה שאמרת, שה זה שאנחנו חתומים על האמנה לא הופך אותנו לא הופך אותנו לכפופים לסמכות בית הדין. בנושא הזה, אה, די ברור לי שה, מחלוקת עם דרום אפריקה, מחלוקת על ג'נוסייד, היא מחלוקת על דיני מלחמה, האם אנחנו מקיימים אותם או לא, מהבחינה הזו, אני חושב שבעניין הגנוסייד, אין שום מחלוקת, לא היינו צריכים להסכים לזה, אתה שואל איך איך נתמודד משפטית, משפטית, אין כל כך בעיה להתמודד עם הטענות האדרומו אפריקיות חלשות, אבל הדיון הוא לא באמת משפטי. this reference, what was called the regime's mistake in participating in the court sessions, was backed by one of the zionist. יש הרבה בישראל ובצוות שחושבים שהיום היה הוכחה למה לישראל לא הייתה שום ברירה לשתף פעולה, כי אם זה מה שקרה כשאנחנו נמצאים שם ויש לנו אפשרות להציג טיעונים, אפשר רק לדמיין מה היה קורה אם ישראל לא הייתה מביעה את עמדתה, ועוד משהו שמתחזק אחרי הדיון הרמטלי, זאת אותה הערכה שפרסמנו שיש בישראל, שצוו כלשהו: i believe that the most important point that the

court of justice in the hague is this recent lawsuit in the international court of justice, which is a judicial pillar of the united nations and whose jurisdiction is limited to lawsuits between governments that accept its jurisdiction. it was menut. in fact, it is relevant to the genocide convention, which both south africa and the israeli regime are members of . what does the international court of justice know about the genocide convention itself, in the event of a dispute in the implementation or interpretation of the provisions of the convention, the dispute resolution authority of the member states? that year the convention was signed. the convention of 190 is actually 48 and one day before the universal declaration of human rights was even approved by the united nations. the countries that signed this convention , if there is a genocide somewhere in the world and there is a difference of opinion between the governments, they can go to the international court of justice based on the text of the convention and make it a ruling . there is a fact , even if that killing and those v

let it be the basis for resolving the dispute of the international court of justice. well , south africa came to file a complaint. the israelis also announced that they had no disagreement with south africa at all, which today in the same consultative vote this decision, which was related to the issuance of a temporary order , is good for the president of the court to declare that there is no need for this dispute to exist. there is an article in the convention on prohibition of injuries. no, if the member states have an objection regarding the interpretation or implementation of the genocide convention , they can file this complaint without any dispute between them, which means that the defense of the zionist regime and the argument it made rejected in the court and therefore it considered itself valid. now, here is the discussion of jurisdecision, qualification. now sometimes it is asked that what is the difference between competence and jurisdeacon? ok, today we saw that he proved his competence, now if we want to talk about the details of the vote , you mentioned

the international court of justice, the u.n.'highest court come has been a plausible risk israel is committing genocide in gaza and ordered provisional measures but stopped short of calling for an immediate ceasefire. this is the president of the court joan donoghue reading out the vote -- part of the ruling. >> by 15 votes to two, the state of israel shall in accordance with its obligations on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in relation to the palestinians in gaza, take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of article two of the convention, in particular, a, killing members as a group, b, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, c, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life cap related to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, and d, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group. amy: over a one-hour ruling, the international court of justice president joan donoghue in the hague quoted israe

court of justice. in his comprehensive 84 page submission, south africa sets out the legal basis for its contention that israel is perpetrating genocide in gaza. it's historically significant that south africa has taken the lead in holding israel to account for its crimes against humanity. years ago, nelson mandela said, "we know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the palestinians. amina taylor has been looking back at the links between south africa and palestine and the collaboration between south africa's previous apartide regime and the zionist entity. south africa has taken the step to invoke the genocide convention in charge israel in the international court of justice. while there are severe limitations to this process. "it is undeniably momentous to see israel brought before the highest international court to answer for its crime of genocide against the palestinians. the relationship between south africa and palestine is deep and cannot be underestimated. it was forge

the international court of justice . the smallest and most detailed points that exist in israel's attacks against the oppressed people of gaza have been tried to be pointed out. we have killed and forced the people of gaza to move . displacing one's own people is one of the manifestations of genocide , that is, they want to take over those lands . it was mentioned once that the security council's attempts for a cease-fire were vetoed by the united states, and this was an interesting point that the court mentioned in relation to the evidence. many that divan was in his hands he announced that the collective punishment was done . in gaza and that the so-called zionist regime had declared that it had no right to the so-called south africa in any way , it had no dispute with the zionist regime at all, here the international court of justice declared that every member state of the convention on the prohibition of deportation has this right in relation to the obligations of the agents. it is not possible for these general obli

court of justice. after more than half a century of occupation, this possession oppression and a party as the palestinian p postcards for justice had been heated by an eminent organ of the united nations. as well as the prime minister benjamin netanyahu has react to the ann going to the quotes decision. he called the ruling a disgrace as well. we'll have to report to the i c j within a month regarding it's compliance with the measures hold up and how means reports from tel aviv extensive damage to the court did not cool and these are up to stop is military campaign in gaza. but it also did not throw out the case submitted by south africa on genocide, the limited as israel requested with alarm. instead, the international court of justice forwarded israel to take steps to prevent acts of genocide in gaza and ruling the prime minister. benjamin netanyahu was quick to dismiss open. israel's commitment to international law is unwavering. equally unwavering is our sacred commitment to continue to defend our

regarding the subject of the sessions of the international court of justice in the hague to discuss south הנוכחות שלה שם רק לטענות חוסר סמכות, אני אגב מאלה שטוענים בניגוד למה שאמרת, שהזה שאנחנו חתומים על האמנה לא הופך אותנו לא הופך אותנו לכפופים לסמכות בית הדין בנושא הזה. הרבה בישראל ובצוות שחושבים שהיום היה הוכחה למה לישראל לא הייתה שום ברירה לשתף פעולה, כי אם זה מה שקרה כשאנחנו נמצאים שם ויש לנו אפשרות להציג טיעונים, אפשר רק לדמיין מה היה קורה אם ישראל לא הייתה מביעה את עמדתה. ועוד משהו שמתחזק אחרי הדיון הרמטלי, זאת אותה הערכה שפרסמנו שיש בישראל, שצב כלשהו בית הדין. hague and any losses incurred by this court, of course, regardless of the ruling that it will be decided and will be issued on this matter. انا بعتقد ان اهم نقطه سيخسرها الكيان. "the most important point that the regime is facing today, since its inception, is not only the fact that it is before an international court, i mean the international court of justice, which is part of the united nations charter, but the tragedy is that the regime of israel believes that this massacre or genocide is justified and has legal right to

, there's the international court of justice which we are at the moment, and then there's the international criminal court a few weeks ago south africa laid complaints with the international criminal court and those target specific individuals in the zionist regime, so for example netanyau tops that list, and so what the minister was saying was that, yes, indeed, it's going to be very difficult for the international criminal court, where netanyahu must certainly account to ignore the rulings of the international court of justice, this court, so so you are absolutely right that it will be certainly very favorable as far as justice is concerned and making sure that netanyahu's stands throw for these war crimes and for genocide and finally, since you mentioned that you're a bit concerned about the fact that you have other countries uh that have not come out and backed south africa but really backing the notion of how israel is committing this genocide and for that to have some repercussions uh why do you think countries uh have refrained from doing so? well let me say i smiled because i though

the occupying regime lies before the international court of justice.as he has started lying since he was slapped on the 7th of october. this regime distorts itself even more by lying and isolation. increases the international meanwhile , the voices in condemning the brutality and aggression of this regime have become louder all over the world. but south africa has the honor to ignore from the success in condemning the zionist regime to genocide in gaza, he was able to bring the occupying regime to the trial table. we are still with you today. mr. habibzadeh, there is a debate here, and that is that, as it was in the report, this honor in the name of south africa has been registered in the world . the apartheid government was the same apartheid government that existed in south africa and was overthrown . it exists in a different form now in the occupied territories and is less labeled. that the israeli regime was able to stick to south africa. because there is absolutely no side to this fight , but in any case, as a country that has supported the palest

court of. justice. while there are severe limitations to this process, it is undeniably momentous to see israel brought before the highest international court to answer for its crime of genocide against the palestinians. the relationship between south africa and palestine is deep and cannot be underestimated. it was forged through oppression and racial subjugation. israel was key player in the development and later the malignancy of apartite rule in south africa. south africa's a parti prime minister daniel molan was the first foreign prime minister to visit tel aviv following the nakba. hendrick veerd, a south african apartide architect and prime minister, even claimed in 1961 that israel, like south africa is an apart state. that was six decades before amnesty international said the same. in order to improve the image of apartide in south africa, israel and the apartite authorities established a joint secretariat for political and psychological warfare in 1975. by 1981, the apartide army in south afri

today the international court of justice has vindicated us. the court has concluded that passwords to articulate 9 of the convention. it has jurisdiction to educate our application, to the effects of the order that the i c j has grunted today. is that there is a possible case of genocide. this marks an important 1st in our quest to secure a justice for the people of guys. some have told us that we should mind our own business and not to get involved in the office of other countries. others have said it was not our place and yet it is very much our place. as the people who know too well the pain of disposition discrimination states one said violence. we are also a people who are the victims of the crime of our pottage. we know what a potted looks like we experienced and lived through it said the many people. busy who died and were anxiety like our beloved leader, only about tumble and many of us. oh, that's what i do. like the father of 5 democracy, nelson mandela, and many others. that for us, was the face of our party. we saw the africans whe

we send to the international court of justice for upholding. it's the role of achieving justice, promoting peace, preventing genocide and holding those responsible for genocide to be accountable. it is a n his hope and wish that this court order page the wave for an end to this crisis. and this painful experience that palestinians are going through and we hope for an end to the terrible loss of life and hardship and for the crush of 1st steps to be taken towards the reconciliation and a just lasting piece. lastly, i'd like to extend my gratitude to, to our lawyers, lawyers who presented our case to the international court. and of course, a got you choose to administer of justice and constitution of the well, there was a lot of comments right there from the south african president serial. and i'm a photo. and one of his comments that really stood out to me for certainly was he said, gaza is a graveyard for thousands of children around. the folks are coming thing in the wake of the car, the decision by the i c j today and run a my folks are sayin

instead, the international court of justice. would it israel to take steps to prevent acts of genocide in gaza at ruling the prime minister benjamin netanyahu was quick to dismiss open. israel's commitment to international law is on wavering. a equally unwavering is our sacred commitment to continue to defend our country and defend our people like every country. israel has an inherent right to defend itself. the vile attempt to deny as well, this fundamental right is blazing discrimination against the jew estates taking no going into the proceedings. israel was hoping it could rely on the vote of the 6 western judges, a decor, but vote after vote, it became clear that the judges were united in their decisions twice even getting the vote of these really judge. on 2 of the 6 provisional measures by 16 votes to one, the state of israel shall take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide in relation to members of the palestinian group in the gaza strip. but while the quo

to the international court of justice. in the case that's been filed against me and mar and they proposed a very expensive understanding of the problem of genocide. of this, of course, is going to be very helpful in terms of finding against me and more than the case. but it's also going to be very helpful to south africa. i think the probably the lawyers in those countries of those european countries in canada who prepared that are now regretting that they took that ignition of what it, it brings up the double standard speak. this is the beauty of the court, is the place where you can to some extent, i don't want to say there are no double standards or either, but you can cut through them and you can expose them. and that's, and that's the interest in these remedies. absolutely, and most cassidy, how much and did you think, how many we have been talking about it already, but just how much has as well as one, gaza at the devised expose the double standards of the west of europe when they open the time and time again condemn

court of justice. while there are severe limitations to this process, it is undeniably..." momentous to see israel brought before the highest international court to answer for its crime of genocide against the palestinians. the relationship between south africa and palestine is deep and cannot be underestimated. it was forged through oppression and racial subjugation. israel was key player in the development and later the malignancy of apartite rule in south africa. south africa's aparthy prime minister daniel molan was the first foreign prime minister. to visit tel aviv following the nakba. hendrick veerd, a south african apartide architect and prime minister, even claimed in 1961 that israel, like south africa, is an apartite state. that was six decades before amnesty international said the same. in order to improve the image of apartide in south africa, israel and the apartite authorities established a joint secretariat for political and psychological warfare in 1975. by 1981, the aparthite army in

on the decision of the international court of justice. meanwhile, netanyahu said that the court's desire to discuss the claims of genocide against israel is not a disgrace, as it is a pure bloodline. will not the minister of national security of the zionist regime also accused the international court of justice of anti-semitism and claimed that its decision proves that it does not seek justice. palestine information center of martyrdom. a hungry baby in the gaza strip reported. this baby, who was less than 6 months old , was martyred in the north of the gaza strip. the area where the zionist regime continues to prevent humanitarian aid from entering on the 111th day of attacks. the palestinian ministry of health has announced that about 600,000 palestinian citizens in northern gaza are at risk of death due to the spread of disease and bombings. regime today, the zionists targeted khan yunus in the south of the gaza strip. the zionist soldiers also shot at the displaced people in the west of this city. al brij and nusirat camps in the cent

says off at the asking the international court of justice. and i would simply hold for it, says r genocidal. i counted us by as many forces in gas and the country wants for you and the top court, which is the so called professional measures to order israel to end the war. i'm robotics and stay with us. the injustice for me is the driving force of why i do this to show people what it's like to live in some of the most dangerous parts of the world to live in places where injustice isn't something you read in. the news is something that happens to every single day. everyone, hey, is watching the news on the mobile phones. unlike your eyes, they don't watching full the news. they weren't seeing that he was being destroyed in real time. when you're on the ground, when you're showing people what's going on, whether it's a war or a natural disaster, whether it's political corruption, making sure they understand less simple language is absolutely crucial. since he's already 50 percent evacuated, most of those people actually left in the early days of

begins at the international court of justice in the hague. south africa accuses israel of committing genocide against palestinians engulfed and the occupied was fine. qualities are held in support of the case being made by south africa. meanwhile, israel's attacks on guys a continued at least 32 people have been killed in the southern city con. donald trump is back in court for closing arguments in a fault file that he continues to criticize the . we're going to begin in the netherlands for south africa as asking the international court of justice and the have to urgently hold what it says are genocidal acts carried out by is really forces in gaza. the country wants for you and the top core to issue so called provisional measures to order israel to the end . it's war. michael awful begins our coverage south africa tells the international court of justice please be seated. the world is witnessing a textbook case of genocide on fold in gaza. this killing is nothing short of destruction of palestinian life. it is inflicted deliberately, or no on

issued by the international court of justice . maybe we can say time. we should trust the institutions affiliated with the west and expect that the western institutions affiliated with the united states and the united nations or even the international court of justice will play an active and effective role in the class of genocide. however, some experts bring the zionist regime to the trial table. they know it's important. condemning the zionist regime to commit genocide, as i have mentioned , will give this regime a lot of legitimacy in three international countries. and on the other hand , it creates legitimacy in order to resist israel. the issue that made the zionists this time say that there is no way to escape. israel cannot escape such an accusation with this level and seriousness. now human rights defenders. their eyes are on examining this complaint of south africa in the highest court affiliated to the united nations, so that maybe this time the tree of international justice will bear fruit. mojtaba shah soni khabar. bro

to the international court of justice. in the case that's been filed against me in march and they proposed a very expensive understanding of the problem of genocide. of this, of course is going to be very helpful in terms of finding against me and more than the case. but it's also going to be very helpful to south africa. i think the probably the lawyers in those countries of those european countries in canada who prepared that are now regretting that they took that ignition of what it, it brings up the double standard speak. this is the beauty of the court, is the place where you can to some extent, i don't want to say there are no double standards or either, but you can cut through them and you can expose them. and that's, and that's the interest in these remedies. absolutely, and most cassidy, how much and did you think, how many we have been talking about it already, but just how much has as well as one, gaza at the devised expose the double standards of the west of europe when they open the time and time again condemn

international court of justice here.n: francis boyle, what is the difference between international art of justice and the international criminal court, which is already considering allegations of war crimes by both israel as well as the palestinian militant groups? >> the international court of justice was originally established back in 1921. it's legal predecessor in law. and that is where i filed the genocide case. i was the first lawyer ever to win two orders in one such case is the world court was established in 1921 and it was on the basis of the genocide convention. the international record -- criminal court is a separate organization set up in 2000. the problem is this. back in 2009, after operation cast lead, i advised the palestinian president abbas to accept the jurisdiction of the international court -- of the international criminal court for palestine, which he did. i regret to report that the international criminal court has not done one darn thing to help the palestinians since two thousand nine. the intern

uh, the international court of justice is in the hague. you can name of the i, c, c, w, h o, well as the clinic for all these institutions that are supposed to serve on a few many t, e, quick. on the other side in the west. the high end is why they terminated by western europe and north america. yeah, just to get started jumping, i get what you're saying. i mean, you're right. i mean, you're either you and has become politicized. i mean, it's quite possible the i c, j and i c. c of the hague, of being politicized as well. i mean that we're just going to have to see how this all plays out. and just quickly, while we're all talking right now, we've been shopping a live pictures from just outside the hey, it's about a 1227 p. m. right? that right now we're showing a demonstrate is all that we built, palestinian flags being floating outside the hague. these are live pictures right now as we continue our discussion with our panel here and i'll let you international same quarterly i'd like to finally come to you if i may. if indeed the cool is t

the measures handed down by the international court of justice. after more than half a century of occupation, disposession, oppression and apartate, the palestinian people's cries for justice have been heated by an eminent organ of the united nations. today, israel stands before the international community, its crimes against the palestinians laid bear. since october last year, the people of gaza have been the victims of bombardment. and strikes from land, sea and air, homes, refugee camps and entire neighborhoods have been destroyed, and not even schools and hospitals and religious places have been spared. iran's welcome a top un court's preliminary ruling in south africa's genocide case against israel, saying regime must be brought to justice. in the phone call of the south african counterpart, the iranian president warned of efforts by israel and its allies to destroy the court's proceedings. ibrahim race said that the international community also expects the regime. to be convicted in the court's a final verdict, he stressed muslim nations and

court of justice.ed in this. i think this could be a turning point. this could be moment where the world. is up in one voice and says in very emphatic term that is supposed to embody justice and equality in the rule of law, that these actions by israel amounts to genocide, torture, and something that we have not witnessed, i think really in the history of mankind, i think this is the most terrible slaughter of innocence that has ever occurred in in history, in my heart is always uh in pain over this, as i know millions of other people are, americans and christians alike, uh, and and europeans alike, and of course the muslim and arab world, so in one sense, i hope for the best, people have taken to the streets in the justicity of the hag in support of palestinians in the gaza strip, as the international court of justice holds hearings on the genocide lawsoit against israel. revolution, revolution, revolution, revolution, revolution, palestine protesters chanted free palestine and demanding an end to the

court of justice. let's take a listen to the reactions of one of the activists. in this instance the zin state has really transgressed all the principles, all the sort of the the clauses that basically speak out against any form of genocide, they've just done a textbook text in the sense of. "they've just you know blindly and arrogantly basically been pushing their own story, they talk about human rights for themselves, but the human rights that have committed against the palestinians, they don't even it silence, and if anybody, you and i speak out against the injustic that they commit, then they say we are anti-semitic. where does antisemitic, anti-semitism fet into this picture, it doesn't, they are anti-semitic as zinas. comrades, when we pray..." we do the most radical. israel has launched fresh air strikes on the gaza strip as the genocidal war enters its 97th day. the latest attacks targeted the city of rafa and the malazi refugee camp in southern gaz at least seven people were killed in the city

israel at the international court of justice, welcome to the show. david, do you think israel's history in supporting apartide in south africa had role in this move? well, as it says at the end of the film there, this is the revenge of history, and you can see in the the demeaner and the the the cheers that went up when the south african legal legal team came back from the hague, that this is seen as being a kind of an atonement for the sins of apartide and... of course the hand held out to the palestinian resistance and to the palestinian people is a is a mark of of how the the south africans see that their struggle intertwined with that of the palestinians as of course you said at the beginning from that famous quote from nelson mandela you who is you who whatever else you might say about mandela you he's seen this as big you know uh saint in a way and of course you can criticize his his views but whatever else you see about him he was sold in the palestinians absolutely and there's pressure on him and not to be so when he was released and and he s

the subject of the sessions of the international court of justice in the hague to discuss south africa'sהנוכחות שלה שם רק לטענות חוסר סמכות, אני אגב מאלה שטוענים בניגוד למה שאמרת שה זה שאנחנו חתומים על האמנה לא הופך אותנו לא הופך אותנו לכפופים לסמכות בית הדין ב'. hague and any losses incurred by this court, of course, regardless of the ruling that it will be decided and will be issued on this matter. انا بعتقد ان اهم نقطه سيخسرها الكيان. believe that the most important point that the regime is facing today, since its inception, is not only the fact that it is before an international court, mean the international court of justice, which is part of the united nations charter, but the tragedy is that the regime of israel believes that this massacre or genocide is justified and has legal right to it. this regime is the only one which was subjected to genocide, and in fact the international court of justice was established for the... reason because it was subjected to genocide at the hands of the nazis. for it to be put on trial before this court, which had been established to defend it on th

the hague, home of the international court of justice. it's the only major oregon of united nations, which is not based in new york, but what happens in the cold in the coming days is being keenly watched here on the other side of the atlantic at un headquarters. already the ambassador of israel, whose diplomats have been activity no being other un members, has angrily denounced the case in a speech in the un general assembly. perhaps an indication of how word his country is in south africa's basements, and libelous cases, a d i. j a. c j. prove this exactly. how can it be remembered that the convention on the prevention of genocide adopted following the hollow clothes, the general side of the jewish people is now being weaponized or does the jewish state. delores normally supposed to be above politics, but when it comes to international law, things get more complicated candidates to be judges at the international court of justice, nominated by their own countries, which then campaign for them and lots of inherently political process. the

the measures handed down by the international court of justice. after more than half a century of occupation, disposession, oppression and apartate, the palestinian people's cries for justice have been headed by an eminent organ of the united nations. today, israel stands before the international community, crimes against the palestinians laid bear. since october last year, the people of gaza have been the victims of bombardment and strikes. from land, sea and air, homes, refugee camps and entire neighborhoods have been destroyed, and not even schools and hospitals and religious places have been spread. south african foreign minister, nellady pandor says a cease fire in gaza is not enough, and as an occupier israel should provide necessary basic. services to palestinians: um, i wish to begin by thanking the judges of the international court of justice for dealing with this matter expeditiously, given the urgency of the needs to protect innocent uh civilians in palestine and to ensure that the harm that south africa. has referred to in the case it

in order to implement the ruling of the international court of justice and the genocide case against as well. then we'll talk for conditions for ministry, says it's time to be, was held accountable for its crimes. how jerry considers that the ruling of the international court of justice announces the beginning of the end of the era of impunity from which the is ready. occupation is long. benefits to give free range was oppression of the palestinian people and repression of or they legitimate rights. on friday, the hague court issued a series of rulings on emergency measures. in the case of mixed by south africa, it's instructed as well to prevent genocide in golf that as well as stores and punish any public incitement of it till the beef must also and show the delivery of basic services and the central humanitarian aid. for me, the court further considers the israel muscle sure with immediate effect, that it's military forces do not commit any of the aforementioned decks. the court is also the view it israel must take measures and its power to prevent and punish the direct and public

well, this has happened one day after the international court of justice released its initial findings regarding israeli generation. side as if to show the world once and for all that there is no international law, might makes right? well, i'd like to welcome my guests to this program. craig murray, former british ambassador to uzbekistan out edinburg, and robert fatina, author and journalist out of kishner on... here, well, thank you both for being with me. i'd like to start it off uh with craig. how do you explain these countries defending unra now? well, i think in part, um, it's a coordinated reaction to the uh international court of justice ruling, and it's important to note within its findings of fact, um, on the uh, genocide, what it the, icj said was plausibly a genocide in in gaza, um unra was quoted quite extensively for giving facts on the ground, so obviously that gives them a motive to discredit uh unra before future icj hearings and also of course it adds to the genocide, it increases the genocidal pressure and speeds up the genocide by potentially. denying a incredibly n

criminal court. court or the the international court of justice were not able in in in previous issues to to criminalize israel for committing crimes against the palestinians and war crimes mainly because of the american non-stop support for the israeli regime and for the united states ability to use the vedo in previous of course we speak about to previous cases, the situation now is a little bit different, many countries around the world had criminalized israel and they had been demanding the israeli regime to immediately stop what they really considered as a genocider war. people have taken to the streets in the dutch city of the hag and support of palestinians in the gaza strip as the international court of justice holds hearings a genocide lawsuit against israel. they held banners reading stop the genocide while waving palestinian flags. the demonstration was also held in south africa's cape town where people called for immediate ceasefire in the besseeg territory. the south african protesters hailed their government for filing the lawsuit against israel at the top un court for co

court of justice. "i think we can all learn from south africa, the way they have stood up for palestine when other country stood by them. we are so proud of south africa and i feel that our government can learn from them. if we want to, we can really make a difference, we can join the petition. south africa i could not even think would come into and having this whole thing taken up by them. it should have been saudi arabia, it should have been uae, it should have been jordan, it would have been other. muslim countries, but the leaders are just watching, they're just watching, and they're not doing anything. the protesters called on other nations to support south africa's initiative and urged the international court of justice to conduct a thorough investigation into alleged atrocities committed by israeli forces in gaza. the demonstrations for gaza highlight a wide spread sentiment among pakistanis against unwavering support from the... and its western allies for israel's actions in the region, these m

court of justice. our reason to change course, the but in many ways the courts measure is reaffirm the framework that we put in place with resolution 27122720. the courts provisional measures order is consistent with the united states view that israel has the right to take action in accordance with international humanitarian law to ensure the terrorist attacks of october, 7th can not be repeated. of course, how israel defends itself, matters. echoing resolution 27122720, the court emphasize that all parties to the conflict are bound by international humanitarian law. it also echoed the united states repeated calls for israel to take all possible steps to minimize harm to civilians and humanitarian workers. to increase the flow of humanitarian assistance and to address the humanizing rhetoric in our conversations with israel's leaders, the united states has been clear as has this council about the urgent need to increase the flow of food water in medicine so that it reaches all those civilians and gaza,

well, this has happened one day after the international court of justice release its initial findings regarding israeli genicide as if to show the... world once and for all that there is no international law, might makes right? well, i'd like to welcome my guests to this program. craig murray, former british ambassador to uzbekistan out edinburg, and robert fatina, author and journalist out of kishner, ontario. well, thank you. both for being with me, i'd like to start it off with craig, how do you explain these countries defunding unrah now? well, i think in part um, it's a coordinated reaction to the uh international court of justice ruling, and it's important to note vedinitz findings of fact um on the uh genocide, what it the icj said was... a genocide in in gaza, unra was quoted quite extensively for giving facts on the ground, so obviously that gives them a motive to discredit anra, before future icj hearings and also of course it adds to the genocide, it increases the genocidal pressure and speeds up the genocide by potentially denying ' incredibly needed uh food, water and sus

court of justice. let's take a listen for the palestinian of course they praised this move and they are really hoping that the court would reject all the pressure uh pressure being imposed it in order to uh let's they find israel guilty and they are hoping palestinians and mainly palestinians in the goja strap that this will lead to ending the israeli genocidal war uh despite the fact that palestinians have so long known that such such moves by the international criminal court or the the international court of justice were not able in in in previous issues to uh to criminalize israel for committing crimes against the palestinians and war crimes mainly because of the american non-stop support for the israeli regime and for the united states ability to use the video in previous of course we are speaking about the previous cases the situation now is a little bit different many countries around the world. had criminalized israel and they had been demanding the israeli regime to immediately stop what they r

regarding the subject of the sessions of the international court of justice in the hague to discuss southישראל הייתה צריכה להגביל את הנוכחות שלה שם רק לטענות חוסר סמכות, אני אגב מאלה שטוענים בניגוד למה שאמרת, שהזה שאנחנו חתומים על האמנה לא הופך אותנו לא הופך אותנו לכפופים לסמכות בית הדין בנושא. that the most important point that the regime is facing today, since its inception, is not only the fact that it is before an international court, mean the international court of justice, which is part of the united nations charter, but the tragedy is that the regime of israel believes that this massacre or genocide is justified and has legal right to it. this regime is the only one which was subjected to genocide, and in fact the international court of justice was established for this because it was subjected to genocide at the hands of the nazis. for it to be put on trial before this court, which had been established to defend it on the subject of genocide, indicates a quantitative change within the framework of the views towards the zianist regime, and in the eyes of those who used to show sympa