jonathan reynolds. thank you, mr deputy _ to the house. jonathan reynolds.mr deputy speaker, i to the house. jonathan reynolds. l thank you, mr deputy speaker, and can i think_ thank you, mr deputy speaker, and can i think the minister for an advance — can i think the minister for an advance copy of his statement? the horizon _ advance copy of his statement? the horizon post office failure has been a scandal_ horizon post office failure has been a scandal we have been responding to for some _ a scandal we have been responding to for some time, but i welcome the weight— for some time, but i welcome the weight the — for some time, but i welcome the weight the recent itv drama has brought— weight the recent itv drama has brought the story to a wider audience. it is a powerful reminder of the _ audience. it is a powerful reminder of the weight art and culture can be used to— of the weight art and culture can be used to tackle injustice and to raise — used to tackle injustice and to raise public awareness. i would also like to— raise public awareness. i would als

jonathan reynolds. — work towards that. jonathan reynolds, thank _ work towards that.american strikes against houthi targets in yemen. i met the us secretary of the navy, carlos del toro, who was in the uk this week and asked him, what is the point of the military strikes if the houthi attacks continue? i think it's a very important observation to make. this isn'tjust about a military solution, it's about a diplomatic solution. right? and they are all interrelated in one way or another. we have a moral responsibility to protect our own sailors, both in the united kingdom and the united states and all the other allies that are partnered with us as well too, but it's obvious that that will take more than just a military solution to this problem in order to resolve the issues in the middle east, with impact obviously on what's going on in the red sea. for how long can you see these strikes continuing, for how long would you be willing to keep carrying on with these strikes? sure, well, to your first question i think perhaps we should ask iran that question. they continue

here's labour's shadowjustice secretary, jonathan reynolds.s has left the public outraged at the injustice. we believe the horizon scandal to be one of the greatest miscarriages ofjustice in british history, where people lost their lives, and then, when trying to find justice, were delayed at every turn. it is unconscionable that despite the larne lough legal rulings, several people have not been able to access the conversation they are entitled to. —— landmark crete legal rulings. we are united in wanting to see them exonerated in full and to receive compensation with urgency. it is important to say exoneration and not a pardon, because a pardon implies guilt that is forgiven. we recognise that doing so is not straightforward. it may be imperfect. it is an unprecedented scandal, and it will require an unprecedented response. live now to our political correspondent, harry farley. the government has gone down the route of this law to overturn the convictions. it is a huge move, isn't it? it convictions. it is a huge move, isn't it? , , ., , isn

labour shadow business secretaryjonathan reynolds was secretary jonathan reynolds was asked secretaryjonathanics was behind it. the scale of the scandal in the post office is so vast, it's absolutely essential the right leadership is in place. the government are going to have to tell us why they made this decision seemingly yesterday. the person who's going wasn't actually there for the scandal so there must be specific reasons why they don't have confidence in that person going on. but i think the public will want to know this is notjust about one person, one chair, being changed but that the overall approach in the entire organisation is going to come to the terms with the scale of this and put it right. in the last few minutes i have spoken to another labour mp, kevin jones, who has been campaigning on this for a number of years and he said he wanted to see the sacking of the post office chair as part of a wider change in the post office leadership and he wanted to be the start of more of a wholesale change in leadership and i think we can expect to hear more about this decision in the hou

labour's shadow business secretary jonathan reynolds was also asked about it this morning and he wast politics was behind it. the scale of the scandal in the post office is so vast, it's absolutely essential the right leadership is in place. the government are going to have to tell us why they made this decision seemingly yesterday, given that the person who is going wasn't actually there for the scandal so there must be specific reasons why they don't have confidence in that person going on. but i think the public will want to know, this is not just about one person, one chair being changed, the overall approach in the entire organisation is going to come to terms with the scale of this, put it right. in the last few minutes, i have spoken to another labour mp, kevin jones. he's one of the key mps whose been campaigning on this for a number of years. he told me that he wants to see the sacking of the post office chair as part of wider change in the post office leadership, he wants this just to be the start of more of a wholesale change in leadership. i think we can expect to hear mo

labour's shadow business secretary jonathan reynolds was also asked about it this morning and he wastics was behind it. the scale of the scandal in the post office is so vast, it's absolutely essential the right leadership is in place. the government are going to have to tell us why they made this decision seemingly yesterday, given that the person who is going wasn't actually there for the scandal so there must be specific reasons why they don't have confidence in that person going on. but i think the public will want to know, this is not just about one person, one chair being changed, the overall approach in the entire organisation is going to come to terms with the scale of this, put it right. in the last few minutes, i have spoken to another labour mp, kevin jones. he's one of the key mps whose been campaigning on this for a number of years. he told me that he wants to see the sacking of the post office chair as part of wider change in the post office leadership, he wants this just to be the start of more of a wholesale change in leadership. i think we can expect to hear more abo

and this morning jonathan reynolds, one of keir starmer�*s top team, was out and we made the politiciansto the focus groups, so they had to respond directly to the voters this morning. and one of the things i asked him is what we heard from people again and again — it's not just that they're not excited about him, but also he changes his mind. they're not quite sure what he stands for. so we put that to mr reynolds this morning. no—one is complacent because we know where we are coming from to do that. and you've got to have the self—awareness to acknowledge in opposition. you've got to keep making the case, keep doing that. people only tune in a little bit to oppositions, i think, when you get closer to an election, but look at the progress that has been made to date. keir starmer was on radio 4 with me a few weeks ago, and to voters who say they don't know what he stands for, actually, i think keir starmerfans and supporters would say, well, actually he stands for this. he had to clear up discipline in the labour party. he had to deal with the problem of antisemitism. he had to get rid

and this morning jonathan reynolds, one of keir starmer�*s top team, was out and we made the politiciansus groups, so they had to respond directly to the voters this morning. and one of the things i asked him is what we heard from people again and again — it's not just that they're not excited about him, but also he changes his mind. they're not quite sure what he stands for. so we put that to mr reynolds this morning. no—one is complacent because we know where we are coming from to do that. and you've got to have the self—awareness to acknowledge in opposition. you've got to keep making the case, keep doing that. people only tune in a little bit to oppositions, i think, when you get closer to an election, but look at the progress that has been made to date. keir starmer was on radio 4 with me a few weeks ago, and to voters who say they don't know what he stands for, actually, i think keir starmer�*s fans and supporters would say, well, actually he stands for this. he had to clear up discipline in the labour party. he had to deal with the problem of antisemitism. he had to get rid of jer

and there for the labour party are rachel reeves, the shadow chancellor, and jonathan reynolds, the shadow been on something that some people have christened the fondue offensive. and so i gotjonathan reynolds to break away from the fondue to chat to us. shadow business secretary, hello! hello from davos. how cold is it there, by the way? it's not too bad. it gets quite cold on an evening, but in the day it's been ok. i mean, obviously this time of year isn't too warm in stalybridge and hyde, so i'm quite used to wrapping up properly. and i'm guessing you don't have time to do any skiing because you've got so many high level meetings. well, i've never been a skier, so that wouldn't be of interest to me. but it's true, it's been a busy time. i mean, the thing here is the calibre of person you're meeting, it's not too different to what you would get access to in the uk, but you have so many people here and the chance to meet so many people at pace and build those relationships. obviously you want to, in my position, ideally use those if you get to be the actual secretary of state for busines

rob reynolds, l g 0, oakland, california. and jonathan cook tab is an international human rights lawyer. he says this case reflects a change of public opinion about his roles, war and gaza. in my opinion, the case is not going to be decided on the matter on the merits. but on the issue of procedural justice ability, the judge feels uncomfortable. he said this was the most difficult case if he's had in his life. because on the one hand, the facts are very clear. on the other hand, to accused the executive branch to excuse the president of the united states of complicity in genocide. it is a very high bar and the judge was not sure that he has the authority to do it. i am actually surprised that he has even allowed the testimonies to appear without the ruling of the procedure issue. first. i think part of it is, is a humanitarian issue, because despite the official line of the united states would support is where the majority of americans believe that there should be a ceasefire. and the ceasefire. now they see the destruction