galyu, i will ask you about the actual naftalin schools, but i will complicate the question a littleore with a quote from oksana, forostina, a writer who says that these neophytes with their money and status ended up in this place because they did not let those who did not fit in into the moscow-centric model. and not only through language , but also aesthetically, and now, on the second day after their conversion, they behave with the usual aplomb, as if nothing had happened, ignoring those who for 30 years prepared the ground so that they could see now, not even all of them remained alive, already not speaking in the profession of these people who prepared the soil. in your opinion, gal, isn't this evidence of a deeper split, in society itself, yes, among your own, yes, because it's all your own. so conditionally yours, and which one testifies to the fact that there is no communication between those who converted recently and those who were immersed in ukrainian culture for a long time, doesn't this testify to you about this split yet? yes, this is a sign of a much deeper problem,