bush and george w. bush to the bench, has faced threats because of his work in handling january 6th defendants and their cases. here's what he had to say in those extraordinary public comments just last night. >> it's very disconcerting to have someone making comments about a judge, and it's particularly problematic when those comments are in the form of a threat, especially if they're directed at one's family. i mean we do these jobs because we're committed to the rule of law and we believe in the rule of law, and the rule of law can only function effectively when we have judges who are prepared to carry out their duties

bush. he championed title x. george h.w. bush the first of the bush presidents, his father prescott bush was the treasurer at planned parenthood. so when we're talking about decades of a standard of recognizing that this is health care -- in fact, george h.w. bush when championing title x, which has been decimated in texas and also decimated we see by the fifth circuit. but decades ago when george h.w. bush was confronted by the question of health care for the poorest of americans, he said this is fundamental health care. this is public health. nixon said the same thing. so part of what we're seeing now is something that is a dramatic -- really dramatic step away from what we understood as basic care for human beings in united states. we are so far from that principle in these states and the principle of understanding that teenagers, too, deserve health care. to give you some example about how strange it is, how chilling it is, we would have the fifth circuit having no problem with seeing a teenager become pregnant and becom

george h.w. bush. donald trump almost tripled it. he got 30% of the jewish vote.lican. it still is a democratic block but it's trending republican. and there's long been a debate inside jewish circles the more religious just jews definitely are more conservative. the justifies who never go to synagogue are definitely more liberal.l. that's true of all religions, bret. in the fox news poll of 2020, it showed that among those who go to church every week, donald trump won by 24 points. among those who never go to church, joe biden won by 28 points. so, the more religious you are, the more you tend to be conservative and vote republican, that is the bigger point donald trump was making. and when it comes to the israel and gaza, certainly for people who are jewish, if israel is your first concern, you tend to vote republican. if abortion is your first concern or fear of christian conservatives is your first concern, you tend to vote democrat. this is a long understanding issue. trump puts indelicately. trump is basically right on the bigger issue. >> bret: all right, l

george h.w. bush as a president there to be some splitting, there has to be an ability to get bush out of reagan's shadow to get bush out of the sense that what he does might merely be tack tacking on to what happens during the reagan administration and to look at things like the americans with disabilities act and other things as, as always bubbling up over time, but things that a particular president actually gets done. and so for bush and his achievements as president, similarly for taft and his the achievements are theirs when they land and a large part of taft approach to the presidency was to point to things done is one of the quotations from from the book to point to actual achievement not building awareness, not moving things through. although that's also of his model and part of his legacy, but also to actually land legislation and pass legislation having influence on things. and so i think you get to bush 41, it's a similar equation. and it also makes me think of the earlier discussion

george h.w. bush as a president there to be some splitting, there has to be an ability to get bush out of reagan's shadow to get bush out of the sense that what he does might merely be tack tacking on to what happens during the reagan administration and to look at things like the americans with disabilities act and other things as, as always bubbling up over time, but things that a particular president actually gets done. and so for bush and his achievements as president, similarly for taft and his the achievements are theirs when they land and a large part of taft approach to the presidency was to point to things done is one of the quotations from from the book to point to actual achievement not building awareness, not moving things through. although that's also of his model and part of his legacy, but also to actually land legislation and pass legislation having influence on things. and so i think you get to bush 41, it's a similar equation. and it also makes me think of the earlier discussion

george h.w.d. george h.w. bush's but i couldn't read his lips because his nose was growing so fast, blocked out his lips. just joking. mike johnson is really great. i think he is doing a good job. i like the way he says just plain no. no taxes, no commission. get the heck out of here. let markets solve problems themselves. that is the way it should be. larry: papa bush, look he had good qualities but economic policy was never one of them. arthur, the other subject is, inflation, climate inflation, you've got some crazy story from "axios" and elsewhere saying, you know, global warming is causing high inflation. how about the trillions of dollars we're spending, seriously, to subsidize evs and what knot? you think those trillions of dollars has something to do with inflation or is it all global warming? >> well if you're going to be serious yes, it is inflation is caused by the dollars and by the spending you're all right. i looked at it seriously, inflation occurred under jimmy carter and joe bide

the former president, george h.w.mericans, when planned parenthood would say, we do breast screenings, that was george h.w. bush. nixon said that was fundamental healthcare. this had been the position of the republican party for the longest time. you know, even planned parenthood, 20 years after roe v. wade, who saves it? who affirms roe? it's justices kennedy, o'conner, again, they are republican appointed. when ruth bader ginsburg goes through her confirmation hearing, she talks about abortion. she talks about racial justice. she talks about voting rights. there were only a few no votes. republicans applauded her and her legacy of helping to strike down sex discriminatory laws. they didn't run from the fact she was going to be a justice who saw equality, fundamental principles of equality as attached to abortion rights. >> you know, this case is coming up. we talked a lot about mifepristone. this is coming before the supreme court. the justices are going to consider about the fda's approval, ability to approve certa

george h.w. president there to be some splitting, there has to be an ability to get bush out of the sense that what he does might merely be tack tacking on to administration and to look at things like the americans with disabilities act and other things as, as always bubbling up over time, things that a particular president actually gets done. and so for bush and his achievements as president, similarly for taft and his the achievements are theirs when they land and a large part of taft approtowas to point to this one of the quotations from from the book to point to actual achievement not build#2ing awareness, not moving things through. although that's also of his model and part of his legacy, but also to actually ld legislation and pass legislation having influence on things. and so i think you get to bush 41, it's a similar equation. and it also makes me think of the earlier discussion about the presidential rankings. there's a tendency, i think, in those to look at presidents who were not reel

of course, george h.w.ush organized an international military coalition to successfully expel him from kuwait, but he survived in power. and that became the unfinished business of the 1990s that george w bush inherited on nine 9/11. nick: what did you discover about why saddam hussein essentially destroyed his weapons of mass destruction program after the gulf war, but then was reluctant to allow u.n. weapons inspectors to be able to confirm that fact? steve: in the summer of 1991, he more or less secretly destroyed his chemical and biological stocks and the infrastructure of his nuclear weapons program. but then he failed to keep any records. he failed to tell the truth about what he had done. he lied about the history of the program, and he didn't really come clean for 4 or 5 years, creating the impression that he was hiding, a secret weapons program. and that uncertainty persisted right through to the end. why? partly, i think he didn't want to appear weak in front of his enemies. he didn't want to appea

. >> reporter: perot was blamed for taking vote away from george h.w.sh and giving the presidency to bill clinton just as ralph nader is still attacked for shifting liberal votes away from al gore in 2000 >> it just doesn't get any closer than this. >> reporter: for many of these double haters they want top have the choice to vote with their heart. >> reporter: could you see yourself voting for a third party in this election? >> absolutely, i could. >> reporter: shaquille brewster, nbc news, wauwatosa, wisconsin >>> and spring is just a few days away, but this winter weather is not behind us yet. look at this 21 million people across parts of the south are under a alerts from now until tuesday. looking at temperatures in the 20s and 30s. it will be ice-cold as far south as montgomery, alabama. >>> clear skies this weekend for a lot of the nation's biggest st. patrick's day celebrations no one throws a party like they do in boston here's their st. paddy's day parade, always a big turnout since it's got one of the largest irish populations in the country.

. >> reporter: perot was blamed for taking votes way from george h.w. bush and giving the presidency to bill clinton, just as ralph nader is still attacked for shifting liberal votes away from al gore in 2000. >> it just doesn't get any closer than this. >> reporter: for many of these double haters they want top have the choice to vote with their heart. >> reporter: could you see yourself voting for a third party in this election? >> absolutely, i could. >> reporter: shaquille brewster, nbc news, wauwatosa, wisconsin. >>> over the weekend, cities across the nation became a sea of green as residents celebrated st. patrick's day. boston, which has one of the largest irish populations in the country, had a major turnout for its st. paddy's day parade. and in new york, an estimated two million to watch bagpipers, floats and more. farther west, the windy city kept up its annual tradition of dyeing the chicago river green for its 69th year. here is the thing. winter isn't done quite yet. nbc's michelle grossman is tracking a cold front. isn't spring on a cale

so this letter right in the case is a letter by president george h.w. bush to one of the survivors of the incarceration camps and. the letter is a letter of apology and also included a payment. the survivor. so the objects in this case relate to the investigations into domestic communism in the early 1950s, done by senator joseph mccarthy of wisconsin. this was the period of the early cold war when there was an intense suspicion of domestic communists, and there was a number of members of congress who were attempting to influence public opinion to go to be against domestic communist holding positions of influence in the united states government and in the country as a whole. so senator joseph mccarthy had given a speech claiming that there were 205 known communists in the department of state. anough a later senate investigation that those allegations were false, mccarthy still had a lot of public support, and he continued his investigations. one of the objects that i want to call out here is this item right here. this is this is a speech that was delive

so this letter right in the case is a letter by president george h.w.to one of the survivors of the incarceration camps and. the letter is a letter of apology and also included a payment. the survivor. so the objects in this case relate to the investigations into-í communism in the early 1950s, done by senator joseph mccarthy of wisconsin. this was the period of the early cold war when there was an intense suspicion of domestic communists, and there was a number of members of congress who were attempting to influence public opinion to go to be against domestic communist holding positions of influence in the united states government and in the country as a whole. so senator joseph mccarthy had given a speech claiming that there were 205 known communists and although a later senate inveion found that those allegations were false, mccarthy still had a lot of public support, and he continued his investigations. one of the objects that i want to call out here is this item right here. this is this is a speech that was delivered by one of mccarthy's fellow sen

you are, you know, i'm old enough to remember george h.w. bush's expression about the great civil society that was out there. he called it a thousand points of light. ... he called it 1000 points of light. that is what i see in this group and it is unbelievably moving so thank you for being here. [applause] i love what you said, michael. so i love what you said, michael. i was thinking before this panel i was thinking about moral formation and that it's very important morality is key to a thriving democratic republic and with all. kinds of expressions f this from the founders where, for example, john adams said our constitution was made for a religious and moral people. it is wholly inadequate for the governance of any other. and yet, look, we have to be realistic. the people on the maga side and the people on the far left, they also feel that they are the moral ones. they think we are evil and they will say that very clearly. so kristi noem at cpac said there are two kinds of americans, two kinds of people in this country, she said right no

so this letter right in the case is a letter by president george h.w.ush to one of the survivors of the incarceration camps and. the letter is a letter of apology and also included a payment. the survivor. so the objects in this case relate to the investigations into domestic communism in the early 1950s, done by senator joseph mccarthy of wisconsin. this was the period of the early cold war when there was an intense suspicion of domestic communists, and there was a number of members of congress who were attempting to influence public opinion to go to be against domestic communist holding positions of influence in the united states government and in the country as a whole. so senator joseph mccarthy had given a speech claiming that there were 205 known communists in the department of state. and although a later senate investigation found that those allegations were false, mccarthy still had a lot of public support, and he continued his ■?investigations. one of the objects that i want to call out here is this item right here. this is this is a speech tha

pero ese año, como pueden ver, terminó ganando un republicano george h.w. bush contra el demócrata.ego eligen a un candidato o oficialmente en las convenciones . en el partido republicano pueden ver que hay 865 delegados en el partido demócrata 1420 para ganar la nominación de su partido. necesitan esta cantidad. así que es bastante. ahora, el presidente joe biden no tiene mucha competencia, así que vamos a ver el otro lado en estos momentos. nicki, hailey tiene 43 delegados mientras que donald trump tiene 276. para poder seguir en esta contienda y destacarse, nicki allí sin duda necesita una victoria o varias. finalmente, hoy es clave para los latinos, que son un 40% de la población en texas y california, 2 de los estados con el mayor número de delegados, es decir, los 2 estados con muchísimo poder. los latinos hoy tienen mucho poder para elegir lo que va a pasar y después de este supermartes estaremos al pendiente de esas convenciones. tanto la república khanna como la demócrata, que es donde eligen oficialmente al candidato. la republicana se lleva a cabo en julio y la demócrata

h.w.nose was growing so fast. just joking, mike johnson is great, he is doing a good job, i like the way he says no, get the heck out. let market solve the problem, ha is the way it should be. larry: pop bush here, had good qualities but economic policy was not one of them. art, other subject, inflation climate inflation, you have some crazy story from axios and elsewhere saying, you know, global warming is causing high inflation. how about the trillions of dollars we're spending, to subsidize electric vehicles and whatnot, do you think it has something to do with inflation or all flownal -- global warming. >> if you are serious, yes, it is inflation caused by dollars and spending, i look at it, and inflation occurred under jimmy carter, and joe biden. global warming mist be the problem -- must be problem. when we need to do make sure we don't elect people like jimmy carter and joe biden, then we'll get rid of global warming and we won't have inflation, i look at last wholesale price index

i was george h.w. bush's, and it took 17 years. it was supposed to be posthumous, but the son of a -- wouldn't die. i'd bring it up. you say knock some here. mr. president, how you feeling feeling. but they used the vice president to say the oy job was to inquire as to the state, the president's health. every morning. but at a very sweet experience, not commiserate with what you've done by any means, but of t, the president had former president had a form of parkinson's and so he couldn't hold a book. so hebook to him which was very this is and so i came up once and where he was in the narrative. was 9en remembered defense and how -- cheney ended up in the cabinet right. so if john tower is confirmed cheney doesn't come to the cabinet, there's not a place on the leadership ladder for it's like the wing of a butterfly but it's the point where gin leadership and the only thing in 45 minutes of reading these chapters to george herbert walke're like this, which is very inti reading i got to gingrich. and the only thing the old man said

so the normal thing would be for them to come together much likeh george h.w. reagan, but i don't thin this is the normal time. and i also don't get the sense that nikki haley is going to go the route of liz cheney. i do think she is going to try to stay republican. she said that all along. so it will be interesting to see. >> trey: kaylee, let me ask you, bill mentionedi vice president.you i don't think it will be w nikki haley. who do you d think it is going o be? and doesma it matter? >> i think it does matter.uall usually you tell the vice president based on certainy demographics you are trying to tap into, certain issues you o want to capitalize on or certais state you want to make the most out of. trump has floated around a few names already. my opinion is he would i be best served by choosing a woman as his vice president. we know that trump really struggles among suburbans demographic. that will be key in swing states like my home state of michigann which he lost to biden last time in pennsylvania and other states. so if he were to choose someonea come

h.w.ried to read his lips, but i could not because his nose was growing so fast. just joking, mike johnson is great, he is doing a good job, i like the way he says no, get the heck out. let market solve the problem, ha is the way it should be. larry: pop bush here, had good qualities but economic policy was not one of them. art, other subject, inflation climate inflation, you have some crazy story from axios and elsewhere saying, you know, global warming is causing high inflation. how about the trillions of dollars we're spending, to subsidize electric vehicles and whatnot, do you think it has something to do with inflation or all flownal -- global warming. >> if you are serious, yes, it is inflation caused by dollars and spending, i look at it, and inflation occurred under jimmy carter, and joe biden. global warming mist be the problem -- must be problem. when we need to do make sure we don't elect people like jimmy carter and joe biden, then we'll get rid of global warming and we won't h

. >> reporter: perot was blamed for taking votes away from george h.w. bush and giving the presidency to bill clinton. just as ralph nader is still attacked for shifting votes away from al gore in 2000. but for many of these double haters, they want to have the choice to vote with their heart. could you see yourself voting for a third party candidate? this election? >> i sure could. >>> meanwhile, benjamin netanyahu is blasting senate majority leader chuck schumer's call for israel to hold a new election. netanyahu says a new election would force israel to stop fighting and paralyze the country for months. instead, he vowed to continue the fight against hamas, saying an assault on the southern city of rafah could be weeks away. netanyahu says international pressure will not stop israel from achievingity war goals. senator schumer called netanyahu a major obstacle to a possible two-state solution. nancy pelosi called it love for israel. >> you mentioned the polls. you see the thousands and thousands of people are in the streets even last night in israel.

bush or john mccain, mitt romney, whoever it is. bob dole. >> george h.w. bush. >> you said, the stakes aren't that high. a man may face criminal prosecution because he led an attempted coup against the government. maybe you can change the tradition for this one case. >> it's not just doing it for the country. if he only cared about the republican party, he would have spoken out and said, we have to get rid of trump long ago. even if he wanted to sacrifice himself just for his party. i mean, why not do that? >> we have lots more to get to this hour. morning joe weekend continues after just a short break. j.p. morgan wealth management knows it's easy to get lost in investment research. get help with j.p morgan personal advisors. hey, david! ready to get started? work with advisors who create a plan with you, and help you find the right investments. so great getting to know you, let's take a look at your new investment plan. ok, great! this should have you moving in the right direction. thanks jen. get ongoing advice; and manage your investments in the chase

ross perot in 1992 took a lot of votes from george h.w.ush and happe handed the election to bill clinton. this adds more turmoil and unpredict ability. i could have the leader of the free world, president trump, governing from prison. >> 100%. that would be a shock. on the other side, you have joe biden. it seems that bidenomics is the one thing he has to ride on. is that enough? >> it might be. i think one of the fundamentals of any electoral outcome is to look at that. the infrastructure and investments which have gone on for biden, then he has done more than most people predicted on the economic front. felt economic benefit, unfortunately, doesn't ride in his direction. so for large numbers of people, they have not felt or benefitted from that directly. their own situation is precarious. that might be it. the other thing, of course, african americans and muslim americans and young voters particularly in the policies of israel and no support for a cease-fire has been in effect up until now. that could play out in the primaries with uncom

she's laying out traditional conservative policies of george w. bush, of george h.w. bush, of ronald reagan, peace through constraint, fiscal conservative, being pro-life. i was with her last week with a small group of reporters. i asked her, in a way she was arguing she was going to implement the republican autopsy report after mitt romney -- >> the one they never implemented. >> she talked about reaching out to people who republicans don't normally talk to. minorities. she said there were gay people at her events, trans people, minorities at her events. talk to the embeds there, they say it's still a typical white republican crowd. that is what she's arguing to be, that's what she's arguing is the future of the republican party. does this maga fever ever break? the answer may be no. >> especially not with the rnc falling into line as well, mark murray. it's his republican party. i don't know how he changes his spots, really, given who he is and what he says when he is off prompter. >> over the last two years, our nbc news poll asked the question, do you want to have

. >> reporter: perot was blamed for taking votes away from george h.w. presidency to bill clinton. just as ralph nader is still attacked for shifting votes away from al gore in 2000. but for many of these double haters, they want to have the choice to vote with their heart. could you see yourself voting for a third party candidate? this election? >> i sure could. >>> meanwhile, benjamin netanyahu is blasting senate majority leader chuck schumer's call for israel to hold a new election. netanyahu says a new election would force israel to stop fighting and paralyze the country for months. instead, he vowed to continue the fight against hamas, saying an assault on the southern city of rafah could be weeks away. netanyahu says international pressure will not stop israel from achievingity war goals. senator schumer called netanyahu a major obstacle to a possible two-state solution. nancy pelosi called it love for israel. >> you mentioned the polls. you see the thousands and thousands of people are in the streets even last night in israel. but, again, it's a d

the george h.w. bush administration had problems with the government of israel at times.nation and in trying to make sure the american perspective was respect did and heard. we don't dictate to allies, but we have a right, especially in our relationship of supply. that's to say israel certainly relies on the united states for a lot of it on security. we have a right to express our concerns and to insist on them. and i would hope that the biden administration is doing that vigorously. >> on ukraine aid, a number of democrats say they would help congressman mike johnson remained speaker if he brought a ukraine funding bill up for a vote. where do you stand on that? >> i'm not one of those democrats. i believe to make that is to turn a blind eye to the history. mike johnson is a christian nationalist reportedly. not only voted to decertify president biden's election after the insurrection, he litigated. he litigated with conservative group of rights. he has opposed lgbtq rights. this is not somebody to rats want the president for signing a proclamation friday for transgender

he was a part of the debates with bill clinton and george h.w. bush.ually got 19% of the vote and the h.w. bush folks would tell you that's why they lost. and it was disruptive. is this potentially what no labels is going to do? >> well, first of all, the facts show that he drew equally from democrats and republicans. if you go back to those exit polls. but, we agree with a fellow dallas ite here we want to make sure there is a pathway to the white house not to be a spoiler. we have no intention there. we're trying to stand up for this common sense majority that says this is broken. there has got to be another way. and that's what america is screaming right now. and so that's what we're looking for. >> bret: last thing, mike. what's your timeline? when would somebody know whether you have all found two candace. democrat and republican. republican and democrat. >> next week can going to be an important week. we will kind of release the process so everybody will know how we are moving forward and how those decisions are being made. that's a question that

lewis house with appointed as manji by george h.w. bush. want to start by asking you you recently sent a letter to chuck schumer and senate north leader mitch mcconnell in defense of adil shhh manji. why did you feel compelled to send that? >> i feel compelled to accepted that in what i feel like it's a base less attacks on mr. manji's character. i know they were initially routed -- rooted in his religious john. they have nothing to do with his competence, with his experience, with his qualifications to serve on the court i was honored to sit on for a number of years. and i just thought it's so outrageous that something had to be done and quite honestly it was an honor to have the opportunity to stand up on his behalf. when i have a sense that someone is being slandered and really torn down based on these kinds of untruths and bigotry and all of the horrible things that were said at the judiciary committee hearing and written about him afterward, there is no way i could stand by and allow that to happen. frankly, think think most americans

ross perot was in it with george h.w. bush when he was going against bill clinton. debate that rages today that he took from one. others say it was equally taking from both. bobby kennedy, how would that be seen? if he makes to it the debate stage, how do you think he affects the stage and the raice? >> it would make it more interesting. who knows if no labels has a candidate and it's a four way. you have to qualify. you have to pass the 15% threshold. what r.f.k. jr. has to focus on is getting on ballots. i watched your interview. he would be wise to go to the libertarian party. they have a head start of getting on ballots. it's not easy to do. if you can't get on enough ballots, you can't get in the debates. >> neil: and you know your political history, too. we always look at the role of h. ross perot in 1992 getting 19% of the vote. for my money, the case is what george wallace pulled off. he won all of the southern states. he got 45 electoral votes. and then he took votes away from humphrey and nixon was elected. i'm not sure lightning strikes twice. big differe

to appreciate george h.w.splitting, there has to be an ability to get bush out of reagan's shadow to get bush out of the sense that what he does might merely be tack tacking on to what happens during the reagan administration and to look at things like the americans with disabilities act and other things as, as always bubbling up over time, but things that a particular president actually gets done. and so for bush and his achievements as president, similarly for taft and his the achievements are theirs when they taft approach to the presidency was to point to things done is one of the quotations from from theto point to actual achievement not building awareness, not moving things through. although that's also of his model and part of his legacy, but also to actually land legislation and pass legislation having influence on things. and so i think you get to bush 41, it's a similar equation. and it also makes me think of the earlier discussion about the presidentialere's a tendency, in those to look at president

h.w.h he was a picture at yale. >> voters like these baseball stars we will see how this all turns out. >> will have more on our baseball and politics maybe we'll talk about it tomorrow thank you. of course super tuesday coverage will continue here on fox news pay to bring in the very latest of ailments of the evening on super tuesday. it all starts tuesday night 7:0n the fox news channel. arthel: all right thank you. hamas officials are in egypt to discuss a possible cease-fire deal as the biden administration says israel has essentially agreed to the proposed framework. we'll have more on those talks coming up next. e who tried me ft more energy in just two weeks. -ugh. -here, i'll take that. woo hoo! ensure max protein, 30 grams protein, 1 gram sugar, 25 vitamins and minerals. and a new fiber blend with a prebiotic. (♪) oooo. trouble seeing, buddy? you should book an exam at america's best. america's best. they have one of the nation's largest groups of optometrists! oh, you're ... very

george h.w. bush wrote one called, looking forward. the titles are all terrible.e titles are all, the truths we hold, american dreams. george h w, i believe his was called looking forward. he also had some kind of line like that, where he sort of acknowledged, oh it's the kind of book you are supposed to do. peter: joe biden a couple of books under his belt. promises to keep, promise to dad. mr. lozada: i have read promise to dad, and i am currently reading promises to keep. what i like about those kinds of books ishf that, you know, promises to keep i believe came out in 2007, promise to dad in 2017. but reading them years later can be revelatory in the new moment we are in. for instance, there is a moment in promise me dad, which is the mom more -- the memoi final year of his vice presidency in the year his oldest son died. and in the aok there's something that i started thinking about only when the latest special counsel report, looking into biden's handed of classifiedocuments it said something about how he would come across to the jury as a well-meaning elder

i was george h.w. bush's, and it took 17 years. it was supposed to be posthumous, but the son of a -- wouldn't die. i'd bring it up. you say knock some things that are said here should stay here. mr. president, how you feeling feeling. but they used the vice president to say the only job was to inquire as to the state, the president's health. every morning. but at a very sweet experience, not commiserate with what you've done by any means, but of actually he at that point, the president had former president had a form of parkinson's and so he couldn't hold a book. so he had come in and read my book to him which was very this is george h.w. h.w. and so i came up once and where he was in the narrative. was 90, 90 when he remembered john tower fails to become secretary of defense that opened up that job and how -- cheney ended up in the cabinet right. so if john tower is confirmed cheney doesn't come to the cabinet, there's not a place on the leadership ladder for it's like the wing of a butterfly but it's the point where gingrich goe

h.w. there to be some splitting, there has to be an ability to get bush out of reagan's shadow to get bush out of the sense t be tack tacking n to what happens during the reagan administration and to look at things like the americans with disabilities as s bubbling up over time, but things that a particular president actually gets done. andfor bush and his achievements as president, similarly for taft and his the achievements are theirs when they land and a large part of taft approach to the presidency was to point to things done is one of the quotations from from the book to point to actual achievement not building awareness, not moving things through. although that's alsof his model and part of his legacy, but also to actually land legislation and pass legislation having influence on things. and so i think you get to bush 41, it's a similar equation. and it also makes me think of the earlier discussion about the presidentiala tendency, i thinkn those to look at presidents who were not re

he too, received h presidential medal of freedom in 1991 from president george h.w. bush, a photo him receiving his presidential medal of freedom from president bush. and first lady barbara bush. but a lile more on ted williams background or captain ted williams. he was known during the korean war ted williams, enlisted in the navy's v5 a42, just two months after john glenn, he earned his. two years later, he mostly was an instructor at pensacola's naval air station in florida. he did not serve in combat during world two, actually played a little bit of baseball, played outfield for a tune called the bronson bombers, a team in the naval air training, auxiliary bases, baseball circuit after world war two, he was discharged to the volunteer reserves. he promptly returned to playing baseball for the red sox, helped lead them to their first pennant in over 30 years, almost 30 years in 1946, won the mvp that year, but he was recalled to active service in the marine corps in january of 1952, at the age of 34, after doing all he could to get out of serving in combat ain dur

george h.w. bush wrote one called, looking forward. the titles are all terrible.ruths we hold, american dreams. george h w, i believe his was called looking forward. he also had some kind of line like that, where he sort of acknowledged, oh, it's the kind of book you are supposed to do. peter: joe biden, a couple of books under his belt. promises to keep, promise to dad. mr. lozada: i have read promise to dad, and i am currently reading promises to keep. what i like about thods of books is that, you know, promises to keep i believe cçnae out in 2007, promise to dad in 2017. but reading them years later can be revelatory in the new moment we are in. for instance, there is a moment in promise me dad, which is the mom more -- the memoir of the final year of his vice presidency in the year his oldest son died. and in the acknowledgment section of that book, there's something that i started thinking about only when latest special counsel report, looking into handed of classified documents, it said something about how he would come across to the jury as a well-meaning e

george h.w. bush wrote one called, looking forward.he titles are all territhe titles are all, the truths we hold, american dreams. george h w, i believe his was called looking forward. he also had some kind of line like that, where he sort of acknowledged, oh it's the kind of book you are supposed to do. peter: joe biden a couple of books under his belt. promises to keep, promise to dad. mr. lozada: i have read promise to dad, and i am currently reading promises to keep. what i like about those kinds of books is that, you know, promises to keep i believe came out in 2007, promise to dad in 2017. but reading them years later can be revelatory in the new moment we are in. for instance, there is a moment in promise me dad, which is the mom more -- the memoir of the final year of his vice presidency in the year his oldest son died. and in the acknowledgment section of that book there's something that i started thinking about only when the latest special counsel report, looking into biden's handed of classified documents it said something a