missing, what is not there , and what can't be in this document, as well as in the document signed by reshisunaknd president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism of its implementation, which i mean, well, the first, actually, is ratification, because then it becomes. is a law, which means that the organizational structure is being adjusted under it both in ukraine and, accordingly, in great britain, because let me remind you that an analogue, an analogue of such a security guarantee, is an act between the government of the united states of america and taiwan, it is called the law on relations with taiwan, an act on relations with taiwan, which, not only that, was also voted on by congress. then he it was also voted in the parliament of taiwan. in this way, it is a document for two parties, and i would still recommend to ukrainian specialists who take care of this topic to take this document and look at it, how it is designed. next, if you read the signed agreement, it is limited in time and term. indeed, this is a document about two-year guarantees, and also, if we look at international norms, then

missing, what is not there and what cannot be in such a document, as well as in the document signed by reshisunaknd by president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism of its implementation, what i mean, well, the first thing is actually ratification, because then it becomes a law, which means that the organizational structure is being adjusted under it in ukraine and, accordingly, great britain, because i will remind you of an analogue, an analogue of a similar security guarantee is an act between the government of the united states of america and taiwan, it is called the taiwan relations act, the taiwan relations act, which, not only... it was voted on by the congress and the senate, it was also voted on by the taiwan parliament. thus it is if the document is for two parties, and i would still recommend to the ukrainian specialists who take care of this topic, to take this document and look at it, how it is designed. next, if you read the signed agreement, it is limited: the time and term, in fact, is a document about two-year guarantees, and also, if you look at international norms, then if you take

missing, what is not there... should and what cannot be in such a document, as in the document signed by reshisunaknd president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism for its implementation, what i mean is, well, the first, actually, is ratification, because then it becomes a law, which means that the organizational structure is being adjusted under it in ukraine and, accordingly, great britain, because let me remind you of an analogue, an analogue of a similar... security guarantee is an act between the government of the united states of america and taiwan, it is called the taiwan relations act, the taiwan relations act, which, not only was it voted by the congress and the senate, it voted was also in the parliament of taiwan. thus, it is like a document for two parties, and i would still recommend it to professionals. ukrainians who take care of this topic, take this document and look at it, how it is designed. next, if you read the signed agreement, it has a limited time and term. in fact, this is a document on two-year guarantees, and if you look at international norms, then if you take away the rati

of russia, therefore the fact that due to the bilateral agreement signed by president zelenskyi and reshisunakorms concerning the stormshadow, taurus, and scalp missiles are contained, which is stated by the majority and even the opposition, and the german parliament, that what the president said macron, shows that little by little... the leadership, the political leadership of the european countries and its country's elite , the establishment, they are coming to the conviction that... that ukraine desperately needs similar capabilities in order to fight and strike at the enemy's territory, and therefore , whether it will happen, say, during 2024, or whether it will happen in the next month, it has already obviously become a matter of technical implementation, the supply of relevant weapons. although in this situation i cannot help but recall a case, let's say, in questions the confrontation between taiwan and china, the need for taiwan to curb the appetites of mainland china in similar weapons per year, as calculated by the headquarters. and the armed forces of taiwan are somewhere around hal

missing, what is not there, and what cannot be in such a document, as well as in a document signed by the reshisunakby president zelenskyi, this is the mechanism of its implementation , which i mean, well, first of all, it is actually ratification, because then it becomes a law, which means that the organizational structure is being adjusted under it in ukraine and , accordingly, great britain, because i will remind you, analog, analog such security guarantee, is an act between the government of the united states of america. and taiwan, it is called the taiwan relations act, the taiwan relations act, which, not only was it voted on by the congress and the senate, but it was also voted on by the parliament of taiwan. in this way, it is a document for two parties, and i would still recommend to ukrainian specialists who take care of this topic to take this document and look at it, how it is designed. next, if you read the signed agreement, it has a limited time and term. in fact, this is a document about two-year guarantees, and also, if you look at international norms, then if you take away the ratif

organizational system of support, then it can be interpreted simply as an agreement between prime minister reshisunakand the president... there is one more thing that is very important, the issue here is a matter of competence, if you look at this document, it contains components related to of the powers of the ministry of defense, the cabinet of ministers and the president, there are things that today are assigned to the competence of the president, that is, in the field of defense policy, there are concrete numbers that relate to money and objects. these are matters of the ministry of defense, well, in the extreme in the case of the cabinet of ministers and so on, that is, all this suggests that at will, if guarantees were to be obtained, obviously from the huge volume of these things that were discussed, the key is lost: and this is not a law for both sides, it is very it is important, secondly, the parliaments did not ratify it, from here it must be read absolutely clearly, its financial... security will be under a big question mark, but from the point of view of political rhetoric, this is a col

russia, therefore the fact that due to the signed agreement, bilateral, and president zelenskyi and reshisunakontain regulations that apply to stormshadow, taurus, scalp missiles, etc. what was stated by the majority and even the opposition of the german parliament, what was said by president macron, shows that little by little the leadership, the political leadership of european countries, and the country's elite, the establishment, they are moving to the conviction that ukraine is extremely necessary. similar capabilities to fight and strike enemy territory, so whether it happens, say, during the year 2024, whether it will happen in the next month, it has already obviously become a matter of only the technical implementation of the supply of the relevant weapons, although in this... situation i cannot help but recall the case, let's say, in the issues of confrontation between taiwan and china, the need for taiwan to deter appetites of mainland china in similar weapons per year, as calculated by the headquarters of the armed forces of taiwan. is somewhere around half a thousand units, ah, wit