1
1.0
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
PRESSTV
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
us and british military attacks on yemen and other west asian countries warning them not to test the rath
us and british military attacks on yemen and other west asian countries warning them not to test the rath
1
1.0
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
PRESSTV
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
us and british military attacks on yemen and other west asian countries warning them not to test the rath of the region. hello everyone, you're watching press tv live from the studios in tehran. thank you for joining us. now the israeli bloodshed continues unabated in gaza as more palestinians lose their lives in fresh air and artillery strikes on the besieg strip. at least 30 civilians were killed in israeli shelling. in the central city of devil balah during the past 24 hours. there was also a drone attack on area in the center of gaza city which claimed the lives of three people. elsewhere in that city, four palestinians were killed after a residential building was bombed. according to a european ngo, roughly 110,000 palestinians have been reported killed, missing or injured in gaza since israel launched this bombing campaign on october the 7th. the euro met human rights monitor also says around 90% of the entire population of gaza has been displaced in almost four months. the death toll from israel's genocidal war stands at over 27,000. earlier in our news review program, we discussed
us and british military attacks on yemen and other west asian countries warning them not to test the rath of the region. hello everyone, you're watching press tv live from the studios in tehran. thank you for joining us. now the israeli bloodshed continues unabated in gaza as more palestinians lose their lives in fresh air and artillery strikes on the besieg strip. at least 30 civilians were killed in israeli shelling. in the central city of devil balah during the past 24 hours. there was also...
0
0.0
Feb 17, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
inflation report clouds the federal reserve's path forward, so could interest rate cuts be coming later rath? ♪ ok ♪ r strength and energy. yay - woo hoo! ensure, with 27 vitamins and minerals, nutrients for immune health. and ensure complete with 30 grams of protein. (♪) a force to be reckon with. no, not you saquon. hm? you! your business bank account with quickbooks money, now earns 5% apy. 5% apy? that's new! yup, that's how you business differently. ♪ no. ♪ -no. -nuh-uh. ♪ yeah. oh. yes. ♪ oh yeah. yes. isn't this great? yeeaahhhh!! ♪ yeah, i could do a cartwheel in here. oh hey! would you like to join us? no. we would love to join you. ♪ ♪ paul: two key inflation indicators came in hotter than expected this week with consumer prices and wholesale prices both rising in january over a year ago. the news clouding the fed's path forward on interest rate cuts and stoking some fierce on wall street that the central bank could act act a later rather than sooner. let's bring in don luskin, chief investment officer at trend macro. don, good do see -- to see you again. >> so good to be here, pau
inflation report clouds the federal reserve's path forward, so could interest rate cuts be coming later rath? ♪ ok ♪ r strength and energy. yay - woo hoo! ensure, with 27 vitamins and minerals, nutrients for immune health. and ensure complete with 30 grams of protein. (♪) a force to be reckon with. no, not you saquon. hm? you! your business bank account with quickbooks money, now earns 5% apy. 5% apy? that's new! yup, that's how you business differently. ♪ no. ♪ -no. -nuh-uh. ♪...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
really the rare case in icthere was real exessive value in choosing a term as a source identifier, rath an using it. >> thank you. >> justice sotomayor? >> no mac. >> justice kagan? >> so this is not , this has to do with the governme declining to support speech, whatever you wa put, what labels you want to put on that context. we frequently talked about, that it shldbe reviewable for reasonleness and i guess what i want to ask you is whether you think reasonableness isthsame as standard rationality review. because as i look at the ses, like reasonableness is definitely not heightened scrutiny, intermediate or strict, but when the court says we look for reasonableness, it tends to do a couple of things. it tends to look at the other expressive opportunities that a spkehas. it tends to lookat whether even though somethinisa fear that official suppression of ideas is afoot. so, that does not seem like relyational-basis scrutiny. we understand that this is a sensitive area. we are not allowin viewpoint- based discrimition. even if it is not facial, is it sort of lurking someplace. we want
really the rare case in icthere was real exessive value in choosing a term as a source identifier, rath an using it. >> thank you. >> justice sotomayor? >> no mac. >> justice kagan? >> so this is not , this has to do with the governme declining to support speech, whatever you wa put, what labels you want to put on that context. we frequently talked about, that it shldbe reviewable for reasonleness and i guess what i want to ask you is whether you think...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
because that rationalityhat they would want to favor the government rathe than an opposition equally rational tt it would want to favor the individuals. and ifou assume thathe government has provided everybody a nic and an opportunityo be heard. but often the government wil seek the difference for adjudications between individual parties and the apply that to everybody without noti t them. orifference for interpretiveul for which no notice and comment and let alone rmal rule making for the preedings is required. and so the are many circumstances in which they will see the difference for view of the law that affected parties would have no chance to be heard about. when doe do that? >> and with respect to the tery, it is true that they have not ruled out that they could receive the prriate circumstances. >> and so you wou have us take th? >> i would just have them reitere. and it is not as though any is going to. >> nod knows what that means. and they would complain about that too and so i don't know with that and is that another factor? >> it is another important check of ensuring the
because that rationalityhat they would want to favor the government rathe than an opposition equally rational tt it would want to favor the individuals. and ifou assume thathe government has provided everybody a nic and an opportunityo be heard. but often the government wil seek the difference for adjudications between individual parties and the apply that to everybody without noti t them. orifference for interpretiveul for which no notice and comment and let alone rmal rule making for the...
0
0.0
Feb 17, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> what i'm disputing is the idea the is also an answer eier way, rathe than the discretion. >> there is an agency? >> yes, under review. if i understood my friend correctly today, he seems to suggest in allonxt, you could look and s they dictated that or an answer with respect to how did they find that source? what they recognize and what i think is just absolutely true as a matter of the on the ground realities and how they legislate, that congress dsn't actually decide all of these ises when congress hasn't decided it and se follow on, they will need to fill in the gap. it's a question of whether it should be the courts or the agency. there is a presumption here that they intended it to be the agency. but alway subject to the guardrails about making sure the construction is reasonable. >> mr. clement suggested that we should ignore chevron because it did not deal with 70 do y have a theory as to why they did not address 706? and how do you respond to this part of the argument? >> yes. so my theory for why they did not address 706 is because 706 has never been uerood at any time. at
>> what i'm disputing is the idea the is also an answer eier way, rathe than the discretion. >> there is an agency? >> yes, under review. if i understood my friend correctly today, he seems to suggest in allonxt, you could look and s they dictated that or an answer with respect to how did they find that source? what they recognize and what i think is just absolutely true as a matter of the on the ground realities and how they legislate, that congress dsn't actually decide all...
0
0.0
Feb 18, 2024
02/24
by
GBN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
person that they liked and incumbent, where the former tory rath person that they choseand the personactually to be actually if they're going to be taking off the tories, taking votes off the tories, i think they're doing a respectable business. they're doing they're doing respectably, but they're not fantastically well. not doing fantastically well. the concern tories the major concern for the tories is right now votes going to is not right now votes going to reform. it's simply conservatives going, yeah, i hear what but hear what you say, but a straight up don't trust you. >> well, it appears like they're not going to labour either in wellingborough more wellingborough they had 107 more votes than in 2019. votes than they did in 2019. varne but benedict, let me ask you about this. uh developing story from keir story this morning from keir starmer for a ceasefire. starmer calling for a ceasefire. finally, in israel. that finally, in israel. what's that going for his election prospects? >> nothing . he'll do absolutely >> nothing. he'll do absolutely nothing . um, you know, this is no
person that they liked and incumbent, where the former tory rath person that they choseand the personactually to be actually if they're going to be taking off the tories, taking votes off the tories, i think they're doing a respectable business. they're doing they're doing respectably, but they're not fantastically well. not doing fantastically well. the concern tories the major concern for the tories is right now votes going to is not right now votes going to reform. it's simply conservatives...
0
0.0
Feb 22, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that joe biden won in 2020, you're not thrilled that that money is going to be spend on donald trump rath a competitive reelection. there are also other structural things. part of the problem the rnc was having, part of the critique is that fundraising wasn't where he wanted it to be. but given that he is now soliciting money for all types of things, where are the dollars then that he sees coming to the rnc? >> again, this is the problem. he's going to remove ron na, who at least has a relationship with republicans, and put in his daughter-in-law, who has never run ab organization like this. and then she's going to have to go back to these donors and say, my father-in-law removed your person, who has been the chair of the rnc since the longest-serving chair of the rnc. and she's been reelected four times. and you're going to remove her because you want someone with a trump last name. i think ultimately, what is happening here is we're seeing trump praise prizing loyalty over any kind of efficiecy or political talent. >> just this week it was report ed how trump's pac is racking up more le
that joe biden won in 2020, you're not thrilled that that money is going to be spend on donald trump rath a competitive reelection. there are also other structural things. part of the problem the rnc was having, part of the critique is that fundraising wasn't where he wanted it to be. but given that he is now soliciting money for all types of things, where are the dollars then that he sees coming to the rnc? >> again, this is the problem. he's going to remove ron na, who at least has a...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
th now say they are in fact editors of their users' speech, rath le a newspaper. they contend they posss broad first amendment right to censor anything eyost on their sites, even when doing so contradict their own representations to consurs but the si of the first amendment is to evt the suppssn of speech, not to enable it. that is why the telephone coan and divery service has no first moment right to u their services as a chokepoint to silence those they disfavor. broadly facilitating communication in thawais conduct, not speech. if verizon asserted a first moment right to cancel disfavored clients at a whim, that wld fail. social networking companiesre in the business of transmitting their users' speech. their users are the one who create and select the content that appears on their sites. the platforms disavowal responsibility for that conduct in their terms of service. th platforms do sort a facilitate the presentation of user speech. this court just last term in twitter versus tamana describe those tools as a little more than passive mechanis r organizing vas
th now say they are in fact editors of their users' speech, rath le a newspaper. they contend they posss broad first amendment right to censor anything eyost on their sites, even when doing so contradict their own representations to consurs but the si of the first amendment is to evt the suppssn of speech, not to enable it. that is why the telephone coan and divery service has no first moment right to u their services as a chokepoint to silence those they disfavor. broadly facilitating...
53
53
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 53
favorite 0
quote 1
other members to enrich itself, and then we have putin saying he'd prefer joe biden to be president ratht we know that's not true. >> very deft there. what he is saying is one thing, but the idea that, politically, he has a base for which it is working is worrisome. and we're going to go to the polls in november. and this is going to be an election where the difference between joe biden, donald trump, in terms of foreign policy, not to mention democracy, is about as black and white as you can get. i don't think for most americans, when they go to the polls, that'll be uppermost in their minds. they'll have other issues. i'm worried about the disconnect. when people vote, they're not voting on the basis of who is the more responsible commander in chief, but the implications of this election for the world and for american interest in the world will be truly profound. it'll be historic. we are at something of a turning point, potentially, and that makes me uneasy. somehow, these issues have not entered enough the political mainstream, or american voters haven't internalized them. i'm worrie
other members to enrich itself, and then we have putin saying he'd prefer joe biden to be president ratht we know that's not true. >> very deft there. what he is saying is one thing, but the idea that, politically, he has a base for which it is working is worrisome. and we're going to go to the polls in november. and this is going to be an election where the difference between joe biden, donald trump, in terms of foreign policy, not to mention democracy, is about as black and white as you...
1
1.0
Feb 4, 2024
02/24
by
PRESSTV
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
height intentions in the region over the ongoing israel warned the us and the uk not to test. quote: the rath of the region: security iraq, syria, yemen and palestine equal security of the entire region. the latest aggression by american and british forces against yemen has also drawn condemnation from palestinian resistance movements. hamas warned the attacks will.
height intentions in the region over the ongoing israel warned the us and the uk not to test. quote: the rath of the region: security iraq, syria, yemen and palestine equal security of the entire region. the latest aggression by american and british forces against yemen has also drawn condemnation from palestinian resistance movements. hamas warned the attacks will.