as the official biographer of the ccj and the co-founder of the three faiths forum. reverend marcus baby brook candidly admitted. with the growing importance of the muslim community, the festering wounds in israel and palestine and the growth of extremism. muslim, jewish and christian dialogue has a special importance. today, the ccj also works with the united jewish israel appeal, which also involves itself taking students on trips to illegal israeli settlements as a part of the racist so-called birthright program. the head of israel. engagement at the ujia, robin moss, described the ccj as carrying out pioneering work. the director of the well be group was until recently elizabeth harris swazenko, who worked for the israeli government funded abraham initiatives at the same time. the abraham initiatives claim to exist to increase synergy between uk and israeli bodies and agencies. justin welby is, in other words, deeply. embedded in the promotion of the genocidal ideology of zionism. joining me in the studio as usual is our resident expert david miller. david's an a

as the official biographer of the ccj, and the co-founder of the three faiths forum, reverend marcus baby brook, candidly admitted. with the growing importance of the muslim community, the festering wounds in israel and palestine and the growth of extremism. muslim, jewish and christian dialogue has a special importance. today, the ccj also works with the united jewish israel. which also involves itself taking students on trips to illegal israeli settlements as a part of the racist so-called birthright program. the head of israel engagement at the ujia, robin moss, described the ccj as carrying out pioneering work. the director of the well-be group was until recently elizabeth harris swazenko who worked for the israeli government funded abraham initiatives at the same time. abraham initiatives claim to exist to increase synergy between uk and israeli bodies and agencies. justin welby is, in other words, deeply embedded in the promotion of the genocidal ideology of zionism. joining me in the studio as usual is our resident expert david miller. david's an academic and a former professo

today, the ccj also works with the united jewish israel appeal, which also involves itself in taking students on trips to illegal israeli settlements as a part of the racist so-called birthright program. the head of israel engagement at the ugia, robin moss, described the ccj as... caring out pioneering work. the director of the well be group was until recently elizabeth harris swazenko, worked for the israeli government funded abraham initiatives at the same time. the abraham initiatives claim to exist to increase synergy between uk and israeli bodies and agencies. justin welby is, in other word, deeply embedded in the promotion of the genocidal ideology of zionism. joining me in the studio as usual is our resident expert david miller. david's an academic and a former professor at bristol university and is now a non-resident senior research fellow at the center of islam and global. affairs at istanbul zaham university. he's also a co-director of the lobbying watch dog spinwatch and is a leading british scholarly critic of israel. and i'm pleased to welcome back the reverend dr. step

um challenging israel's action, so for example in the uk we have the council of christians and jews, ccj, but in reality it's the council of christians for jews, it never criticizes the jewish community, never criticizes israel, it's used as a means of suppressing christian critiques of what israel does, and and if i could turn to yourself as well, and maybe first ask you the same question that uh, what does the zionist movement seek to achieve by engaging in such interfaith, and also maybe touching any uh personal experiences or... you know professional experiences you've had when dealing with uh these types of events? well as reveren was quite eloquently explaining, there's nothing wrong in principle with having interveth dialogue. in fact, you know, particularly between the three abrahamic faites, i think there's been lots of interface dialogue and discussion over many centuries. this is not really something uh new, the issue is really in terms of how the zionist movement and the state of israel in particular seeks. to weaponize this term interfath and this idea of interfaith dialogue

uk we have the council of christians and jews (ccj), but in reality it's the council of christians for jews. it never criticizes, the jewish community never criticizes israel, it's used as a means of suppressing christian critiques of what israel does. and, if i could turn to yourself as well, and maybe first ask you the same question that, what does the zionist movement seek to achieve by engaging in such interf? and also maybe touching any uh personal experiences or professional experiences you've had when dealing with these types of events. well, as reverend ceiser was quite eloquently explaining, there's nothing wrong in principle with having interfath dialogue. in fact, you know, particularly between the three abrahamic faiths, i think there's been lots of interfaith dialogue and discussion over many centuries. this is not really something uh new, the issue is really in terms of... how the zionist movement and the state of israel in particular seeks to weaponize this term inter faith and this idea of inter faith dialogue in order to serve its own interest which really is uh has ma

challenging uh israel's action, so for example, in the uk we have the council of christians and jews, ccj, but in reality it's the council of christians for jews, it never criticizes the jewish community, never criticizes israel, it's used as a means of suppressing christian critiques of what israel does, and if i could turn to yourself as well and maybe first ask you the same question that uh... what does the zionist movement seek to achieve by engaging in such interfath and also maybe touching any personal experiences or professional experiences you've had when dealing with these types of events? well, as reverend cyser was quite eloquently explaining, there's nothing wrong in principle with having interveth dialogue. in fact, you know, particularly between the three abrahamic faiths, i think there's been lots of inter faith dialogue and discussion over many centuries. is not really something uh new, the issue is really in terms of how the zionist movement and the state of israel in particular seeks to weaponize this term interface and this idea of interfaith dialogue in order to serve

challenging israel's action, so for example, in the uk we have... the council of christians and jews (ccj), but in reality it's the council of christians for jews. it never criticizes, the jewish community never criticizes israel. it's used as a means of suppressing christian critiques of what israel does. and, am, if i could turn to yourself as well, and maybe first ask you the same question that uh, what does the zionist movement seek to achieve by engaging in such interfaith, and also? touching any uh personal experiences or professional experiences you've had when dealing with uh these types of events. well, as reverent seizer was quite eloquently explaining, there's nothing wrong in principle with having interfath dialogue. in fact, particularly between the three abrahamic faiths, i think there's been lots of interfaith dialogue and discussion over many centuries, this is not really something new. the issue is really in terms of how design. this movement and the state of israel in particular seeks to weaponize this term interface and this idea of interfaith dialogue in order to serve

um challenging israel's action, so for example in the uk we have the council of christians and jews, ccj, but in reality it's the council of christians. for jews, it never criticizes the jewish community, never criticizes israel, it's used as a means of suppressing christian critiques of what israel does, and and if i could turn to yourself as well, and maybe first ask you the same question that uh, what does the zionist movement seek to achieve by engaging in such interfath, and also may be touching any uh personal experiences or professional experiences you've had when dealing with these types of events. well, as reverend was quite eloquently explaining, there's nothing wrong in principle with having interfaith dialogue. in fact, particularly between the three abrahamic faiths, i think there's been lots of interfath dialogue and discussion over many centuries. this is not really something new. the issue is really in terms of how the design this movement and the state of israel in particular seeks to weaponize. this term inter faith and this idea of interfaith dialogue in order to serve

challenging israel's action. so for example: in the uk we have the council of christians and jews (ccj), but in reality it's the council of christians for jews, it never criticizes the jewish community, never criticizes israel, it's used as a means of suppressing christian critiques of what israel does, and if i could turn to yourself as well, and maybe first ask you the same question that, what does the zionist movement seek to achieve by engaging in such? into faith and also maybe touching any personal experiences or professional experiences you've had when dealing with these types of events. well, as reverend was quite eloquently explaining, there's nothing wrong in principle with having interfath dialogue. in fact, you know, particularly between the three abrahamic faites, i think there's been lots of interfath dialogue and discussion over many centuries. this is not really something new, the issue is really in... terms of how design this movement and the state of israel in particular seeks to weaponize this term inter faith and this idea of interfaith dialogue in order to serve it

suppress, challenging israel's action, so for example, the uk we have the council of christians and jews (ccj), but in reality it's the council of christians for jews. it never criticizes, the jewish community, never criticizes israel, it's used as a means of suppressing christian critiques of what israel does. and if i could turn to yourself as well, and maybe first ask you the same question that uh, what does the zionist movement seek to achieve by engaging in such inter? faith and also maybe touching any uh personal experiences or professional experiences you've had when dealing with uh these types of events? well, as reverend ceiser was quite eloquently explaining, there's nothing wrong in principle with having inter faith dialogue. in fact, particularly between the three abrahamic faiths, i think there's been lots of inter faith dialogue and discussion over many centuries, this is not really something uh new, the issue is really in terms of... how designist movement and the state of israel in particular seeks to weaponize this term inter faith and this idea of inter faith dialogue in ord

challenging israel's action, so for example in the uk. we have the council of christians and jews (ccj), but in reality it's the council of christians for jews. it never criticizes, the jewish community never criticizes israel, it's used as a means of suppressing christian critiques of what israel does. and if i could turn to yourself as well, and maybe first ask you the same question that uh, what does the zionist movement seek to achieve by engaging in such interfaith and also? so maybe touching any uh personal experiences or you know professional experiences you've had when dealing with uh these types of events. well, as reverend ceiser was quite eloquently explaining, there's nothing wrong in principle with having interveth dialog. in fact, you know, particularly between the three abrahamic faiths, i think there's been lots of interfaith dialogue and discussion over many centuries, this is not really something new. the issue is really in terms of how the... lionist movement and the state of israel in particular seeks to weaponize this term interfaith and this idea of interfaith dia