please take care yourself and each otr. yourself and each otr. good night. this ad? typical.s up. with katie porter. porter refuses corporate pac money. and leads the fight to ban congressional stock trading. katie porter. taking on big banks to make housing more affordable. and drug company ceos to stop their price gouging. most politicians just fight each other. while katie porter fights for you. for senate - democrat katie porter. i'm katie porter and i approve this message. >>> get ready. the bay area is bracing for more rain.

and we continue the program razom beraber, a joint project of the tv channel and the otr tv channel,our ukrainian crimea. and the russian federation actually continues to consider itself the rightful owner of our peninsula. moreover, i believe that in the distant year, already now, as it seems, in 2015, we should not have done anything in relation to crimea, but ayder muzhdabayev remembers the events of those days very well. i i will only say that russia plans to file a lawsuit against ukraine. until the end of february and this lawsuit concerns, excuse me, my lord, the power blockades of crimea, this was stated by the speaker of the crimean parliament, volodymyr konstantinov, the so-called speaker, of course. and here, ayder, i give you my word, well, i remember that the blockade of crimea began on the 20th, i think it was september, so on the 15th , before that, trade flourished there, about 700 wagons, imagine crossing the demarcation line at chongar for a day , there were three points working then, and the crimeans, on calls. forest and led by lenur slyamomov, the general directo

tv channels, these are russia 1, russia 24, the first channel, the first channel of tvc moscow and otr, as well as three radio stations, this is radio russia, vesti. and beacon, free airtime will be provided from february 17 on weekdays and until 0 o'clock local time until march 15. the total amount of free airtime provided is 7 hours or 420 minutes. free airtime will be provided on weekdays, that is, starting from february 19. during. for joint campaign events candidates, that is , half of the total amount of free airtime is allocated for debates, this is 3:30 minutes or 210 minutes. well, as for the holding in igtrk, during the presidential election campaign, this year a record amount of airtime is provided, this is 15 hours for... february 27, 28, 29 and march 5, 6, 7. the timing will be 45 minutes. the host of both will be dmitry shchugarev. well, how does the draw itself take place? each of the tv channels has prepared time slots, their sealed in envelopes, each of the party and the candidate, or rather its representatives, can, where they can place theirs. in total, more than 200

in addition, three more channels - the first tv center and otr - will also hold debates on their daysy of the russian central election commission, said, natalya budarina. on each channel, all candidates are guaranteed one hour of air time, such same. the party that nominated presidential candidates has the right. the amount of free airtime is 7 hours. half of the total free airtime is allocated for debates. it's 3:30. participation in debates. three of the four presidential candidates will be accepted: vladislav davankov from the new people party, leonid slutsky ldpr and nikolai kharitonov, communist party of the russian federation. meanwhile, the campaign headquarters of russian presidential candidate vladimir putin has already refused free airtime for debates on television. as noted by the secretary of the central election commission natalya budarina, this is the candidate’s right. the development of science and technology must be a response to the challenges of the economy, mikhail mishustin said today, speaking at a strategic session on the implementation of socio-economic develop

so now he looks for otr men who can still fight. >> there is a full-scale war, but it is still like people care. we need everyone to come together like we did on the first day. everyone was united then like brothers. >> but when i ask about friends who have served with him, he tells me there is almost no one left from his company. >> everyone is other injured like me or did -- dead. >> when th russians occupied this woman's town, her son was captured and tortured. when he escaped, he signed up to fight for ukraine. he has now been badly injured, but his mother is afraid he will recover and go back to the front. he says his friends need him. >> while he is in hospital, i can sleep calmly. when he is on the front line, i can't sleep. so, i really shouldn't say this. i'm glad he is not at the front. >> every ukrainian town now has cemeteries like this. filled with the soldiers honored by their country as heroes and mourned deeply by their families. vladislav was killed by a mine, he was 22. ina hasn't put his photo on the grave yet because she can't quite accept her only son is gone, but she

otring is busy workingless neighborhood on vienna's western outskirts.most active voices of the global south and its struggle in austria. october 7, they have become the target of pro- sonionist media. was founded in 2003 in the context of the protests against the us led war on iraq and afghanistan and the second fada and have come together to create this group and open the center that has the global south as its orientation. is the main player in the boy israel movement bds and an active part of the demonstrations for gaza. so with increased pro-palestinian work, we're also facing increased repression from different institutions, from state media and academic institutions defaming us as anti-semitic as they're doing with all pro-palestinian activists um an effort to silence everyone being active. the premises have regularly been vandalized and damaged in recent weeks. so we face different attacks from zionists including attacks on our locality, for example different forms of analism, we see graffiti with zionis and islamophobic content, such as this typ

otring is busy working glass neighborhood on vienna's western outskirts. here in damelgasse is the premises of dar al-janub, the union for anti-racism and peace policy. it has been one of the most active voices of the global south and its struggle in austria. since october 7, they've become the target of proscionist media. in 2003 in the context of the protests against the us led war on iraq and afghanistan and the second interfada and have come together to create this group and open the center that has the global south as its orientation is the main player in the boy israel movement bds and an active part of the demonstrations for gaza. so with the increased pro palestinian work we're also facing increased repression from different. institutions from state media and academic institutions defaming us as antisemitic as they're doing with all pro-palestinian activits um an effort to silence everyone being active. the premises have regularly been vandalized and damaged in recent weeks. so we face different attacks from zionists including attacks on our locali

in addition, three more channels - the first tv center and otr - will also hold debates on their daysas natalya budarina, secretary of the russian central election commission, said, on each of the channels. all candidates are guaranteed one hour of airtime ; the parties that nominated them have the same right presidential candidates. the amount of free airtime is 7 hours. half of the total free time is allocated for debates - this is 3 hours and 30 minutes. three of the four presidential candidates will take part in the debate: vladislav davankov from the new people party, leonid slutsky ldpr and nikolai kharitonov (communist party of the russian federation). meanwhile, the election headquarters of russian presidential candidate vladimir putin has already refused... latency for debates on television, as noted by natalya, secretary of the central election committee budarina, this is the candidate’s right. russia needs to stop participating in the parliamentary assembly of the organization for security and cooperation in europe and stop paying contributions. this was stated by vyachesla

then it is creating a federal constitutional question that then this court decides and other courts, otr states -- if this court affirms the decision below, determining that president trump is ineligible to be president, other states would sllave to determine what effect that would have on their own state's law . host: the supreme court today hearing the case, trump v anderson, about whether or not the colorado primary ballot should have the former president 's name on it, and the case sundering about 14 amendment section iii, the insurrection because of the institution. we are getting your reactions this evening and we will re-air it in its entirety, coming up here on c-span. vicki from west virginia, whether you think? + i think it should be left on the ballot. if they are allowed to do that in texas, florida, republican states, they say, biden should able to run, that is a bigger insurrection than what we had in d.c.. in d.c. there was not one weapon. the only person who got shot was shot by a cop, not by somebody who was there. trump told them to go peacefully and patriotically to pr

the analysis would have to take into the account that it's a benefit program, but the otr question iscan congress exclude certain types of programs based on their content that ulbe an entirely diert question. that would be a qution that has no historical analog and coucting it could ta into account history and tradition. >> most of our benefits inlve money that the government -- a granor something like that. now, in e case of tremarks, don't they, and applicant also pay a fee as they pay in the copyright case? >> yes. that's correct. that seems like an odd t. it's not a program in which e government advances its own money t at's not the only context in which thcourt has distinguished between goveme benefits and the conditions and restrictions on speech. i think you could analogize this program roughly to the union dues cases, to cornelius, which inlv access to the combined federal campai. in each of those instances, the government was not giving its own money to the participants, but it was providing logistical assistance that would aid the rticipantsin trying to get money from other pri

for them to get to the due process, the substance of the hearing, but ulthat would allow all these otrto kind of poke the bear and continue to litigate eligibility. y find a procedural basis like it doesn't apply to the president because of thela legislative intent, which is what theen district court in colorado actually found, then you end it for all thes thlitigation across the countryp i think that is probably where we are going all the lawyers go on the supreme court.fe >> trey:el you know, jim, i feel so stupid. it never occurred to me to call a sociologofesy professor as a o witness in one of my trials. i always mistakingly scold witnesses or people who hadwho firsthand knowledge. you mentioned an opinion, and i say they are rare and they arebu certainly rare and high-profile, contentious cases. but if it's a fractured opinion along the ideological lines commit would further undercut the legitimacy of the court and' again, don't you think?t >> yeah, that is a shame. we have got a sitting president who is quite comfortable demonizing the supreme court, even when it is something li

if colorado's position is upheld, there will be qualification proceedings on the otrs and some of those will succeed. some will haveifrent standards of proof. some will have different rules about evidence. maybe the senate report would be accepted becau iwas hearsay. maybe it is beyond a reasobl doubt. i would expect, though my predictions have never been correct, a good number of states will say whoever the democratic candidate is, you are the ballot -- you are off the ballot and others, urff of the ballot. it will come down to a handful of states who decided the election. that is a dati consequence. mr. murray: the fact that there are potential fvous applications of a provision is t reason -- chief justice roberts: you might thin differently, but the people who bring them don' think they are frivolous. insurrection is a broad term. if there is debate about it, i suppose that will go into the decision and eventually if there was an insurrection when one president did something as opposed tohen someone else did something else, what do we do? we wait until near the time of cutting the ba

the reason he is in the and hedocuments case but the otr case the failed the democratic party knows the only to stop donald trump from being elected president this fall is to try to convict him and imprison him. >> here's the top democrat on the house armed services committee adam smith. >> president biden, once it was discovered actually self-report of the documents and turn them in. that is the biggest difference. president biden cooperated with the justice department the moment it was discovered. president trump fought them every step of the way and has said it is declassified if i say is declassified. these are my documents for. >> president biden returning here to the white house during the super bowl tonight ahead of his meeting tomorrow with king abdullah of jordan. >> covering a lot of ground for us lucas tomlinson live at the white house thank you. trey yingst will be joining us at the bottom of the hour from tel aviv, israel with the reaction from there. >> is more reaction from the presidents called israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu the prime minister's continued figh

from thatbr exile, from that otr country's embassy while he's hiding out from his ten-year prison sentence he's now running for president of panama again. and he'st winning. according to "the new york times" recent polls show him running in first place. this convicted fugitive right wing businessman former president now trying to rally his countrymen saying online, quote, you have to be very cowardly to discoif a presidential candidate who's first in the polls. yes,di if i can win votes who cares if i'm a convicted felon, spring me out of here. that is happening right now in panama the convict, now a fugitive. he's taken his dog and moved into the foreign embassy of a country who's given him asylum and he may win re-election from there. soro we're not alone. that's panama. also pack sfn. there they've got p a former pre minister who was osted from being prime minister in 2022. he's now in prison. campaigning from prison, his party won this weekend's elections in pakistan. his party didn't know exactly how to deal with the logistics of him proclaiming victory while he's in prison, so they h

is a major cellular outage in the united states being reported by at&t, t-mobile, veer r verizon and otrems to have experienced the largest number of issues with nearly 47,000 reports at around 7:00 a.m. eastern time according to data from down detector, major cities impacted include new york, san francisco, houston, boston and chicago. i personally have at&t. i personally experienced anoutage this morning myself so i apologize for the producer that i didn't call when i was supposed to because i had no phone. a verizon spokesperson telling fox business customers are only experiencing issues when trying to contact folks on at&t which operates first net. lee carter, jump in, you had the same issue. >> i had the same issue. it was starting at 4:00 this morning. it just came back online at 7:30. cheryl: those of us that go to work so early, we need our phones to work. they weren't working. this is true. we are going to keep you posted, folks, on this breaking story and we'll give you more details as we get them. well, the biden administration source telling fox news president biden is consid

frankly, the other side wants us to have it, and i know the mismishagosh coming from the otr side.ng this stuff up. not only has the train left the station, but we get to enjoy a record of accomplishments as we make the case in every election, the likes of louis deming which we couldn't have even jumped up, even as a democrat, in the last century. >> jesse: vivek ramaswamy joins us now. which party, the republican or democratic party, is more united right now? >> i think at this moment undoubtedly it is the republican party. even beyond that, we have a country that is united even outside the traditional republican party. america first includes all americans. i have traveled to inner cities, i was just in michigan. from autoworkers to the inner city, people in rural communities to suburban, if you ever think americans have their head stuck in the sand, if they don't notice you have a southern border right now, that we have a wway to wave of crime, that interest rates have gone up but wages remain flat. i think a lot of this left-wing media has themselves in a delusion to think that

otr ses it is kids telling other kids you should do this tide pods challenge. some cases it is kids that are encouraging other kids to comm suicide. there is a whole bunch of stuff th we think is offensive within the terms of 230 that we are exercising editorial discretion. 230 does not necessarily touch on offensive material. it touches on obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or othwi objectionable. >> that last one. >> well. [laughter] >> we can have a fine debate about the last st -- how much of tha, at is the latin, the company you keep? we can have that fine debate in some other case. >> they use th o doctrine, do a lot of work. let's put that aside. tell magn, exactly what the expressi cduct is. that for example youtube engages in. i'm sorry, twitter, the platforms -- twitter deplatforms someone. what is the expressive content d to whom is it being communicated? >> when they deplatform some buddy for violating termof use or continug post material that violates the terms of use, they are sending a message to that person and th

but i think treere some real problems with these otr applications. do youhi it is an option for kids today? do you think it would be unconstitutional? because we don't know about these otheapications? that might be within the statutes legitimate suite. we are going to send it back to the court to sort out. >> tnk it would be one possible approach appeared want to express strong agreements. it underlies that question. all with respect to the types of application we have been discussing. if you think those issues are properly used in this cas i don't think the court has received a breathing frankly but it seemsikit would be a reasonable thing to do. the factual development and consideration byheower court. >> my other question is about section 230. this is between the post and the post contentor which t platform would not be liable. that is different. is tt ction 230? >> ihink this is a difficult issue about how tutoring might apply. i have to confess iavnot gone back. i think there are circumstances where it is the platform'ow conduct. that is somethi

wartime, we try to shoot each other's stuff, but there's kind of a golden ticket, if s you can see the otr sides stuff, even if you can see these pieces of the other f side's stuff. and so it was last summer, august 2023. a russian pilot at the controls of a twin engine am i a russian military helicopter took off from an airfield from kursk airfield in western russia not far from the ukrainian border. and he was supposed to be flying inside russia. he was supposed to be flying replacement parts for russian fighter jets from one russian airfield to another. but instead, he took his cargo of russian fighter jets spare parts, and he flew straight for the flukrainian border. he flew in radio silence. he flew extremely low altitude. he was w reportedly shot, shot the leg by russian forces, as he flew his helicopter across the border into ukraine. but this, apparently, was a , long planned mission, this russian pilot had planned for months. do the fact that ukrainian side. his family had reportedly already been extracted from russia before he made that fight over the ukrainian border. he landed

his whole premise this whole otr argument, this election cycle was the other guy is worse. >> and americans is know that's not true because we saw what things looked like undet tr trump. we've seen what it looks like under joe biden. nohenow we know that joe biden is a crook. he mishandled classified information since the 1970s and he was a senator or a vice president. nowhern since e. the authority you have as a president who is the ultimate authority on handling classified information, declassifying classified. so i think the muddies have become are the waters have become muddiee d and joentt biden no longer has really any argument to make heading into>>a 2024. >> you know, charlie, i don'n: t think the republicans as slim as their majorities in the are supposede not to be potted plants. right. and i thind k for them to insist t on secure borders and getting our budget in balance with 34 trillion in debt and sayin g no more giveaways, maybe loans, maybe help in another way. that seems to be the right political formula to look s primaries, aleviou . you look at these polls, they all show t

the idea being that one party wants to change it in a way that would be detrimental to the otr party. and therefore, everyone must fight about it. and, you know, that's kind of a recipe for gridlock, obviously. you know, i think the. i have always the question of response ability for recommendation systems and they do to be an interesting one. i think it's a pretty, you know, section 230. right. is the law that sort of shields internet responsibility for user generated content was built a prodigy bulletin board mind right not a you know a recommendation system and so it's always been again i don't get into the legal side of things, but i do think in terms of public appreciation and something that would be good for lawmakers and everyone else to think about it is what responsibilities platforms have for what recommend and whether it is acceptable to be recommending things that literally don't understand what you're recommending whatsoever. you know, i think very rarely can you think a circumstance in which like unleashing a machine and then saying, oh, well, it's driven by itself now,

goin taklet's move on to the otr issue, and that is donald trump being on the ballo tissu in illinois now joininge. the states of colorado and theoe state of maine. and again, in this particular, the word insurrection was used. last i checkeded, donald trump was never charged t with insurrectiorump wn, even ie jack smith case, the january six case in d.c.h , let alone convicted of insurrection or citing an insurrection. how is it possible that they could cite that as the reaso thn for removal from a ballot? >> well, the advocates are arguing that insurrection when thires amendment was written, was meant to include a much broader range of conduct, even something like a riot. manyething of us disagree with o what is really odd about this illinois decision is that most judges are waiting to hear from the supreme court juhearn of many of us is that the court is going to reject this claim, is going e to reject this theory. and yet this judge decidedorr jg to break from the other judges and say, no, no, i want to go on record. ites no,. it's like paddling furiously to get on the titanic bef

and arw otr things about this cartoon. well, the in the top theu can see a police officer being relightistrict.xt to him is the and this this area of missoula where they''ll just go back to this map here for a second. this area right over here, back here on, west front street, you can't see it well enough from where you arebut there's a whole bunch of little buildings here. and what those buildings say on them is f b, this is a sanborn fire insurance map. so we know what that stands for it stands for a female boarding house, which is a euphemism for houses of prostitution. that was the red light district right there, just a block away from where they're meeting. and basically, they're saying in this cartoon, there's, you know, all this other crime that's going on and the police are being off to not do anything about that. in other words, police are not there to enforce the laws really enforced. they're they're, you know, to interfere labor organizing and the bottom right there you can see the jail this is where they were s

but i think that's the right move is to get him out on otr in the field, having conversations with people saying with a voter to some of the lines that that access at my mom was watching sunlight going to say it right now, but yeah, it's but it having those conversations allowing to have conversation and then his campaign get those conversations out on social media. >> all right, david audie, matt ashley. thank you all so much for your time. great to have you acts >> all right. before we go, i'll leave you with this. it was a wildest dream come true for a young taylor swift fan, nine-year-old scarlett oliver is battling an aggressive form of brain cancer. she was given 12 to 18 months to live according to her step mom, who posted on social media that scarlet's dream was to meet taylor swift and also received the coveted 22 at which taylor gives away at each of her shows and this friday and sydney, here's what happened could watch that over and over and over again. right. all right. we're sending our very best wishes to scarlett as she fights. thanks to all of you for joining us on this mo

you take that doctrine of humility and you put on top it starry decisis, otr doctrine of humility , whh is to suggest we do nowilly-nilly reversed things unless there is a special justificio here kaiser said it is even more than that. there is even more reason not to revee mething, because there have been 70 supreme court decisionreing on chevron. because there have been ,0 lower her decisions relying on chevron. you are saying blowup one doctrine of humility, blowup another doctrine ofhumility, and then expect anybody to inthat the courts are acting like court. >> with respect, your honor, this court has on multiple locations corrected its own errs en it comes to statutory interpretation, how to alwith qualified immunity, implied causes of action. in the encino motor case there was a canon of construction at said exemptions the flsa provio could be constrd narrowly. this court overruled an event that should have no roleto play in interpreting the flsa. he did not run through the stryecisis factors. i don't know whether you call it humili ojust clarity, but when the question is judicial

telling that some of the gymnastics with respect aty friend has to do in order to deal with all of the otr hypothetical and actual devices thatavbeen out there, because i think he recognizes that the accelerator, the electric reset assist,he fishing reel and camp, allf these have to be covered by the statute, because congress wouldn't enact something to such easy evasion. i think for the accelerat, suggested maybe the trigger is the spring in the back of the rie rather than the lever that the shooter actually pullso start the firing sequee. on the black box hypothetical, i'm stl not sure what his answer is, but i think it must be that the button is the trigger t fst time it moves up and down, but then it stops being the trigger when it keeps moving up ando afterwards. i think those are all very implausible interpretations that this coun'should not give to a statute if there's another reinavailable, and our view is there is another reading available n. short, we think congress in 1934 wrote this statute not just for the kds of devices that existed then, but for all kinds of devices that cou

the one on the right is frederick and the the left is his otr carl. frederick raises this regime this is a poster behind me here of a recruiting poster which is plastered all over new york. it's a regiment which directly appeals to immigrants where it promises to create companies reflect the a collection of different immigrant groups. as it says, attends, concurrent, germans, french and patriots, you should sign up for this regiment. it will be lit by this dashing colonel who claims to be a great hero, and military hero from hungary. claims to have a aristocrat and claims to be a master swordsman. to have a master swordsman. a master who is a command of multiple languages, et cetera. again a lot of the appeal of this regiment is connected with its colonel. and it's a regiment as you can see from his uniform a rather elaborate over the top uniform which is designed by frederick. and with all sorts of gold thread, et cetera. quite over-the-top. and appealing and this will be a dashing regiment to join. s to might not be who he seems to be and, one of th

but realisticall y know, otr esidents have got a significant number of scandals, too. ronald reagan with in-ntra. yeah, we'll talk about that in a little bit. bill clinton with whitewater and the lewinsky scandal and george w.ush, who had some scandals in nominees like clarence thomas, they're all add up to a healthy number of scandals, but not so much that it kind of hits your imagination in a in a big way. it's so here's a list of scandals by president, and you can see some variation like that i'm talking about. and although nixon tends to get the, you know, kind of most problematic, most, you know, kind of president, he's not the most scandal ridden president, the most scandal ridden president is donald trump. you can see there from the number there exceeding 50 in just a short four year period. ronald reagan, although he was president for eight years, is number two. there. he gets more than 40, followed by bill clinton, who comes in at a third place. you're happy to get the bronze medal on this one. right. but obviously some of the scandals have been pretty impactf

it might capture some other things, but otr ings would be similar enough to bump stocks that congress would want to ban them as well. >> back in the state statute, they did that at the time, ok. last question, you haven'made a second amendment or nstitutional voidance argument. in youvi are bump stocks covered by the second enent, protected by the second amendment? >> we didn't argue that because courts are generally loathe decide constitutional questions when there's an easy statutory offering. >> you did not throw it in as constitutional buoyancy. i imaginth was a considered choice. i'm rious what was behind that. >> there's nothing that prent this court from invoking the constitution canon on e cond amendment issue, because there is a queioat least whether this falls within the dangerous and unusual aps cover out. -- carveut we don't have a position because we didn't brief it, and also dangerous is vague enough that it's just not clear to us what the answer would be. >> thank you. >> justice jackson? >> i guess i'm still not clear as to why you believe there's only one meaning of f

where like we take pleasure in otr people's other groups we don't likes misery. right? so i use this as an example here. a lot of stuff about hunter biden, right? this is why it's become such a kind of commonplace story. right. is that having other people sort of suffer, especially the opponents politically suffer, is something that makes you pleased. it makes you happy. and so that's part of it. but like said, the root of a lot of this is about partizanship. and when you have partizanship effect scandals, it means that they're not going to be as impactful as they otherwise would be. so a couple of things to note here. a couple of my colleagues did a really interesting study. they basically did a survey experiment where they asked about donald trump's acquittal, his second impeachment, and what found wathat support for the acquittal was largely static. and then the partizanship was strongly influenced whether the public accepted, the veracity and importance of the of the political information. so people who liked donald trump were good with the acquittal. people who did

money judgment or some sort of reefor their individual claim aboutsn't something that accrues to every otr creditor for the corporation and separately i will also say you mentioned the consumer protection claim which is wha the second circuit said at a be minimum the claims here and there are individuals wh also have state consumer protection claimsohose are not all included in the settlements with the 50 states. and third, as my veranda says friend saysthere's going to be m against victim race to the courthouse. the solution to that is not to say that everybody gets a zero dollars and that rac the court can't just dohaver it takes to make this deal poible. the court can't say ifhe do that, then the court could say youno what would be more apopate it may be more money that would be helpful to this deal. and as we've said we don't think the court can just say we think itou be better if you put in $15 billion here if it'sot money that is otherwise a part of the estate. so finally, w sport the abatementenr plan and have a disagreement about whether there is a potenti dl on the other side of t

mitchell: i think they mutually enforce each otr. we have an argument we believe it is sufficient to dispose this case jusbad on meaning of ofceof the stage. all of the considerations are additional reasons to reverse the colorado supreme court although we don't think it is necessary to get into consequences because the law is on our side. >> you kp saying term limits buthe are other presidential alifications in the nstitution, age, citizenship and the 22nd amendment that does not permit anyone run for a second term. we have a history of states disqualifying -- not all but some odisqualifying candidates who would not be of age if elected. we have a history of at least e ate disqualifying someone who was not a u.s. citizen. are your arguments limited to seion three? mr. mitchell: not quite. e estion is whether the state is violating term limits by adding two or altering the extent qualifications for the president and thcotitution. justice sotomayor: so you want us to say -- i'm wondering why the term limit qualification is important t

we did -- we looked at the historical evidence and the otr de can get back and throw out evidence back in our face. we focus more on the text of the constitution because this was a compromise in section three justice jackson: lemesk you another question because you have made any argument about the states not being able to enforce seio three if we agree, what happens next? i thought you wanted us to end litigation so is there a possibility of contuein federal court? mr. mitchell: i am sure how it could unless congress enacts a statute. juic jackson:e would have to say congressional enain legislation is necessary for either state or federal enforcement. mr. mitchell: that is correct. justice jacks: the colorado supremcot conud the violent attempts of the petitionersn is case to hold the countn january 6 qualifies as insurrection as defined by section three. i read your eng brief to accept that thoseves accounted as insurrection. your reply seems to suggest they are not. what is your position? mr. mitchell: we never considered this was an insurrection. what we said is president trump did

taxesaxes as opposed to indirect you are talking about certain kinds of things and it's not necessarily otrsothers income and that sort of thing. >> is a matter ofriginal meaning that's incorrect. that certainly did nottand for the position of the court requesteth court, until that hold the income was direct? >> notit respect so much to encumber grace i'm sorry. ask the case tt address this issue was springer which did adopt a narwnterpretation of the direct tax clauses. >> it up until plick was addressed by the 16th amenen we had a very narrow direction for. >> for 20 year there was. saide to that as i pretty much all of that 16th amendmt er the past century have concern taxes on personal property in the fm of investments. i think the crt would have to up and jurisprudence if it would to decide the late date the dire t laws ought to be given some other interetion. >> on the askbo realizations. going back to justice thomas first queio and what the. definition i i guess i am trying to understand whether you think congressas the autri to define what constitutes realization orti not? is it some

also, they were talking about how you had a bunch of lowlifes taking money out of social otr things theyto fund and the government. i think is just horrendously awful that such things are happening and people know nothing about it. they claimed there was $83 billion more brought in then was paid out on and if it's on that particular year. another thing, they have to expose the con being put in america maybe back in the mid-90's. usa today ran five separate issues funded by cato i believe in one of them commented about how taxes at that time had over $6 trillion surplus. from what i recall, legislation was making a big mistake that year about the horrendous deficit. they were trying to con folks into voluntary -- voluntary higher taxation when according to usa today, it showed texas at over $6 trillion surplus. i guess that's about all i wanted to throw in. host: thank you, caller. guest: unfortunately, social security is paying out much more in benefits today than it is bringing in and tax revenue. that is because of the baby boomers moving into retirement. because the trust fund is bein