tamaro, i will ask mrs. tamaro, you now have a prize, maksym strikha, a scientist and also the translator, by the way, is the only one a member of the maksym rylsky prize committee, who disagreed and left the committee in protest, and he wrote a text called how the rylsky prize was killed. he writes that the committee can still meet and make some decisions, but it will no longer have, it will already have very little impact on actual ukrainian translation, do you agree that the award was really killed, or do you think this is a bit of an exaggeration ? you know, it sounds really good, i want to remind you that during the actual 17th. in the 18th year, i also wrote an article about how drozdovskyi, who was a consultant at the time, said that the field of science is being killed, the field of ukrainian science is being destroyed, so actually this is just a repetition of these actions. i think to myself, you see, the question is for me, i really like the fact that i am very glad that you are discussing the actu

tamaro, i will ask ms. you now have an award, maksym strikha, a scientist and also a translator , by the way, the only member of the maksym award committee. who did not agree and as a sign of protest left the committee, and he wrote a text called how the rylsky award was killed, he writes that the committee can still meet and make some decisions, but it will no longer have, it will already have very little touch to actual.

tamaro, i will ask mrs. you are now talking about the prize, maxim strikha, a scientist and also a translator, by the way, the only member of the maksym rylsky award committee, who did not agree and left the committee in protest, he wrote. the text, which is called: "how they killed the rylsky prize". he writes that the committee can still meet and make some decisions, but it will no longer have, it will have very little touching on actual ukrainian translation. do you agree that premium has really been killed or do you think this is a bit of an exaggeration? you know, it's very good. it really sounds, i want to remind you that during the 17th or 18th year, i also wrote an article about how drozdovsky, who was a language consultant at the time, was killing the field of science, destroying the field of ukrainian science, so in fact, this is just a repetition of these actions. i think to myself, you see, the question is for me, i really like what i am very much i am glad that you are discussing the issue of pr

tamaro, i will ask ms.ou now have an award, maxim strikha, a scientist and also a translator, by the way, the only member the committee of the maksym rylsky award, which did not agree and as a sign of protest, leaving the committee, he wrote: a text called: how the rylsky award was killed. he writes that the committee can still meet and make some decisions, but it will no longer have, it will have very little impact on actual ukrainian translation. do you agree that premium has really been killed, or do you think this is a bit of an exaggeration? you know, it's very good. really sounds, i want to remind you that during the 17th or 18th year, i also wrote an article about how drozdovsky, who was a consultant at the time. they are killing the field of science, destroying the field of ukrainian science, so actually, this is just a repetition of these actions. i think to myself, you see, the question is for me, i really like the fact that i am very glad that you are discussing the actual issue of bonuses today,

tamaro. greetings, good evening, good day, please tell me how you took this decision of the maksym rylsky committee? i must say that i was not surprised, because the fact is that this story with rozdovsky, which started four or five years ago, it is not finished, and i have the impression that it is actually like a cancerous tumor. it spreads in our society in the same way and covers different areas, because here we are talking not only about borrowing, let's say, but also about scientific reputation, about the reputation of the translator, the editor of the universe, which remains, remains drozdovsky, you understand what the matter is, when this story with plagiarism began at our institute... i'll just remind you, during the discussion of dmytro druzdovsky's dissertation, which was carried out in the doctoral course of our institute, the fact of borrowing was discovered, a whole commission was created, which included not only us, as employees of the institute, but also, but we also invited our colleagues from other higher education institutions, from other universities, and we, in fact,

tamaro, i will ask you now about... the prize maxim strikha, a scientist and also a translator, by the way, the only member of the committee the maksym rylsky prize, which did not agree and as a sign of protest, left the committee, he wrote a text called how the rylsky award was killed, he writes that the committee can still meet and make some decisions, but it will no longer have, it will already have very little impact on act... of ukrainian translation, do you agree with the fact that the award was really killed, or do you think this is somewhat exaggerated, you know, it sounds really good, i want to remind you that during the 17th or 18th in that year, i also wrote an article about how drozdovsky, who was at that time language consultant is killing the field of science, destroying the field of ukrainian science. so actually it's just a repetition of this these these promotions, i think to myself, you see, the question for me, i really like the fact that i'm very glad that you are discussing the actual issue of bonuses today, uh, because it seems to me, the issue with bonuses in gen